Knowledge

Talk:Pseudoscience

Source đź“ť

568: 723: 702: 601: 1251: 1230: 1202: 1186: 875: 622: 1261: 310: 825: 807: 981: 2201: 960: 733: 280: 516: 473: 363: 559: 1088: 1057: 1098: 1513:"Our team of experts is leading the U.S. government’s efforts to address Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena (UAP) using a rigorous scientific framework and a data-driven approach. Since its establishment in July 2022, AARO has taken important steps to improve data collection, standardize reporting requirements, and mitigate the potential threats to safety and security posed by UAP." 2098:
think they are real science and widely accepted by mainstream scientist. However, most creationism believer and advocator are well-informed and they understand creationism are religious concept not current science concept, but they believe bible is more reliable than science when we study the origin
1633:
Yes, that's exactly what Knowledge does, and always has done, because it roots our articles in fact rather than opinion. There is a big difference between fields that have some minor fringe/pseudoscientific theories attached to them, and fields (like UFOlogy) that are effectively completely fringe.
1729:
An argument from authority (argumentum ab auctoritate), also called an appeal to authority, or argumentum ad verecundiam (argument against shame), is a form of fallacy when the opinion of a non-expert on a topic is used as evidence to support an argument or when the authority is used to say that the
1654:
Intelligence does not come into it either. Your whole approach is totally fakakte. Pseudoscience, that is, a thing that pretends to be science, does not stop being pseudoscience just because someone falls for the pretense. That would be like throwing the theories of relativity out of the window just
1852:
UFO should classified as scientific speculative, rather than pseudoscience or fringe science. There are many evidence of UFO, but it often classified as anecdotal evidence rather than a definitive evidence or scientific evidence. We cannot 100% confirm UFO exists, but there are many UFO reports.
1815:
You can always tell an argument is going well when the personal attacks come out. You're right, though, we've accomplished everything this thread is going to accomplish - you now know that per Knowledge's policies, this article can and will continue to identify Ufology as a pseudoscience. Feel free
1522:
personnel, our equipment and bases, and the security of our operations. DOD is focusing through AARO to better understand UAP, and improve our capabilities to detect, collect, analyze and eventually resolve UAP to prevent strategic surprise and protect our forces, our operations, and our nation.”
1521:
from the article: "When asked why she went all-in on prioritizing AARO as an element under her purview, particularly now, Hicks told DefenseScoop: “The department takes UAP seriously because UAP are a potential national security threat. They also pose safety risks, and potentially endanger our
1416:
These policies have guided the shape and content of the article, and new arrivals are strongly encouraged to become familiar with them prior to raising objections on this page or adding content to the article. Other important policies guiding the article's content are No Original Research
1516: 2093:
Furthermore, there are critical difference between real pseudoscience vs religious concept like creationism, or traditional superstitions concept like astrology. A Real pseudoscience is difficult to differentiate from real science, say most people who believe
2213: 1853:
Some are hoax, some are illusion, some are misclassified, or some may be truth but we cannot 100% sure, and there are no universal agreed way that we can use scientific method to verify these report are definitely or most likely are truth.
1517:
https://defensescoop.com/2023/08/30/hicks-takes-direct-oversight-of-pentagons-uap-office-new-reporting-website-to-be-launched/?utm_content=262515320&utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter&hss_channel=tw-1450183022616121344
1445:
This article uses scientific terminology, and as such, the use of the word 'theory' to refer to anything outside of a recognised scientific theory is ambiguous. Please use words such as 'concept', 'notion', 'idea', 'assertion'; see
907:, a collaborative effort to improve Knowledge's coverage of significant alternative views in every field, from the sciences to the humanities. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the 2194: 410:
Serious and respected encyclopedias and reference works are generally expected to provide overviews of scientific topics that are in line with respected scientific thought. Knowledge aspires to be such a respected
2253: 1343:
First of all, welcome to Knowledge's Pseudoscience article. This article represents the work of many contributors and much negotiation to find consensus for an accurate and complete representation of the topic.
166: 896: 1995:
changing the link seems like a reasonable suggestion to me. and if creation science is what we use for that subject on wikipedia, i think it makes sense for the text to also be changed to Creation Science.
397:, a fundamental policy, requires fair representation of significant alternatives to scientific orthodoxy. Significant alternatives, in this case, refers to legitimate scientific disagreement, as opposed to 1559:
well that's such a huge false equivalency. So how do you determine when government is being misled or not? And what makes you think you're more intelligent than DOD scientists like Sean Kirkpatrick?
1467: 389: 2348: 2010:
We use the term "creation science" for creation science and "creationism" for creationism. Both are pseudoscience (see my contribution above; I moved yours down because it is newer, see
572: 454: 2318: 428: 2072:
rather than pseudoscience. The term "Pseudoscience" is better reserve for only those theory that really look like science but actually are not science or rejected by science, say
2143:
is this pseudoscience? It cannot be tested repeated, falsified, it uses statistics but averaging averages leads to anything. Is it a sort of primitive sacrifice religion?
