Talk:Companion (Doctor Who)/Archive 3

1596:

so he is a companion ! If he helped the doctor a lot of time and travelled with the doctor one time so he is a companion. So the companion that we should not contest at all are: rose tyler, martha jones, donna noble, captain jack harkness, mickey smith, amy pond and rory williams. Now comes the others, adam mitchell he is a companion, certainely in his second adventure he messed up but he helped the doctor in the first one and had travelled in the tardis for a second adventure. Jackie tyler is a companion, the doctor is not proud of it but it is the case, she helped and supported the doctor a lot of time and travelled in the tardis twice. Wilfred mott is a companion, he supported the doctor a lot of time also and had been able to help him once and to travel with him in the tardis. And we have also lynda moss,reinette, astrid peth and jenny that are companions. They have been formidable, the doctor judge that they could come with him but because they died it ended there but if it didn't happened so they would be with him travelling around the universe. Finally there is Lady Christina de Souza, the gorgeous one and she is a companion.She was so brave, so exellent and even the doctor recognize it. She asked to come but for a specific reason and despite him, the doctor refuses but they formed a wonderful team. So, and in any case, we should consider Jackson Lake,Rosita Farisi and Adelaide Brooke as companions. Jackson and rosita never travelled with the doctor in the tardis and were never proposed or asked to it, adelaide was meant to be dead, the doctor shoudn't helped here but he never asked her to come with him or neither she does so why we want them to be companions ?—

2161:

editor chimes in with the rule about a certain source or another having the authority to name them as such. The article purports that the criteria for a companion is a complex issue, but the reality of how the character list is edited is a very, very simple one, and the two simply do not match up. You can argue with me all you want about this, but the reality of the quantity of edit warring and discussion page arguments make it obvious that the article needs major work in this area. If it's as simple as "a companion is anyone who the BBC or Radio Times say is one" then the article pretty much needs to say that, with very little further explanation except to describe their function within the fictional dynamic and a list of examples, and relying on the main DW article for everything else.

2481:

my simple conception is someone who accompanies the Doctor on an adventure. Usually in the Tardis, but sometimes by other means (3rd Doctor especially here.) It's not someone the Doctor visits and has an adventure with where they already were. It seems that the BBC has hijacked the word to mean "co-star" when it's a big-name actor and there isn't a true companion in an episode. There are literally hundreds of characters who would qualify as well as Astrid, Jackson and Craig, from their actual role in the show. I don't expect anyone to agree with me, but following the definition of "whoever the BBC wants to give prominence to" rather than one based on their role in the universe of the show, it's become a pointless distinction. Might as well merge the article with

716:, which unfortunately I doubt is reliable. I am surprised that there doesn't appear to have been a discussion on this at the time. It seems editors focused on sourcing his character name (then sourced as "The Doctor") rather than status before broadcast, and after focus was on Rosita's controversial status and then this episode was largely forgotten about with the understandable excitement around Matt Smith being annouced as the Eleventh Doctor. Of course, unless my memory betrays me very much there are numerous reports of David Tennant acting as Morrissey's "Doctor"'s companion at the start of the episode, but can that be enough to mean vice versa is true? 1885:

doesn't die. He literally doesn't die. He nearly dies, but that's it. If we're going to list every time a companion nearly dies we'll be here till Christmas. In "The Doctor's Wife" all we have is the appearance of a death, and a very brief one at that. We neither see him die, nor see him restored to life, and Rory's assertion that House is "playing with our minds" (from memory) strongly suggests that he has been wondering around the TARDIS the same as Amy and hasn't starved to death and miraculously been revived. In the narrative of the episode there is no death to be mitigated, and it's OR to suggest otherwise.

2271:. The intent of the author doesn't mean they succeded; for example if I write what I think in a comedy, it doesn't mean that it's funny. If(when?) a(n) (acceptable) book is printed that deals with Doctor Who and the recent companions, we can refer to that. I believe this is the position in the classic series. (However, I would expect a heated debate about how we include what the book says however. I may be being sceptical and say those who agree with the conclusions of the author will say it's a reliable and authoritive source and those who disagree will say that it's discredited and unreliable.) 2882:

companions have died while on adventures with the Doctor." So we should change one of them and then decide based on that. As Shada Ng said above, we need to figure out what that section is for: If the section is only for companions who die during their "tenure", River shouldn't be added. If it's for companions who died in the narrative, even after their "tenure", she should be added. I know there are discussions whether River was a companion in SitL/FotD but there are no sources to classify her as such for that episodes, so it's irrelevant that that's not relevant for the discussion. Regards

161:"Rarely" is subjective, but I'd say that this format didn't become the norm until the Sixth Doctor. Four travelled with both Harry and Sarah Jane for an entire season plus one serial and he usually had K-9 as a companion in addition to Leela or Romana. Five also frequently had more than one companion. In the new series, Nine travelled with Rose and Jack together for two episodes and Ten travelled with Rose and Mickey for a time. While Knowledge seems to consider Rory's status as companion debatable, he is currently traveling with Eleven and Amy, making a three-person team. 1335:

use the term 'companion' in order to garner a little publicity for the given episode. Until they become aware that their beloved references are misinformed in their use of the term this article is worthless. There are thousands of references which refer to the main character of the show as "Dr. Who" rather than "The Doctor" yet for some reason they have no issue ignoring those incorrect references and don't refer to him that way in his article, but when it comes to incorrect "companion" references they just lap them up.

2523:, so you might as well decide on one that makes sense. But whatever the definition being used here is clearly dysfunctional and only the old-series section is consistent. Once the term was taken up by the BBC as a marketing tool it became more and more meaningless, until we reach the point I alluded to above; where one-episode co-stars who never see the Tardis are somehow "companions", and ones less well known (as actors) that make a dozen trips are not. It has been debased as much as the word " 2380:

episodes, and how to deal with it across the project. Not just sneak it in under the radar in one article. In this spirit, I invite you to self-revert your edits while the discussion is ongoing. As for this source: it is from BBC America (ie. not the production team), it uses the term loosely and unclearly and does not in any way assert that River is a companion in any particular episodes themselves. It's a classic case of finding a source to fit your viewpoint, rather than the other way round.

31: 2850:

familiar self. She and the Doctor seem to have been on dozens of adventures (per the blue journal), and while some editors seem to be hellbent on making her fit into a forward sequence, her timeline works in reverse. She was a companion to Ten and he just didn't realize it. He very strongly cared for her even in the episodes in the Library, and while they had a brief time together, it was HIS screwdriver that she had. --

4635:

including the Tardisodes of 2006) are accurate. Does it include Children in Need, Time Crash, Space/Time, Good As Gold, Pond Life and the Night and the Doctor mini-episodes? I think we can get away without counting the two Meanwhile in the TARDIS as those were simply additional scenes and defined as such, not standalone stories. Something to also bear in mind if Vastra, Jenny and Strax are upgraded to companions.

215:- if you mouse over the section 'Characters' it states 'Read all about the Doctor and his companions' - if you click on it it then leads to information upon The Doctor, Amy, Churchill, River Song and Rory. This seems to me to be the equivalent of the companions tab on the prior site which was accepted as evidence for the BBC regarding somewhat contentious figures such as Lady Christina. 1762:

the Brig counts as a companion. Because I can't find out exactly what my book says I can't use that as a reliable source at the present time but I did check the official DW website and it does indeed list him as a companion on their official list. I believe that justifies him companion status? It also lists Captain Mike Yates and good old Sergeant Benton aswell. Can be viewed here;

5425:

older Amy pond in the girl who waited) dreams (Rory in Amy’s choice) or strait forward resurrections (grace in the tv move) rivers death is mitigate not because younger version of the character appears but because her mind is uploaded to a computer and even appears after the death from her point of view all of this means that Clara still dies on trap street in face the raven.

2200:

one wouldn't need a reliable source to list a housefly as an insect in article about insects… it's an accepted fact based on the definition. But unless they have been officially deemed as such by a party with the authority to do so, a character in Doctor Who can't be a "Companion®™" ;) … what I'm getting is that the article does not make that clear.

734:, which from RTD's keyboard reads: "The Doctor says, “Who are you?” The man says, “I'm the Doctor!” Good scene. The Doctor becomes his companion." Unfortunately that isn't clear who is becoming companion to who. Indeed in the episode itself Tennant's Doctor says "I'm your companion" to David M, albeit in a slightly throwaway manner. Tricky indeed. 2591:"). But no source has yet contradicted them. Please cite one if you can find it. Although, admittedly the Confidential episode that mentions Craig is a little ambiguous about the matter and can be discussed as to its reliability. As for River, her "status" was discussed because there weren't any unambiguous sources until just recently. Regards, 1842:

mitigated death… In "Wife" all we have is what is shown on-screen; there's no evidence that it was a mind trick, though that's what Amy assumes. What we see on-screen is Rory, dead, Amy reacting to that, and then we see him restored to life. Any assumptions about whether it really happened outside of what is shown on-screen would be OR.

1698:

difficulty in counting episodes, with companions particularly in the black and white era regularly missing single episodes) Nowadays the series are referred to by number of episodes, and so to only count once for each story is I would say far more misleading. The End of Time is counted as one appearance because of its single title.

472:

are in this particular case dead on), the BBC website lists him in characters and companions. On the other side we have Rory is not a companion because: the BBC hasn't released an article explicitly stating it (which is not surprising, Arthur Darvill is not Kylie Minogue. And this isn't a much awaited special either).

4672:

with him and join him for several consecutive adventures? Even a co-star credit in the opening titles for an actor making a one-off appearance doesn't turn their character into the Doctors ongoing companion. Not every recurring character is a companion of course - we could call Lytton a companion if we did that.

1358:

than yours? You know what, I'm going to say that my idea is better than yours. Yep, that's what I'm going to do. But that doesn't give me the right to put my idea in this article. I'm going to be the better person and not demand that my opinions are worthy of an article. I wonder if that's the reason for

5255:

I've moved as astrid death as with as serial show like doctor who it doesn't make sense to use one episode as a dividing line As characters whuood be decided between the seacshons depending on whether they appear in a multiple part story or a one parte as withe shera kingdom and astrid peth where the

4252:

I don't know what "confirmed" means, but imdb.com and tv.com have Coleman credited as being "Clara" in episodes 6 through 15. For what it's worth, as of about when I watched episode 7.1 (on the US west coast), Coleman was not credited for Oswin Oswald in either imdb.com or tv.com. I assume you have

3932:

The issue is that the band member templates have the distinctions of different colours for different roles, ie. vocals, guitar etc. There is no such distinction for companions, as I certainly would be very reluctant to support classing characters as "major" or "minor" companions as you suggest above.

2881:

The section is called "Death of a companion", not "Death of an active companion" or "Death of a current companion" or "Death of a companion while travelling with the Doctor". On the other hand, the text in the section reads "During the course of the show's history, there have been rare occasions when

2864:

In response to Avantu, there is no formal defination of what is a companion and to argue that someone is a companion, you need to have a defination in mind. We all have opinions here and I would imagine they all differ. Therefore, we reflect what reliable sources say, rather than interpreting what we

2199:

Agreed about OR, etc etc… I think you guys are missing my point: The article reads as if "Companion" is a word, like "insect" with a definition which can be applied by anyone as they understand it. But it's not that at all - it's an official "designation" rather than just being a term. By comparison,

1995:

DBD, even though she fits the "definition" defined in the article, the rule at play here is that a reliable source must specifically call her a "companion" in reference to the current Doctor in order for her to be listed as such on Knowledge. So far the only reliable source we have is from Doctor Who

1841:

Another editor included Rory's deaths in Curse of the Black Spot & The Doctor's Wife in the section of mitigated deaths. U-Mos suggests that neither were actually deaths to begin with, but I disagree: In "Curse" Rory is removed from life support and then resuscitated - I think that qualifies as a

1199:

The companions would be Susan, Ian, Barbara, Vicki, Stephen Taylor, Katarina, Sara Kingdom, Dodo Chaplet, Polly, Ben, Jamie McCrimmon, Victoria Waterfield, Samantha Briggs, Zoe Heriot, Liz Shaw, Jo Grant, Sarah Jane Smith, Harry Sullivan, Leela, K-9, Romanadveratralundar, Adric, Nyssa, Tegan Jovanka,

967:

back in 2007, and initially used the YYYY-MM-DD format because at the time it was required in citation templates, and used to be converted for display preferences. Neither of those is the case any more, so I think that the article should use the standard British date format. Anyone mind if I change

879:

I agree Rory is a companion. He has more right to be listed here than some of the 10th Doctors companions who only appear in one episode. By that definition there should be hundreds of characters who lend a hand to the Doctor. He has travelled in the Tardis for several episodes; are we not allowed to

5424:

Clara's death in face the Raven was not undone done in hell bent as the events of the episode and her time travelling with me are stated to take place during the last seconds be for her death from Clara’s point of view. whereas the other deaths in the mitigated are ether in alternative realties (the

5002:

You are so hung up on sources that you make this page worthless. You can have all the sources in the world, but if you are including people like Rosita or Adelaide I would say you have a serious definition problem. Even the loosest definition of the term would not include those characters. If your

4132:

At the time, she was called a "future companion" or "companion-to-come". I have never seen a source that calls her a companion of the Tenth Doctor, and even if there was one it would probably be considered an exceptional viewpoint. She appeared in the same capacity in series 5, and in series 6 there

4056:

You do realize that only the nerdiest and lamest news outlets will dwell on such an esoteric thing as whether or not River Song was or was not a "companion" of the Doctor from their first encounter. With that in mind, such a new character will not be in some "Companions of Doctor Who Compendium" or

3881:

then I mean something different. This template separates the companions by Doctor, mine would show all the major companions on one timeline (with "major companion" being defined as a companion who appears in at least half of the stories in any season). I would also be okay with just adding it to the

3016:

would not appear). The primary purposes of this would be to show how long each companion was on the show for, when there were multiple companions, and when the doctor actor is replaced, but a companion stays on the show. I just need to know if there is there community consensus that a timeline would

2900:

We now have a real example of my hypothetical scenarios above: the Brigadier's death. I suggest that whether or not that remains in the "companion deaths" section should be the litmus test for the issue of River's death, per above discussion, as it's an example of a companion death in the show, past

2658:

The only reason criticisms aren't a daily occurrence is because fans have just decided to give up and use a more accurate source. The definition of companion that you follow here is wrong. I check in every few months to see if you've finally come to your senses and fixed your broken definition but

2480:

On my first, and probably last, visit to this article I'm amazed to see that Astrid, Jackson Lake and Craig Owens have been somehow designated "companions", despite their having never even entered the Tardis, yet there is dispute over River Song, who was conceived in the Tardis.... A "companion" in

2379:

I'm not going to revert straight away for fear of getting into an edit war, but please take it to the project page. We can't have this page saying one thing and every other page saying something else, which is what this change has meant. If River is a companion, we need to gain consensus on in which

1962:

Okay, so she's currently listed as a Future Companion — someone who will/did travel with the Doctor. Except we've been seeing her travels with the Doctor... Shouldn't we list her as a companion of Eleven? We've seen her last 3 trips with him (1969, Pandorica, Byzantium) and it's heavily-implied that

1595:

Guys you really have a problem because you don't now what is a companion ! A companion is somebody who continusely help the doctor, have travelled with him more than a time or have been so good that he has been asked to join the crew ! If he is dead helping the doctor and have been asked to join him

1357:

