Knowledge

Talk:Community ownership

Source 📝

338: 320: 240: 222: 142: 124: 250: 78: 53: 348: 22: 152: 449:
adding the {{expand}} tag this discounts your claim that I don't think it can be expanded. My claim is that this article, in it's current state, is nothing more than a dictdef and does not meet the criteria for being on Knowledge. It should be noted that I am neutral in the AfD pending any expansion of this article.
448:
I disagree. I have, on a number of occassions, changed my vote on an AfD because an editor showed an article some love. If the article is expandable then the opportunity for somebody to adopt this article to love should be given. BTW, I never claimed that the article could not be expanded and by
426:
has made a claim that this is more notable than the dictdef that it currently is. I have, therefore, requested that the article be expanded. I don't believe that there is any policy prohibiting a request for expansion on an AfD article. Besides if the article is properly expanded I could be
544:
There is so much more to be published here. For example, about two-thirds of the electricity produced in the State of Minnesota is produced by what may be called community-owned enterprise (electric utilities owned by their rate-payers) This is true of a number of other States as well.
526:
I don't see why this article is in so much more need of expansion than 350,000 other stubs. Rush-expanding this article is going to take someone's time away from working on something they probably knew more about.
469:
Ummm, what part of "My claim is that this article, in it's current state, is nothing more than a dictdef and does not meet the criteria for being on Knowledge" did you misunderstand?
517:
Well as I said I don't feel I am wasting anyones time. I would think you, as an inclusionist, would be happy that the article has been requested for expansion.
548:
Substantial number of housing communities are owned by the community in some form (co-housing, housing co-ops, community land trusts, community associations)
400: 204: 302: 643: 613: 394: 198: 628: 296: 521: 501: 473: 453: 531: 510: 486: 462: 441: 618: 638: 633: 608: 623: 563: 370: 174: 272: 84: 58: 585:, but could not find or come up with a satisfiable formulation. The current lead sentence is definitely not ideal. – 554:
While not an expert myself, I can see a real need for an expert's accumulation of info under this topic heading.
437:
If the article is unexpandable, as you believe, you are wasting other editors' time by making them come and try.
431: 361: 325: 165: 129: 539: 263: 227: 497:. I am well within policy to open an AfD for this page. Just as I am within policy to add the expand tag. 157: 33: 478:
If it has potential, it's "a stub (but with potential)" - a problem which does not belong on AFD. See the
479: 594: 369:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
271:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
173:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
21: 573:
I attempted to improve the definition of community ownership, searching widely for sources on
39: 506:
Yes, there is no policy against wasting other editors' time, it's just better if you don't.
427:
persuaded to change my vote. I am adding the tag back and requesting that it stay intact.
89: 63: 8: 559: 417: 422:
I disagree with the removal of the {{expand}} tag. By removing the {{prod}} tag
255: 590: 574: 568: 353: 337: 319: 602: 555: 518: 498: 494: 470: 450: 428: 578: 458:
If you believe it has potential for expansion you shouldn't have AFDed it.
493:
Sorry. My opinion is that this is a dictdef and, therefore, is against
249: 239: 221: 551:
The Green Bay Packers is a community-owned professional football team.