2338: 2144: 271: 2249: 2099:
of species. Astrology believer are also well-informed that it is being criticized as superstitions. Better language can highlight which one is the real pseudoscience.
415: 405: 942: 441: 160: 2353: 1119:
on Knowledge. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the
1531: 2237: 1363:
A common objection made often by new arrivals is that the article presents the fields it lists as "pseudoscience" in an unsympathetic light or violates Knowledge's
1538: 2448: 437:, but which are generally considered pseudoscience by the scientific community may properly contain that information and may be categorized as pseudoscience. 1502:
So is UFO considered Pseudoscience and fringe science? if so why is US government considers it a national security threat and scientifically analyzing it?
493:. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. 1156: 1039: 684: 1485: 789: 458:: Alternative theoretical formulations which have a following within the scientific community are not pseudoscience, but part of the scientific process. 2453: 2393: 932: 1409:
The contributors to the article continually strive to adhere to these to the letter. Also, splitting the article into sub-articles is governed by the
1394: 2100: 2080: 1854: 1401: 1619:
So in your opinion editors are supposed to not use their brain, ignore facts and delegate their thinking to so called reliable sources? Great idea!
1317: 2148: 381: 329: 2443: 2398: 1577:
say (this is how we determine more or less everything on Knowledge). They're pretty clear. Ufology is a field dominated by fringe/pseudoscience.
841: 2383: 2188: 908: 2272: 2171: 450:, but which some critics allege to be pseudoscience, may contain information to that effect, but generally should not be so characterized. 2423: 2408: 2388: 2363: 1146: 1029: 674: 1669:
Intelligence is also irrelevant to this then? lol. that's what I meant about some people here expecting editors to not use their brains.
2378: 2029: 1380: 832: 812: 779: 92: 2333: 2152: 2463: 2413: 2368: 1307: 1209: 1071: 1695: 2343: 2323: 2257: 903: 880: 2433: 1001: 480: 1387: 1945: 1121: 650: 98: 57: 181: 2418: 2403: 2358: 1681: 1664: 755: 279: 1862: 1638: 148: 2373: 997: 2438: 2005: 1873: 1825: 1810: 1796: 1782: 1768: 1744: 1721: 1628: 1614: 1600: 1586: 1568: 1554: 1428:
Tempers can and have flared here. All contributors are asked to please respect Knowledge's policy No Personal Attacks (
1357: 1283: 523: 377: 43: 2458: 532: 2108: 2088: 2023: 1111: 1062: 1005: 988: 965: 840:
related articles on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
649:
related articles on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
629: 606: 536: 203: 2126: 1591:
there's fringe/pseudoscience in every field, such as vaccinology. is Vaccinology considered fringe/pseudoscience?
2428: 2328: 746: 707: 496: 484: 394: 112: 142: 117: 33: 2095: 2073: 1274: 1235: 267: 263: 259: 255: 251: 247: 243: 87: 2221: 2077: 1806: 1778: 1740: 1691: 1677: 1624: 1596: 1564: 1527: 1347: 581: 348: 317: 239: 235: 231: 227: 223: 219: 215: 211: 207: 2284: 1447: 138: 2288: 1497: 1193: 1067: 347:
may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the
78: 344: 198: 1700:
Yes. Knowledge is based on appeals to authority, by design. That is the essence of our core policies,
539:. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about 1941: 188: 1672:
Aren't you just appealing to authority and pretending that your approach is science and fact based?
2049: 1773:
you don't make any sense man. read what you write first. you don't know what you're talking about.
544: 1686:
I ask everyone to not make this personal and stay on subject. This is all to improve the article.
1282:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
754:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
2204:
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between
1967: 1955: 1802: 1774: 1736: 1687: 1673: 1620: 1592: 1560: 1523: 502: 122: 1356:. That's OK — everybody does it! You'll find a list of a few common ones you might try to avoid 2032:
guideline, it is better to use a more accurate language rather than pseudoscientific one. So,
336: 2184: 2176: 2114: 2019: 1918: 1660: 1000:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, you can edit the attached article, help with
587: 2304: 2122: 2104: 2084: 2001: 1937: 1858: 1635: 837: 154: 8: 2159: 1987: 1963: 1914: 1894: 558: 340: 68: 1932:, seeing that that page is dedicated to the specific pseudoscientific claims instead of 1498:
https://en.wikipedia.org/User_talk:Lonestar-physicist#Introduction_to_contentious_topics
2300: 2138: 1979: 1906: 1410: 83: 2268: 1821: 1792: 1764: 1717: 1610: 1582: 1550: 1454: 1103: 490: 64: 2292: 2243: 2233: 2195:
Wiki Education assignment: Research Process and Methodology - SP24 - Sect 201 - Thu
2180: 2167: 2061: 2041: 2037: 2015: 2011: 1971: 1925: 1910: 1656: 174: 2118: 1997: 1975: 1959: 420:
Theories which, while purporting to be scientific, are obviously bogus, such as
2069: 1422: 1372: 1368: 1266: 738: 447: 325: 2052:
is better to classified as scientific speculative rather than pseudoscience.