Actually, I'm one of those "folks" who know what "companion" means in reference to Doctor Who. At least, I think i do. Do you? You probably think that you do too. The problem is, your idea might be different from my idea. So who's to say that your idea is better than mine...or my idea is better

811:

I actually quite like that source. The poll choices do not appear to have come from Knowledge, especially as Rosita is ommitted, with the prose explaining they are there for reference only. It does appear to be an independent source of Lake as a companion to me (although he's only got a single vote,

471:

This has been debated ad nauseum. The discussion always goes like this: Rory is a companion because: it is the consensus in fandom, it is abundantly clear in the primary source, articles mention him being a companion or an assistant (such as the daily star, which even though are rumours or spoilers,

5376:

Clara's death in face the Raven was not uone done in hell bent as the events of the episode and her time traveling with me are stated to take place during the last seconds be for her death from Claras point of view. where as the other deaths in the mitigated are ether in alternative realties dreams

5059:

so we have a section about companion deaths and then a comprehensive list of companion deaths. They are both essentially the same information. Should the first section just be a general discussion about how deaths are handled and then followed up with a comprehensive detailed list? As it stands now

4505:

Beat me to it. This page really is a pile of dog doo though. Most of the people mentioned on here aren't companions as most people would think of them. Since the series re-started I can count Rose, Martha, Donna, Amy, Rory and now Clara is companions. That's six. Astrid Peth, Christina De Souza and

4390:

as Oswin Oswald, but it remains to be seen if she will be playing the same character when she returns to the series later this season. Simple and allows "TBC" to be maintained. No official source (BBC, Doctor Who Magazine, cast/crew) has confirmed "Clara". Thus far the only official name associated

4152:

If she can't be labeled a companion in Silence in the Library/Forest of the Dead, maybe Jackson Lake and Adelaide Brooke shouldn't be considered either. They ALSO at the time only appeared once, yet River was in a two-parter. The rule is, if you have an adventure with the Doctor and he respects you

2808:

Also, as the whole subject of River's time travel confuses the issue, let me ask this for comparison: How would we treat the death of a companion had it occurred after their main tenure as such? I don't think there are any real examples unless I'm forgetting, but, imagine that Jamie had died in The

2424:

As I am saying, if a consensus is made to consider River a companion in so-many episodes on the project page then it can and will be made in every relevant article. This is why I have started the discussion on the project talk page. Until then, there is no reason to have to project disagreeing with

1761:

Earlier today I put the Brig into the fray based on something I believe I read in a 1970s book, my edit was undone and I was requested to add a discussion here. Sadly I haven't got my copy to hand as its in Sunderland sitting in my caravan right now.. however - something commonly debated is whether

1658:

I note that the number of appearances is counted as number of stories in the lists for companions of Doctors 1 to 8, and counted as number of episodes thereafter. This could be a bit misleading and a fairer comparison would be number of stories throughout IMHO. Counting multi-episode stories as a

1381:

So apparently the definition of a companion has changed from, "A costar of the show who travels with The Doctor in the TARDIS for more than one episode" to - "Anybody referred to in any media article as either an assistant or companion." If you believe the second definition then sure this article

682:

Sources provided for all but Mr Lake, largely due to the whole "next doctor" ruse pre-broadcast. I don't see the issue with including him though, after all if Rosita is then Morrissey (with star billing) surely is too. I know star billing can't be the be all and end all in light of the end of time,

478:

I believe that has gone beyond doubt. And at this rate you'll just keep getting bothered by the fandom because of your rigidity. I understand why such adherance to the rules is important in important or ambiguous articles, but in this case I feel it is unnecessary, especially considering the amount

191:

What are you asking me to source? I'm not suggesting any changes in the existing text, I'm saying there's a fundamental inaccuracy in what's there based on information that's already on Knowledge, most of it on the page itself. Bringing it up here seemed like a better idea than removing the section

5454:

But Clara’s death is the only one in the mitigated section that in the description says that she will have to go bake to that death eventually. Plus the fact that Clara’s death cannot be changed and the doctor cannot accept it is why the doctor’s memory of Clara has to be erased in the episode the

4312:"Usually correct" means that they're also wrong on occasion. Knowledge needs sources that are as close to 100% correct as possible. And both imdb and tv.com are run by volunteers, so anthing they say or don't say should be taken with a grain of salt and not considered to be significant in any way. 2784:

I tended to agree with U-Mos on this previously, but Avanu makes some interesting points … here's how I see this: she has been verified to be a companion of the Eleventh Doctor, and her death takes place after that in her chronology. So, knowing what we know now, is that, then, the death of one of

2560:

I didn't claim that I am an RS on this, (otherwise I'd have cleaned up the article already, which would have lasted all of 10 seconds) but I do question that the BBC is, as they clearly have no consistency and use it interchangeably with "co-star". The creators of a show are not automatically the

2310:

Several more changes made today by myself and Ckatz on the intro paragraph, and I think we've reached a point where it reads consistently with edit patterns. As for River Song (to get back to the subject of this section), the article now correctly lists her as a companion in line with this revised

1926:

I agree about dropping te "mitigated" subsection… just list the deaths (whatever the consensus view is of the ones that are actual deaths, any almost-deaths shouldn't be included there). Let the explanations of whether a death was reversed somehow be explained within the prose as Gaeme suggests. A

1334:

Don't waste your breath. The editors of this page obviously have no interest in making this page accurate and have no interest in listening to folks who actually know what 'the companion' means in reference to Doctor Who. They would much rather quote various news articles and press releases that

1210:

The Guest Stars would be those with a significant role in the programme but not enough to be a companion, for example, none of the actors in the Specials were ever planned for anything more than a one-off. So that would include Astrid Peth, Jackson Lake, Lady deSousa, Adelaide, Rosita and Wilfred

958:

that I didn't intend to undo his cleanup work. However, one thing that was intentional was my change of the date format from the ugly and rarely used (outside of Knowledge) YYYY-MM-DD format to the more common and more comprehensible "1 June 2010" format. The article currently uses both formats;

603:

Added "cn" for Adam (no source at all), Mickey (who I think was added on the principle of being in the tardis), Jack (same pretty much) and re-appearances in Jounrey's End - which I actually remember for the discussion were only addeed because they appeared as companions before with no source that

5111:

Jamie is listed as having "21 (20 as companion)" appearances with the Second Doctor. Similarly, Zoe is listed as "9 (8 as companion)". The discrepancy appears to refer to The Five Doctors, where both appear to the second Doctor as illusions. He appears in 20 stories in the 60s (Highlanders to War

4915:

Under the Third Doctor there is a section for disputed companions like the Brigadier, Mike Yates etc - they are considered disputed due to sporadic appearances. However under the Tenth Doctor there are 'companions' that made sporadic appearances, or even one-off appearances. Surely they deserve a

4671:

I expect it's a debate that rages endlessly, but I'm surprised to see a lot of one-off guest stars being added to this list as companions. The term gets thrown about without much thought in the media, but surely to qualify as the Doctor's traveling companion, a character has to throw their all in

4634:

We should be including the mini-episodes in the counts. As Craig's 3rd episode (the mini-sode "Up All Night" from the Series 6 DVD set) wasn't included (it is now), the question has to be asked as to whether the counts for Rose, Mickey, Amy, Rory and River (all of whom participated in minisodes -

2439:

I've responded on the discussion on the Doctor Who wikiproject page in detail to defend the edit, and the source. Again, if your concern is "the project disagreeing with itself" as it is inconsistently with verifiable details that are present in this and other articles, then the other articles in

1662:

Also, there is a reference in the text to "standard definition" of a companion, which might lead the reader to think there is a special definition of a companion of the Doctor elsewhere in the article. Or does it just mean the dictionary definition of "companion": someone who accompanies someone

4405:

Not really a better idea. It is much simpler to just mention stuff that has aired and wait for the rest. I have also removed the "Time of the Angels" references, which made the episode count for the characters involved complete guesswork. I know it's a time-travelling show, but editors should

4189:

The article initially defined Rose, Martha, Donna and Amy as the "primary companions" in the revival series. I added Rory Williams to this list. Not only due to the actor receiving star billing since the 2010 Christmas special, but if you look at the number of episodes listed for each companion,

2160:

It's an element of it, and based on editing patterns, it's the most essential one. The article tells us there is not a definition, and then proceeds to tell us in great detail what the definition is, both by explanation and example, and every time one editor adds or subtracts an example, another

1884:

I am starting to like the mitigated section less and less too, although Peri's death is a tricky one as it's a good few episodes after her exit when we get the cop-out that she didn't actually die. As for the points in hand, though, for me "Curse of the Black Spot" at least is a no-brainer. Rory

1425:

What is going on here ? Why does someones consider jackson lake, rosita and adelaide as companions ? They've done only one adventure with the doctor and did not ask or been ask to go further so why consider them ? This is crazy! It is not becose their names are in the credits that they should be

4985:

The three UNIT companions are "disputed" because there is no clear consensus of sources whether they are companions or not. The one-off companions are almost invariably described as such, and those that don't (for instance, best companion polls) often deem it necessary to explain their absence.

2849:

River Song is an obvious exception among companions. Her timeline for some reason works itself out backwards (and circuituously) from the Doctor's. She begins her tenure as a companion at her conception, and continues it later as Mels stealing the TARDIS at gunpoint and regenerating into her

2834:

In the hypothetical examples above, I'd say that they should only be included if they died as a companion. If Jamie had died in The Two Doctors then he was a companion of the Second Doctor there, so yes he should be included. If Donna had died in The End of Time she shouldn't be. But that's my

2614:

Barsoomian, don't waste any more time trying to get these guys to make this article correct. They obviously have zero interest in making an accurate resource on Doctor Who Companions. If some article somewhere in existence calls somebody a companion then they are a companion according to the

834:

By any definition, Rory is a companion. Yet a certain clique of editors insists on keeping the obvious out of the article out of spite. You people are the reason editing Knowledge is so unsufferable. I don't have the time or the patience to deal with a group of pedants who continually act like

4744:

Looking over the number of one-shot companions, shouldn't Brian Williams (Rory's father) be added to the list for the Eleventh Doctor? He appeared in two episodes ("Dinosaurs on a Spaceship" and "The Power of Three"), traveling in the TARDIS for the first of those episodes. What do y'all say?

1724:

reverted presumably because there wasn't positive consensus to standardise in this way), I would suggest in the interest of accuracy to casual readers that this is pointed out - as I said, "Otherwise, the different method of counting should be made clear in the text." I still think it's a bit

1697:

I would oppose this I'm afraid. The classic and new series are treated differently because they're very different. In the old, serial-based DW it makes far less sense to use number of episodes, as the seperate episodes are rarely if ever divorced from their serials. (Plus there would be great

1682:

In the absence of objections, I've implemented the first change, I hope without introducing any errors. Wilf was recorded as 1 appearance as a companion already. I don't have enough DW non-fiction to investigate reliable attempts at a definition, although there has been much discussion in

2038:

starts with "There is no formal definition of what makes a companion." Therefore saying someone is a companion because ... doesn't work. The recent companions on this list all have a reliable sources (except Amy, but there's ref 5 on her page). No the BBC is not the only reliable source.

773:

is clearly an RS. On the other hand, he's not mentioned in the main text, only in the poll and the list of companions after it. That might be good enough, though the fact that it links back to Knowledge makes it a bit recursive and possibly a self-reference. What do other folks think?

2019:

The trouble with that is that the BBC website for series four (still available) had a list of "companions" including Astrid Peth and Lady Christina, but the website now has a list of "characters" including Amy Pond. The word "companion" is not used. Is the BBC the only reliable source?

2266:

Shada Ng, that's not my position, and I don't believe it's consensus. We need a reliable source to say a character is a companion. Recently this has come from the BBC, the authors and the press (the main sources we have). However we can't just rely on the BBC and the creators, that's

1404:

Short answer: the producers of the show have always defined who a companion is. And the media helped too. Compare "the four time-traveling companions" (the Doctor, Susan, Ian and Barbara) vs "the Doctor's new companion Vicki"...and any of the later iterations including "assistants".

4880:

The "Deaths of companions" section states that "ince the series was relaunched in 2005, the Doctor believes himself to be the only Time Lord to have survived the Last Great Time War, indicating that Susan Foreman and Romana were killed." This seems to me to need two qualifications:

1712:

OK. I've just made a couple of edits that should be uncontroversial: firstly a clarification and reference for the reasons for Katarina's death that I'd put in earlier; and secondly an explanation that the appearances with the Sixth Doctor do not correspond to the number column in

2949:

With Jack Harkness as a companion it said "First episode" Utopia. I thought to myself "Wait, didn't he first join in The Empty Child" because I am an idiot I didn't pay attention and missed that they were in sections for different doctors and that he was already listed under 9.

4425:

Funny to see people sitting here arguing over when is the right time to put Oswin on this page when this wiki is already full of people who were merely guest stars, and not companions like Astrid. Knock yourself dead and enjoy fighting for hours over your inaccurate resource.

1907:

How about dropping the subsection title and using actual prose instead of a list of examples to describe the cases where the character apppears to be dead but isn't (wasn't?). I'd also like to see a better referencing for Amy being dead, rather than nearly dead, at the end of

4358:

I don't understand why many editors are so obsessed with jumping the gun and incorporating stuff that hasn't aired yet. It is particularly disastrous when it comes to Doctor Who, whose production staff have long enjoyed misleading the public in advance with great success.

2769:

I'm happy to go with any consensus, but don't think she should be added without one. If she is included, it opens a whole can of worms as to whether she belongs in the mitigated section or not because although she appeared again after her death, the death itself was final.

2334:

Once again this article seems to have decided it has the right to display contradictory information to the rest of wikipedia. It doesn't. This is not on people. I'm going to kick off a discussion at the project page so we can get an agreement that covers the whole project.

2398:

rather than complaining about it here). Nothing has "sneaked in under the radar" here, and I've made consistent edits on several other articles where relevant, all with legitimate source (and no, I don't see any reason to question BBC's "loose" use of the term; it's quite

4279:

I know they're not reliable, but they're both usually correct about the cast. I consider the ommission from the (then) imdb entry significant, as it may have indicated that that credit was not announced until the actual broadcast. But it's not directly relevant to

4069:

Things don't have to be cause and effect in a show like Doctor Who. "Time can be rewritten." Literally anything can happen in that show. We have an episode with a woman who the Doctor doesn't know, but who he comes to love and trust within the span of one episode.

850:

Actually, we're just following wikipedia guidelines. We need at least one reliable source that states that he is a companion, then all this warring and arguement can stop. Finally, we do seem to have a couple, just need a consensus and we can change the articles.

633:

which I didn't add by the way (it was already there) - also there's still the thing about whether being a companion once automatically means you're one whenever you return (which is the only reason that those in Journey's End are counted as being one in that story)

2637:

Thank you for your opinion and criticism. But I would like to point out that without the guideline of citing reliable sources, this article would be in constant flux and criticisms such as yours would be a daily occurrence rather than once every so oftem. Regards.

894:

The real problem is editors who get upset whenever someone who is not them start editing "their" pages. You can spot them by the way they launch into legalistic arguments about whether a source is "reliable" or not and ignore whether the actual argument is *true*.

4549:

The thing is, Aside from "The End of Time Part2" She also appeared in Time Crash for a few seconds. Since it is declared canon yet is not an actual episode does that count? In fact do any of the shorts count? Space/Time, Unnamed 10th Doctor regeneration segment.

