948:
advertisements, and the omission of
Charles Plott and Vernon Smith's work in the Experimental Economics section. Smith won a Nobel-memorial prize in 2002 for being a pioneer of human-subject laboratory experimentation in market economics and in particular demonstrating the success of the competitive equilibrium model, aka The Law of Supply and Demand, which assumes individual rationality in explaining market price patterns and efficiency of market allocation. The 2002 Nobel memorial prize was shared with Kahneman, whose lab work had a different topic -- individuals' departures from rational behavior in Behavioral Economics -- so why mention Kahneman in the list but not Smith?. Charles Plott, who also has numerous publications involving laboratory experiments in economics, together with Vernon Smith co-edited a large volume, The Handbook of Experimental Economics Results, that took about a decade to produce and drew in dozens of contributed chapters from other practitioners across almost every specialty (not simply markets, or game theory, or individual choice but all of these, and more) in which the evolving laboratory methodologies in Economics had been applied. Not mentioned.
955:
specialties are more important or central than others. In truth, many articles shaped these fields. The "unappointed trust" is the idea that we, the editors of the list, become "trustees" who sit in judgement of an entire field and can somehow come to a consensus on important works in an entire field, when we are mostly unqualified to do so and the field is still alive and evolving, so can not be captured by a few interested reviewers or the occasional passing volunteer (an argument I have to credit in part to F. Hayek, 1945, The Use of
Knowledge in Society). The difference between this and factual wikipedia topics is that we are expressing an opinion (which publications are most important; and as a corollary, which careers of living researchers are the most important) rather than a matter of facts or definitions on which there is substantial agreement (what is the Slutsky equation?).
562:
was taught. Second, they decided that all new entries should be raised for debate over a 10 day period on the talk page to determine whether they should be kept or deleted. Most existing entries were debated and several were deleted. This has worked reasonably well although it would be better if more people had participated. It is clear enough that it is not, for these articles, sufficient to allow anyone to add entries, as only very obvious nonsense is likely to be deleted. Each entry needs the consideration of several editors. I urge all interested in this project to look at what the chemists here have done and consider whether something similar or even better can be used on all pages in the project. I am putting this paragraph on all the other talk pages of this project. --
80:
53:
865:. He is a loose cannon who in no way represents the views of the rest of us. I hope his actions will not prejudice editors against the WikiProject, the members of which are not a clique and do not wish to impose our policies on anyone. However, the project is potentially a good response to all these recent AfDs. Unlike "List of important X", "Bibliography" is a recognized form of list. Contrary to a popular impression, bibliographies do not have to be indiscriminate, or even very different from what you have now. In fact,
847:. This article is not a bibliography. The "List of important publications..." format is well-established. There was no prior discussion on this talk page. If a separate article "Bibliography of economics" is required then it would be very different from this one as the items presently included have been carefully considered and justified. Don't hijack existing articles for other purposes. If a small clique of people want to introduce a new policy on Knowledge they should go about it rather more carefully than this.
199:
181:
90:
297:
279:
22:
209:
763:
Ricardo set the deductive, abstract tone that both JS Mill and
Marshall incorporated, and Samuelson presented the comparative statics approach that characterizes the way economics is presented at the graduate level, even today. Surprisingly, neither JS Mill nor Marshall are mentioned. They should be.
677:
I agree. I suggest we call it
Classical Political Economy, as that term has been used by Robert Heilbroner to describe the period of thought and their chief proponents (Smith, Ricardo, Marx, et al). Further, "The Wealth of Nations" and Das Kapital" should be moved to Classical Political Economy (or
371:
The text bellow was the entry of health economics. Though it is very detailed, probably not all the publications in it fit in the list. One should note that other entries have publications by Smith, Marx and that league. In order to allow future use of this reference, I moved it to the talk page. It
561:
debated this and decided on two matters. First, they tightened up the criteria for inclusion, in particular insisted that publications that were important as an introduction had to have had a wider importance such as altering the way all future text books were written or altered the way the subject
598:
on rewording the template that generates the header to this list of publications to make the criteria for entries to the list rather tighter and better reflecting the notability criteria of WP. The motivation is to better take into account comments that have been made when some of these lists have
662:
This article should add a section specifically for
Classical Economics (which I suppose would be merged or a subsection of "Political Economy"). There are many publications from classical economists/philosophers, such as Say, Malthus, Mill, etc. who have had a profound affect on the study of
954:
Artificial scarcity and unappointed trusts are created by lists such as these. While often useful as a marketing hustle, the premise that only a few entries can be "important" in each category creates the artificial scarcity. The ordering of entries can also create an impression that some
947:
Tagging the article POV today because of several previous notes in the talk section arguing bias and noting omitted authors (e.g. Hayek), the tendency towards books instead of journal articles, my noticing that the
Behavioral and Experimental Economics sections read like one sentence book
456:
This is listed here not because it is new but because it is different in the basic approach. It is original, and it avoids all of the inexact wordy descriptions of the past. Here you will find the raw conversion to science of this past pseudo-scientific subject.
