31:
85:
64:
190:
169:
200:
95:
22:
903:
Categorisation and navigation templates are messy since you have one page for multiple concepts and it can be categorised/nav-templated based on those different concepts. When links are made from other articles, it can be unclear in which sense the link is intended; section links can help there, but they are fragile (someone innocently changes the section title and suddenly all the section links are broken).
274:
669:
Is there a line to be drawn between signature and ratification of an international treaty in the Holy See or historically in countries ruled by absolute monarchs? I see several sources that mention treaty ratification by the Holy See, but does that mean more than "the Pope signed and an instrument of
902:
One reason for splitting: I don't like articles which cover multiple topics with the same name. They can't be linked cleanly to
Wikidata. Relatedly, they pose problems for interlanguage links (other language versions may split them, or they might not even all share the same name in other languages).
375:
The lengthy discussion of modern US ratification issues, particularly surrounding the Law of the Sea, seems to belong more in an opinion piece or a law review article than in an encyclopedia entry. The multiple citations to the writings of a single individual, even if an expert, suggest that someone
798:
I think "Ratification" is an important enough concept in the international law of treaties that it should be spun off into a separate article. The stuff about "Ratification" in other legal contexts – such as ratification of constitutions or constitutional amendments – can stay here. Any objections?
376:
is advancing a specific point of view. I claim no special expertise in the topic of US Senate treaty ratifications, but strictly from the viewpoint of form, I would argue that the discussion of this Law of the Sea example should be shortened or deleted entirely.
390:
I agree with the above comment and have deleted that section. If someone wants to revert and rework it that would be fine with me, but as it is now it is basically a rant against environmental treaties. Doesn't seem appropriate for this article.
35:
316:
828:
My point is, I think the treaty sense of "ratification" is important enough to deserve its own article. Maybe, we move the other senses of "ratification" into another article(s), and make this one just about the treaty sense?
880:
The parliamentary procedure aspect is super-stubby–only two sentences; maybe that is an argument against creating an article for it, and just leaving a note about it on the disambiguation page. That said, if we create
564:
The UN seems to differentiate between ratification, acceptance, approval, and accession; yet it treats them all as ratification. Could someone please add a section explaining the difference between these?
328:
843:
I have no objection in principle but it is not a very long article that really needs to be split, does it? And it gives you the pain of tryung to come up with distinctive disambiguators. Proposal? --
973:
882:
870:
367:
Ratification is the act of making something valid by confirming it; for example, international threaties are often confirmed by vote from national parliaments or other national institutions.
814:
For most readers in most of the world, "ratification" is a word that applies to the process of creating or acceding to an international treaty. It is the other meanings that are obscure. --
857:
It discusses "ratification" in four senses: (1) private law, (2) international law of treaties, (3) constitutional law, (4) parliamentary procedure. So, one approach might be to have: (1)
722:
436:
This article is extremely ambiguous - it talks about "the
Convention and its resulting constitution", "the text", and "the treaty", without giving any indication of what might be meant.
866:
642:
Apparently ratification is not completed (at least for the UK ratification of EU treaties?) until the instruments of ratification are deposited in Rome by the
British government -
476:
I've updated this section now to take account of the fact that the
European Constitution wasn't ratified. It needs to be watched, though, just in case the constitution is revived.
963:
740:
736:
874:
978:
336:
321:
Article helps to spread racism by ignoring the ratification process in all of Africa, the
Caribbean, South America. Academic racism is part of why racism keeps spreading.
858:
356:
576:
377:
559:
421:
627:
352:
460:. Right now, it's effectively orphan, since none of pages pointing here is about European constitution. Incorporate into some article about EU? Or just delete?
332:
580:
151:
471:
526:
371:
I suggest that the text about the project of a constitution for the
European Union is moved to another article, probably about European Union)
252:
808:
793:
553:
480:
930:
912:
852:
838:
823:
988:
958:
141:
718:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
425:
968:
788:
993:
896:(covering contract and tort law) – those are both US sources, but here's a source which discusses it in English contract law –
405:
897:
1003:
242:
572:
658:
637:
117:
983:
888:
The private law aspect is two whole paragraphs, yet with zero citations. But it is easy to find citations for it, e.g.
