398:
262:
436:
278:
224:
227:
QPQ done. Nice article on notable actress. It was 450 chars and its now 2400 so expand is OK. Lots of refs and no evidence of close paraphrasing or lack of neutrality. Alt1 is my own suggestion so I cannot approve that, unless its considered a rewrite of Alt0. However Alt0 IS a hook and it has a ref,
246:
I wish that I could. On that topic, the reference only says that she was called on for acting due to her poetry. I could suggest a different hook if detail is needed. I think that your hook can count as a rewrite because that was what I was trying to get across.
300:
say that, and how she lamented that they weren't even closely related, so that could be an option. Alternatively, a little rephrasing, something that mentions
Longfellow was a poet like her famous relative, but became known for her acting?
36:
315:"Alternatively, a little rephrasing, something that mentions Longfellow was a poet like her famous relative, but became known for her acting?" - I honestly thought that the hooks stated that and one said that the hook is confusing.
408:
I guess I will just ask for a different editor to review your hook. I really don't see the issue with the hooks that
Victuallers and I suggested though. ALT2 doesn't even state that it was her poetry that led to her acting.
123:
93:
228:
but I cannot read the detail so AGF. The article does say that "Due to her poetry, she received an offer to become an actress" ... but can we offer a bit more detail of how this happened?
364:
Not really, it's something you can glean from the hooks but I mean make it the point of the hook - the currents are about her poetry (somehow) leading her to acting:
198:
457:
292:
If the hook is confusing but the source (and so article) not forthcoming, is there a better hook to propose? The hooks both suggest (but don't
88:
143:
17:
44:
371:
328:
184:
165:
40:
83:
148:
113:
103:
270:
233:
118:
376:
323:
176:
160:
8:
296:) that Longfellow wanted to make a name for herself outside of her family - the article
390:
306:
98:
29:
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below.
343:
287:
266:
243:
229:
65:
414:
351:
336:
252:
212:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
451:
403:
386:
312:
302:
397:
440:
61:
410:
359:
347:
332:
283:
261:
248:
208:
47:), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page.
435:
277:
223:
385:
is more like what I was thinking. The hookiness is the contrast.
346:
although I feel like we already had what
Kingsif suggested.
370:... "... that though a poet like her famous great-uncle
265:
OK, (we tried). Tick for ALT0 and (rephrased as) ALT1.
108:
449:
215:). Self-nominated at 04:01, 26 April 2021 (UTC).
187:, she became an actress due to her own poetry?
49:No further edits should be made to this page
331:, was known for her poetry and acting?
134:
14:
458:Passed DYK nominations from April 2021
450:
168:, became an actress due to her poetry?
23:
24:
469:
18:Template:Did you know nominations
434:
396:
276:
260:
222:
443: 22:05, 13 May 2021 (UTC)
68:) 23:17, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
32:Please do not modify this page.
327:, the grand-niece of the poet
164:, the grand-niece of the poet
13:
1:
273:) 13:50, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
255:) 13:32, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
236:) 09:40, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
7:
393:) 20:14, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
354:) 19:30, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
309:) 18:53, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
45:Knowledge talk:Did you know
37:this nomination's talk page
10:
474:
417:) 20:59, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
380:found fame as an actress?"
339:) 19:25, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
183:great uncle was the poet
119:Find sources (notability)
94:Earwig's Copyvio Detector
41:the article's talk page
109:A Simple Word Counter
89:Reviewer instructions
377:Stephanie Longfellow
324:Stephanie Longfellow
177:Stephanie Longfellow
161:Stephanie Longfellow
135:Stephanie Longfellow
114:Reviewers' template
439:Approving Alt3. --
174:... that although
216:
132:
131:
465:
438:
407:
400:
363:
291:
280:
264:
226:
206:
199:Sitara (textile)
182:
72:
71:
56:The result was:
34:
473:
472:
468:
467:
466:
464:
463:
462:
448:
447:
446:
401:
372:Henry Wadsworth
357:
329:Henry Wadsworth
281:
207:5x expanded by
180:
166:Henry Wadsworth
155:
153:
149:Article history
137:
128:
104:Character count
69:
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
471:
461:
460:
445:
444:
431:
430:
429:
428:
427:
426:
425:
424:
423:
422:
421:
420:
419:
418:
383:
382:
381:
340:
316:
257:
256:
238:
237:
204:
203:
202:
201:
189:
188:
169:
152:
151:
146:
144:Back to T:TDYK
140:
138:
136:
133:
130:
129:
127:
126:
121:
116:
111:
106:
101:
96:
91:
86:
80:
77:
76:
54:
53:
25:
15:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
470:
459:
456:
455:
453:
442:
437:
433:
432:
416:
412:
405:
399:
395:
394:
392:
388:
384:
379:
378:
373:
369:
366:
365:
361:
356:
355:
353:
349:
345:
341:
338:
334:
330:
326:
325:
320:
317:
314:
311:
310:
308:
304:
299:
295:
289:
285:
279:
275:
274:
272:
268:
263:
259:
258:
254:
250:
245:
242:
241:
240:
239:
235:
231:
225:
221:
220:
219:
218:
217:
214:
210:
200:
196:
193:
192:
191:
190:
186:
179:
178:
173:
170:
167:
163:
162:
157:
156:
150:
147:
145:
142:
141:
125:
122:
120:
117:
115:
112:
110:
107:
105:
102:
100:
97:
95:
92:
90:
87:
85:
82:
81:
79:
78:
74:
73:
70:
67:
63:
59:
52:
50:
46:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
375:
367:
322:
318:
297:
293:
205:
194:
175:
171:
159:
57:
55:
48:
31:
28:
344:Victuallers
288:Victuallers
267:Victuallers
244:Victuallers
230:Victuallers
124:Hook length
75:DYK toolbox
185:Longfellow
321:... that
158:... that
99:QPQ check
84:DYK check
452:Category
342:Pinging
195:Reviewed
58:promoted
404:Kingsif
387:Kingsif
313:Kingsif
303:Kingsif
181:'s
441:evrik
62:Z1720
16:<
415:talk
411:SL93
391:talk
368:ALT3
360:SL93
352:talk
348:SL93
337:talk
333:SL93
319:ALT2
307:talk
298:does
286:and
284:SL93
271:talk
253:talk
249:SL93
234:talk
213:talk
209:SL93
172:Alt1
66:talk
294:say
60:by
43:or
454::
374:,
197::
139:(
39:,
413:(
406::
402:@
389:(
362::
358:@
350:(
335:(
305:(
290::
282:@
269:(
251:(
232:(
211:(
154:)
64:(
51:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
