323:
305:
423:
402:
274:
243:
21:
433:
523:
the boundaries back and forth from legit Jazz to Jam bands. The Dirty Dozen is a great example of how a brass band can find themselves in a psychedelic freestyle jam and then bring it back (usually) to Jazz. I also mentioned The
Primate Fiasco who is more recently doing the same thing, but with a slightly more Dixieland or Trad-Jazz feel blended with somewhat of a funk/disco.
333:
554:
once. Instead, they are mentioned in the 80's paragraph, despite the fact that the band formed in 1991. The 1990-1999 paragraph does contain some interesting info but, in the form it is today, it is unsalvageable. So I decided to merge it with the previous paragraph, given that the previous paragraph actually covers the 90's.
513:
Much of the material of both acts does feature jamming, but I am not sure if either one could be considered a jam band per se. Both have incorporated influences generally rejected by the jam band crowd, such as
Spacemen 3 and Jesus and Mary Chain in the case of both, and The Cure and Black Sabbath in
553:
The
Paragraph "1990–1999: Phish" is ridiculous, it mentions no other band, it basically looks as if it was written by a boy-band teenage fan. Dave Matthews band was founded and came to prominence during that decade (with their 1994 album released under a major label) yet they're not even mentioned
522:
Not sure what went wrong here. I recently added the Jam Band's jazz branch to the article in a very small way. All I wanted to do was mention that Jazz (the original improv that stormed the US and eventually lead to Jam Bands) has a few bands, going all the way back to the 1970's, who have crossed
530:
After the whole debate about Dave matthews, it seems clear that we all agree that it's not about the style or sound, it's about the free flowing ideas that happen only once and then are different at the next show. The
Dixieland/Jam combination is probably one of the most obvious examples.
526:
I would appreciate an explaination of how this in not part of the Jam band scene. While you're explaining, please explain why we don't remove String Cheese. Or Carl Denson. Should we shove
Medeski back into "modern Jazz" while we're at it?
548:
514:
the case of the
Warlocks. While both acts do jam, and both draw upon blues based influences that jam bands also have, I don't know if influences from 1980s British post-punk are conducive to the jam band genre.
193:
537:
PS. I'm glad to see this much intelligent enthousiasm about Jam bands. Even from those who disagree with my point of view. This genre will remain part of music history much more than pop will.
364:
360:
234:
187:
563:
489:
351:
310:
534:
I'm going to go ahead and put that back up. It's one sentence and I think if you take a moment you'll realize what you may otherwise be missing out on.
592:
479:
119:
582:
577:
597:
587:
508:
455:
125:
242:
208:
70:
175:
42:
446:
407:
368:
84:
139:
144:
60:
114:
285:
169:
105:
225:
40:
on 20 September 2024. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see
165:
517:
454:
on
Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
273:
230:
149:
215:
549:
According to the chronology section, between 1990 and 1999 Phish was the only active jam band
291:
8:
95:
110:
540:
181:
559:
438:
91:
33:
28:
47:
201:
253:
571:
555:
338:
356:
258:
451:
422:
401:
322:
304:
257:
345:
255:
64:
37:
363:
page for ideas on how to structure a genre article and help us
259:
200:
450:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
428:
355:, a user driven attempt to clean up and standardize
328:
55:
377:
Knowledge:WikiProject Music/Music genres task force
359:articles on Knowledge. Please visit the task force
380:Template:WikiProject Music/Music genres task force
569:
73:for general discussion of the article's subject.
545:I started tightening the text, but I give up.
214:
509:Spiritualized and The Warlocks as jam bands?
352:Music genres task force of the Music project
271:
46:; for the discussion at that location, see
570:
444:This article is within the scope of
267:
15:
290:It is of interest to the following
63:for discussing improvements to the
13:
593:Low-importance Rock music articles
14:
609:
583:Music genres task force articles
578:Start-Class music genre articles
464:Knowledge:WikiProject Rock music
431:
421:
400:
331:
321:
303:
272:
241:
85:Click here to start a new topic.
19:
598:WikiProject Rock music articles
588:Start-Class Rock music articles
484:This article has been rated as
467:Template:WikiProject Rock music
1:
518:Who deleted the jazz comment?
458:and see a list of open tasks.
374:Music/Music genres task force
311:Music/Music genres task force
82:Put new text under old text.
