153:, according to whom textualities are "ordered sets of texts of different status that are related to each other and come with pre-arranged modes of interpretation". A textuality consists of base-texts, "those that define a textual community and form a part of the necessary cultural competence of its members", result-texts, "bids that have just been accepted and entered circulation, as well as those that have done so some time ago but are still being considered recent arrivals by their recipients", mediated by an operational memory, "a shared (and internally contradictory) mental space of the cultural community and its various subgroups where texts are produced and processed", which contains different kinds of knowledge, standards and codes shared to different extent by the carriers of the culture. According to Raud, this model is complementary to a model of cultural practices, in which the production, distribution and transmission of meaning is regarded in the context of individual participation and activity, while a textuality is necessarily shared and perceived by its carriers to be an objective, albeit constructed, reality.
138:). Peter Barry's discussion of textuality notes that "its essence is the belief that things cannot be understood in isolation – they have to be seen in the context of the larger structures they are part of". To form an opinion, criticise, or completely interpret a text one would first have to read the complete literary work as a whole; this enables the reader to make supported judgements on the personality and individuality of the text. The text is always hiding something. Although the reading may define and the interpretation may decide, the text does not define or decide. The text rests as operationally and fundamentally indecidable. Roger Webster frequently uses metaphors of ‘weaving’, ‘tissue’, ‘texture’, ‘strands’, and ‘filiation’ when talking about the structure of texts. He also agrees that "instead, the text is a surface over which the reader can range in any number of ways that the text permits."
43:
142:
itself, etches itself in a texture or network of meaning, which is not limited to the text itself. Barry describes this as a "structuralist approach to literature, there is a constant movement away from the interpretation of the individual literary work and a parallel drive towards understanding the larger,
133:
Being textual includes innumerable elements and aspects. Each and every form of text and text in that form of literature embraces and consists of its own individual and personal characteristics; these may include its personality, the individuality of that personality, the popularity, and so on. The
120:
Textuality is not just about the written word; it also comprises the placement of the words and the reader’s interpretation. There is not a set formula to describe a text’s textuality; it is not a simple procedure. This summary is true even though the interpretation that a reader develops from that
247:
In short, textuality is an individual and uncertain skill that will always be read and interpreted in texts in different ways, by different people, and at different times. It is a literary tool that can never be defined like an exact science and that will always be influenced by the writer's life,
141:
Textuality is a practice. Through a text’s textuality, it makes itself mean, makes itself be, and makes itself come about in a particular way. Through its textuality, the text relinquishes its status as identity and affirms its condition as pure difference. In indifference, the text "dedefines"
169:
of the "work", which is always complete and deliberately authored. A text must necessarily be thought of as incomplete, indeed as missing something crucial that provides the mechanics of understanding. The text is always partially hidden; one word for the hidden part in literary theory is the
220:" which is in fact, closely linked also to textuality. And Barry believes that the "post-structuralist maintains that the consequences of this belief are that we enter a universe of radical uncertainty…". Derrida further states:
228:
leads to the interpretation of all eruptions of the nonphonetic within writing as transitory crises and accidents of passage, and it is right to consider this teleology to be a
Western
125:, is that which constitutes a text in a particular way. The text is an undecidable (there is an inexistence of an effective or "strict" method of writing or structure).
208:
Barry says that "one of structuralism's characteristic views is the notion that language doesn’t just reflect or record the world: rather, it shapes it, so that
199:"Saussure confronts the system of the spoken language with the system of phonetic (and even alphabetic) writing as though with the telos (purpose) of writing."
134:
textualities of the text define its characteristics. However, the characteristics are also closely associated with the structure of the text (
104:
comprises all of the attributes that distinguish the communicative content under analysis as an object of study. It is associated with
484:
457:
432:
407:
382:
287:
An example of textuality in the electronic medium is the interactivity of a website, or visual of a specific television show.
557:
536:
515:
361:
341:
83:
179:
The concept of the text in structuralism requires a relatively simple relationship between language and writing.
248:
such as, their upbringing, education, culture, age, religion, gender, and multiple other persuading factors.
507:
277:– has a different form of textuality that reflects the way the sensory modalities are stimulated.
61:
187:, who, he claims, does not recognize in the relationship between speech and writing "more than a
17:
562:
297:
237:
183:, a leading post-structuralist, questions this relationship, aiming his critique primarily at
274:
261:
184:
8:
53:
121:
text may decide the identity and the definitive meanings of that text. Textuality, as a
217:
166:
143:
109:
532:
511:
480:
453:
428:
403:
378:
357:
337:
28:
195:
function". For
Derrida, this approach requires putting too much emphasis on speech:
307:
302:
180:
122:
97:
65:
551:
229:
135:
105:
240:
284:
An example of textuality in the print medium is the physicality of a book.
233:
225:
150:
270:
165:
arose within structuralism as a replacement for the older idea in
334:
Beginning Theory: An
Introduction to Literary and Cultural Theory
172:
281:
An example of textuality in the oral medium is the sound itself.
510:,1976 corrected edition, Johns Hopkins University Press, 1998.
266:
450:
Meaning in Action: Outline of an
Integral Theory of Culture
425:
Meaning in Action: Outline of an
Integral Theory of Culture
400:
Meaning in Action: Outline of an
Integral Theory of Culture
375:
Meaning in Action: Outline of an
Integral Theory of Culture
256:
Textuality can be seen, heard, read, and interacted with.