2286:

Again, I'm trying to make the article read in such a way that's consistent with the consensus viewpoint on this matter. The way the intro paragraph reads now is a huge improvement in my opinion, and is much closer to matching what you're saying. Do you agree?

1996:

Confidential around her first appearance calling her a "companion-to-come." Obviously she fits the bill… as does Canton, but they haven't been officially bestowed by the BBC with the label yet, and that's all that matters to the rest of the editors here.

4876:

The "List of spin-off companions" section should include a description of the type of media, as at the moment it is difficult to work out what kind of work is being referred to, particularly for those items that don't have a link to an article about the

4675:

A bona fide Companion has to be part of the *regular* Tardis team at some point, surely? That's why Sara Kingdom in particular has always had rather tenuous companion status that only just makes the 'grade'. Like Pluto ;) Am I really being too strict?

989:

No problem at all, I noticed that in restoring my cleanup I had undone the date alterations, although unfortunately as they were performed in the same edit they will have to be changed back manually. Was going to tackle said task at some point myself.

4760:

I consider Brian Williams to be a companion; I think of Jackie Tyler as a companion for the same reason. Both of them traveled in the TARDIS, and both played more-than-supporting roles. If Rosita is a companion, then in my opinion, they qualify.

1611:

You're right, we really don't know what is a companion is! As wikipedia editors our opinions do not count. My opinion, yours or Edokter's what a companion are likely to be different so how are we going to have an article if they did? We rely on

4036:

It seems to me that the original series counts each story as an "appearance", whilst the new series counts each episode as an "appearance" - i.e. counting each episode in the two-part stories separately. This seems hard to justify, surely ? --

2561:

authoritative source on its interpretation. If any press release by the BBC trumps all else, well, it's hopeless to even try to define the term, with the absurd results we see in the article. And yes DonQuixote, that is my POV, not to mention

5127:

I don't think we should count "The Five Doctors" as an appearance as if I recall we don't count Adric's cameo in "Time-Flight" or Amy's cameo in "The Time of the Doctor" as an appearance. So keep it at 21 appearances for Jamie and 8 for Zoe.

4717:

Also I'm not sure it makes sense to separate "Television" and "Spin Off" Companions, since the 7th and 8th Doctor books weren't actually spin offs but the main continuation of the story. But the way it is now is cleaner if a bit inaccurate.

158:" in stories on other planets the Doctor and Jo became a two-person team with a close, personal bond. This pattern, the Doctor with a single female companion, became a template from which subsequent episodes of Doctor Who rarely diverged." 281:

So what is it exactly that is refraining Rory being in the lists of companions? Such characters as Micky and Captain Jack appeared in recent series for only a handful of episodes travelling with The Doctor yet are classed as companions.

4391:

with the actress is "Oswin Oswald." We also don't know if she indeed will appear again in the Christmas special or if she might make more appearances in the interim. Again, a footnote as I describe here covers that eventuality as well.

2093:

There being no formal definition, we include characters who have been called a companion by a reliable source. We can't determine who is a companion and who isn't and I would expect my opinion be different to yours and other editors.

697:

Of course, there is no pre-transmission announcement by the BBC because of the nature of the story. There was an RTD interview saying that there would be one-off companions for these specials. We need reviews, lists of companions etc.

5483:

But as a result of time travel we have see her die and then at an earlier part of the story of Clara Oswald it’s not that different to how river song showed up in the wrong order meaning it was still a permeate death shown on screen

4570:

Just so you know, in the "Companion Deaths" I mentioned that Rita from "The God Complex" though not an official companion was already chosen by the Doctor to be one before her death. So I don't know if that would technically count.

2485:

or whatever. -- PS How is it that Kazran and Abigail (in "Christmas Carol") are not "Companions"? Both went with the Doctor on numerous trips, albeit mostly sightseeing. Do you have to fight an alien invasion to be a "Companion"?

2053:

I agree. I removed "a term primarily used in fandom" but it still doesn't make sense. If there's no strict definition then there wouldn't be such restrictions on who is included as a companion in this article… so, clearly there is.

4233:

It has been confirmed that Coleman will act as the Doctor's companion, but I do see the point that you're trying to get across. For example, she may be acting as different character related to Coleman (similar to Freema Agyeman in

667:

and the other character pages, specifically calling them series 4 companions (as much as I was resentful of Mickey being called thus at the time). I will have a hunt for Jackson Lake sources, I have no doubt they exist somewhere.

2527:" which is now used by the BBC in a way completely opposite to its original definition, because it sounds cooler than "prologue", presumably, but that's another rant. I suppose if I have a point at all it's that the BBC is not a 2531:

on this issue now, if it ever was. It's a fannish term not an official listed credit like "Special guest star" or "Gaffer" and to defer to the BBC on this may be a simple rule, but it makes the article worthless going forward.

2184:

We can describe the characteristics of a companion (define, if you will), but we cannot define a certain character as being a companion. That's original research. We rely on other people to do that for us (reliable sources).

662:

That is by no means the only reason those characters are listed as such in JE, that is due to their star billing in the episode, the myriad of sources describing the return of the doctor's companions at the time, and of course

880:

reference the programme content itself? Of course they don't call him a 'companion' in the show itself so you are looking for some print media in defiance of the obvious. Or has he been written out of existance here as well?

5319:

as as it is stated that it is a fixst point in time and that Clara will have to go bake in the episode no mater how long she an Ashildr spend traveling in there tardis aswell as the fact that she is frozen just before her

4807:

There should be a mention of Clara Oswald and her childhood as portrayed by a young actress in "The RIngs of Akhaten" (at least, there may be more) but actually there should be more said overall on this page about Clara.

2785:

the Eleventh Doctor's companions? Does the point in the story at which it appears matter more than seeing the information as a whole in hindsight as we can now? (These are not rhetorical questions, I'm actually asking).

4474:

I was just browsing the article and thought "where's Oswin?". However thinking about it, she hasn't actually appeared as the companion yet. What's the big deal? We'll add her after she's been on the Christmas Special.

4611:

Exactly. The BBC has official lists of who are considered companions, and there are numerous books that do the same as well. To declare a character a companion in this article would be original research and a no-no.

3012:. I would use one color for the doctors, and another color for the companions. All eleven doctors would be on the timeline, and all companions who made more than one appearance would also be on the timeline (e.g. 5003:

source is saying they are, your source is wrong. So if you want, put them in a disputed area, leave them out all together, or continue to make this page inaccurate and a worthless resource by leaving them in.

1200:

Vislor Turlough, Kamelion, Perpugilliam Brown, Melanie Bush, Ace, Dr. Grace Holloway, Chang Lee, Rose Tyler, Adam Mitchell, Captain Jack Harkness, Micky, Martha Jones,Donna Noble, Amelia Pond and Rory Williams.

5377:

or strat fowed resurrections rivers death is mitergat not because younger version of the character appears but because her mind is uploaded to a computer and even appears after the death from her point of view

2440:"the project" should be corrected. It's unreasonable to suggest (if you are) that verifiable details should be removed from relevant articles simply because it's not yet present in other, less relevant ones. 4729: 4650:

No, they're not. And no, they shouldn't be. Full episodes only. I had never given any thought to the original Children in Need ep with Rose, but I will remove that now. It gets very complicated otherwise.

3933:

And leaving out one-off companions again seems like a bad idea to me. And what about River Song? I dont think it is a format that would work, but as Graeme says feel free to sandbox it and prove me wrong.

2953:

I goofed... I replaced "Utopia" with "The Empty Child" until I realized my idiotic goof so I immediately changed it back. I just wanted to inform you incase you're wondering what just happened. I'm sorry.

1729:

which could easily have gone out under two separate titles. The third possibility, which I'd also have no problem with, would be to have an episode count for all companions. --09:12, 6 June 2011 (UTC)

4952:

Which sources are "official"? John Nathan-Turner wrote a 1986 book about the companions, and he included the Brig. It seems that, despite efforts to make this objective, it remains highly subjective.

796:

Does seem quite recursive. Although to be honest, I should point out that I don't really think the case for listing him as a companion to begin with is particularly strong which may prejudice my views.

4063:

As the Doctor looks down at her blue journal, she comes along and they exchange the following: "Sorry, you're not allowed to see inside the book; it's against the rules. What rules? Your rules."

4057:

similar publication. So the baffling thing to me is why we are not all in agreement that she is a companion and has been since her conception. This would include her appearance in the Library.

1817: 1065:

the Doctor, though the Master (or the diamonds) convinced him that the Doctor was the bad guy. If the series had been picked up, then I believe Chang Lee would have joined Grace and the Doctor.

3914:

I note that Woknam66 linked to illustrative maps of the timeline, rather than a navbox and that makes sense. Things can be drawn a lot better in illustration that wikimarkup can manage (though

2733:

If she is a companion, she belongs there. If she isn't, she doesn't. The question we need to solve is whether she should be classified as a companion or not (see next section as well). Regards

4938:

We go on sources, and the sources provided describe all of the Tenth Doctor's companions as such. (Although personally I've never considered Rosita a companion, we have to go along with it.)

2132:

But the underlying point is that, although you and I can define whomever as companions, we can't be cited because we're not reliable sources. Also, it would be original research regardless.

4133:

was a slight change in her narrative role and, far more importantly, reliable sources started to refer to her as a current companion. This has all been discussed at length and decided upon.

4209:

Okay, folks, let's not go mad. Oswin Oswald has appeared in one episode and did not travel with the Doctor. Yes, she is portrayed by Coleman, but we do not know that she is the companion

2482: 4869:

isn't listed as the first episode for Clara is that she doesn't really fulfill the role of companion in that story, and not that the character is different -- otherwise, the choice of

1927:

good rule would be whether we actually see the death happen on-screen. And I'm with Graeme on this too… Amy didn't die, she was preserved in a "near death" state; totally different.

5162:

I think we should, since he's had as many appearances as Craig (who's listed as a companion) and he never even saw the TARDIS. Although maybe it's more appropriate to list him as

1481:

It is not up to us to decide if they are companions or not (see the whole discussion on this page). We can only put here what other sources say, and they say they are companions.

3918:

does a fair job) - the ability to compress or expand the passage of time, flexiblity in coloration etc. I suggest Woknam66 gives it a go and takes feedback on what they present.

563:

Ummm.... the article itself defines a companion as "someone who travels in the TARDIS and shares in the Doctor's adventures". How does Rory not fit the criteria of the article?

1004:

I would concur that the "1 June 2010" format is the easiest for me to parse, so would prefer that, assuming there is no technical imperative requiring the YYYY-MM-DD format.

526:

should rory not be listed as a companion of the eleventh doctor? He has travelled in the tardis on more than one ocasion, I would say that that gives him companion status.

5440:

No. She is no longer properly dead in the next episode and still not by the end of the series. I don't even understand quite what you are arguing but you make no sense.

5398:

It is very difficult to understand what you are saying - please make some efforts with capitalisation, spelling and grammar. None of the recent edits were improvements.

2827: 2329: 2241: 1203:

The Associate companions would be those who regularly (but not continuously) took trips with the Doctor. So that would be the Brigadeer (did Benton and Yates ever even

5469:

You are making things unnecessarily complicated. Everyone dies in the end but Clara is not dead once the story ends, which is what matters when writing about fiction.

2718:

There seems to be some disagreement about if this should be in the "Death of a companion" section. Rather than change the article, perhaps we should discuss this here.

2394:

If other articles are inconsistent with clearly-sourced material in this article, then perhaps it is those other articles which need to be revised (by you, perhaps, ie

1089:

citations establishing Rosita as a companion? Surely this can be cut down to the two or three that we consider most reliable. I suggest that we cut this back to just

5325: 5280: 5117: 4792: 4437: 1870:

is a case of jeopardy more than a genuine case of companion death. The whole concept of "mitigated death" smacks of OR, unless there is a source that uses the phrase.

1118:

Following the earlier discussion I was considering removing those that didn't mention 'companion' - i.e. referr to her as assistant. I agree, we don't need that many.

1051: 5112:

Games), but doesn't Jamie's apperance in The Two Doctors also count as a legit companion apperance with the Second Doctor? So shouldn't it be "22 (21 as companion)"?

4694:

We don't get to decide who is or isn't a companion. We cite reliable sources, such as the producers. So the better question is, "what constitutes a reliable source?"

1659:

single appearance also correlates better, but not of course perfectly, to screen time. Otherwise, the different method of counting should be made clear in the text.

5177: 5014: 4927: 4884:

It isn't explicitly stated that he has actual knowledge of this, and as he was mistaken in the case of the Master he may have been mistaken in either of these cases.

2670: 2626: 1780: 1561:

There are, just not for every companion. Others come from news stories, interviews with producers, actors, etc. We source from what we can find and what conforms to

806: 574: 197: 166: 1945: 1879: 1717:. That's not a change in policy, just a clarification, as casual readers may not have the same understanding as the editors as to what constitutes an "appearance". 239: 5035: 4849: 4345: 1275:

O(riginal) R(esearch). If you can find a reliable source that says any of the above, then feel free to cite it, otherwise it's OR. 19:10, 23 September 2010 (UTC)

1139: 1005: 798: 537: 216: 146: 4688: 439:

Rory is sourced, look at the official website for a start. He was a companion and until this is acknowledged this list is inaccurate. I'm sorry, but it is. Look:

5329: 5314: 4725: 4666: 2218: 2194: 2141: 2029: 2014: 1147: 1033: 1013: 2305: 2179: 2127: 2072: 5366: 1692: 1393: 789: 313: 134: 5098: 1828: 1801: 5240: 5226: 5137: 4781:

HEY, FIRST OF ALL YOUR WELCOME FOR ADDING THE TWELVTH DOCTOR! ALSO THANKS FOR MAKING IT ONE OF THOSE LIST THINGS INSTEAD OF WHAT I DID WITH A TON OF SPACES

4463: 4400: 1753: 342: 5197: 4733: 4162: 2919: 2844: 2803: 2697: 2674: 2647: 2458: 2434: 2417: 2344: 1375: 963:

says that articles should be self-consistent in this regard, and also says "Where in doubt, defer to the style used by the first major contributor." I was

943: 5511: 4494: 4321: 3243: 1161: 1074: 821: 657: 643: 628: 224: 105: 4621: 4349: 4291: 4274: 4260: 1813: 1328: 1291: 1270: 1256: 2600: 2582: 2555: 2541: 2514: 1414: 1127: 865:

Here's a wikipedia guideline: "If a rule prevents you from improving or maintaining Knowledge, ignore it." Can you cease your childish behavior already?

677: 401: 185: 4515: 4484: 4415: 4381: 4265:

imdb is not a reliable source; don't know about tv.com, what sources do they quote? Coleman is credited in the end credits of "Asylum of the Daleks‎‎".

4082: 2155: 2048: 557: 5529: 5493: 5478: 5464: 5449: 5407: 5018: 4947: 4606: 4178: 3942: 3927: 3895: 3045: 1921: 1894: 1707: 904: 889: 5084: 5045: 4703: 4660: 4199: 4051: 3030: 874: 860: 5149: 5129: 4006: 3986: 2989: 1860: 1633: 1181: 999: 955: 479:

of evidence we have provided. Let us simply add him with a "citation needed" like you did Jackson Lake, or let us cite the BBC doctor who website.--

4770: 4575: 4551: 4533: 4154: 4142: 4127: 3691: 2955: 2874: 2779: 2764: 2746: 1584: 1540: 1500: 1460: 725: 707: 84: 4995: 4980: 4962: 4498: 3964: 3909: 1990: 1304:

So I'm guessing my inclusion of Samantha Briggs as a companion counted as original research too, since I haven't seen anyone else ever suggest it.

