Knowledge

Talk:Design space exploration

Source 📝

22: 47:
Even with some basic understanding of the matter, it remains unclear what the bottom line of the article is supposed to be. It does not explain anything, and uses a lot of superficial and abstract language that leaves the reader more confused than before. The article needs
63: 67: 42: 59: 81: 33: 55:
context to understand what problems are being solved, and how this relates to other terms and concepts
21: 8: 75: 73: 52:clear explanations of the terms and concepts 19: 74: 15: 43:Confusing and poorly contextualised 13: 14: 93: 20: 1: 68:08:18, 14 February 2023 (UTC) 7: 10: 98: 28:This article is rated 82:Stub-Class articles 34:content assessment 40: 39: 89: 31: 25: 24: 16: 97: 96: 92: 91: 90: 88: 87: 86: 72: 71: 45: 32:on Knowledge's 29: 12: 11: 5: 95: 85: 84: 57: 56: 53: 44: 41: 38: 37: 26: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 94: 83: 80: 79: 77: 70: 69: 65: 61: 54: 51: 50: 49: 35: 27: 23: 18: 17: 60:87.77.189.26 58: 46: 30:Stub-class 76:Category 36:scale. 64:talk 78:: 66:) 62:(

Index


content assessment
87.77.189.26
talk
08:18, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
Category
Stub-Class articles

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.