417:
708:
678:
1008:
623:
348:
700:
385:
953:
926:
848:
819:
683:
664:
545:
512:
917:
Ok, IMO you can go ahead on that basis. I can't see that you need to go through the full consultation phases of
885:, someone else may come along and merge it to some other article on parliamentary procedure–which would be fine.
739:
to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
631:
431:
908:
834:
804:
108:
69:
650:
Can we get a generalized definition of the term added to the article? That's half of what I came to look for.
998:
381:
608:
217:, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the
783:
44:
400:
538:
lets talk about the ratificaton of the constitution!!! this information doesn't really talk about it!!!
758:
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
922:
844:
815:
699:. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit
520:
505:
there is ratifcation european constitution but not one on the u.s. history constiution!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
593:
The application of the treaty or legislation is not possible until it has been ratified, so we think.
904:
830:
800:
213:
174:
458:
670:
ratification, made a paper airplane out of it, and threw it out the window to a waiting courier?"
116:
on
Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
774:
299:
743:
before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template
614:
759:
696:
306:
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. |
746:
586:
454:
50:
898:
https://olrl.ouplaw.com/view/10.1093/law/9780198784685.001.0001/law-9780198784685-chapter-6
766:
619:
568:
541:
508:
413:
396:
324:
317:
Racists wrote article to ignores
African, Caribbean, South American ratification processes
8:
549:
516:
307:
21:
613:
Read the following report from page 47: it explains all these terms, as used by the UN.
725:, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by
765:
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
643:
604:
344:
709:
https://web.archive.org/web/20131203013055/http://164.100.47.134/intranet/CAI/1.pdf
362:
286:
531:
Why did he ratify the constitution? i don't really know from the article written.
918:
392:
100:
865:(this article covering the international law of treaties sense as primary); (3)
492:
892:(albeit that covers the constitutional law and international law senses too),
731:. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
947:
862:
712:
692:
671:
651:
600:
889:
732:
477:
461:
893:
94:
84:
63:
294:
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
205:
599:
which could also be explained as well as ratification and accession.
595:
In addition to the suggestion above, I note in a UN document the term
189:
168:
199:
591:
What does the -so we think- mean on this sentence in the article?
446:
410:
The sentence in reference needs to be ratified. You know the one.
113:
442:
It certainly doesn't seem to talk about ratification in general.
974:
Knowledge level-5 vital articles in
Society and social sciences
615:
http://www.ohchr.org/Documents/Publications/FactSheet30en.pdf
703:
for additional information. I made the following changes:
439:
I suppose this is intended to be part of another article?
218:
964:
Knowledge vital articles in
Society and social sciences
979:
C-Class vital articles in Society and social sciences
877:, with a hatnote pointing to the disambiguation page.
195:
112:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
90:
735:using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
644:http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/7465665.stm
560:ratification, acceptance, approval, and accession
945:
721:This message was posted before February 2018.
691:I have just modified one external link on
472:Ratification of the European Constitution
794:Split treaty stuff into separate article
713:http://164.100.47.134/intranet/CAI/1.pdf
329:2604:2000:DDD1:4900:B5FC:4ED7:8687:22F9
19:
946:
890:https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/ratify
883:ratification (parliamentary procedure)
871:ratification (parliamentary procedure)
527:Lets talk about.......... George Read!
894:https://www.jstor.org/stable/25763184
268:
211:This article is within the scope of
106:This article is within the scope of
15:
457:, in a section that is now removed
432:What is this article talking about?
221:and the subjects encompassed by it.
49:It is of interest to the following
13:
502:A ratifuing; formal confirmation.
14:
1020:
867:ratification (constitutional law)
695:. Please take a moment to review
989:Mid-importance politics articles
959:Knowledge level-5 vital articles
272:
198:
188:
167:
93:
83:
62:
29:
20:
247:This article has been rated as
146:This article has been rated as
969:C-Class level-5 vital articles
406:SENTENCE NEEDS TO BE FINISHED!