4796: 4490: 4247: 3077: 881: 385: 120: 4073:

It almost seems unbelievably hard headed for our editors to make rules about how to sequentially document the adventures of a time traveler. --

201: 170: 5265: 4109: 2895: 2859: 2389: 2374: 743: 692: 4824: 3000:

I would like to make a graphical timeline of all the doctors and companions on Doctor Who, similar to the ones that exist for band members in

5069: 4931: 613: 2630: 461: 356: 283: 5284: 1676: 1350: 1134:

Most of them don't seem to really add anything, I think pruning it back to those two would be fine. I think most of them are also used on

1112: 431: 325: 4559: 2034:

IMHO the first line of this article is wrong, and I've been meaning to propose a change for some time. The better and referenced section

925: 844: 488: 436:

Rumour is that Rory re-appears in the finale, how the crack comes into things is somewhat different. hence a 'presumed death' is better

4046: 2495: 5557: 5386: 5121: 3512: 2995: 2727: 2280: 2103: 1397: 1055: 4714:

Added Chris & Roz, but not sure if there is a specific order for the companions. I put them in what would be chronological order.

4644: 4441: 4905: 3238: 2146:

Is saying "We have no (reliable) way of working out who is or is not a companion so we'll wait for someone to tell us" a definition?

1313: 1239: 5434: 4853: 2809:

Five Doctors or if The 7th Doctor traveled to Gallifrey and witnessed the death of Romana. Would those be a "death of a companion?"

731: 648:

I seem to remember a long winded debate about Lake at the time, consensus was reached I think, but I can't find a cast iron source.

276: 3554: 2914: 2822: 2798: 2453: 2412: 2324: 2300: 2236: 2213: 2174: 2122: 2067: 2009: 1940: 1855: 983: 299: 5089:

And a lot of it is synthesis if not original research and should be cut. The fannish nature of this whole article is troubling.

1975: 4754: 3005: 2963: 2615:

editors. Using that reasoning the star of the show is "Dr. Who" not The Doctor because plenty of news articles call him that.

368: 5352:

would fool the Quantum Shades, though, but I could imagine a resolution not resulting in a permanent death for Clara. Perhaps

4368: 3622: 457: 206: 5181: 1648: 1605: 1196:

OK, I think I've figured out the best way to categorize all these people: Companions, Associate Companions, and Guest Stars.

5455:

only different after hell bent is that Clara and me have adventures in there own tardis before Clara goes bake to hear death.

4184: 2680:

Thank you for your definitions of "fan" and "companion". However, this is your personal view and falls under the category of

578: 321: 142: 76: 64: 59: 3009: 541: 508: 263: 5321: 5307: 5276: 5219: 5157: 5113: 4788: 4433: 4227: 1047: 480: 256:

Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

231: 713: 593: 497:

Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

5549: 5173: 5010: 4923: 4583: 4191: 3070: 2666: 2622: 1737: 1684: 1668: 1342: 935: 570: 521: 393: 193: 162: 4060:

For those who would argue, consider that the Doctor was *immediately* won over by her whispering his name into his ear.

1555: 1515: 1475: 1466:

They figured as companions because in these episodes the doctor hadn't companions. But really they aren't companions ! —

1435: 5054: 5031: 4897: 4845: 4636: 4613: 4392: 4341: 533: 1836: 5503: 5485: 5456: 5426: 5378: 5257: 1176: 1107: 1028: 978: 784: 964: 5250: 4802: 1389: 917: 896: 866: 836: 585: 1620:". Companion status for each character is sourced to a reliable, published source. Please also read the policy on 507:

I've closed this section to save repeating the same arguments because Rory's status as been and been discussed at

262:

I've closed this section to save repeating the same arguments because Rory's status as been and been discussed at

4776: 3866: 153: 4916:

section for 'disputed' or 'one off' companions. It's silly to consider Rosita a companion when the Brig isn't.

4574:

Well actually yeah... the thing is she would have been a companion but the fact is, she wasn't. I'll remove it.

4541: 767: 4028: 4000: 3980: 3958: 3915: 3889: 3063: 3024: 1279: 1235: 4968: 3900:

I don't think that's necessary, it would have to do something different (and useful) to what already exists.

101: 2713: 584:

This is still a topic under debate. Cease your unilateral closing off of dicussion or you will be reported.

3567: 2910: 2818: 2794: 2587:

Just like to point out that any press released by the BBC doesn't trump all else (which is poor practice--"

2449: 2408: 2320: 2296: 2232: 2209: 2170: 2118: 2063: 2005: 1936: 1851: 5502:

this may not be a source accepted by Knowledge but it dose accurately reflect what happens in the episodes

2035: 683:

but if an assissting character is given star credit I say that's a strong indication of companion status.

4910: 4546:

I should note that it states Martha was a companion for 18 episodes but appeared in one episode not one.

3357: 3302: 2367: 1143: 1080: 1009: 829: 802: 364: 220: 47: 17: 4334:

Or Romana II, for that matter, who deliberately took on the appearance of Princess Astra at her regen.

2261: 2088: 5334:

Well, there was at least one previous "fixed point in time" which became unfixed, that is the death of

5299: 5211: 3422: 3322: 3312: 1957: 1714: 1616:

as per our guidelines and policies. The first line of this says "Knowledge articles should be based on

1613: 1562: 453: 38: 3001: 245: 5344: 4222: 3845: 2755:

The argument appeared to be that she wasn't a companion in that episode. I'm unsure if this matters.

1971: 1653: 1191: 639: 609: 598: 424: 317: 138: 92:

Its Parting of the Ways, since he regenerates in that episode and is seen with rose in that episode.

5030:

Fans have different views on what a companion is. That is why wikipedia uses the BBC site instead.

5270: 5094: 3497: 2588: 1763: 484: 235: 5419: 5106: 5553: 5548:

Should spi off's even be in the death section as they are not metond any where else on this page

4709: 4195: 4088:

All valid points but they are OR points. Whether she is a companion or not is only determined by

3923: 3805: 3632: 3482: 3467: 3103: 2904: 2812: 2788: 2443: 2402: 2314: 2290: 2226: 2203: 2164: 2112: 2057: 1999: 1930: 1917: 1875: 1845: 1824: 1797: 1741: 1688: 1672: 1359: 1346: 1324: 1287: 1252: 939: 397: 2546:

Thank you for your POV. Please publish it in a reliable source so that we can cite it. Regards,

1912:- my understanding being that the Pandorica prevents death rather than "resurrecting" the dead. 348:

He has traveled with the doctor much longer than some other componions, like Adam in Series 1.

5543: 5363: 5188:

The current consensus is to cite a reliable source so that we avoid original research and POV.

4901: 4739: 4640: 4629: 4617: 4396: 4378: 4288: 4257: 3266: 2355:"Get an inside look at the Eleventh Doctor's Companions: Amy Pond, Rory Williams and River Song 1818:

Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Doctor_Who/Archive_21#The_Brigadier.2FYates.2FBenton_-_companions.3F

1776: 2688:

that defines "fan" and "companion" the way that you want, we cannot include it here. Regards.

440: 5507: 5489: 5460: 5430: 5382: 5261: 5080: 4859: 4591: 4521: 3970: 3815: 3757: 3233: 1172: 1103: 1041: 1024: 974: 780: 449: 4838:

is missing from the list. She did 15 episodes and should be listed with doctors 9 and 10.

230:

But Churchill isn't a companion. Hopefully... Damn that BBC for making things so ambiguous--

5236: 5193: 5169: 5153: 5133: 5041: 5006: 4919: 4841: 4830: 4820: 4784: 4721: 4699: 4459: 4429: 4337: 4317: 4204: 3762: 3041: 2693: 2662: 2643: 2618: 2596: 2578: 2551: 2537: 2510: 2491: 2190: 2137: 2025: 1986: 1733: 1410: 1385: 1371: 1338: 1223: 1018:

Nope — there's no technical requirement for the YYYY-MM-DD format. I'll make the switch. —

949: 921: 900: 870: 840: 635: 605: 589: 566: 529: 445: 412: 352: 309: 130: 664: 8: 5291: 5203: 5090: 4602: 4579: 4555: 4529: 4270: 4243: 4174: 4158: 4123: 3582: 3525: 3372: 3332: 2959: 2941: 2870: 2760: 2723: 2276: 2268: 2151: 2099: 2044: 1629: 1590: 1123: 703: 517: 511:

Please read the arguments there and if you have a new source, please join the discussion.

338: 272: 266:

Please read the arguments there and if you have a new source, please join the discussion.

5256:

only real difference as companies is the number of episodes in the story they appear in

4374:

Perhaps the table entry should be removed completely until the (first) episode airs. —

4066:

He gave River Song his sonic screwdriver, which he claims he would never do for anyone.

1138:

page anyway, which is the place for any detailed analysis of her role that is required.

4976: 4958: 4766: 3919: 3810: 3725: 3607: 3382: 3362: 3307: 2311:

definition, so, for now, from my perspective, all of the above is case-closed. Thanks.

1913: 1871: 1820: 1793: 1320: 1309: 1283: 1266: 1248: 1231: 1216: 1070: 885: 4454:

So, feel free to contribute reliable sources so that we can make this article better.

4386:

A better idea: why not someone just add a footnote indicating that Coleman debuted in

4118:

I predict that several books will be published and disagree about who is a companion.

2501:

Thank you for your original definition of "companion". Unfortunately that falls under

5525: 5474: 5445: 5403: 5360: 4684: 4411: 4375: 4364: 4285: 4254: 3730: 3520: 3186: 3181: 2982: 2519:

Well, duh. You think I didn't know that? Though I can't see how ANY definition isn't

1772: 1644: 1601: 1577: 1551: 1533: 1511: 1493: 1471: 1453: 1431: 960: 856: 653: 624: 553: 381: 376:

So? Still needs a reliable source or you can't add him. Adam is sourced, Rory, not.

295: 181: 97: 5569: 4520:

Thank you for your opinion, however the characters are considered companions by the

4213:. Remember Eve Myles' two separate (related) characters? Good. Let's hold off then. 1963:

she had a fair few with him (11) before those. Surely that makes her his companion?

5076: 5065: 4750: 4042: 3627: 3407: 3352: 3191: 1167: 1098: 1019: 969: 775: 4590:

We should not be deciding who is or is not a companion. We should be referring to

932: 411:

Does that mean I should not have added him to the list of dead companions? Sorry!

5232: 5189: 4991: 4943: 4816: 4695: 4656: 4511: 4480: 4455: 4313: 4138: 4103: 4078: 3938: 3905: 3572: 3540: 3487: 3392: 3367: 3327: 3217: 3171: 3037: 2889: 2855: 2840: 2775: 2740: 2689: 2639: 2592: 2574: 2547: 2533: 2506: 2487: 2430: 2385: 2365: 2340: 2186: 2133: 2021: 1982: 1890: 1703: 1406: 1367: 1157: 1135: 995: 817: 739: 721: 688: 673: 360: 116: 46:

If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the

5275:

ive moved clara from mitigated deaths as hell bent did not undo face the raven

5231:

Review the various talk page archives. This has been discussed numerous times.

4891:

may well change this situation, relegating them to alternative timeline deaths.

4595: 4525: 4266: 4239: 4235: 4170: 4119: 3658: 3412: 3297: 3176: 3151: 2866: 2756: 2719: 2659:

alas the masters of this page apparently just enjoy spreading misinformation.

2272: 2147: 2095: 2040: 1625: 1363: 1119: 699: 513: 334: 268: 5339: 5143: 4972: 4954: 4762: 4219: 3994: 3974: 3952: 3883: 3840: 3782: 3592: 3530: 3492: 3462: 3427: 3387: 3292: 3156: 3136: 3126: 3018: 2566: 1968: 1420: 1305: 1262: 1227: 1212: 1066: 2865:

see on the screen, otherwise this encyclopedia would be impossible to edit.

1441:

They have been designated as companions by several sources. Check the refs.

290:

Lack of a reliable source. Have you bothered to read any of the discussion?

5521: 5516:

No. You are making no sense and your edits are poorly written. Could you

5470: 5441: 5399: 4835: 4812: 4680: 4565: 4407: 4360: 4190:

you'll see that Rory appears in more episodes than either Donna or Martha.

4089: 3597: 3587: 3562: 3472: 3452: 3442: 3432: 3317: 3207: 3166: 3161: 3146: 3141: 3131: 3121: 2973: 2685: 2681: 2570: 2562: 2528: 2520: 2502: 2395: 2357:". Not sure how we'd argue against her being a companion given that ref. -- 2109:

My point is that that IS a definition, or at least an essential part of it.

1640: 1621: 1597: 1568: 1547: 1524: 1507: 1484: 1467: 1444: 1427: 852: 649: 620: 549: 501: 377: 291: 177: 93: 4969:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/doctorwho/classic/episodeguide/companions/index.shtml

1663:

else (in this case between stories)? I would have thought there might be

5061: 4746: 4093: 4038: 3737: 3617: 3612: 3502: 3447: 3437: 3013: 3055: 5499: 5335: 4987: 4939: 4652: 4507: 4476: 4134: 4098: 4074: 3934: 3901: 3637: 3602: 3577: 3417: 3397: 3337: 3212: 3087: 2884: 2851: 2836: 2771: 2735: 2426: 2381: 2359: 2336: 1886: 1721: 1699: 1153: 991: 813: 735: 717: 684: 669: 112: 1061:

That was Chang Lee. For most of the episode he works with the Master

5349: 3797: 3747: 1278:

My aplogies for not giving the full expression - the policy is here:

212: 1720:

For whatever reasons for treating the 2005 revival differently (and

4216: 3973:. I actually have two slightly different versions of the timeline. 3820: 3772: 3767: 3710: 3457: 3402: 3347: 3342: 1965: 1546:

Are you kidding me? This is your sources? I want sources like BBC!

3036:

Thanks, but we already have templates with that exact same thing.

1814:

Talk:Companion_(Doctor_Who)/Archive_2#Brigadier_Lethbridge-Stewart

604:

their reappearance made them a companion again in those episodes.

5353: 4489:

Just a note to say I've readded her after the Christmas special.

3642: 3535: 3477: 2524: 1866:

OR could also be any assumption that he did die. The instance in

916:

Thank you Josiah for correcting the article to reflect reality.

4033:

Where does the number of appearances come from - or is it OR ?

3742: 3720: 1764:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/doctorwho/classic/episodeguide/companions/

4092:

and that's we need. It's annoying sometimes but unfortunately

1382:

is accurate, but who got to decide on the latter definition?

712:

The only source I can find for Mr Morrissey as a companion is

4971:) lists Benton, Yates, and Lethbridge-Stewart as companions. 3787: 3777: 3715: 3705: 3377: 1319:

Yes, if its not been stated in a reputable source, it would.

1667:

authority that attempted a concise, quotable definition. --

3882:

above template, as opposed to adding it to this article.

3752: 1981:

If you can cite a reliable source, then she'll be added.

1768:

So, should we put the three UNIT troopers into the list?

5202:

What consensus? There was one reply to this discussion.

192:

and I don't know how I'd change it short of doing that.

2349:

Actually, I've reverted your change simply because the

5356:

did it at the time, even though she said she couldn't.