521:
The most comprehensive available collection of essays on contemporary health economics. Advanced readers will appreciate its mathematical rigor. Those who are seeking research or dissertation topics should find this two-volume set to be an invaluable resource.
904:
A perennial issue on this and similar pages is how to set criteria for the list. I have carefully considered existing guidelines and tried to craft a broad set of policies that satisfy them. I have posted it on the
678:
Classical
Economics if we prefer), under Political Economy. As they stand, those works do not belong under the heading of macroeconomics. Macroeconomics didn't emerge until Keynes published his "General Theory."
958:
I think one of the ideas behind wikipedia is that one person should not do "too much", so my contribution will be limited to this notice here and I will leave future discussion to other editors and enthusiasts.
577:
970:
942:
541:
534:
have emerged as the leading technical specialty journals. There are also many other specialised journals to address readers' particular need. European readers in particular will appreciate the
146:
566:
697:
Seems to me a page about important publications in economics that doesn't mention
Friedman, Von Mises, Hayek, or Rothbard is a bit biased... But that's just my two cents CS /10/03/2009
1038:
557:
project for some months now, I am concerned. There is indeed a case that the material here is not free of a POV. How do we determine importance? Earlier this year the participants on
1056:
1052:
535:
595:
909:. I would welcome your comments. Of course, these guidelines are not intended to be binding for any particular page, but might help you choose your own selection criteria.
652:
866:
862:
1125:
966:
891:
708:
856:
906:
158:
63:
1104:
918:
712:
1117:
466:
261:
951:
Now some people might say "it is great that you discovered our page, we can't maintain it all, so just edit your changes in!". But there's a problem.
1109:
789:
679:
639:
687:
603:
1144:
773:
136:
1154:
937:
163:
634:
347:
1174:
723:
In the history of economics, the three most important books (because they were used as the fundamental texts by consecutive generations) were:
672:
255:
811:
797:
614:
750:
664:
396:
A book that reveals in plain
English the concepts and methods used by health economists. Very accessible to non-specialists and students.
376:
1149:
1139:
984:
442:
A book designed to introduce the subject to health professionals and other interested readers with little or no background in economics.
553:
was put up for deletion at AfD but survived the process as there was no consensus. However, as someone who has been concerned with this
583:
1189:
844:
837:
807:
No citations supporting importance of texts. No citations for the summaries given, either. Perhaps this article should be deleted? --
341:
112:
1034:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
1179:
1169:
527:
962:
554:
543:
372:
seems that this few publications should be selected from this reference for the health economics entry in the list itself.
231:
103:
58:
1194:
1164:
1159:
899:
486:
The standard health economics textbook in most leading universities. It assumes some background knowledge in economics.
739:
704:
1024:
1000:
1184:
692:
558:
992:
869:, which crafted the template for your current inclusion criteria, is now a task force in WikiProject Bibliographies.
756:
589:
317:
625:
I suggest we list these in chronological order, earliest first. Also, I'm not sure what the stuff above is about.
608:
975:
733:
550:
222:
186:
1055:
to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
1018:
214:
1099:
33:
657:
313:
309:
304:
284:
1074:
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
882:
for how this page might look. Of course, there is no need to rename the list before making any changes.
991:. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit
923:
718:
381:
822:
462:
644:
What, currently, is the most popular and/or authoritative textbook in economics, or microeconomics?
364:
230:
on
Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
111:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
1090:
914:
887:
879:
1114:
Should it also be included as an important publication? It made an impact in political economy.
1059:
before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template
1121:
1075:
988:
649:
620:
1062:
630:
39:
79:
52:
1082:
833:
802:
793:
769:
700:
683:
458:
928:
I propose we add Cournot and Jevons. If I get agreement, I can do the work of adding them.
8:
778:
571:
531:
1041:, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by
1012:
933:
910:
883:
852:
434:
Health Economics: An Introduction for Biomedical and Other Health-Related Professionals
412:
A UK text which provides an introduction to health economics in less technical detail.