722: 701: 290: 2312: 2296: 2057: 1701: 1433: 1429: 1418: 642: 638: 621: 600: 540: 528: 398: 321: 37: 2264: 1817: 1788: 1760: 1756: 1755:- This is why we rely on experts (that is, reliable sources as laid out in 1713: 1709: 1606: 1578: 1574: 1546: 505:
when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information.
1250: 1229: 2287:
recent edit. The removal based on the edit summary appears incorrect, if
2229: 2217: 2163: 2033: 1983: 1951: 1933: 1929: 1882: 1705: 1494:
I recently got a notification on my talkpage when I edited this article.
895: 874: 294: 1655:
because of one measurement of a speed value above c. Mistakes happen. --
1201: 1185: 295: 2065: 1890: 1537:
Governments get mislead by pseudoscience all the time. See for example
1478: 1116: 1115:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to 993: 646: 424:, may be so labeled and categorized as such without more justification. 380:
ruled on guidelines for the presentation of topics as pseudoscience in
309: 1260: 2053: 1886: 751: 434: 421: 2200: 1468:
Should UFO still be categorized as Pseudoscience and fringe science?
824: 806: 1352: 292: 1350:
to Knowledge and this article may find that it's easy to commit a
980: 959: 732: 2278: 2045: 1902: 1898: 1733: 1542: 1279: 634: 992:, which aims to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to the 1801:
if you can't act as a grown up, please go play somewhere else.
296: 1878:
I understand that the list for pseudoscience's is a quote,
2349:
Knowledge level-4 vital articles in Philosophy and religion
1087: 1056: 2295:
then then logic goes that it is not scientifically valid.
335:
Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the
2319:
Pseudoscience articles under contentious topics procedure
1539:
National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health
1508: 320:
procedure applies to this page. This page is related to
1726:
appeal to authority is a fallacy according to wikipedia
173: 2113:
The gist is that we (meaning Wikipedians) aren't the
1573:
We determine it by following what the best available
446:
Theories which have a substantial following, such as
1278:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 1256: 1093: 836:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 750:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 728: 633:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 372:
Arbitration Ruling on the Treatment of Pseudoscience
28: 2339:
Knowledge vital articles in Philosophy and religion
1605:We don't have reliable sources that say so, so no. 1924:but should the link for creationism be changed to 2354:B-Class vital articles in Philosophy and religion 2030:Knowledge:Neutral_point_of_view/FAQ#Pseudoscience 1008:, where you can join the project and discussions. 2310: 1734:https://en.wikipedia.org/Argument_from_authority 1652:And what makes you think you're more intelligent 382:Knowledge:Requests for arbitration/Pseudoscience 46:for general discussion of the article's subject. 2014:), so there is no good reason to replace it. -- 2263:No, in this case 'unfalisifiable' is correct. 2449:Mid-importance philosophy of science articles 187: 1634:And yes, that's what reliable sources say. 1505:this is from AARO website published today: 390:Neutral point of view as applied to science 1730:claim is true, as authorities can be wrong 1375:that apply directly to this article are: 850:Knowledge:WikiProject Alternative medicine 2454:Philosophy of science task force articles 2394:Top-importance Alternative Views articles 1816:to take the last word if you require it. 853:Template:WikiProject Alternative medicine 433:Theories which have a following, such as 917:Knowledge:WikiProject Alternative Views 556: 2444:B-Class philosophy of science articles 2399:WikiProject Alternative Views articles 2311: 2145:2A00:23C6:F680:2C01:D843:9A0C:FCCA:F08 1125:about philosophy content on Knowledge. 