298:] The anchor (#Law) has been
126:Knowledge:WikiProject Politics
1:
994:WikiProject Politics articles
875:ratification (disambiguation)
789:06:41, 11 December 2017 (UTC)
581:03:13, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
554:00:02, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
521:00:04, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
426:05:45, 10 February 2010 (UTC)
129:Template:WikiProject Politics
120:and see a list of open tasks.
1004:High-importance law articles
646:. 18:55, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
609:19:41, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
534:It's a pretty poor example.
386:21:04, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
7:
638:Instruments of ratification
10:
1025:
931:12:23, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
913:01:57, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
859:ratification (private law)
853:23:44, 10 April 2023 (UTC)
839:22:19, 10 April 2023 (UTC)
824:10:55, 10 April 2023 (UTC)
809:00:53, 10 April 2023 (UTC)
752:(last update: 5 June 2024)
688:Hello fellow Wikipedians,
481:22:43, 21 March 2006 (UTC)
401:13:40, 14 April 2010 (UTC)
253:project's importance scale
152:project's importance scale
984:C-Class politics articles
679:08:01, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
659:08:01, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
449:17:09, 20 Mar 2004 (UTC)
357:08:53, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
246:
227:Knowledge:WikiProject Law
183:
145:
78:
57:
1009:WikiProject Law articles
632:11:20, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
464:20:35, Apr 9, 2004 (UTC)
230:Template:WikiProject Law
684:External links modified
665:Holy See & monarchs
486:i still don't get what
954:C-Class vital articles
873:. And then of course,
300:deleted by other users
455:European constitution
36:level-5 vital article
999:C-Class law articles
905:SomethingForDeletion
831:SomethingForDeletion
801:SomethingForDeletion
733:regular verification
109:WikiProject Politics
723:After February 2018
378:Goldfish-silverfish
777:InternetArchiveBot
728:InternetArchiveBot
45:content assessment
753:
634:
622:comment added by
583:
571:comment added by
556:
544:comment added by
523:
511:comment added by
453:It was a part of
416:comment added by
340:
327:comment added by
314:
313:
289:in most browsers.
267:
266:
263:
262:
259:
258:
162:
161:
158:
157:
132:politics articles
1016:
787:
778:
751:
750:
729:
676:
656:
617:
566:
539:
506:
428:
322:
308:Reporting errors
276:
275:
269:
235:
234:
231:
228:
225:
208:
203:
202:
192:
185:
184:
179:
171:
164:
163:
134:
133:
130:
127:
124:
103:
98:
97:
87:
80:
79:
74:
66:
59:
58:
42:
33:
32:
25:
24:
16:
1024:
1023:
1019:
1018:
1017:
1015:
1014:
1013:
944:
943:
796:
781:
776:
744:
737:have permission
727:
701:this simple FaQ
686:
672:
667:
652:
640:
589:
562:
529:
495:
474:
434:
411:
408:
365:
319:
310:
292:
291:
290:
273:
249:High-importance
232:
229:
226:
223:
222:
214:WikiProject Law
204:
197:
178:High‑importance
177:
131:
128:
125:
122:
121:
101:Politics portal
99:
92:
72:
43:on Knowledge's
40:
30:
12:
11:
5:
1022:
1012:
1011:
1006:
1001:
996:
991:
986:
981:
976:
971:
966:
961:
956:
942:
941:
940:
939:
938:
937:
936:
935:
934:
933:
900:
886:
878:
795:
792:
771:
770:
763:
716:
715:
707:Added archive
685:
682:
666:
663:
662:
661:
639:
636:
588:
585:
573:130.15.164.116
561:
558:
537:
528:
525:
494:
491:
484:
473:
470:
468:
466:
465:
433:
430:
407:
404:
374:
364:
361:
360:
359:
318:
315:
312:
311:
305:
304:
303:
287:case-sensitive
281:
280:
279:
277:
265:
264:
261:
260:
257:
256:
245:
239:
238:
236:
210:
209:
193:
181:
180:
172:
160:
159:
156:
155:
148:Mid-importance
144:
138:
137:
135:
118:the discussion
105:
104:
88:
76:
75:
73:Mid‑importance
67:
55:
54:
48:
26:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1021:
1010:
1007:
1005:
1002:
1000:
997:
995:
992:
990:
987:
985:
982:
980:
977:
975:
972:
970:
967:
965:
962:
960:
957:
955:
952:
951:
949:
932:
928:
924:
920:
916:
915:
914:
910:
906:
901:
899:
895:
891:
887:
884:
879:
876:
872:
868:
864:
860:
856:
855:
854:
850:
846:
842:
841:
840:
836:
832:
827:
826:
825:
821:
817:
813:
812:
811:
810:
806:
802:
791:
790:
785:
780:
779:
768:
764:
761:
757:
756:
755:
748:
742:
738:
734:
730:
724:
719:
714:
710:
706:
705:
704:
702:
698:
694:
689:
681:
680:
677:
675:
660:
657:
655:
649:
648:
647:
645:
635:
633:
629:
625:
621:
616:
611:
610:
606:
602:
598:
594:
587:So we think??