1081:
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
727:
645:
1025:
https://web.archive.org/web/20040717023557/http://cepa.newschool.edu/het/essays.htm
1001:
https://web.archive.org/web/20040625152156/http://www.econ.utah.edu/ehrbar/akmc.htm
808:
626:
596:
Knowledge talk:WikiProject Science pearls#Header template to all project list pages
428:
An alternative text which takes market failure in health care as a starting point.
365:
829:
765:
668:
578:
Knowledge:Articles for deletion/List of publications in biology (2nd nomination)
526:
Journals also constitute a first-class resource for cutting-edge research. The
108:
1047:. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
471:
1133:
929:
848:
500:
Probably the most direct competitor of the above text. About the same level.
1028:
1019:
http://publications.worldbank.org/ecommerce/catalog/product?item_id=7014177
1004:
816:
451:
Consequential Macroeconomics--Rationizing About How Our Social System Works
95:
615:
Knowledge:WikiProject Science pearls##Categories of important publications
1048:
600:
580:
563:
89:
506:
227:
198:
180:
373:
943:
Lacks Neutral Point of View - and perhaps impossible in principle?
843:
For exactly the same reasons put forward by other discussants in
783:
Article needs to add the other side. Hayek and Friedman to Start
296:
278:
208:
995:
for additional information. I made the following changes:
316:, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the
402:
McPake, B., Kumaranayake, L. and Normand, C. (2002)
226:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
204:
107:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
85:
1051:using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
746:To this, two other books that should be added are:
346:This article has not yet received a rating on the
260:This article has not yet received a rating on the
1131:
861:Please don't identify Curb Chain's actions with
404:Health Economics – An International Perspective
1037:This message was posted before February 2018.
786:I would do it but I don't really know how to.
663:economics, whether they were right or wrong.
751:Principles of Political Economy and Taxation
476:Folland S., Goodman AC. and Stano M. (2001)
985:List of important publications in economics
617:. Thanks, APH 10:23, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
308:, an attempt to structure and organize all
515:, Volumes 1A and 1B. Elsevier: Amsterdam.
480:(4th edition). New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
21:
19:
983:I have just modified 2 external links on
845:Knowledge talk:WikiProject Bibliographies
640:A question for people who watch this page
511:Culyer AJ. and Newhouse JP. (eds) (2000)
1029:http://cepa.newschool.edu/het/essays.htm
1005:http://www.econ.utah.edu/ehrbar/akmc.htm
422:, Health Administrative Press: Chicago.
312:. If you wish to help, please visit the
1145:High-importance Bibliographies articles
1110:Karl Polanyi's The Great Transformation
492:The Economics of Health and Health Care
478:The Economics of Health and Health Care
1155:Top-importance Science pearls articles
1132:
828:What reasons not to do this are there?
594:Please take a look at a discussion at
449:, March 2015: Chester, David Harold:
1175:Unknown-importance Economics articles
609:Categories of important publications
555:Knowledge:WikiProject Science pearls
544:Knowledge:WikiProject Science pearls
536:European Journal of Health Economics
420:The Economics of Health Reconsidered
302:This article is within the scope of
220:This article is within the scope of
121:Knowledge:WikiProject Bibliographies
101:This article is within the scope of
15:
124:Template:WikiProject Bibliographies
38:It is of interest to the following
13:
1150:List-Class Science pearls articles
1140:List-Class Bibliographies articles
388:The Dictionary of Health Economics
14:
1206:
987:. Please take a moment to review
559:List of publications in chemistry
1190:Unknown-importance List articles
757:Foundations of Economic Analysis
295:
277:
207:
197:
179:
88:
78:
51:
20:
734:Principles of Political Economy
551:List of publications in biology
240:Knowledge:WikiProject Economics
141:This article has been rated as
1180:WikiProject Economics articles
821:I recently moved this page to
688:17:15, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
599:been proposed for deletion. --
584:08:12, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
243:Template:WikiProject Economics
1:
1170:List-Class Economics articles
1105:21:16, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
812:03:03, 22 December 2010 (UTC)
798:19:18, 4 September 2010 (UTC)
774:03:28, 28 November 2009 (UTC)
604:00:43, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
377:10:49, 7 September 2005 (UTC)
234:and see a list of open tasks.
215:Business and economics portal
156:This article is supported by
115:and see a list of open tasks.
919:00:33, 8 November 2011 (UTC)
892:00:33, 8 November 2011 (UTC)
857:09:59, 4 November 2011 (UTC)
838:14:50, 3 November 2011 (UTC)
513:Handbook of Health Economics
7:
900:Proposed inclusion criteria
764:Any arguments about this?--
713:18:03, 3 October 2009 (UTC)
653:16:15, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
528:Journal of Health Economics
390:, Edward Elgar Publishing.