564:00:00, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
7:
349:is within the scope of the
90:New to Knowledge? Welcome!
10:
614:
490:project's importance scale
483:
416:
316:
298:
120:Be welcoming to newcomers
541:Hopelessly bad writing
447:WikiProject Rock music
280:This article is rated
115:avoid personal attacks
235:Auto-archiving period
140:Neutral point of view
26:The contents of the
383:music genre articles
145:No original research
470:Rock music articles
369:good article status
367:genre articles to
365:assess and improve
286:content assessment
126:dispute resolution
87:
504:
503:
500:
499:
496:
495:
439:Rock music portal
395:
394:
391:
390:
266:
265:
106:Assume good faith
83:
54:
53:
605:
472:
471:
468:
465:
462:
441:
436:
435:
434:
425:
418:
417:
412:
404:
397:
396:
385:
384:
381:
378:
375:
341:
336:
335:
334:
325:
318:
317:
307:
300:
299:
283:
277:
276:
268:
260:
246:
245:
236:
219:
218:
204:
135:Article policies
56:
45:
23:
22:
16:
613:
612:
608:
607:
606:
604:
603:
602:
568:
567:
551:
543:
520:
511:
469:
466:
463:
460:
459:
437:
432:
430:
410:
382:
379:
376:
373:
372:
337:
332:
330:
284:on Knowledge's
281:
262:
261:
256:
233:
161:
156:
155:
154:
131:
101:
41:
20:
12:
11:
5:
611:
601:
600:
595:
590:
585:
580:
550:
547:
542:
539:
519:
516:
510:
507:
502:
501:
498:
497:
494:
493:
486:Low-importance
482:
476:
475:
473:
456:the discussion
443:
442:
426:
414:
413:
411:Low‑importance
405:
393:
392:
389:
388:
386:
343:
342:
326:
314:
313:
308:
296:
295:
289:
278:
264:
263:
254:
252:
251:
248:
247:
221:
220:
158:
157:
153:
152:
147:
142:
133:
132:
130:
129:
122:
117:
108:
102:
100:
99:
88:
79:
78:
75:
74:
68:
52:
51:
24:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
610:
599:
596:
594:
591:
589:
586:
584:
581:
579:
576:
575:
573:
566:
565:
561:
557:
546:
538:
535:
532:
528:
524:
515:
506:
491:
487:
481:
478:
477:
474:
457:
453:
449:
448:
440:
429:
427:
424:
420:
419:
415:
409:
406:
403:
399:
398:
387:
370:
366:
362:
358:
354:
353:
348:
347:
340:
329:
327:
324:
320:
319:
315:
312:
309:
306:
302:
301:
297:
293:
287:
279:
275:
270:
269:
250:
249:
244:
240:
232:
229:
227:
223:
222:
217:
213:
210:
207:
203:
199:
195:
192:
189:
186:
183:
180:
177:
174:
171:
167:
164:
163:Find sources:
160:
159:
151:
150:Verifiability
148:
146:
143:
141:
138:
137:
136:
127:
123:
121:
118:
116:
112:
109:
107:
104:
103:
97:
93:
92:Learn to edit
89:
86:
81:
80:
77:
76:
72:
66:
62:
58:
57:
49:
48:its talk page
44:
39:
35:
31:
30:
25:
18:
17:
552:
544:
536:
533:
529:
525:
521:
512:
505:
485:
445:
350:
344:
339:Music portal
292:WikiProjects
238:
224:
211:
205:
197:
190:
184:
178:
172:
162:
134:
59:This is the
27:
357:music genre
282:Start-class
188:free images
71:not a forum
43:its history
29:Livetronica
572:Categories
461:Rock music
452:Rock music
408:Rock music
361:guidelines
32:page were
128:if needed
111:Be polite
61:talk page
346:Jam band
226:Archives
96:get help
69:This is
67:article.
65:Jam band
38:Jam band
556:Mastazi
488:on the
239:90 days
194:WP refs
182:scholar
288:scale.
166:Google
34:merged
209:JSTOR
170:books
124:Seek
36:into
560:talk
202:FENS
176:news
113:and
480:Low
216:TWL
574::
562:)
237::
196:)
94:;
558:(
492:.
371:.
294::
231:1
228::
212:·
206:·
198:·
191:·
185:·
179:·
173:·
168:(
98:.
50:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.