5075:

most of the deaths listed are not really companions.

2970:

No big deal. That's how we all started on Knowledge.

3244:

List of actors considered for the part of the Doctor

1521:The ones linked to, next to the companion's names. 126:Whats the definition of a 'Tenth Doctor episode'? 4096:does not make exceptions for such things. Regards 3916:Timeline of British aerospace companies since 1955 1812:Oh, here's some previous discussion on the matter 89:Technically its not the Children in Need special. 5570:http://doctorwhotv.co.uk/finale-spoilers-5888.htm 3947:I'll make the timeline and put it here. I still 1792:lists the Brig, Benton and Yates as companions. 4865:It should perhaps be clarified that the reason 2901:that character's tenure as a current companion. 3101: 2946:I edited this page but made a tiny mistake... 509:Talk:The Vampires of Venice#Rory = companion ? 264:Talk:The Vampires of Venice#Rory = companion ? 5498:as shown on the tardis wiki page about clara 3071: 1754:Brigadier Alistair Gordon Lethtbridge Stewart 619:Sourced all bar Jackson Lake, still looking. 3680: 3078: 3064: 2902: 2810: 2786: 2441: 2400: 2312: 2288: 2224: 2201: 2162: 2110: 2055: 1997: 1928: 1843: 4873:as the actual first episode is illogical. 3265: 3239:List of actors who have played the Doctor 3085: 2223:To that end, see last edit to intro para 85:Roses first appearance with tenth doctor 4052:Regarding River Song's Companion Status 14: 5148:Are we counting Rigsy as a companion? 1639:An original research ? If you say so. 766:source for Jackson Lake as companion: 333:Where exactly? Please provide a link. 305:The Doctor Who website says he is... 44:Do not edit the contents of this page. 5166:companion rather than the Doctor's. 3679: 3264: 3100: 3059: 1624:, which is what you are doing above. 5500:http://tardis.wikia.com/Clara_Oswald 252:The following discussion is closed. 25: 2573:, so no need for you point it out. 176:Yes, now source it and we are set. 111:That isn't a Tenth Doctor episode. 23: 4967:In fact, the BBC Companion guide ( 4169:Where did you get that rule from? 3969:I put the preliminary timeline in 2996:Timeline of Doctors and Companions 2483:List of some Doctor Who characters 1219:) 03:45, 23 September 2010 (UTC) 24: 5583: 4726:2620:0:100E:9:A10E:AB11:2DD4:81E4 3951:and include one-time companions. 2036:Companion (Doctor Who)#Definition 213:http://www.bbc.co.uk/doctorwho/dw 5359:But this is all speculation. — 4253:a source for her appearance? — 493:The discussion above is closed. 29: 425: 418: 5563: 4797:09:17, 22 September 2013 (UTC) 4143:16:46, 28 September 2011 (UTC) 4128:16:08, 28 September 2011 (UTC) 4110:15:58, 28 September 2011 (UTC) 4083:15:47, 28 September 2011 (UTC) 2896:18:55, 28 September 2011 (UTC) 2875:19:42, 28 September 2011 (UTC) 2860:19:00, 28 September 2011 (UTC) 2845:18:20, 28 September 2011 (UTC) 2828:18:05, 28 September 2011 (UTC) 2804:17:57, 28 September 2011 (UTC) 2780:16:48, 28 September 2011 (UTC) 2765:16:10, 28 September 2011 (UTC) 2747:16:01, 28 September 2011 (UTC) 2728:10:45, 28 September 2011 (UTC) 1292:19:26, 23 September 2010 (UTC) 1280:Knowledge:No original research 1271:18:52, 23 September 2010 (UTC) 1257:08:30, 23 September 2010 (UTC) 1240:03:42, 23 September 2010 (UTC) 1097:reference. Anyone disagree? — 1075:00:47, 23 September 2010 (UTC) 413: 207:The Current Doctor Who Website 13: 1: 5558:08:09, 14 December 2015 (UTC) 5530:18:43, 13 December 2015 (UTC) 5512:18:30, 13 December 2015 (UTC) 5494:17:39, 13 December 2015 (UTC) 5479:17:13, 13 December 2015 (UTC) 5465:16:38, 13 December 2015 (UTC) 5450:12:58, 13 December 2015 (UTC) 5435:11:59, 13 December 2015 (UTC) 5408:14:14, 12 December 2015 (UTC) 5266:07:21, 10 December 2015 (UTC) 5241:18:18, 23 November 2015 (UTC) 5227:18:11, 23 November 2015 (UTC) 5198:18:09, 23 November 2015 (UTC) 5182:10:08, 23 November 2015 (UTC) 5158:18:31, 22 November 2015 (UTC) 5138:18:35, 22 November 2015 (UTC) 5122:18:56, 21 November 2015 (UTC) 5046:19:35, 3 September 2014 (UTC) 5019:06:53, 24 November 2013 (UTC) 4996:18:48, 16 November 2013 (UTC) 4906:00:21, 24 December 2013 (UTC) 4854:05:16, 22 December 2013 (UTC) 4825:13:50, 30 November 2013 (UTC) 4534:11:07, 26 December 2012 (UTC) 4522:published independent sources 4516:10:43, 26 December 2012 (UTC) 4499:20:28, 25 December 2012 (UTC) 4485:09:30, 10 November 2012 (UTC) 4416:09:00, 6 September 2012 (UTC) 4401:05:56, 6 September 2012 (UTC) 4382:09:13, 3 September 2012 (UTC) 4369:09:10, 3 September 2012 (UTC) 4350:22:43, 7 September 2012 (UTC) 4322:12:44, 3 September 2012 (UTC) 4292:09:13, 3 September 2012 (UTC) 4275:08:58, 3 September 2012 (UTC) 4261:08:00, 3 September 2012 (UTC) 4248:04:05, 2 September 2012 (UTC) 4228:20:08, 1 September 2012 (UTC) 3995: 3975: 3953: 3884: 3019: 2990:18:31, 13 November 2011 (UTC) 2964:18:27, 13 November 2011 (UTC) 2648:20:05, 21 November 2011 (UTC) 2631:19:03, 21 November 2011 (UTC) 1677:14:28, 21 December 2010 (UTC) 1649:21:19, 21 November 2010 (UTC) 1634:08:45, 19 November 2010 (UTC) 1606:23:33, 18 November 2010 (UTC) 1585:23:37, 17 November 2010 (UTC) 1556:22:21, 17 November 2010 (UTC) 1541:22:01, 17 November 2010 (UTC) 1516:20:35, 17 November 2010 (UTC) 1501:19:42, 17 November 2010 (UTC) 1476:19:31, 17 November 2010 (UTC) 1461:19:07, 17 November 2010 (UTC) 1436:19:00, 17 November 2010 (UTC) 1376:03:24, 30 December 2010 (UTC) 1351:02:42, 30 December 2010 (UTC) 1056:16:29, 23 December 2008 (UTC) 1046:What about the Chinese dude? 5387:22:13, 9 December 2015 (UTC) 5367:21:06, 6 December 2015 (UTC) 5330:13:03, 6 December 2015 (UTC) 5315:12:21, 6 December 2015 (UTC) 5285:12:14, 6 December 2015 (UTC) 4607:20:00, 8 December 2012 (UTC) 4584:15:16, 8 December 2012 (UTC) 4560:14:52, 8 December 2012 (UTC) 4464:20:33, 4 November 2012 (UTC) 4442:20:16, 4 November 2012 (UTC) 4179:19:39, 8 December 2012 (UTC) 4163:14:43, 8 December 2012 (UTC) 4153:enough, you're a companion! 4007:21:11, 10 January 2012 (UTC) 4001: 3987:02:47, 8 December 2011 (UTC) 3981: 3965:18:13, 4 December 2011 (UTC) 3959: 3943:17:46, 4 December 2011 (UTC) 3928:13:37, 4 December 2011 (UTC) 3910:11:37, 4 December 2011 (UTC) 3896:04:09, 4 December 2011 (UTC) 3890: 3568:Brigadier Lethbridge-Stewart 3046:16:26, 3 December 2011 (UTC) 3031:22:13, 2 December 2011 (UTC) 3025: 2698:15:30, 11 January 2012 (UTC) 2675:08:46, 11 January 2012 (UTC) 2601:18:34, 21 October 2011 (UTC) 2583:05:43, 21 October 2011 (UTC) 2556:04:33, 21 October 2011 (UTC) 2542:04:02, 21 October 2011 (UTC) 2515:21:05, 20 October 2011 (UTC) 2496:19:18, 20 October 2011 (UTC) 1829:21:33, 7 February 2011 (UTC) 1802:21:29, 7 February 2011 (UTC) 1781:21:02, 7 February 2011 (UTC) 1708:10:57, 4 February 2011 (UTC) 1693:17:28, 30 January 2011 (UTC) 1329:15:13, 12 October 2010 (UTC) 1314:15:05, 12 October 2010 (UTC) 1207:the TARDIS?), Jackie Tyler. 7: 4981:13:29, 22 August 2013 (UTC) 4963:22:03, 21 August 2013 (UTC) 4771:21:45, 21 August 2013 (UTC) 4734:16:11, 13 August 2013 (UTC) 4667:"Guest star" or "companion" 4645:05:33, 6 January 2013 (UTC) 4622:05:33, 6 January 2013 (UTC) 4506:Craig Owens though? Jog on 2920:19:27, 5 October 2011 (UTC) 1618:reliable, published sources 1415:15:24, 5 January 2011 (UTC) 1398:02:12, 5 January 2011 (UTC) 965:the first major contributor 548:Read the discussion above. 18:Talk:Companion (Doctor Who) 10: 5588: 5342:, which became unfixed in 4932:10:25, 28 April 2013 (UTC) 4755:23:59, 9 August 2013 (UTC) 4704:11:20, 18 March 2013 (UTC) 4689:11:10, 18 March 2013 (UTC) 4047:12:53, 15 April 2012 (UTC) 1715:List of Doctor Who serials 1563:Knowledge:Reliable sources 106:08:13, 25 March 2010 (UTC) 5345:The Wedding of River Song 5099:04:16, 23 July 2015 (UTC) 5085:17:50, 17 June 2015 (UTC) 5070:03:41, 11 July 2014 (UTC) 4661:14:39, 5 April 2013 (UTC) 3862: 3833: 3796: 3701: 3690: 3686: 3675: 3651: 3553: 3511: 3285: 3278: 3274: 3260: 3226: 3200: 3114: 3110: 3096: 3050:If by that you mean this: 2459:02:50, 13 June 2011 (UTC) 2435:20:11, 12 June 2011 (UTC) 2418:19:35, 12 June 2011 (UTC) 2390:23:47, 11 June 2011 (UTC) 2375:23:37, 11 June 2011 (UTC) 2353:reference clearly states 2345:23:02, 11 June 2011 (UTC) 2330:04:17, 10 June 2011 (UTC) 1946:23:59, 30 June 2011 (UTC) 1922:13:13, 30 June 2011 (UTC) 1895:12:58, 30 June 2011 (UTC) 1880:18:04, 28 June 2011 (UTC) 1861:17:17, 28 June 2011 (UTC) 211:At the official website, 121:16:48, 6 April 2010 (UTC) 5251:One episode or one story 4948:11:44, 12 May 2013 (UTC) 4803:Childhoods of companions 4406:leave future stuff out. 4200:22:42, 13 May 2012 (UTC) 2684:. Unless you can cite a 2306:14:03, 9 June 2011 (UTC) 2281:05:23, 9 June 2011 (UTC) 2242:00:14, 9 June 2011 (UTC) 2219:00:08, 9 June 2011 (UTC) 2195:23:32, 8 June 2011 (UTC) 2180:22:47, 8 June 2011 (UTC) 2156:17:47, 8 June 2011 (UTC) 2142:17:09, 8 June 2011 (UTC) 2128:16:56, 8 June 2011 (UTC) 2104:16:24, 8 June 2011 (UTC) 2073:16:17, 8 June 2011 (UTC) 2049:15:20, 8 June 2011 (UTC) 2030:15:13, 8 June 2011 (UTC) 1182:17:24, 1 June 2010 (UTC) 1162:16:44, 1 June 2010 (UTC) 1148:16:23, 1 June 2010 (UTC) 1128:16:18, 1 June 2010 (UTC) 1113:16:07, 1 June 2010 (UTC) 1034:15:26, 1 June 2010 (UTC) 1014:13:32, 1 June 2010 (UTC) 1000:13:17, 1 June 2010 (UTC) 984:12:46, 1 June 2010 (UTC) 944:10:56, 1 June 2010 (UTC) 926:03:00, 1 June 2010 (UTC) 905:00:42, 1 June 2010 (UTC) 890:23:28, 31 May 2010 (UTC) 875:22:48, 31 May 2010 (UTC) 861:22:46, 31 May 2010 (UTC) 845:22:43, 31 May 2010 (UTC) 822:17:48, 1 June 2010 (UTC) 807:17:44, 1 June 2010 (UTC) 790:17:29, 1 June 2010 (UTC) 744:13:53, 1 June 2010 (UTC) 726:13:33, 1 June 2010 (UTC) 708:14:22, 31 May 2010 (UTC) 693:14:17, 31 May 2010 (UTC) 678:11:45, 31 May 2010 (UTC) 658:21:29, 29 May 2010 (UTC) 644:21:24, 29 May 2010 (UTC) 629:21:05, 29 May 2010 (UTC) 614:20:53, 29 May 2010 (UTC) 594:22:46, 31 May 2010 (UTC) 579:23:25, 29 May 2010 (UTC) 558:20:16, 29 May 2010 (UTC) 542:19:58, 29 May 2010 (UTC) 522:07:12, 30 May 2010 (UTC) 495:Please do not modify it. 489:01:22, 30 May 2010 (UTC) 462:22:54, 29 May 2010 (UTC) 432:19:36, 29 May 2010 (UTC) 402:20:33, 29 May 2010 (UTC) 386:12:15, 29 May 2010 (UTC) 369:11:53, 29 May 2010 (UTC) 343:21:24, 27 May 2010 (UTC) 326:20:06, 27 May 2010 (UTC) 300:18:57, 27 May 2010 (UTC) 277:07:15, 30 May 2010 (UTC) 254:Please do not modify it. 240:07:28, 24 May 2010 (UTC) 225:06:38, 24 May 2010 (UTC) 202:20:17, 30 May 2010 (UTC) 186:19:34, 23 May 2010 (UTC) 171:19:26, 23 May 2010 (UTC) 147:15:56, 24 May 2010 (UTC) 4777:YOUR WELCOME AND THANKS 3633:Kate Lethbridge-Stewart 2015:21:39, 5 May 2011 (UTC) 1991:14:31, 5 May 2011 (UTC) 1976:13:43, 5 May 2011 (UTC) 1837:Rory's mitigated deaths 392:Where is Adam sourced? 