986:This article falls under the scope of 920:Template:WikiProject Alternative Views 2384:B-Class Alternative medicine articles 2250:2607:D580:30:7B00:C88D:C3AD:FAF8:987A 384:. The final decision was as follows: 2056:is better classified as traditional 1477:Socks don't get to start threads -- 1333: 1272:This article is within the scope of 1109:This article is within the scope of 901:This article is within the scope of 830:This article is within the scope of 744:This article is within the scope of 627:This article is within the scope of 552: 510: 467: 455:Alternative theoretical formulations 357: 304: 15: 36:for discussing improvements to the 13: 2424:Mid-importance Philosophy articles 2409:Top-importance paranormal articles 2389:B-Class Alternative Views articles 2364:Top-importance Skepticism articles 2209: 2205: 1395:NPOV: Making necessary assumptions 1200: 1184: 429:Generally considered pseudoscience 361: 14: 2475: 2379:Mid-importance sociology articles 2248:Should be falsifiable I believe. 1954:has sections on different types. 2334:Knowledge level-4 vital articles 2212:. Further details are available 2199: 1752:when the opinion of a non-expert 1259: 1249: 1228: 1131:Knowledge:WikiProject Philosophy 1096: 1086: 1055: 1014:Knowledge:WikiProject Paranormal 979: 958: 894: 873: 833:WikiProject Alternative medicine 823: 805: 731: 721: 700: 659:Knowledge:WikiProject Skepticism 620: 599: 566: 557: 514: 471: 308: 278: 58:Click here to start a new topic. 2464:Top-importance science articles 2414:WikiProject Paranormal articles 2369:WikiProject Skepticism articles 1936:, which is more philosophical. 1874:Creationism vs Creation Science 1448:Knowledge:Words to avoid#Theory 1312:This article has been rated as 1151:This article has been rated as 1134:Template:WikiProject Philosophy 1034:This article has been rated as 1017:Template:WikiProject Paranormal 937:This article has been rated as 784:This article has been rated as 764:Knowledge:WikiProject Sociology 679:This article has been rated as 662:Template:WikiProject Skepticism 495:Content must be written from a 479:The subject of this article is 395:Knowledge:Neutral point of view 2344:B-Class level-4 vital articles 2324:Knowledge controversial topics 767:Template:WikiProject Sociology 586:It is of interest to multiple 1: 2434:Mid-importance logic articles 2228:— Assignment last updated by 2096:Ten percent of the brain myth 2074:Ten percent of the brain myth 2024:05:53, 9 September 2023 (UTC) 2006:04:52, 9 September 2023 (UTC) 1946:05:47, 5 September 2023 (UTC) 1432:) and to abide by consensus ( 1402:NPOV: Giving "equal validity" 1292:Knowledge:WikiProject Science 1286:and see a list of open tasks. 904:WikiProject Alternative views 856:Alternative medicine articles 844:and see a list of open tasks. 758:and see a list of open tasks. 653:and see a list of open tasks. 527:for general discussion about 349:contentious topics procedures 55:Put new text under old text. 2078:Neuro-linguistic programming 2064:rather than pseudoscience. 2044:rather than pseudoscience. 1295:Template:WikiProject Science 7: 2419:B-Class Philosophy articles 2404:B-Class paranormal articles 2359:B-Class Skepticism articles 2305:14:53, 14 August 2024 (UTC) 2289:race (human categorization) 2117:who establish demarcation. 2040:is better to classified as 1826:19:23, 31 August 2023 (UTC) 1811:19:20, 31 August 2023 (UTC) 1797:19:18, 31 August 2023 (UTC) 1787:Right back at you, my man. 1783:19:17, 31 August 2023 (UTC) 1769:19:16, 31 August 2023 (UTC) 1745:19:06, 31 August 2023 (UTC) 1722:18:48, 31 August 2023 (UTC) 1696:18:43, 31 August 2023 (UTC) 1682:18:41, 31 August 2023 (UTC) 1665:18:14, 31 August 2023 (UTC) 1639:18:13, 31 August 2023 (UTC) 1629:18:09, 31 August 2023 (UTC) 1615:18:08, 31 August 2023 (UTC) 1601:18:07, 31 August 2023 (UTC) 1587:17:40, 31 August 2023 (UTC) 1569:17:25, 31 August 2023 (UTC) 1555:17:17, 31 August 2023 (UTC) 1532:17:08, 31 August 2023 (UTC) 1486:19:43, 31 August 2023 (UTC) 1340:Please read before starting 489:When updating the article, 63:New to Knowledge? Welcome! 