Knowledge

Talk:Lex mercatoria

Source đź“ť

529:(from the Latin for "merchant law") is the body of commercial law used by merchants throughout Europe during the medieval period. It evolved similar to English common law as a system of custom and best practice, which was enforced through a system of merchant courts along the main trade routes. It functioned as the international law of commerce. It emphasised contractual freedom and alienability of property, while shunning legal technicalities and deciding cases ex aequo et bono. A distinct feature was the reliance by merchants on a legal system developed and administered by them. States or local authorities seldom interfered, and did not interfere a lot in internal domestic trade. Under lex mercatoria trade flourished and states took in large amounts of taxation." 610:, "Stateless, Not Lawless: Voluntaryism & Arbitration" by Carl Watner. His research suggests that the Law Merchant may not have been, as characterized in the preceding unsigned and unreferenced comment, "understood as exceptions to the regulations ruling the ordinary Common Law process. The Lex Mercatoria was therefore already in the Middle ages seen as the daugther of the Common Law and therefore as part of English law." For example, in William C. Wooldridge's UNCLE SAM THE MONOPOLY MAN, on page 96 the author writes "edieval merchants must have considered their interests better served by voluntary submission of disputes to one of their own than by formal common-law actions." 627:
Lord Chancellor. Obviously he is reporting the practice in England at the time, and what historians adduce from matters ahors de record, outside the record, is quite immaterial. More generally, all reasonable men know there is a law merchant, universal law, involved in trading. If you don't, it's because you've failed to mature into a fully developed human, so you're governed by civil law, as an infant who cannot speak and claim to be a trader exempt from innovations. Free trade is ancient, innovations in restraint of free trade are illegal.
270: 252: 465: 377: 350: 172: 74: 154: 53: 84: 387: 22: 280: 182: 453: 626:
My general problem with addressing legal questions as historical questions is that law is not a genre of history, so historical analysis of what may or not be done is irrelevant. We know law by precedents, e.g. the case cited calling the law merchant the law of nature. That is a good case, quoting a
654:
There are so many issues with the article, the main one being that most of the contents is unsourced, that I think it will probably be best to just remove most of the unsourced content and just stick to a simple definition. Right now it feels like reading an essay written by someone trying to push
513:
was a body of trading principles that evolved as a system of custom and best practice, common to merchants and traders in Europe, emphasizing contractual freedom and enabling quick dispute resolution by merchant courts along the main trade routes. A key characteristic of the system was that local
590:
While there is no doubt that a body of rules named "Lex Mercatoria" existed in England since the late 13th c., there is heavy doubt that anything comparable existed on the continent, let alone identical rules all over Europe. One of the various reasons for doubt is the fact that the English Lex
591:
Mercatoria-rules regarded procedure and were understood as exceptions to the regulations ruling the ordinary Common Law process. The Lex Mercatoria was therefore already in the Middle ages seen as the daugther of the Common Law and therefore as part of English law.
594:
Legal historians have uttered these and various other doubts since the late 1990ies but apparently the partisans of the modern Lex Mercatoria don't want to confuse their minds with historical facts. For further reference see among many others:
598:
Emily Kadens, The Myth of the Customary Law Merchant, Texas Law Review, Vol. 90, 2012; Vito Piergiovanni (ed.), From lex mercatoria to commercial law, 2005; Albrecht Cordes, The search for a medieval Lex mercatoria, 2003, online available at