154:Doctor/Companion format 4029:Numbers of appearances 3681:Creatures and villains 5348:. I don't think the 4889:The Day of the Doctor 4815:has her own article. 1790:Doctor Who Companions 42:of past discussions. 5060:it seems redundant. 4867:Asylum of the Daleks 4542:Martha's appearances 4388:Asylum of the Daleks 3867:List of cast members 954:U-Mos is correct in 931:Additional source - 4911:Disputed companions 4592:independent sources 4238:") or the like. :) 4185:"Primary companion" 3583:Professor Chronotis 3526:Bernice Summerfield 3333:Victoria Waterfield 2569:and definitely not 2269:Intentional fallacy 1725:awkward, eg around 1152:No objection here. 1081:Rosita — overcited? 830:Rory is a companion 3726:Great Intelligence 2714:River Song's Death 1958:Revisiting Dr Song 1788:Howe and Stammers 1247:that would be OR. 1085:Do we really need 286:19:36 27 May 2010 255: 5184: 5172:comment added by 5009:comment added by 4922:comment added by 4844:comment added by 4787:comment added by 4724:comment added by 4432:comment added by 4340:comment added by 3875: 3874: 3858: 3857: 3854: 3853: 3829: 3828: 3671: 3670: 3667: 3666: 3549: 3548: 3256: 3255: 3252: 3251: 2682:original research 2665:comment added by 2621:comment added by 2503:original research 2372: 1736:comment added by 1654:Appearances stats 1622:Original Research 1388:comment added by 1341:comment added by 1243: 1226:comment added by 1192:Companion classes 1180: 1140:AlexanderJBateman 1111: 1032: 1006:AlexanderJBateman 982: 956:this edit summary 799:AlexanderJBateman 788: 769:On the one hand, 599:other non sourced 569:comment added by 532:comment added by 465: 448:comment added by 372: 355:comment added by 329: 312:comment added by 253: 217:AlexanderJBateman 150: 133:comment added by 82: 81: 54: 53: 48:current talk page 5579: 5572: 5567: 5312: 5304: 5296: 5290:How did it not? 5271:Companion deaths 5224: 5216: 5208: 5167: 5055:"Deaths" section 5048: 5021: 4934: 4856: 4799: 4736: 4598: 4444: 4352: 4106: 4101: 4090:reliable sources 4003: 3997: 3983: 3977: 3961: 3955: 3892: 3886: 3699: 3698: 3688: 3687: 3677: 3676: 3628:Paternoster Gang 3353:Sarah Jane Smith 3283: 3282: 3276: 3275: 3262: 3261: 3112: 3111: 3102:Incarnations of 3098: 3097: 3080: 3073: 3066: 3057: 3056: 3027: 3021: 2988: 2985: 2979: 2918: 2892: 2887: 2826: 2802: 2743: 2738: 2677: 2633: 2457: 2416: 2364: 2328: 2304: 2265: 2240: 2217: 2178: 2126: 2092: 2071: 2013: 1944: 1859: 1745: 1614:reliable sources 1583: 1580: 1539: 1536: 1499: 1496: 1459: 1456: 1400: 1360:WP:verifiability 1353: 1242: 1220: 1170: 1101: 1022: 972: 778: 581: 544: 464: 450:DrPatrickSpiller 442: 429: 422: 417: 371: 349: 328: 306: 149: 127: 73: 56: 55: 33: 32: 26: 5587: 5586: 5582: 5581: 5580: 5578: 5577: 5576: 5575: 5568: 5564: 5546: 5422: 5308: 5300: 5292: 5273: 5253: 5220: 5212: 5204: 5146: 5109: 5057: 5039: 5004: 4917: 4913: 4862: 4839: 4833: 4805: 4782: 4779: 4742: 4719: 4712: 4710:Chris & Roz 4669: 4632: 4596: 4568: 4544: 4427: 4335: 4207: 4187: 4104: 4099: 4054: 4031: 4005: 3985: 3963: 3894: 3876: 3871: 3850: 3825: 3792: 3682: 3663: 3647: 3573:Sergeant Benton 3545: 3541:Charley Pollard 3507: 3393:Vislor Turlough 3328:Jamie McCrimmon 3270: 3248: 3222: 3218:Fugitive Doctor 3196: 3106: 3092: 3084: 3029: 2998: 2983: 2974: 2971: 2944: 2890: 2885: 2741: 2736: 2716: 2686:reliable source 2660: 2616: 2370: 2259: 2086: 1960: 1839: 1756: 1731: 1727:The End of Time 1656: 1593: 1578: 1566: 1534: 1522: 1506:What sources ?– 1494: 1482: 1454: 1442: 1423: 1383: 1336: 1221: 1194: 1136:The Next Doctor 1095:Daily Telegraph 1093:and the second 1083: 1044: 952: 832: 636:Eleventh Doctor 606:Eleventh Doctor 601: 564: 527: 504: 499: 498: 443: 350: 314:Ladylovedisdain 307: 258: 248: 246:Rory's Position 209: 156: 135:Ladylovedisdain 128: 87: 69: 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 5585: 5574: 5573: 5561: 5545: 5544:Spin off daths 5542: 5541: 5540: 5539: 5538: 5537: 5536: 5535: 5534: 5533: 5532: 5514: 5421: 5418: 5417: 5416: 5415: 5414: 5413: 5412: 5411: 5410: 5374: 5373: 5372: 5371: 5370: 5369: 5357: 5322:88.107.190.133 5277:88.107.190.133 5272: 5269: 5252: 5249: 5248: 5247: 5246: 5245: 5244: 5243: 5145: 5142: 5141: 5140: 5114:31.186.113.106 5108: 5105: 5104: 5103: 5102: 5101: 5091:ZarhanFastfire 5056: 5053: 5052: 5051: 5050: 5049: 5044:comment added 5025: 5024: 5023: 5022: 5000: 4999: 4998: 4965: 4912: 4909: 4895: 4894: 4893: 4892: 4887:The ending of 4885: 4878: 4874: 4861: 4858: 4832: 4829: 4828: 4827: 4804: 4801: 4789:84.111.117.238 4778: 4775: 4774: 4773: 4741: 4740:Brian Williams 4738: 4711: 4708: 4707: 4706: 4668: 4665: 4664: 4663: 4631: 4630:Episode counts 4628: 4627: 4626: 4625: 4624: 4567: 4564: 4543: 4540: 4539: 4538: 4537: 4536: 4503: 4502: 4501: 4472: 4471: 4470: 4469: 4468: 4467: 4466: 4434:108.66.103.139 4423: 4422: 4421: 4420: 4419: 4418: 4356: 4355: 4354: 4353: 4331: 4330: 4329: 4328: 4327: 4326: 4325: 4324: 4301: 4300: 4299: 4298: 4297: 4296: 4295: 4294: 4236:Army of Ghosts 4206: 4203: 4186: 4183: 4182: 4181: 4150: 4149: 4148: 4147: 4146: 4145: 4113: 4112: 4053: 4050: 4030: 4027: 4026: 4025: 4024: 4023: 4022: 4021: 4020: 4019: 4018: 4017: 4016: 4015: 4014: 4013: 4012: 4011: 4010: 4009: 3999: 3979: 3957: 3888: 3873: 3872: 3870: 3869: 3863: 3860: 3859: 3856: 3855: 3852: 3851: 3849: 3848: 3843: 3837: 3835: 3831: 3830: 3827: 3826: 3824: 3823: 3818: 3813: 3808: 3802: 3800: 3794: 3793: 3791: 3790: 3785: 3783:Weeping Angels 3780: 3775: 3770: 3765: 3760: 3755: 3750: 3745: 3740: 3735: 3734: 3733: 3723: 3718: 3713: 3708: 3702: 3696: 3694: 3684: 3683: 3673: 3672: 3669: 3668: 3665: 3664: 3662: 3661: 3659:Iris Wildthyme 3655: 3653: 3649: 3648: 3646: 3645: 3640: 3635: 3630: 3625: 3620: 3615: 3610: 3605: 3600: 3595: 3590: 3585: 3580: 3575: 3570: 3565: 3559: 3557: 3551: 3550: 3547: 3546: 3544: 3543: 3538: 3533: 3528: 3523: 3517: 3515: 3509: 3508: 3506: 3505: 3500: 3495: 3490: 3488:Graham O'Brien 3485: 3480: 3475: 3470: 3465: 3460: 3455: 3450: 3445: 3440: 3435: 3430: 3425: 3420: 3415: 3413:Grace Holloway 3410: 3405: 3400: 3395: 3390: 3385: 3380: 3375: 3370: 3365: 3360: 3358:Harry Sullivan 3355: 3350: 3345: 3340: 3335: 3330: 3325: 3320: 3315: 3310: 3305: 3303:Barbara Wright 3300: 3298:Ian Chesterton 3295: 3289: 3287: 3280: 3272: 3271: 3258: 3257: 3254: 3253: 3250: 3249: 3247: 3246: 3241: 3236: 3230: 3228: 3224: 3223: 3221: 3220: 3215: 3210: 3204: 3202: 3198: 3197: 3195: 3194: 3189: 3184: 3179: 3174: 3169: 3164: 3159: 3154: 3149: 3144: 3139: 3134: 3129: 3124: 3118: 3116: 3108: 3107: 3094: 3093: 3083: 3082: 3075: 3068: 3060: 3054: 3053: 3052: 3051: 3023: 2997: 2994: 2993: 2992: 2943: 2940: 2939: 2938: 2937: 2936: 2935: 2934: 2933: 2932: 2931: 2930: 2929: 2928: 2927: 2926: 2925: 2924: 2923: 2922: 2879: 2878: 2877: 2750: 2749: 2715: 2712: 2711: 2710: 2709: 2708: 2707: 2706: 2705: 2704: 2703: 2702: 2701: 2700: 2612: 2611: 2610: 2609: 2608: 2607: 2606: 2605: 2604: 2603: 2589:cherry picking 2478: 2477: 2476: 2475: 2474: 2473: 2472: 2471: 2470: 2469: 2468: 2467: 2466: 2465: 2464: 2463: 2462: 2461: 2368: 2257: 2256: 2255: 2254: 2253: 2252: 2251: 2250: 2249: 2248: 2247: 2246: 2245: 2244: 2084: 2083: 2082: 2081: 2080: 2079: 2078: 2077: 2076: 2075: 1959: 1956: 1955: 1954: 1953: 1952: 1951: 1950: 1949: 1948: 1900: 1899: 1898: 1897: 1838: 1835: 1834: 1833: 1832: 1831: 1807: 1806: 1805: 1804: 1755: 1752: 1751: 1750: 1749: 1748: 1747: 1746: 1718: 1655: 1652: 1637: 1636: 1592: 1589: 1588: 1587: 1544: 1543: 1504: 1503: 1464: 1463: 1422: 1419: 1418: 1417: 1379: 1378: 1332: 1331: 1303: 1301: 1300: 1299: 1298: 1297: 1296: 1295: 1294: 1193: 1190: 1189: 1188: 1187: 1186: 1185: 1184: 1131: 1130: 1082: 1079: 1078: 1077: 1048:75.165.106.238 1043: 1040: 1039: 1038: 1037: 1036: 1002: 951: 948: 947: 946: 914: 913: 912: 911: 910: 909: 908: 907: 831: 828: 827: 826: 825: 824: 793: 792: 759: 758: 757: 756: 755: 754: 753: 752: 751: 750: 749: 748: 747: 746: 660: 600: 597: 561: 560: 503: 500: 492: 481:66.131.156.124 476: 475: 474: 473: 409: 408: 407: 406: 405: 404: 346: 345: 303: 302: 259: 250: 249: 247: 244: 243: 242: 232:66.131.156.124 208: 205: 189: 188: 155: 152: 124: 123: 86: 83: 80: 79: 74: 67: 62: 52: 51: 34: 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 5584: 5571: 5566: 5562: 5560: 5559: 5555: 5551: 5550:31.90.223.171 5531: 5527: 5523: 5519: 5515: 5513: 5509: 5505: 5501: 5497: 5496: 5495: 5491: 5487: 5482: 5481: 5480: 5476: 5472: 5468: 5467: 5466: 5462: 5458: 5453: 5452: 5451: 5447: 5443: 5439: 5438: 5437: 5436: 5432: 5428: 5420:Clara's death 5409: 5405: 5401: 5397: 5396: 5395: 5394: 5393: 5392: 5391: 5390: 5389: 5388: 5384: 5380: 5368: 5365: 5362: 5358: 5355: 5351: 5347: 5346: 5341: 5340:Lake Silencio 5337: 5333: 5332: 5331: 5327: 5323: 5318: 5317: 5316: 5313: 5311: 5305: 5303: 5297: 5295: 5289: 5288: 5287: 5286: 5282: 5278: 5268: 5267: 5263: 5259: 5242: 5238: 5234: 5230: 5229: 5228: 5225: 5223: 5217: 5215: 5209: 5207: 5201: 5200: 5199: 5195: 5191: 5187: 5186: 5185: 5183: 5179: 5175: 5174:62.232.103.35 5171: 5165: 5160: 5159: 5155: 5151: 5139: 5135: 5131: 5126: 5125: 5124: 5123: 5119: 5115: 5107:Jamie's count 5100: 5096: 5092: 5088: 5087: 5086: 5082: 5078: 5074: 5073: 5072: 5071: 5067: 5063: 5047: 5043: 5037: 5033: 5029: 5028: 5027: 5026: 5020: 5016: 5012: 5011:108.217.75.77 5008: 5001: 4997: 4993: 4989: 4984: 4983: 4982: 4978: 4974: 4970: 4966: 4964: 4960: 4956: 4951: 4950: 4949: 4945: 4941: 4937: 4936: 4935: 4933: 4929: 4925: 4924:86.139.225.51 4921: 4908: 4907: 4903: 4899: 4890: 4886: 4883: 4882: 4879: 4875: 4872: 4868: 4864: 4863: 4860:Some comments 4857: 4855: 4851: 4847: 4843: 4837: 4826: 4822: 4818: 4814: 4811: 4810: 4809: 4800: 4798: 4794: 4790: 4786: 4772: 4768: 4764: 4759: 4758: 4757: 4756: 4752: 4748: 4737: 4735: 4731: 4727: 4723: 4715: 4705: 4701: 4697: 4693: 4692: 4691: 4690: 4686: 4682: 4677: 4673: 4662: 4658: 4654: 4649: 4648: 4647: 4646: 4642: 4638: 4623: 4619: 4615: 