10: 2480: 2374:B-Class sociology articles 2273:12:25, 1 August 2024 (UTC) 2258:10:18, 1 August 2024 (UTC) 2238:01:44, 14 April 2024 (UTC) 2189:13:43, 11 March 2024 (UTC) 2172:22:19, 10 March 2024 (UTC) 2153:19:56, 10 March 2024 (UTC) 2127:18:59, 5 August 2024 (UTC) 2109:08:26, 5 August 2024 (UTC) 2089:07:52, 5 August 2024 (UTC) 1915:Velikovskian catastrophism 1863:07:40, 5 August 2024 (UTC) 1318:project's importance scale 1157:project's importance scale 1040:project's importance scale 943:project's importance scale 923:Alternative Views articles 790:project's importance scale 685:project's importance scale 2439:Logic task force articles 1421:) and Cite Your Sources ( 1311: 1244: 1208: 1192: 1167: 1163: 1150: 1081: 1033: 974: 936: 889: 818: 783: 716: 678: 615: 594: 491:be bold, but not reckless 351:before editing this page. 93:Be welcoming to newcomers 22:Skip to table of contents 2459:B-Class science articles 2068:is better classified as 2050:ancient astronaut theory 1919:climate change denialism 1907:ancient astronaut theory 376:In December of 2006 the 345:normal editorial process 21: 1968:Progressive creationism 1956:Young Earth creationism 1371:). The sections of the 1168:Associated task forces: 332:as a contentious topic. 2429:B-Class logic articles 2329:B-Class vital articles 1990:are all pseudoscience. 1205: 1189: 1112:WikiProject Philosophy 989:WikiProject Paranormal 630:WikiProject Skepticism 483:and content may be in 366: 341:standards of behaviour 88:avoid personal attacks 2216:. Student editor(s): 2177:Climate change denial 1921:are pseudosciences." 1750:is a form of fallacy 1509:https://www.aaro.mil/ 1365:Neutral Point of View 1210:Philosophy of science 1204: 1188: 747:WikiProject Sociology 573:level-4 vital article 497:neutral point of view 416:Obvious pseudoscience 406:Serious encyclopedias 378:Arbitration Committee 365: 272:Auto-archiving period 113:Neutral point of view 2179:is pseudoscience. -- 847:Alternative medicine 838:Alternative medicine 813:Alternative medicine 531:. Any such comments 442:Questionable science 337:purpose of Knowledge 118:No original research 1988:Omphalos hypothesis 1964:Day-age creationism 1911:Holocaust denialism 1895:Kirlian photography 1381:NPOV: Pseudoscience 1275:WikiProject Science 1137:Philosophy articles 1020:paranormal articles 665:Skepticism articles 2214:on the course page 1980:Intelligent design 1803:Lonestar-physicist 1775:Lonestar-physicist 1737:Lonestar-physicist 1688:Lonestar-physicist 1674:Lonestar-physicist 1621:Lonestar-physicist 1593:Lonestar-physicist 1561:Lonestar-physicist 1524:Lonestar-physicist 1388:NPOV: Undue weight 1206: 1190: 1122:general discussion 770:sociology articles 582:content assessment 526: 367: 318:contentious topics 99:dispute resolution 60: 1870: 1869: 1636:Black Kite (talk) 1463: 1462: 1440:Notes to editors: 1332: 1331: 1328: 1327: 1324: 1323: 1223: 1222: 1219: 1218: 1215: 1214: 1104:Philosophy portal 1050: 1049: 1046: 1045: 953: 952: 949: 948: 914:Alternative Views 881:Alternative Views 868: 867: 864: 863: 800: 799: 796: 795: 695: 694: 691: 690: 551: 550: 522: 509: 508: 466: 465: 356: 355: 328:, which has been 303: 302: 79:Assume good faith 56: 27: 26: 2471: 2293:social construct 2240: 2222:article contribs 2211: 2207: 2203: 2062:pseudopsychology 2042:religious belief 2038:Creation Science 1972:Creation science 1926:Creation Science 1575:reliable sources 1483: 1473: 1472: 1334: 1300: 1299: 1298:science articles 1296: 