638: 514:
authorities opted to interfere as little as possible, thus leaving merchants with a significant amount of contractual freedom, which lead to increased levels of trade and, as a result, increased tax revenues."
585: 509:
By Claus D. Zimmermann, which can be found on Google Books. For example the following is from Zimmermann's book on page 81: "Literally meaning 'merchant law' the medieval
634: 619: 713: 326: 642: 544: 564:
Was there actually a guy called Lex Mercatorius? That would be quite a coincidence since the words actually mean merchant law. Perhaps it was a fable?
234: 708: 443: 332: 738: 540: 483: 698: 228: 478: 360: 136: 743: 733: 728: 433: 703: 693: 748: 723: 718: 683: 204: 126: 571: 409: 302: 664: 688: 678: 649: 195: 159: 579: 548: 400: 355: 293: 257: 187: 552: 101:, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the 301:
articles on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
33: 97: 58: 408:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
203:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
575: 21: 470: 39: 630: 567: 536: 8: 615: 500: 660: 559: 600: 392: 285: 269: 251: 672: 611: 656: 607: 519:
Commercial Law: Text, Cases, and Materials (4th edn OUP, Oxford 2008) 14-20
386: 376: 349: 89: 586:
Serious doubts in regard to the existence of a medieval Lex Mercatoria
200: 171: 153: 73: 52: 83: 405: 298: 279: 181: 452: 517:
Zimmerman references: Len S Sealy and Richard JA Hooley,
102: 532:
This article references: Sealy and Hooley (2008) 14
460: 404:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 382: 297:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 275: 199:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 177: 79: 331:This article has not yet received a rating on the 233:This article has not yet received a rating on the 714:Unknown-importance WikiProject Business articles 670: 505:At least a portion of this article plagiarizes 601:http://ouclf.iuscomp.org/articles/cordes.shtml 507:A Contemporary Concept of Monetary Sovereignty 19: 709:Start-Class WikiProject Business articles 608:http://voluntaryist.com/articles/084.html 523:Now compared to the opening paragraph: " 606:Several other sources are available at 739:Low-importance Libertarianism articles 671: 635:2001:569:7A3C:9100:2474:E5B9:5B68:F771 699:Unknown-importance Economics articles 398:This article is within the scope of 291:This article is within the scope of 193:This article is within the scope of 95:This article is within the scope of 15: 744:WikiProject Libertarianism articles 734:Start-Class Libertarianism articles 105:and the subjects encompassed by it. 38:It is of interest to the following 13: 451: 14: 760: 729:Low-importance politics articles 463: 385: 375: 348: 278: 268: 250: 180: 170: 152: 82: 72: 51: 20: 438:This article has been rated as 213:Knowledge:WikiProject Economics 131:This article has been rated as 704:WikiProject Economics articles 694:Start-Class Economics articles 418:Knowledge:WikiProject Politics 311:Knowledge:WikiProject Business 216:Template:WikiProject Economics 1: 749:WikiProject Politics articles 724:Start-Class politics articles 719:WikiProject Business articles 665:13:14, 15 November 2020 (UTC) 580:17:30, 30 November 2011 (UTC) 476:This article is supported by 421:Template:WikiProject Politics 412:and see a list of open tasks. 317:WikiProject Business articles 314:Template:WikiProject Business 305:and see a list of open tasks. 207:and see a list of open tasks. 