4610: 4609: 4608: 4604: 4600: 4593: 4589: 4588: 4587: 4585: 4581: 4577: 4572: 4563: 4561: 4557: 4553: 4547: 4535: 4531: 4527: 4523: 4519: 4518: 4517: 4513: 4509: 4504: 4500: 4496: 4492: 4488: 4487: 4486: 4482: 4478: 4473: 4465: 4461: 4457: 4453: 4452: 4451: 4450: 4449: 4448: 4447: 4446: 4445: 4443: 4439: 4435: 4431: 4417: 4413: 4409: 4404: 4403: 4402: 4398: 4394: 4389: 4385: 4384: 4383: 4380: 4377: 4373: 4372: 4371: 4370: 4366: 4362: 4351: 4347: 4343: 4339: 4333: 4332: 4323: 4319: 4315: 4311: 4310: 4309: 4308: 4307: 4306: 4305: 4304: 4303: 4302: 4293: 4290: 4287: 4283: 4278: 4277: 4276: 4272: 4268: 4264: 4263: 4262: 4259: 4256: 4251: 4250: 4249: 4245: 4241: 4237: 4232: 4231: 4230: 4229: 4226: 4225: 4224: 4221: 4218: 4212: 4202: 4201: 4197: 4193: 4192:70.72.223.215 4180: 4176: 4172: 4168: 4167: 4166: 4164: 4160: 4156: 4144: 4140: 4136: 4131: 4130: 4129: 4125: 4121: 4117: 4116: 4115: 4114: 4111: 4108: 4107: 4102: 4095: 4091: 4087: 4086: 4085: 4084: 4080: 4076: 4071: 4067: 4064: 4061: 4058: 4049: 4048: 4044: 4040: 4034: 4008: 4004: 3998: 3992: 3991: 3990: 3989: 3988: 3984: 3978: 3972: 3968: 3967: 3966: 3962: 3956: 3950: 3946: 3945: 3944: 3940: 3936: 3931: 3930: 3929: 3925: 3921: 3920:GraemeLeggett 3917: 3913: 3912: 3911: 3907: 3903: 3899: 3898: 3897: 3893: 3887: 3880: 3879: 3878: 3877: 3868: 3865: 3864: 3861: 3847: 3844: 3842: 3839: 3838: 3836: 3832: 3822: 3819: 3817: 3814: 3812: 3809: 3807: 3804: 3803: 3801: 3799: 3795: 3789: 3786: 3784: 3781: 3779: 3776: 3774: 3771: 3769: 3766: 3764: 3761: 3759: 3756: 3754: 3751: 3749: 3746: 3744: 3741: 3739: 3736: 3732: 3729: 3728: 3727: 3724: 3722: 3719: 3717: 3714: 3712: 3709: 3707: 3704: 3703: 3700: 3697: 3693: 3689: 3685: 3678: 3674: 3660: 3657: 3656: 3654: 3650: 3644: 3641: 3639: 3636: 3634: 3631: 3629: 3626: 3624: 3621: 3619: 3616: 3614: 3611: 3609: 3606: 3604: 3601: 3599: 3596: 3594: 3593:Harriet Jones 3591: 3589: 3586: 3584: 3581: 3579: 3576: 3574: 3571: 3569: 3566: 3564: 3561: 3560: 3558: 3556: 3552: 3542: 3539: 3537: 3534: 3532: 3531:Izzy Sinclair 3529: 3527: 3524: 3522: 3519: 3518: 3516: 3514: 3510: 3504: 3501: 3499: 3496: 3494: 3493:Ryan Sinclair 3491: 3489: 3486: 3484: 3481: 3479: 3476: 3474: 3471: 3469: 3466: 3464: 3463:Rory Williams 3461: 3459: 3456: 3454: 3451: 3449: 3446: 3444: 3441: 3439: 3436: 3434: 3431: 3429: 3428:Jack Harkness 3426: 3424: 3423:Adam Mitchell 3421: 3419: 3416: 3414: 3411: 3409: 3406: 3404: 3401: 3399: 3396: 3394: 3391: 3389: 3388:Tegan Jovanka 3386: 3384: 3381: 3379: 3376: 3374: 3371: 3369: 3366: 3364: 3361: 3359: 3356: 3354: 3351: 3349: 3346: 3344: 3341: 3339: 3336: 3334: 3331: 3329: 3326: 3324: 3323:Ben and Polly 3321: 3319: 3316: 3314: 3313:Steven Taylor 3311: 3309: 3306: 3304: 3301: 3299: 3296: 3294: 3293:Susan Foreman 3291: 3290: 3288: 3284: 3281: 3277: 3273: 3268: 3263: 3259: 3245: 3242: 3240: 3237: 3235: 3232: 3231: 3229: 3225: 3219: 3216: 3214: 3211: 3209: 3206: 3205: 3203: 3199: 3193: 3190: 3188: 3185: 3183: 3180: 3178: 3175: 3173: 3170: 3168: 3165: 3163: 3160: 3158: 3155: 3153: 3150: 3148: 3145: 3143: 3140: 3138: 3135: 3133: 3130: 3128: 3125: 3123: 3120: 3119: 3117: 3113: 3109: 3105: 3099: 3095: 3090: 3089: 3081: 3076: 3074: 3069: 3067: 3062: 3061: 3058: 3049: 3048: 3047: 3043: 3039: 3035: 3034: 3033: 3032: 3028: 3022: 3015: 3011: 3007: 3006:Black Sabbath 3003: 2991: 2986: 2980: 2977: 2969: 2968: 2967: 2965: 2961: 2957: 2951: 2947: 2921: 2916: 2912: 2908: 2907: 2899: 2898: 2897: 2894: 2893: 2888: 2880: 2876: 2872: 2868: 2863: 2862: 2861: 2857: 2853: 2848: 2847: 2846: 2842: 2838: 2833: 2832: 2831: 2830: 2829: 2824: 2820: 2816: 2815: 2807: 2806: 2805: 2800: 2796: 2792: 2791: 2783: 2782: 2781: 2777: 2773: 2768: 2767: 2766: 2762: 2758: 2754: 2753: 2752: 2751: 2748: 2745: 2744: 2739: 2732: 2731: 2730: 2729: 2725: 2721: 2699: 2695: 2691: 2687: 2683: 2679: 2678: 2676: 2672: 2668: 2667:98.151.141.84 2664: 2657: 2656: 2655: 2654: 2653: 2652: 2651: 2650: 2649: 2645: 2641: 2636: 2635: 2634: 2632: 2628: 2624: 2623:98.151.141.84 2620: 2602: 2598: 2594: 2590: 2586: 2585: 2584: 2580: 2576: 2572: 2568: 2564: 2559: 2558: 2557: 2553: 2549: 2545: 2544: 2543: 2539: 2535: 2530: 2526: 2522: 2518: 2517: 2516: 2512: 2508: 2504: 2500: 2499: 2498: 2497: 2493: 2489: 2484: 2460: 2455: 2451: 2447: 2446: 2438: 2437: 2436: 2432: 2428: 2423: 2422: 2421: 2420: 2419: 2414: 2410: 2406: 2405: 2397: 2393: 2392: 2391: 2387: 2383: 2378: 2377: 2376: 2373: 2371: 2366: 2362: 2361: 2356: 2352: 2348: 2347: 2346: 2342: 2338: 2333: 2332: 2331: 2326: 2322: 2318: 2317: 2309: 2308: 2307: 2302: 2298: 2294: 2293: 2285: 2284: 2283: 2282: 2278: 2274: 2270: 2263: 2243: 2238: 2234: 2230: 2229: 2222: 2221: 2220: 2215: 2211: 2207: 2206: 2198: 2197: 2196: 2192: 2188: 2183: 2182: 2181: 2176: 2172: 2168: 2167: 2159: 2158: 2157: 2153: 2149: 2145: 2144: 2143: 2139: 2135: 2131: 2130: 2129: 2124: 2120: 2116: 2115: 2108: 2107: 2106: 2105: 2101: 2097: 2090: 2074: 2069: 2065: 2061: 2060: 2052: 2051: 2050: 2046: 2042: 2037: 2033: 2032: 2031: 2027: 2023: 2018: 2017: 2016: 2011: 2007: 2003: 2002: 1994: 1993: 1992: 1988: 1984: 1980: 1979: 1978: 1977: 1974: 1973: 1970: 1967: 1947: 1942: 1938: 1934: 1933: 1925: 1924: 1923: 1919: 1915: 1914:GraemeLeggett 1911: 1906: 1905: 1904: 1903: 1902: 1901: 1896: 1892: 1888: 1883: 1882: 1881: 1877: 1873: 1872:GraemeLeggett 1869: 1865: 1864: 1863: 1862: 1857: 1853: 1849: 1848: 1830: 1826: 1822: 1821:GraemeLeggett 1819: 1815: 1811: 1810: 1809: 1808: 1803: 1799: 1795: 1794:GraemeLeggett 1791: 1787: 1786: 1785: 1784: 1783: 1782: 1778: 1774: 1769: 1766: 1765: 1759: 1743: 1739: 1738:93.96.136.249 1735: 1728: 1723: 1719: 1716: 1711: 1710: 1709: 1705: 1701: 1696: 1695: 1694: 1690: 1686: 1685:93.96.136.249 1681: 1680: 1679: 1678: 1674: 1670: 1669:93.96.136.249 1666: 1660: 1651: 1650: 1646: 1642: 1635: 1631: 1627: 1623: 1619: 1615: 1610: 1609: 1608: 1607: 1603: 1599: 1586: 1581: 1575: 1574: 1572: 1564: 1560: 1559: 1558: 1557: 1553: 1549: 1542: 1537: 1531: 1530: 1528: 1520: 1519: 1518: 1517: 1513: 1509: 1502: 1497: 1491: 1490: 1488: 1480: 1479: 1478: 1477: 1473: 1469: 1462: 1457: 1451: 1450: 1448: 1440: 1439: 1438: 1437: 1433: 1429: 1426:companions ! 1416: 1412: 1408: 1403: 1402: 1401: 1399: 1395: 1391: 1387: 1377: 1373: 1369: 1365: 1361: 1356: 1355: 1354: 1352: 1348: 1344: 1343:76.90.222.247 1340: 1330: 1326: 1322: 1321:GraemeLeggett 1318: 1317: 1316: 1315: 1311: 1307: 1293: 1289: 1285: 1284:GraemeLeggett 1281: 1277: 1276: 1274: 1273: 1272: 1268: 1264: 1260: 1259: 1258: 1254: 1250: 1249:GraemeLeggett 1246: 1245: 1244: 1241: 1237: 1233: 1229: 1225: 1218: 1214: 1208: 1206: 1201: 1197: 1183: 1178: 1174: 1169: 1165: 1164: 1163: 1159: 1155: 1151: 1150: 1149: 1145: 1141: 1137: 1133: 1132: 1129: 1125: 1121: 1117: 1116: 1115: 1114: 1109: 1105: 1100: 1096: 1092: 1088: 1076: 1072: 1068: 1064: 1060: 1059: 1058: 1057: 1053: 1049: 1042:Eighth Doctor 1035: 1030: 1026: 1021: 1017: 1016: 1015: 1011: 1007: 1003: 1001: 997: 993: 988: 987: 986: 985: 980: 976: 971: 966: 962: 957: 945: 941: 937: 936:188.221.79.22 934: 930: 929: 928: 927: 923: 919: 906: 902: 898: 893: 892: 891: 887: 883: 878: 877: 876: 872: 868: 864: 863: 862: 858: 854: 849: 848: 847: 846: 842: 838: 823: 819: 815: 810: 809: 808: 804: 800: 795: 794: 791: 786: 782: 777: 772: 768: 765: 761: 760: 745: 741: 737: 733: 729: 728: 727: 723: 719: 715: 711: 710: 709: 705: 701: 696: 695: 694: 690: 686: 681: 680: 679: 675: 671: 666: 661: 659: 655: 651: 647: 646: 645: 641: 637: 632: 631: 630: 626: 622: 618: 617: 616: 615: 611: 607: 596: 595: 591: 587: 582: 580: 576: 572: 571:86.164.65.106 568: 559: 555: 551: 547: 546: 545: 543: 539: 535: 531: 524: 523: 519: 515: 512: 510: 496: 491: 490: 486: 482: 470: 469: 468: 467: 466: 463: 459: 455: 451: 447: 441: 437: 434: 433: 430: 428: 423: 421: 416: 403: 399: 395: 394:188.221.79.22 391: 390: 389: 388: 387: 383: 379: 375: 374: 373: 370: 366: 362: 358: 354: 344: 340: 336: 332: 331: 330: 327: 323: 319: 315: 311: 301: 297: 293: 289: 288: 287: 285: 279: 278: 274: 270: 267: 265: 257: 241: 237: 233: 229: 228: 227: 226: 222: 218: 214: 204: 203: 199: 195: 194:71.190.81.108 187: 183: 179: 175: 174: 173: 172: 168: 164: 163:71.190.81.108 159: 151: 148: 144: 140: 136: 132: 122: 118: 114: 110: 109: 108: 107: 103: 99: 95: 90: 78: 75: 72: 68: 66: 63: 61: 58: 57: 49: 45: 41: 40: 35: 28: 27: 19: 5565: 5547: 5517: 5423: 5375: 5361:Arthur Rubin 5343: 5309: 5301: 5293: 5274: 5254: 5221: 5213: 5205: 5168:— Preceding 5163: 5161: 5147: 5110: 5058: 5040:— Preceding 5032:176.27.6.119 5005:— Preceding 4918:— Preceding 4914: 4898:212.159.69.4 4896: 4888: 4870: 4866: 4846:98.165.41.33 4840:— Preceding 4836:Jackie Tyler 4834: 4831:Jackie Tyler 4806: 4783:— Preceding 4780: 4743: 4720:— Preceding 4716: 4713: 4678: 4674: 4670: 4637:70.72.211.35 4633: 4614:70.72.211.35 4573: 4569: 4548: 4545: 4428:— Preceding 4424: 4393:70.72.211.35 4387: 4376:Arthur Rubin 4357: 4342:67.149.59.83 4336:— Preceding 4286:Arthur Rubin 4284:article. — 4281: 4255:Arthur Rubin 4215: 4214: 4210: 4208: 4205:Oswin Oswald 4188: 4151: 4097: 4072: 4068: 4065: 4062: 4059: 4055: 4035: 4032: 3948: 3841:Death's Head 3738:Ice Warriors 3695:and villains 3598:Toshiko Sato 3588:Jackie Tyler 3563:Sara Kingdom 3473:Clara Oswald 3453:Wilfred Mott 3443:Martha Jones 3433:Mickey Smith 3318:Dodo Chaplet 3208:The Valeyard 3115:Series leads 3086: 3017:be helpful. 2999: 2975: 2952: 2948: 2945: 2905: 2883: 2813: 2789: 2734: 2717: 2661:— Preceding 2617:— Preceding 2613: 2479: 2444: 2403: 2363: 2358: 2354: 2350: 2315: 2291: 2258: 2227: 2204: 2165: 2113: 2085: 2058: 2000: 1964: 1961: 1931: 1909: 1868:The Curse... 1867: 1846: 1840: 1789: 1773:Connorthomha 1770: 1767: 1760: 1758:Hey There - 1757: 1732:— Preceding 1726: 1664: 1661: 1657: 1638: 1617: 1594: 1570: 1569: 1545: 1526: 1525: 1505: 1486: 1485: 1465: 1446: 1445: 1424: 1380: 1333: 1302: 1209: 1204: 1202: 1198: 1195: 1094: 1091:Confidential 1090: 1086: 1084: 1062: 1045: 953: 950:Date formats 915: 833: 812:bless him). 