1293: 1290: 1269: 1264: 1263: 1253: 1246: 1245: 1240: 1232: 1225: 1224: 1175: 1165: 1164: 1139: 1138: 1135: 1132: 1129: 1106: 1101: 1100: 1099: 1090: 1083: 1082: 1077: 1074: 1059: 1052: 1051: 1022: 1021: 1018: 1015: 1012: 983: 976: 975: 970: 962: 955: 954: 925: 924: 921: 918: 915: 898: 891: 890: 885: 877: 870: 869: 858: 857: 854: 851: 848: 827: 820: 819: 809: 802: 801: 772: 771: 768: 765: 762: 741: 736: 735: 725: 718: 717: 712: 704: 697: 696: 667: 666: 663: 660: 657: 624: 617: 616: 611: 603: 596: 595: 579: 570: 569: 562: 561: 553: 518: 517: 511: 475: 474: 468: 364: 358: 312: 305: 297: 283: 282: 273: 192: 191: 177: 108:Article policies 29: 16: 2479: 2478: 2474: 2473: 2472: 2470: 2469: 2468: 2309: 2308: 2281: 2246: 2227: 2197: 2141: 2139:Climate science 1976:Neo-creationism 1960:Gap creationism 1938:Chip K. Daniels 1876: 1871: 1488: 1479: 1470: 1411:Content forking 1297: 1294: 1291: 1288: 1287: 1265: 1258: 1238: 1173: 1136: 1133: 1130: 1127: 1126: 1102: 1097: 1095: 1075: 1065: 1019: 1016: 1013: 1010: 1009: 1004:, or visit the 968: 922: 919: 916: 913: 912: 883: 855: 852: 849: 846: 845: 769: 766: 763: 760: 759: 737: 730: 710: 664: 661: 658: 655: 654: 609: 580:on Knowledge's 577: 567: 515: 472: 462: 461: 373: 362: 339:, any expected 299: 298: 293: 270: 134: 129: 128: 127: 104: 74: 12: 11: 5: 2477: 2467: 2466: 2461: 2456: 2451: 2446: 2441: 2436: 2431: 2426: 2421: 2416: 2411: 2406: 2401: 2396: 2391: 2386: 2381: 2376: 2371: 2366: 2361: 2356: 2351: 2346: 2341: 2336: 2331: 2326: 2321: 2280: 2277: 2276: 2275: 2245: 2242: 2196: 2193: 2192: 2191: 2174: 2140: 2137: 2136: 2135: 2134: 2133: 2132: 2131: 2130: 2129: 2091: 2070:pseudomedicine 1992: 1991: 1875: 1872: 1868: 1867: 1866: 1865: 1850: 1849: 1848: 1847: 1846: 1845: 1844: 1843: 1842: 1841: 1840: 1839: 1838: 1837: 1836: 1835: 1834: 1833: 1832: 1831: 1830: 1829: 1828: 1731: 1727: 1670: 1649: 1648: 1647: 1646: 1645: 1644: 1643: 1642: 1641: 1490: 1489: 1476: 1471: 1469: 1466: 1461: 1460: 1459: 1458: 1455:edit summaries 1451: 1407: 1406: 1398: 1391: 1384: 1337: 1330: 1329: 1326: 1325: 1322: 1321: 1314:Top-importance 1310: 1304: 1303: 1301: 1284:the discussion 1271: 1270: 1267:Science portal 1254: 1242: 1241: 1239:Top‑importance 1233: 1221: 1220: 1217: 1216: 1213: 1212: 1207: 1197: 1196: 1191: 1181: 1180: 1178: 1176: 1170: 1169: 1161: 1160: 1153:Mid-importance 1149: 1143: 1142: 1140: 1108: 1107: 1091: 1079: 1078: 1076:Mid‑importance 1060: 1048: 1047: 1044: 1043: 1036:Top-importance 1032: 1026: 1025: 1023: 998:related topics 984: 972: 971: 969:Top‑importance 963: 951: 950: 947: 946: 939:Top-importance 935: 929: 928: 926: 899: 887: 886: 884:Top‑importance 878: 866: 865: 862: 861: 859: 842:the discussion 828: 816: 815: 810: 798: 797: 794: 793: 786:Mid-importance 782: 776: 775: 773: 756:the discussion 743: 742: 739:Society portal 726: 714: 713: 711:Mid‑importance 705: 693: 692: 689: 688: 681:Top-importance 677: 671: 670: 668: 651:the discussion 625: 613: 612: 610:Top‑importance 604: 592: 591: 585: 563: 549: 548: 545:Reference desk 533:may be removed 519: 507: 506: 476: 464: 463: 460: 459: 451: 448:psychoanalysis 438: 425: 412: 402: 374: 371: 370: 368: 354: 353: 326:fringe science 313: 301: 300: 291: 289: 288: 285: 284: 194: 193: 131: 130: 126: 125: 120: 115: 106: 105: 103: 102: 95: 90: 81: 75: 73: 72: 61: 52: 51: 48: 47: 41: 25: 24: 19: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 2476: 2465: 2462: 2460: 2457: 2455: 2452: 2450: 2447: 2445: 2442: 2440: 2437: 2435: 2432: 2430: 2427: 2425: 2422: 2420: 2417: 2415: 2412: 2410: 2407: 2405: 2402: 2400: 2397: 2395: 2392: 2390: 2387: 2385: 2382: 2380: 2377: 2375: 2372: 2370: 2367: 2365: 2362: 2360: 2357: 2355: 2352: 2350: 2347: 2345: 2342: 2340: 2337: 2335: 2332: 2330: 2327: 2325: 2322: 2320: 2317: 2316: 2314: 2307: 2306: 2302: 2298: 2294: 2290: 2286: 2274: 