584:
582:
578:
574:
570:
557:
555:
551:
547:
543:
535:
532:
524:
522:
518:
514:
510:
503:
501:
498:
496:
489:
488:
483:
482:
479:
469:
463:
459:
456:
452:
451:
450:
448:
443:
440:
437:
429:
427:
423:
419:
415:
403:
402:
398:
394:
388:
387:
383:
379:
372:
368:
358:
354:
350:
346:
343:
342:
341:
338:
334:
330:
326:
309:
301:
297:
296:
295:
288:
284:
278:
271:
270:
254:
250:
244:
241:
240:
237:
220:
216:
215:
207:
201:
196:
194:
191:
187:
186:
182:
176:
173:
170:
166:
165:
153:
149:
143:
140:
139:
136:
119:
115:
111:
110:
102:
96:
91:
89:
86:
82:
81:
77:
71:
68:
65:
61:
60:
56:
52:
46:
38:
37:
27:
23:
18:
17:
863:ratification
797:
775:
772:
747:source check
726:
720:
717:
693:Ratification
690:
687:
673:
668:
653:
641:
612:
596:
592:
590:
563:
536:
533:
530:
504:
500:
499:
497:
490:
487:
485:
475:
467:
444:
441:
438:
435:
418:124.187.8.36
409:
389:
373:
369:
366:
347:and add it.
323:— Preceding
320:
293:
285:Anchors are
282:
248:
233:law articles
212:
147:
107:
51:WikiProjects
34:
624:152.78.45.5
618:—Preceding
567:—Preceding
540:—Preceding
507:—Preceding
412:—Preceding
349:162.23.30.5
219:legal field
948:Categories
784:Report bug
597:succession
393:Greatersam
206:Law portal
767:this tool
760:this tool
546:63.3.14.2
513:63.3.14.2
39:is rated
919:WP:SPLIT
773:Cheers.—
620:unsigned
569:unsigned
542:unsigned
509:unsigned
414:unsigned
363:Comments
337:contribs
325:unsigned
123:Politics
114:politics
70:Politics
697:my edit
674:MrZaius
654:MrZaius
601:Ray3055
370:(-: -->
345:Be bold
302:before.
251:on the
150:on the
41:C-class
923:𝕁𝕄𝔽
869:; (4)
861:; (2)
845:𝕁𝕄𝔽
816:𝕁𝕄𝔽
493:ratify
478:Daduzi
462:Andris
47:scale.
28:This
927:talk
921:. --
909:talk
849:talk
835:talk
820:talk
805:talk
628:talk
605:talk
577:talk
550:talk
517:talk
422:talk
397:talk
382:talk
353:talk
333:talk
283:Tip:
243:High
741:RfC
711:to
447:pne
445:--
224:Law
175:Law
142:Mid
950::
929:)
911:)
851:)
837:)
822:)
807:)
754:.
749:}}
745:{{
630:)
607:)
579:)
552:)
519:)
424:)
399:)
384:)
355:)
339:)
335:•
925:(
907:(
847:(
833:(
818:(
803:(
786:)
782:(
769:.
762:.
626:(
603:(
575:(
548:(
515:(
420:(
395:(
380:(
351:(
331:(
255:.
154:.
53::
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