326:Knowledge:WikiProject Lists
10:
1211:
1195:WikiProject Lists articles
1165:WikiProject Bibliographies
1160:WikiProject Science pearls
1068:(last update: 5 June 2024)
980:Hello fellow Wikipedians,
867:WikiProject Science pearls
863:WikiProject Bibliographies
673:04:47, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
635:06:43, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
567:08:45, 22 April 2006 (UTC)
348:project's importance scale
329:Template:WikiProject Lists
262:project's importance scale
104:WikiProject Bibliographies
823:Bibliography of economics
693:An unbalanced unfair page
494:, Aspen Books: Maryland.
467:14:59, 1 April 2015 (UTC)
345:
290:
259:
192:
155:
140:
73:
46:
1185:List-Class List articles
1126:09:21, 13 May 2018 (UTC)
938:18:41, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
907:Science pearls talk page
590:The criteria for entries
976:External links modified
971:13:08, 3 May 2017 (UTC)
880:Bibliography of biology
740:Principles of Economics
310:list pages on Knowledge
127:Bibliographies articles
28:This article is rated
736:, by John Stuart Mill
542:Standards in all the
406:, Routledge: London.
223:WikiProject Economics
159:the Science Taskforce
1049:regular verification
878:Also have a look at
742:, by Alfred Marshall
386:Culyer, A.J. (2005)
1039:After February 2018
759:, by Paul Samuelson
658:Classical Economics
1093:InternetArchiveBot
1044:InternetArchiveBot
924:Proposed Additions
753:, by David Ricardo
719:Bit of a potpourri
490:Jacobs, P. (1997)
472:Intermediate texts
432:Phua, K.L. (2005)
382:Introductory texts
246:Economics articles
34:content assessment
1069:
728:Wealth of nations
703:comment added by
362:
361:
358:
357:
354:
353:
305:WikiProject Lists
272:
271:
268:
267:
174:
173:
170:
169:
1202:
1103:
1094:
1067:
1066:
1045:
1016:
715:
532:Health Economics
418:Rice, T. (1998)
366:Health economics
334:
333:
330:
327:
324:
299:
292:
291:
281:
274:
273:
248:
247:
244:
241:
238:
217:
212:
211:
201:
194:
193:
183:
176:
175:
147:importance scale
129:
128:
125:
122:
119:
98:
93:
92:
82:
75:
74:
69:
66:
55:
48:
47:
31:
25:
24:
23:
16:
1210:
1209:
1205:
1204:
1203:
1201:
1200:
1199:
1130:
1129:
1112:
1097:
1092:
1060:
1053:have permission
1043:
1010:
993:this simple FaQ
978:
945:
926:
902:
819:
805:
781:
730:, by Adam Smith
721:
698:
695:
660:
642:
623:
611:
592:
574:
548:
509:
474:
459:Macrocompassion
384:
369:
331:
328:
325:
322:
321:
245:
242:
239:
236:
235:
213:
206:
143:High-importance
126:
123:
120:
117:
116:
94:
87:
68:High‑importance
67:
61:
32:on Knowledge's
29:
12:
11:
5:
1208:
1198:
1197:
1192:
1187:
1182:
1177:
1172:
1167:
1162:
1157:
1152:
1147:
1142:
1111:
1108:
1087:
1086:
1079:
1032:
1031:
1023:Added archive
1021:
1007:
999:Added archive
977:
974:
963:204.93.123.146
944:
941:
925:
922:
901:
898:
897:
896:
895:
894:
873:
872:
871:
870:
818:
815:
804:
801:
780:
777:
761:
760:
754:
744:
743:
737:
731:
720:
717:
694:
691:
659:
656:
641:
638:
622:
621:Listing order?