2270: 2266: 2262: 2261: 2260: 2259: 2255: 2251: 2244:Unfalsifiable 2241: 2239: 2235: 2231: 2225: 2223: 2219: 2215: 2202: 2190: 2186: 2182: 2178: 2175: 2173: 2169: 2165: 2161: 2157: 2156: 2155: 2154: 2150: 2146: 2128: 2124: 2120: 2116: 2112: 2111: 2110: 2106: 2102: 2097: 2092: 2090: 2086: 2082: 2079: 2075: 2071: 2067: 2063: 2059: 2058:superstitions 2055: 2051: 2047: 2043: 2039: 2035: 2031: 2028:According to 2027: 2026: 2025: 2021: 2017: 2013: 2009: 2008: 2007: 2003: 1999: 1994: 1993: 1989: 1985: 1981: 1977: 1973: 1969: 1965: 1961: 1957: 1953: 1950: 1949: 1948: 1947: 1943: 1939: 1935: 1931: 1927: 1922: 1920: 1916: 1912: 1908: 1904: 1900: 1896: 1892: 1888: 1884: 1879: 1864: 1860: 1856: 1851: 1827: 1823: 1819: 1814: 1813: 1812: 1808: 1804: 1800: 1799: 1798: 1794: 1790: 1786: 1785: 1784: 1780: 1776: 1772: 1771: 1770: 1766: 1762: 1758: 1754: 1753: 1748: 1747: 1746: 1742: 1738: 1735: 1732: 1728: 1725: 1724: 1723: 1719: 1715: 1711: 1707: 1703: 1699: 1698: 1697: 1693: 1689: 1685: 1684: 1683: 1679: 1675: 1671: 1668: 1667: 1666: 1662: 1658: 1653: 1650: 1640: 1637: 1632: 1631: 1630: 1626: 1622: 1618: 1617: 1616: 1612: 1608: 1604: 1603: 1602: 1598: 1594: 1590: 1589: 1588: 1584: 1580: 1576: 1572: 1571: 1570: 1566: 1562: 1558: 1557: 1556: 1552: 1548: 1544: 1540: 1536: 1535: 1534: 1533: 1529: 1525: 1519: 1518: 1514: 1511: 1510: 1506: 1503: 1500: 1499: 1495: 1492: 1491: 1487: 1484: 1482: 1475: 1474: 1465: 1456: 1452: 1449: 1444: 1443: 1442: 1441: 1437: 1435: 1431: 1426: 1424: 1420: 1414: 1412: 1405: 1403: 1399: 1397: 1396: 1392: 1390: 1389: 1385: 1383: 1382: 1378: 1377: 1376: 1374: 1370: 1366: 1361: 1359: 1355: 1354: 1349: 1345: 1341: 1338: 1336: 1335: 1319: 1315: 1309: 1306: 1305: 1302: 1285: 1281: 1277: 1276: 1268: 1262: 1257: 1255: 1252: 1248: 1247: 1243: 1237: 1234: 1231: 1227: 1226: 1211: 1203: 1199: 1198: 1195: 1187: 1183: 1182: 1179: 1177: 1172: 1171: 1166: 1162: 1158: 1154: 1148: 1145: 1144: 1141: 1124: 1123: 1118: 1114: 1113: 1105: 1094: 1092: 1089: 1085: 1084: 1080: 1073: 1069: 1064: 1061: 1058: 1054: 1053: 1041: 1037: 1031: 1028: 1027: 1024: 1007: 1003: 1002:current tasks 999: 995: 991: 990: 985: 982: 978: 977: 973: 967: 964: 961: 957: 956: 944: 940: 934: 931: 930: 927: 910: 906: 905: 900: 897: 893: 892: 888: 882: 879: 876: 872: 871: 860: 843: 839: 835: 834: 829: 826: 822: 821: 817: 814: 811: 808: 804: 803: 791: 787: 781: 778: 777: 774: 757: 753: 749: 748: 740: 734: 729: 727: 724: 720: 719: 715: 709: 706: 703: 699: 698: 686: 682: 676: 673: 672: 669: 652: 648: 644: 643:pseudohistory 640: 639:pseudoscience 636: 632: 631: 626: 623: 619: 618: 614: 608: 605: 602: 598: 597: 593: 589: 583: 575: 574: 564: 560: 555: 554: 546: 542: 541:Pseudoscience 538: 534: 530: 529:Pseudoscience 525: 521:This page is 520: 513: 512: 504: 500: 498: 492: 488: 486: 482: 481:controversial 477: 470: 469: 457: 456: 452: 449: 445: 443: 439: 436: 432: 430: 426: 423: 419: 417: 413: 409: 407: 403: 400: 399:pseudoscience 396: 393: 391: 387: 386: 385: 383: 379: 369: 360: 359: 352: 350: 346: 342: 338: 333: 331: 327: 323: 322:pseudoscience 319: 314: 311: 307: 306: 287: 286: 281: 277: 269: 265: 261: 257: 253: 249: 245: 241: 237: 233: 229: 225: 221: 217: 213: 209: 205: 202: 200: 196: 195: 190: 186: 183: 180: 176: 172: 168: 165: 162: 159: 156: 153: 150: 147: 144: 140: 137: 136:Find sources: 133: 132: 124: 123:Verifiability 121: 119: 116: 114: 111: 110: 109: 100: 96: 94: 91: 89: 85: 82: 80: 77: 76: 70: 66: 65:Learn to edit 62: 59: 54: 53: 50: 49: 45: 39: 38:Pseudoscience 35: 31: 30: 23: 20: 18: 17: 2291:is merely a 2282: 2247: 2226: 2206:4 March 2024 2198: 2160:WP:NOTAFORUM 2158:No. And see 2142: 1928:rather than 1923: 1880: 1877: 1751: 1749: 1651: 1520: 1515: 1512: 1507: 1504: 1501: 1496: 1493: 1480: 1464: 1439: 1438: 1427: 1415: 1413:guidelines. 