188:Business and economics portal 643:07:48, 8 February 2021 (UTC) 7: 684:Low-importance law articles 620:17:39, 16 August 2015 (UTC) 10: 765: 553:02:02, 31 March 2014 (UTC) 479:WikiProject Libertarianism 444:project's importance scale 333:project's importance scale 235:project's importance scale 137:project's importance scale 459: 437: 370: 330: 263: 232: 165: 130: 111:Knowledge:WikiProject Law 67: 46: 689:WikiProject Law articles 679:Start-Class law articles 114:Template:WikiProject Law 650:Issues with the article 456: 28:This article is rated 655:their point of view. 471:Libertarianism portal 455: 196:WikiProject Economics 401:WikiProject Politics 294:WikiProject Business 457: 219:Economics articles 34:content assessment 645: 633:comment added by 570:comment added by 556: 539:comment added by 498: 497: 494: 493: 490: 489: 424:politics articles 343: 342: 339: 338: 245: 244: 241: 240: 147: 146: 143: 142: 756: 628: 582: 555: 533: 473: 468: 467: 466: 426: 425: 422: 419: 416: 395: 390: 389: 379: 372: 371: 366: 363: 352: 345: 344: 319: 318: 315: 312: 309: 288: 283: 282: 272: 265: 264: 254: 247: 246: 221: 220: 217: 214: 211: 190: 185: 184: 174: 167: 166: 156: 149: 148: 119: 118: 115: 112: 109: 92: 87: 86: 76: 69: 68: 63: 55: 48: 47: 31: 25: 24: 16: 764: 763: 759: 758: 757: 755: 754: 753: 669: 668: 652: 588: 565: 562: 534: 503: 469: 464: 462: 423: 420: 417: 414: 413: 393:Politics portal 391: 384: 364: 358: 316: 313: 310: 307: 306: 286:Business portal 284: 277: 218: 215: 212: 209: 208: 186: 179: 116: 113: 110: 107: 106: 98:WikiProject Law 88: 81: 61: 32:on Knowledge's 29: 12: 11: 5: 762: 752: 751: 746: 741: 736: 731: 726: 721: 716: 711: 706: 701: 696: 691: 686: 681: 651: 648: 647: 646: 623: 622: 587: 584: 561: 558: 526:Lex mercatoria 511:lex mercatoria 502: 499: 496: 495: 492: 491: 488: 487: 484:Low-importance 475: 474: 458: 448: 447: 440:Low-importance 436: 430: 429: 427: 410:the discussion 397: 396: 380: 368: 367: 365:Low‑importance 361:Libertarianism 353: 341: 340: 337: 336: 329: 323: 322: 320: 303:the discussion 290: 289: 273: 261: 260: 255: 243: 242: 239: 238: 231: 225: 224: 222: 205:the discussion 192: 191: 175: 163: 162: 157: 145: 144: 141: 140: 133:Low-importance 129: 123: 122: 120: 94: 93: 77: 65: 64: 62:Low‑importance 56: 44: 43: 37: 26: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 761: 750: 747: 745: 742: 740: 737: 735: 732: 730: 727: 725: 722: 720: 717: 715: 712: 710: 707: 705: 702: 700: 697: 695: 692: 690: 687: 685: 682: 680: 677: 676: 674: 667: 666: 662: 658: 644: 640: 636: 632: 625: 624: 621: 617: 613: 609: 605: 604: 603: 602: 596: 592: 583: 581: 577: 573: 572:130.132.21.77 569: 557: 554: 550: 546: 542: 538: 530: 528: 527: 521: 520: 515: 512: 508: 485: 482:(assessed as 481: 480: 472: 461: 454: 450: 449: 445: 441: 435: 432: 431: 428: 411: 407: 403: 402: 394: 388: 383: 381: 378: 374: 373: 369: 362: 357: 354: 351: 347: 346: 334: 328: 325: 324: 321: 304: 300: 296: 295: 287: 281: 276: 274: 271: 267: 266: 262: 259: 256: 253: 249: 248: 236: 230: 227: 226: 223: 206: 202: 198: 197: 189: 183: 178: 176: 173: 169: 168: 164: 161: 158: 155: 151: 150: 138: 134: 128: 125: 124: 121: 104: 100: 99: 91: 85: 80: 78: 75: 71: 70: 66: 60: 57: 54: 50: 49: 45: 41: 35: 27: 23: 18: 17: 653: 629:— Preceding 597: 593: 589: 566:— Preceding 563: 535:— Preceding 531: 525: 524: 522: 518: 516: 510: 506: 504: 477: 439: 399: 292: 194: 132: 117:law articles 96: 40:WikiProjects 103:legal field 30:Start-class 673:Categories 501:Plagiarism 90:Law portal 210:Economics 201:Economics 160:Economics 631:unsigned 612:Dscotese 568:unsigned 560:confused 549:contribs 541:Gamehobo 537:unsigned 415:Politics 406:politics 356:Politics 308:Business 299:business 258:Business 442:on the 135:on the 36:scale. 657:BeŻet 661:talk 639:talk 616:talk 576:talk 545:talk 434:Low 327:??? 229:??? 127:Low 108:Law 59:Law 675:: 663:) 641:) 618:) 578:) 551:) 547:• 486:). 359:: 659:( 637:( 614:( 574:( 543:( 446:. 335:. 237:. 139:. 42::

Index


content assessment
WikiProjects
WikiProject icon
Law
WikiProject icon
icon
Law portal
WikiProject Law
legal field
Low
project's importance scale
WikiProject icon
Economics
WikiProject icon
icon
Business and economics portal
WikiProject Economics
Economics
the discussion
???
project's importance scale
WikiProject icon
Business
WikiProject icon
icon
Business portal
WikiProject Business
business
the discussion

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