770: 763: 602: 583: 562: 534:86.174.192.0 525: 506: 505: 494: 477: 438: 435: 426: 419: 414: 410: 347: 304: 280: 261: 260: 251: 210: 190: 160: 157: 125: 91: 88: 70: 43: 37: 5520:stop this? 5504:2.103.93.46 5486:2.103.93.46 5457:2.103.93.46 5427:2.103.93.46 5379:2.103.93.46 5258:2.103.93.46 5077:GimliDotNet 4871:The Snowmen 3763:The Silence 3618:Ianto Jones 3613:Gwen Cooper 3503:Ruby Sunday 3498:Yasmin Khan 3448:Astrid Peth 3438:Donna Noble 3014:Astrid Peth 3010:Deep Purple 2942:I apologize 2505:. Regards, 1591:a companion 1384:—Preceding 1337:—Preceding 1222:—Preceding 1168:Josiah Rowe 1099:Josiah Rowe 1020:Josiah Rowe 970:Josiah Rowe 776:Josiah Rowe 565:—Preceding 528:—Preceding 444:—Preceding 351:—Preceding 308:—Preceding 129:—Preceding 36:This is an 5336:The Doctor 5233:DonQuixote 5190:DonQuixote 5150:BlueBlue11 5130:BlueBlue11 4817:DonQuixote 4696:DonQuixote 4586:Dartpaw86 4562:Dartpaw86 4456:DonQuixote 4314:DonQuixote 4165:Dartpaw86 4002:James Bond 3982:James Bond 3971:my sandbox 3960:James Bond 3891:James Bond 3806:The Master 3798:Time Lords 3748:Mechonoids 3638:Danny Pink 3623:Luke Smith 3603:Pete Tyler 3578:Mike Yates 3483:Bill Potts 3468:River Song 3418:Rose Tyler 3398:Peri Brown 3338:Zoe Heriot 3286:Television 3279:Companions 3269:and allies 3267:Companions 3213:War Doctor 3187:Fourteenth 3182:Thirteenth 3104:the Doctor 3091:characters 3088:Doctor Who 3038:DonQuixote 3026:James Bond 2966:Dartpaw86 2690:DonQuixote 2640:DonQuixote 2593:DonQuixote 2575:Barsoomian 2548:DonQuixote 2534:Barsoomian 2507:DonQuixote 2488:Barsoomian 2399:explicit). 2187:DonQuixote 2134:DonQuixote 2022:Abigailgem 1983:DonQuixote 1722:User:Ckatz 1407:DonQuixote 1390:69.42.7.43 1368:DonQuixote 968:it back? — 961:WP:MOSDATE 918:68.33.34.2 897:68.33.34.2 867:68.33.34.2 837:68.33.34.2 835:children. 586:68.33.34.2 284:Emtythe1st 5350:Teselecta 4576:Dartpaw86 4552:Dartpaw86 4526:Edgepedia 4267:Edgepedia 4240:Rhain1999 4171:Edgepedia 4155:Dartpaw86 4120:Edgepedia 3773:Sontarans 3758:Silurians 3692:Creatures 3513:Spin-offs 3192:Fifteenth 2956:Dartpaw86 2867:Edgepedia 2835:opinion. 2757:Edgepedia 2720:Edgepedia 2273:Edgepedia 2148:Edgepedia 2096:Edgepedia 2041:Edgepedia 1910:Pandorica 1626:Edgepedia 1120:Edgepedia 762:Here's a 730:There is 700:Edgepedia 514:Edgepedia 335:Edgepedia 269:Edgepedia 77:Archive 4 71:Archive 3 65:Archive 2 60:Archive 1 5170:unsigned 5007:unsigned 4973:EJSawyer 4955:EJSawyer 4920:unsigned 4842:unsigned 4785:unsigned 4763:EJSawyer 4722:unsigned 4491:Lukeno94 4430:unsigned 4338:unsigned 3996:Woknam66 3993:Anyone? 3976:Woknam66 3954:Woknam66 3885:Woknam66 3834:See also 3821:Rassilon 3816:The Rani 3768:Slitheen 3711:Cybermen 3652:See also 3458:Amy Pond 3403:Mel Bush 3348:Jo Grant 3343:Liz Shaw 3227:See also 3172:Eleventh 3020:Woknam66 2915:contribs 2906:Shada Ng 2823:contribs 2814:Shada Ng 2799:contribs 2790:Shada Ng 2663:unsigned 2619:unsigned 2454:contribs 2445:Shada Ng 2425:itself. 2413:contribs 2404:Shada Ng 2325:contribs 2316:Shada Ng 2301:contribs 2292:Shada Ng 2237:contribs 2228:Shada Ng 2214:contribs 2205:Shada Ng 2175:contribs 2166:Shada Ng 2123:contribs 2114:Shada Ng 2068:contribs 2059:Shada Ng 2010:contribs 2001:Shada Ng 1941:contribs 1932:Shada Ng 1856:contribs 1847:Shada Ng 1734:unsigned 1386:unsigned 1339:unsigned 1306:Parmadil 1263:Parmadil 1261:OR what? 1236:contribs 1228:Parmadil 1224:unsigned 1213:Parmadil 1177:contribs 1108:contribs 1067:Parmadil 1029:contribs 979:contribs 882:Kayakboy 785:contribs 764:possible 567:unsigned 530:unsigned 458:contribs 446:unsigned 365:contribs 353:unsigned 322:contribs 310:unsigned 143:contribs 131:unsigned 102:contribs 5522:Mezigue 5471:Mezigue 5442:Mezigue 5400:Mezigue 5310:Whovian 5222:Whovian 5164:Clara's 5042:undated 4681:PRL1973 4524:cited. 4408:Mezigue 4361:Mezigue 3643:Ashildr 3536:Destrii 3478:Nardole 3234:Dr. Who 3177:Twelfth 3152:Seventh 2525:prequel 1641:Mehdioa 1598:Mehdioa 1548:Mehdioa 1508:Mehdioa 1468:Mehdioa 1428:Mehdioa 1364:WP:cite 1166:Done. — 1063:against 853:magnius 650:magnius 621:magnius 550:magnius 378:magnius 292:magnius 178:magnius 94:Goku1st 39:archive 5518:please 5364:(talk) 5062:Esprix 4877:story. 4747:Tikatu 4599:rose64 4379:(talk) 4289:(talk) 4258:(talk) 4039:Beardo 3846:Robots 3788:Zygons 3743:Judoon 3721:Davros 3716:Daleks 3706:Autons 3555:Allies 3521:Kroton 3373:Romana 3157:Eighth 3137:Fourth 3127:Second 3008:, and 2978:dokter 2567:WP:SYN 1683:DWM.-- 1573:dokter 1529:dokter 1489:dokter 1449:dokter 1087:eleven 427:monkey 420:tictoc 5320:death 5144:Rigsy 4988:U-Mos 4940:U-Mos 4813:Clara 4653:U-Mos 4508:Cls14 4477:Cls14 4135:U-Mos 4075:Avanu 3949:could 3935:U-Mos 3902:U-Mos 3811:Omega 3778:Voord 3608:Jenny 3383:Nyssa 3378:Adric 3363:Leela 3308:Vicki 3201:Other 3167:Tenth 3162:Ninth 3147:Sixth 3142:Fifth 3132:Third 3122:First 3002:AC/DC 2911:talk 2852:Avanu 2837:U-Mos 2819:talk 2795:talk 2772:U-Mos 2571:WP:RS 2563:WP:OR 2529:WP:RS 2521:WP:OR 2450:talk 2427:U-Mos 2409:talk 2396:WP:BB 2382:U-Mos 2360:Ckatz 2337:U-Mos 2321:talk 2297:talk 2233:talk 2210:talk 2171:talk 2119:talk 2064:talk 2006:talk 1937:talk 1887:U-Mos 1852:talk 1700:U-Mos 1421:Hein? 1211:Mott. 1205:enter 1154:U-Mos 992:U-Mos 814:U-Mos 771:Wired 736:U-Mos 718:U-Mos 685:U-Mos 670:U-Mos 357:FJVGE 113:U-Mos 16:< 5554:talk 5526:talk 5508:talk 5490:talk 5475:talk 5461:talk 5446:talk 5431:talk 5404:talk 5383:talk 5326:talk 5294:Alex 5281:talk 5262:talk 5237:talk 5206:Alex 5194:talk 5178:talk 5154:talk 5134:talk 5118:talk 5095:talk 5081:talk 5066:talk 5036:talk 5015:talk 4992:talk 4977:talk 4959:talk 4944:talk 4928:talk 4902:talk 4850:talk 4821:talk 4793:talk 4767:talk 4751:talk 4730:talk 4700:talk 4685:talk 4657:talk 4641:talk 4618:talk 4603:talk 4594:. -- 4580:talk 4566:Rita 4556:talk 4530:talk 4512:talk 4495:talk 4481:talk 4460:talk 4438:talk 4412:talk 4397:talk 4365:talk 4346:talk 4318:talk 4282:this 4271:talk 4244:talk 4196:talk 4175:talk 4159:talk 4139:talk 4124:talk 4094:WP:V 4079:talk 4043:talk 3939:talk 3924:talk 3906:talk 3731:Yeti 3042:talk 2987:) — 2984:talk 2960:talk 2871:talk 2856:talk 2841:talk 2776:talk 2761:talk 2724:talk 2694:talk 2671:talk 2644:talk 2627:talk 2597:talk 2579:talk 2552:talk 2538:talk 2511:talk 2492:talk 2431:talk 2386:talk 2341:talk 2277:talk 2191:talk 2152:talk 2138:talk 2100:talk 2045:talk 2026:talk 1987:talk 1918:talk 1891:talk 1876:talk 1825:talk 1816:and 1798:talk 1777:talk 1742:talk 1704:talk 1689:talk 1673:talk 1665:some 1645:talk 1630:talk 1602:talk 1579:Talk 1552:talk 1535:Talk 1512:talk 1495:Talk 1472:talk 1455:Talk 1432:talk 1411:talk 1394:talk 1372:talk 1362:and 1347:talk 1325:talk 1310:talk 1288:talk 1267:talk 1253:talk 1232:talk 1217:talk 1173:talk 1158:talk 1144:talk 1124:talk 1104:talk 1071:talk 1052:talk 1025:talk 1010:talk 996:talk 975:talk 940:talk 933:here 922:talk 901:talk 886:talk 871:talk 857:talk 841:talk 818:talk 803:talk 781:talk 740:talk 732:this 722:talk 714:this 704:talk 689:talk 674:talk 665:this 654:talk 640:talk 625:talk 610:talk 590:talk 575:talk 554:talk 538:talk 518:talk 502:Rory 485:talk 454:talk 398:talk 382:talk 361:talk 339:talk 318:talk 296:talk 273:talk 236:talk 221:talk 198:talk 182:talk 167:talk 139:talk 117:talk 98:talk 5338:at 5302:The 5214:The 5038:) 4597:Red 4211:yet 4105:Why 3753:Ood 3408:Ace 2891:Why 2742:Why 2369:spy 2351:BBC 415:The 5556:) 5528:) 5510:) 5492:) 5477:) 5463:) 5448:) 5433:) 5406:) 5385:) 5354:Me 5328:) 5283:) 5264:) 5239:) 5196:) 5180:) 5156:) 5136:) 5120:) 5097:) 5083:) 5068:) 5017:) 4994:) 4979:) 4961:) 4946:) 4930:) 4904:) 4852:) 4823:) 4795:) 4769:) 4753:) 4745:-- 4732:) 4702:) 4687:) 4679:-- 4659:) 4643:) 4620:) 4605:) 4582:) 4558:) 4532:) 4514:) 4497:) 4483:) 4462:) 4440:) 4414:) 4399:) 4367:) 4348:) 4320:) 4273:) 4246:) 4198:) 4177:) 4161:) 4141:) 4126:) 4100:So 4081:) 4045:) 3941:) 3926:) 3908:) 3368:K9 3044:) 3004:, 2972:— 2962:) 2886:So 2873:) 2858:) 2843:) 2778:) 2763:) 2737:So 2726:) 2696:) 2673:) 2646:) 2629:) 2599:) 2581:) 2565:, 2554:) 2540:) 2513:) 2494:) 2433:) 2388:) 2343:) 2279:) 2264:) 2193:) 2154:) 2140:) 2102:) 2091:) 2047:) 2028:) 1989:) 1920:) 1893:) 1878:) 1827:) 1800:) 1779:) 1771:-- 1744:) 1706:) 1691:) 1675:) 1647:) 1632:) 1604:) 1582:• 1576:• 1567:— 1565:. 1554:) 1538:• 1532:• 1523:— 1514:) 1498:• 1492:• 1483:— 1474:) 1458:• 1452:• 1443:— 1434:) 1413:) 1396:) 1374:) 1366:. 1349:) 1327:) 1312:) 1290:) 1282:. 1269:) 1255:) 1238:) 1234:• 1175:• 1160:) 1146:) 1126:) 1106:• 1073:) 1054:) 1027:• 1012:) 998:) 977:• 942:) 924:) 903:) 888:) 873:) 859:) 843:) 820:) 805:) 783:• 742:) 724:) 706:) 691:) 676:) 656:) 642:) 627:) 612:) 592:) 577:) 556:) 540:) 520:) 487:) 460:) 456:• 400:) 384:) 367:) 363:• 341:) 324:) 320:• 298:) 275:) 238:) 223:) 200:) 184:) 169:) 145:) 141:• 119:) 104:) 100:• 5552:( 5524:( 5506:( 5488:( 5473:( 5459:( 5444:( 5429:( 5402:( 5381:( 5324:( 5306:| 5298:| 5279:( 5260:( 5235:( 5218:| 5210:| 5192:( 5176:( 5152:( 5132:( 5116:( 5093:( 5079:( 5064:( 5034:( 5013:( 4990:( 4975:( 4957:( 4942:( 4926:( 4900:( 4848:( 4819:( 4791:( 4765:( 4749:( 4728:( 4698:( 4683:( 4655:( 4639:( 4616:( 4601:( 4578:( 4554:( 4528:( 4510:( 4493:( 4479:( 4458:( 4436:( 4410:( 4395:( 4363:( 4344:( 4316:( 4269:( 4242:( 4234:" 4223:D 4220:B 4217:D 4194:( 4173:( 4157:( 4137:( 4122:( 4077:( 4041:( 3937:( 3922:( 3904:( 3079:e 3072:t 3065:v 3040:( 2981:( 2976:E 2958:( 2917:) 2913:| 2909:( 2903:— 2869:( 2854:( 2839:( 2825:) 2821:| 2817:( 2811:— 2801:) 2797:| 2793:( 2787:— 2774:( 2759:( 2722:( 2692:( 2669:( 2642:( 2625:( 2595:( 2577:( 2550:( 2536:( 2509:( 2490:( 2456:) 2452:| 2448:( 2442:— 2429:( 2415:) 2411:| 2407:( 2401:— 2384:( 2339:( 2327:) 2323:| 2319:( 2313:— 2303:) 2299:| 2295:( 2289:— 2275:( 2262:← 2260:( 2239:) 2235:| 2231:( 2225:— 2216:) 2212:| 2208:( 2202:— 2189:( 2177:) 2173:| 2169:( 2163:— 2150:( 2136:( 2125:) 2121:| 2117:( 2111:— 2098:( 2089:← 2087:( 2070:) 2066:| 2062:( 2056:— 2043:( 2024:( 2012:) 2008:| 2004:( 1998:— 1985:( 1972:D 1969:B 1966:D 1943:) 1939:| 1935:( 1929:— 1916:( 1889:( 1874:( 1858:) 1854:| 1850:( 1844:— 1823:( 1796:( 1775:( 1740:( 1702:( 1687:( 1671:( 1643:( 1628:( 1600:( 1571:E 1550:( 1527:E 1510:( 1487:E 1470:( 1447:E 1430:( 1409:( 1392:( 1370:( 1345:( 1323:( 1308:( 1286:( 1265:( 1251:( 1230:( 1215:( 1179:) 1171:( 1156:( 1142:( 1122:( 1110:) 1102:( 1069:( 1050:( 1031:) 1023:( 1008:( 994:( 981:) 973:( 938:( 920:( 899:( 884:( 869:( 855:( 839:( 816:( 801:( 787:) 779:( 774:— 738:( 720:( 702:( 687:( 672:( 652:( 638:( 623:( 608:( 588:( 573:( 552:( 536:( 516:( 483:( 452:( 396:( 380:( 359:( 337:( 316:( 294:( 271:( 234:( 219:( 196:( 180:( 165:( 137:( 115:( 96:( 50:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index