149:
A different view of textuality has been put forward by
549:
477:The Princeton Encyclopedia of Poetry and Poetics
336:, 3rd ed., Manchester University Press, 2002.
156:
64:. There might be a discussion about this on
494:
492:
354:Studying Literary Theory: An Introduction
84:Learn how and when to remove this message
489:
531:. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.
328:
326:
324:
322:
14:
550:
526:
471:
469:
479:, Princeton University Press, 2012.
447:
422:
397:
372:
319:
216:we see". This is closely linked to "
36:
356:, 2nd ed. St.Martin's Press, 1996.
24:
466:
25:
574:
452:. Cambridge: Polity. p. 56.
377:. Cambridge: Polity. p. 55.
427:. Cambridge: Polity. p. 9.
41:
251:
520:
475:Greene, Roland, ed.-in-chief,
441:
416:
391:
366:
346:
115:
13:
1:
313:
203:
7:
291:
259:Each of the three forms of
10:
579:
527:Hayles, Katherine (2002).
508:Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak
128:
26:
558:Terms in literary theory
34:Collection of attributes
402:. Poility. p. 64.
27:For the 2011 film, see
185:Ferdinand de Saussure
146:which contain them".
232:, a premathematical
54:confusing or unclear
500:De la Grammatologie
448:Raud, Rein (2016).
423:Raud, Rein (2016).
398:Raud, Rein (2016).
373:Raud, Rein (2016).
144:abstract structures
62:clarify the article
498:Derrida, Jacques,
218:post-structuralism
167:literary criticism
110:post-structuralism
485:978-0-691-13334-8
459:978-1-5095-1125-9
434:978-1-5095-1125-9
409:978-1-5095-1125-9
384:978-1-5095-1125-9
157:Concept of "text"
94:
93:
86:
29:Textuality (film)
16:(Redirected from
570:
543:
542:
529:Writing Machines
524:
518:
502:, translated as
496:
487:
473:
464:
463:
445:
439:
438:
420:
414:
413:
395:
389:
388:
370:
364:
352:Webster, Roger,
350:
344:
330:
89:
82:
78:
75:
69:
45:
44:
37:
21:
578:
577:
573:
572:
571:
569:
568:
567:
548:
547:
546:
539:
525:
521:
504:Of Grammatology
497:
490:
474:
467:
460:
446:
442:
435:
421:
417:
410:
396:
392:
385:
371:
367:
351:
347:
331:
320:
316:
308:Hypertextuality
303:Intertextuality
294:
254:
206:
181:Jacques Derrida
159:
131:
123:literary theory
118:
98:literary theory
90:
79:
73:
70:
59:
46:
42:
35:
32:
23:
22:
15:
12:
11:
5:
576:
566:
565:
560:
545:
544:
537:
519:
488:
465:
458:
440:
433:
415:
408:
390:
383:
365:
345:
332:Barry, Peter,
317:
315:
312:
311:
310:
305:
300:
293:
290:
289:
288:
285:
282:
253:
250:
245:
244:
205:
202:
201:
200:
158:
155:
130:
127:
117:
114:
92:
91:
49:
47:
40:
33:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
575:
564:
563:Structuralism
561:
559:
556:
555:
553:
540:
538:0-262-58215-5
534:
530:
523:
517:
516:0-8018-5830-5
513:
509:
505:
501:
495:
493:
486:
482:
478:
472:
470:
461:
455:
451:
444:
436:
430:
426:
419:
411:
405:
401:
394:
386:
380:
376:
369:
363:
362:0-340-58499-8
359:
355:
349:
343:
342:0-7190-6268-3
339:
335:
329:
327:
325:
323:
318:
309:
306:
304:
301:
299:
296:
295:
286:
283:
280:
279:
278:
276:
272:
268:
264:
263:
257:
249:
242:
239:
235:
231:
230:ethnocentrism
227:
223:
222:
221:
219:
215:
211:
198:
197:
196:
194:
190:
186:
182:
177:
175:
174:
168:
164:
154:
152:
147:
145:
139:
137:
136:Structuralism
126:
124:
113:
111:
107:
106:structuralism
103:
99:
88:
85:
77:
67:
66:the talk page
63:
57:
55:
50:This article
48:
39:
38:
30:
19:
528:
522:
503:
499:
476:
449:
443:
424:
418:
399:
393:
374:
368:
353:
348:
333:
260:
258:
255:
252:In the media
246:
241:intuitionism
238:preformalist
213:
209:
207:
192:
188:
178:
171:
162:
160:
148:
140:
132:
119:
101:
95:
80:
71:
60:Please help
51:
234:primitivism
116:Explanation
552:Categories
314:References
275:electronic
212:we see is
193:derivative
102:textuality
74:March 2013
56:to readers
226:teleology
204:Summation
161:The word
151:Rein Raud
292:See also
236:, and a
173:subtext
129:Aspects
52:may be
18:Textual
535:
514:
483:
456:
431:
406:
381:
360:
340:
273:, and
262:medium
224:"This
189:narrow
271:print
533:ISBN
512:ISBN
481:ISBN
454:ISBN
429:ISBN
404:ISBN
379:ISBN
358:ISBN
338:ISBN
298:Text
267:oral
214:what
191:and
163:text
108:and
506:by
210:how
96:In
554::
491:^
468:^
321:^
269:,
265:–
243:."
176:.
112:.
100:,
541:.
462:.
437:.
412:.
387:.
87:)
81:(
76:)
72:(
68:.
58:.
31:.
20:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.