423:
444:
377:
352:
282:
264:
233:
292:
551:
It is necessary that Van Lommel's research on NDE is mentioned with primary source. The article mentioned (september 18, 2017) only a critical reaction to his theory without explaining his research (that was published in the Lancet) on which Van Lommel's theory is based. I added Van Lommel's research
531:
Is this the opinion of neurobiologist Dick Swaab? In that case the opinion should be articulated more specifically, preferably backed up by the complete reference. The statement, as it is formulated in the text, is a bit diffuse. It would be perhaps be better to write: "according to Swaab Van Lommel
602:
There is more input on wikipedia from science adherents that have a materialistic view of the world. It lacks input from science adherents from other side of the argument, of which there are many. Pseudoscience is an overused and pejorative term devised by those people involved in science that have
708:
This article does not present a biography of Pim Van Lommel which is what one should expect from any encyclopaedia worthy of the name. Most of the content of the article seems focused on "debunking" Pim Van Lommel without even outlining the main points of the study published in the Lancet that he
625:
You're probably not coming back here again to read this, but I would like to point out that
Knowledge is an encyclopedia, that per definition summarizes mainstream scientific theory. However, I do agree that the criticism levelled in the article is vague and too generalizing. As it reads now, van
597:
731:
I agree. The information listed for Van Lommel does not square with other entries which include more biographical information, work history, and contributions. Instead, it is a landing page for his critics to post their opinions at best.
552:
with a fair explanation with reference to the primary source (article in The Lancet). Someone deleted my text, but that is not fair because information on Van Lommel's research is essential in a encyclopedia article on 'Pim van Lommel'.
720:
153:
724:
618:
634:
is part of the surname) looks like merely an author of pseudoscientific theories without any academic credibility. This is not accurate. His reputation has two sides to it.--
716:
147:
680:
751:
614:
654:
the sscientist affirms the relation among consciousness and the brain shall be discussed another time. That would have relevantr implication on the concept of
200:) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or
506:
212:
737:
559:
694:
645:
733:
741:
684:
772:
217:
792:
496:
79:
591:
797:
787:
309:, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Knowledge's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to
782:
777:
690:
I do agree this article was very bias and the person who wrote these biased claims seems to copy and pasted it from this article
310:
192:
44:
702:
472:
168:
85:
383:
357:
314:
135:
676:
571:
747:
610:
318:
30:
567:
541:
471:
related articles on
Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
451:
428:
546:
755:
305:
269:
99:
129:
104:
20:
651:
528:"Van Lommel deviates from the scientific approach and his book can only be categorized as pseudoscientific".
74:
523:
244:
125:
582:. It should be possible to summarise some more of PvL's ideas using the existing sources in the article.
65:
175:
641:
211:. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to
232:
215:.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see
201:
109:
598:
The wikipedia page is biased and edited by science adherents with fixed ideas. It lacks balance.
532:
deviates from the scientific approach and his book can only be categorized as pseudoscientific".
563:
250:
141:
712:
672:
666:
636:
606:
555:
388:
362:
8:
698:
55:
70:
587:
51:
297:
161:
659:
537:
208:
24:
766:
464:
460:
443:
422:
583:
579:
578:
We generally only report what secondary sources say. Doing otherwise risks
655:
691:
662:
533:
468:
376:
351:
317:. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the
281:
263:
456:
207:
from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially
603:
limited view of the world and a bias that is unscientific.
160:
455:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
287:
15:
764:
386:, a project which is currently considered to be
33:for general discussion of the article's subject.
174:
230:
717:2403:6200:8856:E04C:7C91:F907:9CD6:742E
765:
692:https://alchetron.com/Pim-van-Lommel
449:This article is within the scope of
398:Knowledge:WikiProject Parapsychology
382:This article is within the scope of
303:This article is within the scope of
226:
184:
773:Biography articles of living people
401:Template:WikiProject Parapsychology
23:for discussing improvements to the
13:
793:Low-importance Skepticism articles
14:
809:
626:Lommel (please don't just write
481:Knowledge:WikiProject Skepticism
442:
421:
375:
350:
290:
280:
262:
231:
190:This article must adhere to the
45:Click here to start a new topic.
798:WikiProject Skepticism articles
788:Start-Class Skepticism articles
501:This article has been rated as
484:Template:WikiProject Skepticism
327:Knowledge:WikiProject Biography
783:WikiProject Biography articles
778:Start-Class biography articles
742:15:17, 15 September 2023 (UTC)
709:later developed in his book.
592:16:52, 18 September 2017 (UTC)
572:16:50, 18 September 2017 (UTC)
330:Template:WikiProject Biography
249:It is of interest to multiple
1:
756:18:18, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
475:and see a list of open tasks.
193:biographies of living persons
42:Put new text under old text.
315:contribute to the discussion
7:
746:i agree with you....shame!
542:11:25, 10 August 2013 (UTC)
205:must be removed immediately
50:New to Knowledge? Welcome!
10:
814:
685:09:36, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
646:16:04, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
619:10:55, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
507:project's importance scale
384:WikiProject Parapsychology
725:10:36, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
703:01:05, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
500:
437:
370:
275:
257:
80:Be welcoming to newcomers
404:Parapsychology articles
669:/Micheledisaveriosp.
