Knowledge

Talk:Unnecessary health care

Source 📝

158: 450: 429: 460: 142: 270: 213: 287: 339: 318: 349: 643:"Use" is a noun or a verb, "utility" is the participle, "utilize" is a verb made (up) from the participle, and "utilization" is a noun derived from the participle/verb, so "overutilization" is the long way to spell overuse - they have the same meaning in theory. If they differ in practice, it is derived. Why not use the original, short, "correct" word? 622:
majority audience for this article then the name "unnecessary health care" would be better. "Overtreatment" is another good name for this concept but the content of this article describes types of overutilization and unnecessary health care which may not be "overtreatment". If anyone has comments about the best name for this article then share.
621:
I changed the name of the article from "overutilization" to "unnecessary health care". I am not sure what the correct name is. The most common term in medical literature is "overutilization". However, I do not feel that this is a term which is used by non-professionals, and I thought since that was a
582:
Unnecessary treatment (surgery) was defined by Dr. Lucian Leape. "No operation is necessary if it is ineffective, if it does not accomplish its objective for a clinical situation.... An operation is unnecessary if it confers no clear advantage over a less risks alternative. In both instances the
767:
You don't appear to understand what this article is about, Kku. Nothing I said would imply we should purge defensive medicine, which i explicitly mentioned. If you want to keep at this, please actually read this article and before you reply again.
135: 150: 565: 171: 689: 601: 753:
I'm afraid that isn't a rationale for referring to Big Pharma. The reference to defensive medicine cites an academic article which identifies its relevance. --
723:
are major factor in the entire complex (if it weren't for them, media coverage might be even lower than it is) All of which puts your views in a dubious light.
184: 637: 367: 566:
http://iom.edu/Reports/1998/Statement-on-Quality-of-Care-National-Roundtable-on-Health-Care-Quality--The-Urgent-Need-to-Improve-Health-Care-Quality.aspx
728: 516: 411: 371: 685: 644: 44: 777: 762: 681: 262: 79: 819: 804: 506: 401: 554: 794: 609: 809: 613: 577: 824: 709: 593:
The purpose here is to distinguish between things that are merely unnnecessary, and the things that cause harm, e.g. overuse.
587:. Note this link only has an abstract. Have to pay for the aricle. This quote is in The Treatment Trap and I copied it here.. 85: 680:, Daily Mail is not reliable for much of anything (see the just-concluded RfC and the many links in it to past discussions, 533: 482: 376: 191: 814: 799: 652: 30: 729:
https://www.theguardian.com/society/2015/aug/18/soft-touch-doctors-write-10m-needless-prescriptions-a-year-says-nice
677: 255: 99: 657: 473: 434: 362: 323: 198: 104: 20: 74: 605: 584: 564:
Overuse is defined as when the potential for harm of a health care service exceeds the possible benefit.
298: 65: 688:
you linked to is by a "contributor" which means it is an SPS blog, and also not a reliable source. See
571: 177: 590:
Can also use the definitions of overutilization already in the wikipedia entry on overutilization.
758: 481:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
583:
operation does not represent a net benefit to the patient. The patient will not be better off."
109: 24: 630: 696:(like a diagnostic test offered by a doctor to avoid getting sued for malpractice) but about 578:
http://www.kaiserhealthnews.org/Stories/2011/April/07/KHN-Interview-with-Rosemary-Gibson.aspx
304: 228: 165: 597: 126: 233: 8: 754: 648: 559: 286: 55: 716: 70: 733: 623: 212: 51: 719:. Because, as you yourself might also easily infer, drugs have a price. Unnecessary 773: 705: 550: 539: 738: 538:
This article discusses some challenges in knowing if care is appropriate or not.
465: 354: 250: 244: 788: 743: 769: 701: 673: 546: 543: 125: 700:, especially for specialty drugs, which is an entirely different issue. 585:
http://www.annualreviews.org/doi/abs/10.1146/annurev.pu.13.050192.002051
459: 449: 428: 669: 659: 223: 572:
http://psnet.ahrq.gov/popup_glossary.aspx?name=underuseoverusemisuse
665: 478: 692:. And in any case, that blog posting is not about unneccessary 374:. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at 715:
Given your line of reasoning, you ought to also purge mentions
570:
Definition used by Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality:
141: 366:, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the 720: 338: 317: 149: 477:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 455: 344: 15: 576:Defintiion used in a Kaiser Health News interview: 734:https://www.worstpills.org/public/page.cfm?op_id=3 254:, which is a major factor behind the high cost of 786: 33:for general discussion of the article's subject. 739:https://www.citizen.org/documents/HL_201004.pdf 370:and that biomedical information in any article 668:please provide some rationale for including " 368:Manual of Style for medicine-related articles 197: 157: 744:http://www.bbc.com/news/magazine-26890072 236:). The text of the entry was as follows: 672:" as a "see also" that makes sense per 284: 787: 261:A record of the entry may be seen at 183: 750:-- Kku 11:14, 9 February 2017 (UTC) 471:This article is within the scope of 360:This article is within the scope of 280: 263:Knowledge:Recent additions/2011/July 207: 377:Knowledge talk:WikiProject Medicine 303:It is of interest to the following 23:for discussing improvements to the 13: 268: 14: 836: 269: 820:Low-importance politics articles 805:Mid-importance medicine articles 458: 448: 427: 372:use high-quality medical sources 347: 337: 316: 285: 211: 45:Click here to start a new topic. 795:Knowledge Did you know articles 511:This article has been rated as 406:This article has been rated as 810:All WikiProject Medicine pages 491:Knowledge:WikiProject Politics 386:Knowledge:WikiProject Medicine 1: 825:WikiProject Politics articles 638:20:06, 5 September 2013 (UTC) 494:Template:WikiProject Politics 485:and see a list of open tasks. 389:Template:WikiProject Medicine 42:Put new text under old text. 778:20:02, 9 February 2017 (UTC) 763:13:37, 9 February 2017 (UTC) 710:10:55, 9 February 2017 (UTC) 653:19:34, 12 October 2014 (UTC) 7: 555:20:55, 19 August 2011 (UTC) 534:Defining inappropriate care 50:New to Knowledge? Welcome! 10: 841: 517:project's importance scale 412:project's importance scale 815:C-Class politics articles 800:C-Class medicine articles 510: 443: 405: 332: 311: 80:Be welcoming to newcomers 232:column on 11 July 2011 ( 222:appeared on Knowledge's 614:16:49, 1 May 2013 (UTC) 220:Unnecessary health care 25:Unnecessary health care 293:This article is rated 274: 75:avoid personal attacks 272: 123:Find medical sources: 100:Neutral point of view 544:10.1056/NEJMp1107283 474:WikiProject Politics 363:WikiProject Medicine 105:No original research 676:. about your edit 717:defensive medicine 602:Patientadvocate100 299:content assessment 275: 129: 86:dispute resolution 47: 617: 600:comment added by 531: 530: 527: 526: 523: 522: 497:politics articles 422: 421: 418: 417: 392:medicine articles 279: 278: 248:model encourages 206: 205: 128:Source guidelines 127: 66:Assume good faith 43: 832: 635: 634: 628: 616: 594: 499: 498: 495: 492: 489: 468: 463: 462: 452: 445: 444: 439: 431: 424: 423: 394: 393: 390: 387: 384: 357: 352: 351: 350: 341: 334: 333: 328: 320: 313: 312: 296: 290: 289: 281: 271: 256:U.S. health