619:
610:
607:
591:
588:
587:
586:
573:
570:
547:
540:
525:
508:
507:Advanced texts
505:
503:
489:
473:
470:
445:
431:
415:
399:
383:
380:
368:
363:
360:
359:
356:
355:
352:
351:
344:
338:
337:
335:
300:
288:
287:
282:
270:
269:
266:
265:
258:
252:
251:
249:
232:the discussion
219:
218:
202:
190:
189:
184:
172:
171:
168:
167:
164:Top-importance
154:
151:
150:
139:
133:
132:
130:
118:Bibliographies
113:the discussion
109:Bibliographies
100:
99:
83:
71:
70:
59:Bibliographies
56:
44:
43:
37:
26:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1207:
1196:
1193:
1191:
1188:
1186:
1183:
1181:
1178:
1176:
1173:
1171:
1168:
1166:
1163:
1161:
1158:
1156:
1153:
1151:
1148:
1146:
1143:
1141:
1138:
1137:
1135:
1128:
1127:
1123:
1119:
1115:
1107:
1106:
1101:
1096:
1095:
1084:
1080:
1077:
1073:
1072:
1071:
1064:
1058:
1054:
1050:
1046:
1040:
1035:
1030:
1026:
1022:
1020:
1014:
1008:
1006:
1002:
998:
997:
996:
994:
990:
986:
981:
973:
972:
968:
964:
960:
956:
952:
949:
940:
939:
935:
931:
921:
920:
916:
912:
911:RockMagnetist
908:
893:
889:
885:
884:RockMagnetist
881:
877:
876:
875:
874:
868:
864:
860:
859:
858:
854:
850:
846:
842:
841:
840:
839:
835:
831:
826:
824:
814:
813:
810:
800:
799:
795:
791:
787:
784:
776:
775:
771:
767:
758:
755:
752:
749:
748:
747:
741:
738:
735:
732:
729:
726:
725:
724:
716:
714:
710:
706:
702:
690:
689:
685:
681:
675:
674:
670:
666:
655:
654:
651:
647:
637:
636:
632:
628:
618:
616:
606:
605:
602:
597:
585:
582:
579:
576:
575:
569:
568:
565:
560:
556:
552:
545:
539:
537:
533:
529:
523:
520:
516:
514:
504:
501:
499:
495:
493:
487:
485:
481:
479:
469:
468:
464:
460:
455:
452:
448:
443:
441:
437:
435:
429:
427:
423:
421:
416:
413:
411:
407:
405:
400:
397:
395:
391:
389:
379:
378:
375:
367:
349:
343:
340:
339:
336:
332:List articles
319:
315:
311:
307:
306:
301:
298:
294:
293:
289:
286:
283:
280:
276:
275:
263:
257:
254:
253:
250:
233:
229:
225:
224:
216:
210:
205:
203:
200:
196:
195:
191:
188:
185:
182:
178:
177:
165:
162:(assessed as
161:
160:
153:
152:
148:
144:
138:
135:
134:
131:
114:
110:
106:
105:
97:
91:
86:
84:
81:
77:
76:
72:
65:
60:
57:
54:
50:
49:
45:
41:
35:
27:
18:
17:
1118:Sammartinlai
1116:
1113:
1091:
1088:
1063:source check
1042:
1036:
1033:
982:
979:
961:
957:
953:
950:
946:
927:
903:
827:
820:
809:superioridad
806:
803:poor article
788:
785:
782:
762:
745:
722:
705:68.104.15.61
696:
676:
661:
646:Slrubenstein
643:
624:
613:Please note
612:
593:
549:
524:
519:Description:
518:
517:
512:
510:
502:
498:Description:
497:
496:
491:
488:
484:Description:
483:
482:
477:
475:
453:
450:
446:
444:
440:Description:
439:
438:
433:
430:
426:Description:
425:
424:
419:
417:
414:
410:Description:
409:
408:
403:
401:
398:
394:Description:
393:
392:
387:
385:
370:
314:project page
303:
221:
157:
142:
102:
96:Books portal
40:WikiProjects
779:Biased Left
699:—Preceding
627:OptimistBen
572:Related AFD
454:Description
1134:Categories
1100:Report bug
830:Curb Chain
790:D6stringer
766:Anthon.Eff
680:Greenm1981
318:discussion
30:List-class
1083:this tool
1076:this tool
1013:dead link
237:Economics
228:Economics
187:Economics
1089:Cheers.—
930:JoelDick
849:Melcombe
701:unsigned
546:articles
447:New book
1017:tag to
989:my edit
145:on the
64:Science
1009:Added
36:scale.
665:24630
601:Bduke
581:Kappa
564:Bduke
323:Lists
285:Lists
1122:talk
967:talk
934:talk
915:talk
888:talk
853:talk
834:talk
817:Move
794:talk
770:talk
709:talk
684:talk
669:talk
650:Talk
631:talk
530:and
463:talk
137:High
1057:RfC
1027:to
1003:to
648:|
374:APH
342:???
256:???
1136::
1124:)
1070:.
1065:}}
1061:{{
1015:}}
1011:{{
969:)
936:)
917:)
890:)
855:)
836:)
825:.
796:)
772:)
711:)
686:)
671:)
633:)
538:.
465:)
436:.
166:).
62::
1120:(
1102:)
1098:(
1085:.
1078:.
965:(
932:(
913:(
886:(
851:(
832:(
792:(
768:(
707:(
682:(
667:(
629:(
461:(
350:.
320:.
264:.
149:.
42::
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