1408: 1400: 1393: 1386: 1379: 1364: 1362: 1351: 1346: 1342: 1339: 1313: 1273: 1152: 1120: 1110: 1035: 1006:project page 987: 938: 902: 831: 785: 745: 680: 628: 588:WikiProjects 571: 494: 478: 453: 440: 427: 414: 404: 388: 375: 334: 315: 275: 197: 184: 178: 170: 163: 157: 151: 145: 135: 107: 32:This is the 2181:Hob Gadling 2115:authorities 2034:Creationism 2016:Hob Gadling 1984:Geocentrism 1952:Creationism 1934:Creationism 1930:Creationism 1883:creationism 1657:Hob Gadling 1453:Please use 524:not a forum 161:free images 44:not a forum 2313:Categories 2210:4 May 2024 2119:tgeorgescu 2101:Cloud29371 2081:Cloud29371 2066:Homeopathy 1998:Handpigdad 1891:homeopathy 1855:Cloud29371 1128:Philosophy 1117:philosophy 1063:Philosophy 1011:Paranormal 994:paranormal 966:Paranormal 909:discussion 656:Skepticism 647:skepticism 607:Skepticism 537:refactored 330:designated 2054:Astrology 2012:WP:THREAD 1887:astrology 1348:Newcomers 761:Sociology 752:sociology 708:Sociology 576:is rated 503:citations 435:astrology 422:Time Cube 343:, or any 101:if needed 84:Be polite 34:talk page 2297:Gotitbro 1367:policy ( 1353:faux pas 501:Include 199:Archives 69:get help 42:This is 40:article. 2265:MrOllie 2046:Ufology 1903:ufology 1899:dowsing 1818:MrOllie 1789:MrOllie 1761:MrOllie 1714:MrOllie 1712:, etc. 1607:MrOllie 1579:MrOllie 1547:MrOllie 1543:ADE 651 1541:or the 1423:WP:CITE 1373:WP:NPOV 1369:WP:NPOV 1316:on the 1289:Science 1280:Science 1236:Science 1155:on the 1072:Science 1038:on the 941:on the 788:on the 683:on the 635:science 578:B-class 543:at the 485:dispute 276:60 days 167:WP refs 155:scholar 2283:About 2230:Sj4452 2218:Sj4452 2164:HiLo48 1917:, and 1881:"that 1702:WP:NOR 1434:WP:CON 1430:WP:NPA 1419:WP:NOR 584:scale. 139:Google 2076:, or 1757:WP:RS 1710:WP:RS 1481:Ponyo 1194:Logic 1068:Logic 565:This 411:work. 204:Index 182:JSTOR 143:books 97:Seek 2301:talk 2285:this 2279:Race 2269:talk 2254:talk 2234:talk 2208:and 2185:talk 2168:talk 2149:talk 2123:talk 2105:talk 2085:talk 2048:and 2036:and 2020:talk 2002:talk 1942:talk 1859:talk 1822:talk 1807:talk 1793:talk 1779:talk 1765:talk 1741:talk 1718:talk 1706:WP:V 1692:talk 1678:talk 1661:talk 1625:talk 1611:talk 1597:talk 1583:talk 1565:talk 1551:talk 1545:. - 1528:talk 1358:here 996:and 645:and 324:and 316:The 175:FENS 149:news 86:and 2224:). 2125:) 2060:or 1759:). 1436:). 1425:). 1308:Top 1147:Mid 1030:Top 933:Top 780:Mid 675:Top 535:or 189:TWL 2315:: 2303:) 2271:) 2256:) 2236:) 2187:) 2170:) 2162:. 2151:) 2107:) 2087:) 2022:) 2004:) 1986:, 1982:, 1978:, 1974:, 1970:, 1966:, 1962:, 1958:, 1944:) 1913:, 1909:, 1905:, 1901:, 1897:, 1893:, 1889:, 1885:, 1861:) 1824:) 1809:) 1795:) 1781:) 1767:) 1743:) 1720:) 1708:, 1704:, 1694:) 1680:) 1663:) 1627:) 1613:) 1599:) 1585:) 1567:) 1553:) 1530:) 1360:. 1174:/ 1070:/ 1066:: 641:, 637:, 274:: 268:16 266:, 264:15 262:, 260:14 258:, 256:13 254:, 252:12 250:, 248:11 246:, 244:10 242:, 238:, 234:, 230:, 226:, 222:, 218:, 214:, 210:, 206:, 169:) 67:; 2299:( 2267:( 2252:( 2232:( 2220:( 2183:( 2166:( 2147:( 2121:( 2103:( 2083:( 2018:( 2000:( 1940:( 1857:( 1820:( 1805:( 1791:( 1777:( 1763:( 1739:( 1716:( 1690:( 1676:( 1659:( 1623:( 1609:( 1595:( 1581:( 1563:( 1549:( 1526:( 1457:. 1450:. 1417:( 1404:. 1320:. 1159:. 1042:. 945:. 911:. 792:. 687:. 590:. 547:. 499:. 487:. 444:: 431:: 418:: 408:: 401:. 392:: 240:9 236:8 232:7 228:6 224:5 220:4 216:3 212:2 208:1 201:: 185:· 179:· 171:· 164:· 158:· 152:· 146:· 141:( 71:.

Index

Skip to table of contents
talk page
Pseudoscience
not a forum
Click here to start a new topic.
Learn to edit
get help
Assume good faith
Be polite
avoid personal attacks
Be welcoming to newcomers
dispute resolution
Neutral point of view
No original research
Verifiability
Google
books
news
scholar
free images
WP refs
FENS
JSTOR
TWL
Archives
Index
1
2
3
4

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