care 215: 208: 202: 201: 187: 161: 153: 145: 131: 95:Article policies 16: 840: 839: 835: 834: 833: 831: 830: 829: 785: 784: 690:this RSN thread 663: 632: 631: 624: 595: 562: 536: 496: 493: 490: 487: 486: 466:Politics portal 464: 457: 437: 391: 388: 385: 382: 381: 355:Medicine portal 353: 348: 346: 326: 297:on Knowledge's 294: 251:overutilization 245:fee-for-service 121: 116: 115: 114: 91: 61: 12: 11: 5: 838: 828: 827: 822: 817: 812: 807: 802: 797: 783: 782: 781: 780: 765: 755:ChrisSampson87 747: 746: 741: 736: 731: 725: 724: 686:Forbes article 662: 656: 641: 640: 626:Blue Rasberry 561: 558: 535: 532: 529: 528: 525: 524: 521: 520: 513:Low-importance 509: 503: 502: 500: 483:the discussion 470: 469: 453: 441: 440: 438:Low‑importance 432: 420: 419: 416: 415: 408:Mid-importance 404: 398: 397: 395: 359: 358: 342: 330: 329: 327:Mid‑importance 321: 309: 308: 302: 291: 277: 276: 266: 260: 259: 216: 204: 203: 118: 117: 113: 112: 107: 102: 93: 92: 90: 89: 82: 77: 68: 62: 60: 59: 48: 39: 38: 35: 34: 28: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 837: 826: 823: 821: 818: 816: 813: 811: 808: 806: 803: 801: 798: 796: 793: 792: 790: 779: 775: 771: 766: 764: 760: 756: 752: 751: 749: 748: 745: 742: 740: 737: 735: 732: 730: 727: 726: 722: 718: 714: 713: 712: 711: 707: 703: 699: 695: 691: 687: 683: 679: 675: 671: 667: 661: 655: 654: 650: 646: 639: 636: 629: 627: 620: 619: 618: 615: 611: 607: 603: 599: 591: 588: 586: 580: 579: 574: 573: 568: 567: 557: 556: 552: 548: 545: 541: 518: 514: 508: 505: 504: 501: 484: 480: 476: 475: 467: 461: 456: 454: 451: 447: 446: 442: 436: 433: 430: 426: 425: 413: 409: 403: 400: 399: 396: 379: 378: 373: 369: 365: 364: 356: 345: 343: 340: 336: 335: 331: 325: 322: 319: 315: 314: 310: 306: 300: 292: 288: 283: 282: 267: 264: 257: 253: 252: 247: 246: 242:... that the 241: 238: 237: 235: 231: 230: 225: 221: 217: 214: 210: 209: 200: 196: 193: 190: 186: 182: 179: 176: 173: 172:ScienceDirect 170: 167: 164: 160: 156: 152: 148: 144: 140: 137: 134: 130: 124: 120: 119: 111: 110:Verifiability 108: 106: 103: 101: 98: 97: 96: 87: 83: 81: 78: 76: 72: 69: 67: 64: 63: 57: 53: 52:Learn to edit 49: 46: 41: 40: 37: 36: 32: 26: 22: 18: 17: 697: 693: 664: 658:See also to 642: 625: 596:— Preceding 592: 589: 581: 575: 569: 563: 537: 512: 472: 407: 375: 361: 305:WikiProjects 249: 243: 240:Did you know 239: 229:Did you know 227: 219: 218:A fact from 194: 188: 180: 174: 168: 162: 154: 146: 138: 132: 122: 94: 19:This is the 674:MOS:SEEALSO 560:Definitions 234:check views 31:not a forum 789:Categories 670:big pharma 660:Big Pharma 684:). The 645:Gigemag76 273:Knowledge 224:Main Page 88:if needed 71:Be polite 21:talk page 666:User:Kku 610:contribs 598:unsigned 488:Politics 479:politics 435:Politics 383:Medicine 324:Medicine 178:Springer 143:Cochrane 56:get help 29:This is 27:article. 515:on the 410:on the 295:C-class 226:in the 770:Jytdog 702:Jytdog 633:(talk) 547:Jesanj 301:scale. 166:OpenMD 136:PubMed 721:costs 192:Wiley 84:Seek 774:talk 759:talk 706:talk 698:cost 694:care 682:here 678:here 649:talk 606:talk 551:talk 185:Trip 159:Gale 151:DOAJ 73:and 540:doi 507:Low 402:Mid 199:TWL 791:: 776:) 761:) 708:) 651:) 612:) 608:• 553:) 54:; 772:( 757:( 704:( 647:( 604:( 549:( 542:: 519:. 414:. 380:. 307:: 265:. 258:? 195:· 189:· 181:· 175:· 169:· 163:· 155:· 147:· 139:· 133:· 58:.

Index

talk page
Unnecessary health care
not a forum
Click here to start a new topic.
Learn to edit
get help
Assume good faith
Be polite
avoid personal attacks
Be welcoming to newcomers
dispute resolution
Neutral point of view
No original research
Verifiability
Source guidelines
PubMed
Cochrane
DOAJ
Gale
OpenMD
ScienceDirect
Springer
Trip
Wiley
TWL

Main Page
Did you know
check views
fee-for-service

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.