Knowledge

Trevor v Whitworth

Source đź“ť

28: 143:
the moneys subscribed as the source out of which the company’s liabilities to them were to be met. And the stringent precautions to prevent the reduction of the capital of a limited company, without due notice and judicial sanction, would be idle if the company might purchase its own shares wholesale, and so effect the desired result... I cannot think that the employment of the company’s money in the purchase of shares for any such purpose was legitimate.
142:
If the claim under consideration can be supported, the result would seem to be this, that the whole of the shareholders, with the exception of those holding seven individual shares, might now be claiming payment of the sums paid upon their shares as against the creditors, who had a right to look to
101:. The rule coming from the case itself has since been reformed by statute in several commonwealth countries. In the UK, the rule was reformed in 1980 and replaced with a statutory procedure so that shares can either be classed as redeemable or be bought back, under the 270: 258: 334: 121:
A company bought back almost a quarter of its own shares. During liquidation of the company, one shareholder applied to court for the balance of amounts owed to him after the buyback.
282: 98: 244: 311: 217: 386: 176: 27: 391: 401: 293: 169: 396: 324: 307: 234: 205: 162: 110: 8: 52: 320: 303: 230: 102: 106: 193: 94: 97:
buybacks. It held they were unlawful. The case is often used in support for the
357: 346: 90: 73: 38: 380: 154: 134: 68: 246:
Scottish Insurance Corp v Wilsons & Clyde Coal Ltd
124:The Court of Appeal held that he should be paid. 378: 138:the company. Lord Herschell said the following, 219:Borland’s Trustee v Steel Brothers & Co Ltd 184: 170: 177: 163: 26: 132:The House of Lords held the buyback was 271:Will v United Lankat Plantations Co Ltd 259:Dimbula Valley (Ceylon) Tea Co v Laurie 379: 147:Lord Macnaghten also gave an opinion. 109:are allowed under ss 257A-257J of the 158: 13: 14: 413: 335:Re Scandinavian Banking Group plc 105:sections 684-723. In Australia, 387:United Kingdom company case law 1: 368: 294:Second Company Law Directive 53:[1887] UKLawRpAC 26 7: 283:Re Bradford Investments Ltd 150: 127: 89:(1887) 12 App Cas 409 is a 10: 418: 343: 331: 318: 301: 291: 279: 267: 255: 241: 228: 214: 202: 190: 185:Sources on company shares 64: 59: 44: 34: 25: 20: 363: 116: 99:Capital Maintenance Rule 55:, (1887) 12 App Cas 409 206:Andrews v Gas Meter Co 145: 197:(1889) 14 App Cas 525 140: 111:Corporations Act 2001 392:House of Lords cases 402:1887 in British law 321:Companies Act 2006 304:Companies Act 2006 231:Companies Act 2006 103:Companies Act 2006 86:Trevor v Whitworth 49:Trevor v Whitworth 21:Trevor v Whitworth 353: 352: 82: 81: 409: 397:1887 in case law 247: 220: 179: 172: 165: 156: 155: 93:case concerning 30: 18: 17: 417: 416: 412: 411: 410: 408: 407: 406: 377: 376: 371: 366: 354: 349: 339: 327: 314: 297: 287: 275: 263: 251: 245: 237: 224: 218: 210: 198: 194:Birch v Cropper 186: 183: 153: 130: 119: 78: 74:Share buy backs 12: 11: 5: 415: 405: 404: 399: 394: 389: 375: 374: 370: 367: 365: 362: 361: 360: 358:UK company law 351: 350: 347:UK company law 344: 341: 340: 332: 329: 328: 319: 316: 315: 302: 299: 298: 292: 289: 288: 280: 277: 276: 268: 265: 264: 256: 253: 252: 242: 239: 238: 229: 226: 225: 215: 212: 211: 203: 200: 199: 191: 188: 187: 182: 181: 174: 167: 159: 152: 149: 129: 126: 118: 115: 107:share buybacks 91:UK company law 80: 79: 77: 76: 71: 65: 62: 61: 57: 56: 46: 42: 41: 39:House of Lords 36: 32: 31: 23: 22: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 414: 403: 400: 398: 395: 393: 390: 388: 385: 384: 382: 373: 372: 359: 356: 355: 348: 342: 337: 336: 330: 326: 322: 317: 313: 309: 305: 300: 295: 290: 285: 284: 278: 273: 272: 266: 261: 260: 254: 249: 248: 240: 236: 232: 227: 222: 221: 213: 208: 207: 201: 196: 195: 189: 180: 175: 173: 168: 166: 161: 160: 157: 148: 144: 139: 137: 136: 125: 122: 114: 112: 108: 104: 100: 96: 92: 88: 87: 75: 72: 70: 67: 66: 63: 58: 54: 50: 47: 43: 40: 37: 33: 29: 24: 19: 16: 333: 281: 269: 257: 243: 216: 204: 192: 146: 141: 133: 131: 123: 120: 85: 84: 83: 48: 15: 135:ultra vires 69:Company law 381:Categories 369:References 323:ss 10 and 233:ss 33 and 296:77/91/EEC 45:Citations 286:BCLC 224 223:1 Ch 279 209:1 Ch 361 151:See also 128:Judgment 60:Keywords 312:561-571 308:549-551 262:Ch 353 250:AC 462 364:Notes 338:Ch 87 274:AC 11 235:282-4 117:Facts 95:share 51: 35:Court 345:see 310:and 325:617 306:ss 383:: 113:. 178:e 171:t 164:v

Index


House of Lords
[1887] UKLawRpAC 26
Company law
Share buy backs
UK company law
share
Capital Maintenance Rule
Companies Act 2006
share buybacks
Corporations Act 2001
ultra vires
v
t
e
Birch v Cropper
Andrews v Gas Meter Co
Borland’s Trustee v Steel Brothers & Co Ltd
Companies Act 2006
282-4
Scottish Insurance Corp v Wilsons & Clyde Coal Ltd
Dimbula Valley (Ceylon) Tea Co v Laurie
Will v United Lankat Plantations Co Ltd
Re Bradford Investments Ltd
Second Company Law Directive
Companies Act 2006
549-551
561-571
Companies Act 2006
617

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