177:
223:
205:
115:
91:
64:
408:
case of nominating it for deletion I do. Thiarticle was
Prodded because it clearly did not meet the criteria with the sources that were there. this is a community and the idea is to have articles that warrant their place in an encyclopedia. The subject may be notable but if the sources do allow the reader to verify that, then the article does not have its place on Knowledge. i hope you understand what I am getting at.
237:
125:
437:
prod for deletion. My view of what you are about is somewhat clouded by the fact that there are many pages on
Knowledge that do not meet the criteria you are using, but they have passed by the likes of new page reviewers. So you'll have to excuse me if I find your approach a little like trying to close the stable door after the horse has bolted.
364:
the criteria N°3 by conveniently omitting the following phrase "In addition, such work must have been the primary subject of an independent and notable work (for example, a book, film, or television series, but usually not a single episode of a television series) or of multiple independent periodical
451:
Unfortunately I cannot reprod it now you have removed the PROD the next course of action is a delete discussion which can be very quick, which is one of the reasons I chose PROD as that gave you 7 days to improve the article and find the sources. I suggest we take this conversation to your talk page
436:
It's also not simply your view or my view. Like you say, this is a community. I am happy to wait for others to chime in, which is why I posted on the Trains
Project Page. Of course, if you are strongly of the view that this article is not worth keeping, then I would encourage you to re-instate the
407:
hi it's not about whose move it is, it's not a game or a competition. I am a new pages reviewer and when i come across a page that needs attention there are several things that can be done. If I can tidy it up myself I do, if it's just a case of adding sources that I can quickly find I do if it's a
357:
Hi thanks for the advice but I have read the criteria and concerning criteria 1. you may consider as may do lots of other people that this author is an important figure but this is not supported by the sources and this is what is needed. I would love to take your word for it but that's not how it
481:
is that being widely published (as
Schafer is) isn't enough; you need to be cited by others and recognized by peers. Is Schafer? Not on the evidence provided. Morphenniel is certainly correct that many articles fail this test but that has no bearing here; this article stands and falls on its own
507:
Although an author has pretty wide latitude for G7; this nomination strikes me as being in bad faith. The article's creator has also prodded several other articles about authors (railway and otherwise), apparently in reaction to the discussion above. Schafer
541:. This time the author seems to be more notable than Schafer. I've found quite a few sources notably reviews of his books form the Railway and Locomotive Historical Society which seems to be a well respected society.
345:
3. The person has created or played a major role in co-creating a significant or well-known work or collective body of work. Mike
Schafer meets this criteria, per the lengthy list of his published works.
580:
342:
1. The person is regarded as an important figure or is widely cited by peers or successors. Mike
Schafer meets this criteria, and is a widely respected figure in railroad circles.
575:
422:
I have just looked at the source you added which was written by the subject himself so this does not help towards proving his notability. Do you have any other sources?
538:
186:
101:
31:) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or
600:
585:
303:
43:
309:
461:
446:
417:
395:
431:
550:
565:
48:
595:
374:
497:
142:, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Knowledge's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to
590:
143:
23:
570:
605:
326:
147:
523:
151:
275:
271:
138:
96:
267:
258:
210:
71:
42:. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to
502:
46:.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see
32:
477:
I'm familiar with
Schafer's work and I'm not sure if he's notable either. My understanding of
442:
391:
77:
546:
457:
427:
413:
370:
8:
520:
494:
478:
336:
438:
402:
387:
352:
130:
542:
453:
423:
409:
381:
366:
332:
39:
532:
517:
513:
491:
359:
263:
176:
559:
279:
246:
222:
204:
150:. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the
114:
90:
266:
on
Knowledge. If you would like to participate, you can visit the
581:
Unknown-importance biography (arts and entertainment) articles
452:
as I think you need a bit of help that I am willing to offer.
38:
from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially
537:
He's just !voted to speedily delete another of his articles
365:
articles or reviews." this is not supported by the sources.
262:, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to
270:, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the
236:
539:
Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Herbert H. Harwood, Jr.
512:
be notable; the discussion is ongoing. This is classic
576:
Unassessed biography (arts and entertainment) articles
120:
331:The editor that proposed this article for deletion
70:This article has not yet been rated on Knowledge's
308:This article has not yet received a rating on the
557:
386:I've de-proded the article. It's your move.
