71:
53:
334:(most of which I wrote), especially the part on codification. The only "average user" that would appreciate such a navbox would be a lawyer like myself with significant experience in comparative law and administrative law. Most laypersons would be utterly bewildered. I suppose one could distinguish the regulatory codes with asterisks and an explanatory footer, but that would be of little help to ordinary people who barely understand separation of powers, let alone regulatory rulemaking by the executive branch. --
22:
81:
182:
164:
192:
294:
The template's title right now is "Statutory codes and regulations in the United States" - is there a good reason why both shouldn't be covered in one navbox? This sort of technical difference between statutory and regulatory code certainly deserves mention and I'd be open to somehow splitting this
313:
Because for one, the current template is severely incomplete and doesn't even come close to accurately representing the complexity of both statutory and regulatory law for all U.S. jurisdictions, and two, any attempt at doing so would be a mind-boggling mess with numerous redlinks to nonexistent
278:
The CFR is not a statutory code, it's a regulatory code. This is a fundamental distinction in political science that goes back to the idea of separation of powers. Statutes come from
Congress; regulations come from executive branch agencies. Statutes can be very broad in scope (up to
317:
For example, no one has bothered to write articles for the five
Louisiana Codes on WP for the last 17 years. If I had the inclination and about 40 hours to spare, I could probably do it, but I have my own current interests and priorities to attend to, like improving the article on
326:
campuses. Considering that it took me six years to find the time to do the research and start to fix the mess in product liability, it's unlikely that I'll get around to the
Louisiana Codes for another five
288:
262:
343:
304:
295:
navbox into two sections for each topic, but I think the average user would appreciate and even expect codes and regulations to appear together, regardless of technical difference.
370:
111:
279:
constitutional boundaries); regulations can only go up to the boundaries of the underlying authorizing statute. Any objections before I take out the trash? --
272:
275:
and in particular, the inclusion of the Code of
Federal Regulations. This makes no sense because it's confusing two fundamentally different things.
128:
257:
360:
365:
375:
118:
123:
106:
380:
102:
on
Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
385:
94:
58:
390:
209:, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the
33:
331:
205:
169:
323:
300:
39:
339:
284:
253:
86:
8:
319:
296:
264:
335:
280:
249:
70:
52:
354:
243:
99:
98:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the
197:
181:
163:
191:
322:
and improving WP's coverage of the history of the various
210:
371:
Template-Class United States articles of NA-importance
187:
76:
352:
330:It sounds like you haven't read the article on
248:It seems like all the links are redirects.
32:does not require a rating on Knowledge's
353:
361:Template-Class United States articles
203:This template is within the scope of
92:This template is within the scope of
21:
19:
366:NA-importance United States articles
15:
213:and the subjects encompassed by it.
139:Knowledge:WikiProject United States
38:It is of interest to the following
13:
376:WikiProject United States articles
142:Template:WikiProject United States
14:
402:
190:
180:
162:
79:
69:
51:
20:
263:Challenging major revision by
1:
271:I'm specifically challenging
344:01:20, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
305:21:47, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
289:19:02, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
258:15:05, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
7:
381:Template-Class law articles
10:
407:
386:NA-importance law articles
332:State law (United States)
219:Knowledge:WikiProject Law
175:
95:WikiProject United States
64:
46:
391:WikiProject Law articles
324:University of California
222:Template:WikiProject Law
100:United States of America
145:United States articles
87:United States portal
113:Articles Requested!
34:content assessment
320:product liability
265:User:DividedFrame
241:
240:
237:
236:
233:
232:
157:
156:
153:
152:
398:
227:
226:
223:
220:
217:
200:
195:
194:
184:
177:
176:
166:
159:
158:
147:
146:
143:
140:
137:
89:
84:
83:
82:
73:
66:
65:
55:
48:
47:
25:
24:
23:
16:
406:
405:
401:
400:
399:
397:
396:
395:
351:
350:
269:
267:on 20 June 2020
246:
224:
221:
218:
215:
214:
206:WikiProject Law
196:
189:
144:
141:
138:
135:
134:
133:
119:Become a Member
85:
80:
78:
12:
11:
5:
404:
394:
393:
388:
383:
378:
373:
368:
363:
349:
348:
347:
346:
328:
315:
308:
307:
268:
261:
245:
242:
239:
238:
235:
234:
231:
230:
228:
202:
201:
185:
173:
172:
167:
155:
154:
151:
150:
148:
132:
131:
126:
121:
116:
109:
107:Template Usage
103:
91:
90:
74:
62:
61:
56:
44:
43:
37:
26:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
403:
392:
389:
387:
384:
382:
379:
377:
374:
372:
369:
367:
364:
362:
359:
358:
356:
345:
341:
337:
333:
329:
325:
321:
316:
312:
311:
310:
309:
306:
302:
298:
293:
292:
291:
290:
286:
282:
276:
274:
266:
260:
259:
255:
251:
229:
212:
208:
207:
199:
193:
188:
186:
183:
179:
178:
174:
171:
168:
165:
161:
160:
149:
136:United States
130:
127:
125:
122:
120:
117:
115:
114:
110:
108:
105:
104:
101:
97:
96:
88:
77:
75:
72:
68:
67:
63:
60:
59:United States
57:
54:
50:
49:
45:
41:
35:
31:
27:
18:
17:
277:
270:
247:
225:law articles
204:
124:Project Talk
112:
93:
40:WikiProjects
29:
211:legal field
355:Categories
336:Coolcaesar
281:Coolcaesar
250:ONEder Boy
198:Law portal
314:articles.
273:this edit
30:template
327:years.
129:Alerts
36:scale.
244:Links
28:This
340:talk
301:talk
297:Brad
285:talk
254:talk
216:Law
170:Law
357::
342:)
303:)
287:)
256:)
338:(
299:(
283:(
252:(
42::
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