452:WikiProject Skepticism
239:This article is rated
75:avoid personal attacks
547:Van Lommel's research
306:WikiProject Biography
100:Neutral point of view
667:user:Philosopher81sp
524:Dick Swaab criticism
105:No original research
487:Skepticism articles
333:biography articles
245:content assessment
86:dispute resolution
47:
727:
715:comment added by
687:
675:comment added by
621:
609:comment added by
580:original research
574:
558:comment added by
521:
520:
517:
516:
513:
512:
416:
415:
412:
411:
345:
344:
341:
340:
225:
224:
183:
182:
66:Assume good faith
43:
805:
710:
670:
665:. Best regards,
658:and the related
644:
639:
604:
553:
489:
488:
485:
482:
479:
446:
439:
438:
433:
425:
418:
417:
406:
405:
402:
399:
396:
379:
372:
371:
366:
354:
347:
346:
335:
334:
331:
328:
325:
311:join the project
300:
298:Biography portal
295:
294:
293:
284:
277:
276:
266:
259:
258:
242:
236:
235:
227:
213:this noticeboard
185:
179:
178:
164:
95:Article policies
16:
813:
812:
808:
807:
806:
804:
803:
802:
763:
762:
638:Farang Rak Tham
637:
635:
600:
549:
526:
486:
483:
480:
477:
476:
431:
403:
400:
397:
394:
393:
360:
332:
329:
326:
323:
322:
296:
291:
289:
243:on Knowledge's
240:
121:
116:
115:
114:
91:
61:
12:
11:
5:
811:
801:
800:
795:
790:
785:
780:
775:
761:
760:
759:
758:
706:
705:
688:
652:this interview
648:
599:
596:
595:
594:
548:
545:
525:
522:
519:
518:
515:
514:
511:
510:
503:Low-importance
499:
493:
492:
490:
473:the discussion
447:
435:
434:
432:Low‑importance
426:
414:
413:
410:
409:
407:
395:Parapsychology
380:
368:
367:
358:Parapsychology
355:
343:
342:
339:
338:
336:
302:
301:
285:
273:
272:
267:
255:
254:
248:
237:
223:
222:
218:this help page
202:poorly sourced
188:
181:
180:
118:
117:
113:
112:
107:
102:
93:
92:
90:
89:
82:
77:
68:
62:
60:
59:
48:
39:
38:
35:
34:
28:
25:Pim van Lommel
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
810:
799:
796:
794:
791:
789:
786:
784:
781:
779:
776:
774:
771:
770:
768:
757:
753:
749:
745:
744:
743:
739:
735:
730:
729:
728:
726:
722:
718:
714:
704:
700:
696:
693:
689:
686:
682:
678:
677:84.223.68.124
674:
668:
664:
661:
657:
653:
649:
647:
643:
640:
633:
629:
624:
623:
622:
620:
616:
612:
608:
593:
589:
585:
581:
577:
576:
575:
573:
569:
565:
561:
557:
544:
543:
539:
535:
529:
508:
504:
498:
495:
494:
491:
474:
470:
466:
465:pseudohistory
462:
461:pseudoscience
458:
454:
453:
448:
445:
441:
440:
436:
430:
427:
424:
420:
419:
408:
391:
390:
385:
381:
378:
374:
373:
369:
364:
359:
356:
353:
349:
348:
337:
320:
319:documentation
316:
312:
308:
307:
299:
288:
286:
283:
279:
278:
274:
271:
268:
265:
261:
260:
256:
252:
246:
238:
234:
229:
228:
220:
219:
214:
210:
206:
203:
199:
195:
194:
189:
187:
186:
177:
173:
170:
167:
163:
159:
155:
152:
149:
146:
143:
140:
137:
134:
131:
127:
124:
123:Find sources:
120:
119:
111:
110:Verifiability
108:
106:
103:
101:
98:
97:
96:
87:
83:
81:
78:
76:
72:
69:
67:
64:
63:
57:
53:
52:Learn to edit
49:
46:
41:
40:
37:
36:
32:
26:
22:
18:
17:
748:81.38.219.71
711:— Preceding
707:
671:— Preceding
631:
627:
611:86.8.144.245
605:— Preceding
601:
554:— Preceding
550:
530:
527:
502:
450:
387:
304:
251:WikiProjects
216:
204:
197:
191:
171:
165:
157:
150:
144:
138:
132:
122:
94:
19:This is the
663:transplants
660:industry of
656:brain death
241:Start-class
148:free images
31:not a forum
767:Categories
560:Perierkeia
478:Skepticism
469:skepticism
429:Skepticism
695:Bofor2544
324:Biography
270:Biography
209:libellous
88:if needed
71:Be polite
21:talk page
713:unsigned
673:unsigned
607:unsigned
568:contribs
556:unsigned
389:inactive
363:inactive
56:get help
29:This is
27:article.
584:Alexbrn
505:on the
457:science
154:WPÂ refs
142:scholar
734:WDWPHD
642:(Talk)
630:, the
628:Lommel
247:scale.
126:Google
534:Hawol
169:JSTOR
130:books
84:Seek
752:talk
738:talk
721:talk
699:talk
681:talk
615:talk
588:talk
564:talk
538:talk
467:and
313:and
162:FENS
136:news
73:and
650:In
632:van
497:Low
198:BLP
176:TWL
769::
754:)
740:)
723:)
701:)
683:)
617:)
590:)
570:)
566:•
540:)
463:,
459:,
156:)
54:;
750:(
736:(
719:(
697:(
679:(
613:(
586:(
562:(
536:(
509:.
392:.
365:)
361:(
321:.
253:.
221:.
196:(
172:·
166:·
158:·
151:·
145:·
139:·
133:·
128:(
58:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