601:Unknown-importance rail transport articles
586:Arts and entertainment work group articles
63:
61:
558:
187:the arts and entertainment work group
256:This article is within the scope of
136:This article is within the scope of
57:
15:
566:Biography articles of living people
76:It is of interest to the following
13:
596:Unassessed rail transport articles
175:
14:
617:
482:merits. Places to look might be
235:
221:
203:
123:
113:
89:
62:
21:This article must adhere to the
160:Knowledge:WikiProject Biography
591:WikiProject Biography articles
163:Template:WikiProject Biography
1:
571:Unassessed biography articles
486:magazine, or back numbers of
276:WikiProject Trains to do list
184:This article is supported by
24:biographies of living persons
606:All WikiProject Trains pages
327:Article Propose for Deletion
288:Knowledge:WikiProject Trains
148:contribute to the discussion
7:
291:Template:WikiProject Trains
36:must be removed immediately
10:
622:
310:project's importance scale
307:
216:
183:
108:
84:
551:14:08, 8 June 2017 (UTC)
524:12:45, 8 June 2017 (UTC)
498:19:36, 7 June 2017 (UTC)
462:15:24, 7 June 2017 (UTC)
447:15:20, 7 June 2017 (UTC)
432:15:08, 7 June 2017 (UTC)
418:15:06, 7 June 2017 (UTC)
396:11:10, 7 June 2017 (UTC)
375:10:32, 7 June 2017 (UTC)
294:rail transport articles
180:
102:Arts and Entertainment
179:
139:WikiProject Biography
335:, needs to re-read
259:WikiProject Trains
181:
166:biography articles
72:content assessment
324:
323:
320:
319:
316:
315:
254:
253:
198:
197:
194:
193:
56:
55:
613:
536:
488:Railroad History
406:
385:
358:works. You have
356:
296:
295:
292:
289:
286:
239:
230:
229:
225:
218:
217:
207:
200:
199:
168:
167:
164:
161:
158:
144:join the project
133:
131:Biography portal
128:
127:
126:
117:
110:
109:
104:
93:
86:
85:
67:
66:
65:
58:
44:this noticeboard
16:
621:
620:
616:
615:
614:
612:
611:
610:
556:
555:
530:
505:
503:Speedy deletion
400:
379:
350:
329:
293:
290:
287:
284:
283:
255:
241:
240:
165:
162:
159:
156:
155:
129:
124:
122:
99:
12:
11:
5:
619:
609:
608:
603:
598:
593:
588:
583:
578:
573:
568:
554:
553:
504:
501:
475:
474:
473:
472:
471:
470:
469:
468:
467:
466:
465:
464:
328:
325:
322:
321:
318:
317:
314:
313:
306:
300:
299:
297:
264:rail transport
252:
251:
242:
234:
233:
228:
226:
214:
213:
208:
196:
195:
192:
191:
182:
172:
171:
169:
135:
134:
118:
106:
105:
94:
82:
81:
75:
68:
54:
53:
49:this help page
33:poorly sourced
19:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
618:
607:
604:
602:
599:
597:
594:
592:
589:
587:
584:
582:
579:
577:
574:
572:
569:
567:
564:
563:
561:
552:
548:
544:
540:
534:
528:
527:
526:
525:
522:
519:
515:
511:
500:
499:
496:
493:
489:
485:
480:
463:
459:
455:
450:
449:
448:
444:
440:
435:
434:
433:
429:
425:
421:
420:
419:
415:
411:
404:
399:
398:
397:
393:
389:
383:
378:
377:
376:
372:
368:
363:
362:
361:cherry picked
354:
349:
348:
347:
343:
340:
338:
334:
311:
305:
302:
301:
298:
281:
280:Trains Portal
277:
273:
269:
265:
261:
260:
250:
249:
248:
247:Trains Portal
243:
238:
232:
231:
227:
224:
220:
219:
215:
212:
209:
206:
202:
201:
189:
188:
178:
174:
173:
170:
153:
152:documentation
149:
145:
141:
140:
132:
121:
119:
116:
112:
111:
107:
103:
98:
95:
92:
88:
87:
83:
79:
73:
69:
60:
59:
51:
50:
45:
41:
37:
34:
30:
26:
25:
20:
18:
17:
509:
506:
487:
483:
476:
360:
344:
341:
330:
274:. See also:
268:project page
257:
245:
244:
185:
137:
78:WikiProjects
47:
35:
28:
22:
439:Morphenniel
403:Morphenniel
388:Morphenniel
353:Morphenniel
560:Categories
543:Domdeparis
516:behavior.
479:WP:NAUTHOR
454:Domdeparis
424:Domdeparis
410:Domdeparis
382:Domdeparis
367:Domdeparis
337:WP:NAUTHOR
333:domdeparis
272:discussion
533:Mackensen
518:Mackensen
492:Mackensen
157:Biography
97:Biography
40:libellous
278:and the
514:WP:PRAM
521:(talk)
495:(talk)
484:Trains
285:Trains
211:Trains
74:scale.
510:might
547:talk
458:talk
443:talk
428:talk
414:talk
392:talk
371:talk
146:and
529:Hi
304:???
29:BLP
562::
549:)
490:.
460:)
445:)
430:)
416:)
394:)
373:)
339:.
100::
545:(
535::
531:@
456:(
441:(
426:(
412:(
405::
401:@
390:(
384::
380:@
369:(
355::
351:@
312:.
282:.
190:.
154:.
80::
52:.
27:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