528: 507: 483: 459: 438: 423: 586: 366: 170: 141: 123: 268: 77: 52: 347: 582: 151: 365:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 343: 267:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 245: 169:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 147: 399:This article has not yet received a rating on the 301:This article has not yet received a rating on the 203:This article has not yet received a rating on the 600: 87:, a project which is currently considered to be 19: 601: 644:Unknown-importance sociology articles 614:Unknown-importance Economics articles 629:Unknown-importance politics articles 359:This article is within the scope of 261:This article is within the scope of 163:This article is within the scope of 83:This article is within the scope of 15: 38:It is of interest to the following 13: 99:Knowledge:WikiProject Cooperatives 14: 655: 102:Template:WikiProject Cooperatives 346: 336: 318: 248: 238: 220: 150: 140: 122: 76: 51: 20: 379:Knowledge:WikiProject Sociology 183:Knowledge:WikiProject Economics 619:WikiProject Economics articles 595:01:35, 18 September 2023 (UTC) 382:Template:WikiProject Sociology 281:Knowledge:WikiProject Politics 186:Template:WikiProject Economics 1: 639:Stub-Class sociology articles 634:WikiProject Politics articles 609:Stub-Class Economics articles 532:04:20, 20 February 2006 (UTC) 522:04:09, 20 February 2006 (UTC) 511:04:02, 20 February 2006 (UTC) 502:03:49, 20 February 2006 (UTC) 487:03:44, 20 February 2006 (UTC) 474:03:39, 20 February 2006 (UTC) 463:03:32, 20 February 2006 (UTC) 454:03:30, 20 February 2006 (UTC) 442:03:25, 20 February 2006 (UTC) 432:03:12, 20 February 2006 (UTC) 373:and see a list of open tasks. 284:Template:WikiProject Politics 275:and see a list of open tasks. 177:and see a list of open tasks. 158:Business and economics portal 624:Stub-Class politics articles 7: 10: 660: 564:23:55, 12 April 2011 (UTC) 401:project's importance scale 303:project's importance scale 205:project's importance scale 480:Knowledge:Deletion_policy 398: 331: 300: 233: 202: 135: 71: 46: 85:WikiProject Cooperatives 540:Need for More Material 28:This article is rated 362:WikiProject Sociology 166:WikiProject Economics 105:Cooperatives articles 264:WikiProject Politics 385:sociology articles 189:Economics articles 34:content assessment 415: 414: 411: 410: 407: 406: 313: 312: 309: 308: 287:politics articles 215: 214: 211: 210: 117: 116: 113: 112: 651: 581:and the regular 387: 386: 383: 380: 377: 356: 351: 350: 340: 333: 332: 322: 315: 314: 289: 288: 285: 282: 279: 258: 253: 252: 242: 235: 234: 224: 217: 216: 191: 190: 187: 184: 181: 160: 155: 154: 144: 137: 136: 126: 119: 118: 107: 106: 103: 100: 97: 80: 73: 72: 67: 55: 48: 47: 31: 25: 24: 16: 659: 658: 654: 653: 652: 650: 649: 648: 599: 598: 571: 542: 420: 384: 381: 378: 375: 374: 352: 345: 286: 283: 280: 277: 276: 256:Politics portal 254: 247: 188: 185: 182: 179: 178: 156: 149: 104: 101: 98: 95: 94: 61: 32:on Knowledge's 29: 12: 11: 5: 657: 647: 646: 641: 636: 631: 626: 621: 616: 611: 575:Google Scholar 570: 567: 541: 538: 537: 536: 535: 534: 515: 514: 513: 491: 490: 489: 467: 466: 465: 445: 444: 419: 416: 413: 412: 409: 408: 405: 404: 397: 391: 390: 388: 371:the discussion 358: 357: 354:Society portal 341: 329: 328: 323: 311: 310: 307: 306: 299: 293: 292: 290: 273:the discussion 260: 259: 243: 231: 230: 225: 213: 212: 209: 208: 201: 195: 194: 192: 175:the discussion 162: 161: 145: 133: 132: 127: 115: 114: 111: 110: 108: 81: 69: 68: 56: 44: 43: 37: 26: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 656: 645: 642: 640: 637: 635: 632: 630: 627: 625: 622: 620: 617: 615: 612: 610: 607: 606: 604: 597: 596: 592: 588: 584: 580: 576: 566: 565: 561: 557: 552: 549: 546: 533: 530: 525: 524: 523: 520: 516: 512: 509: 505: 504: 503: 500: 496: 492: 488: 485: 481: 477: 476: 475: 472: 468: 464: 461: 457: 456: 455: 452: 447: 446: 443: 440: 436: 435: 434: 433: 430: 425: 402: 396: 393: 392: 389: 372: 368: 364: 363: 355: 349: 344: 342: 339: 335: 334: 330: 327: 324: 321: 317: 316: 304: 298: 295: 294: 291: 274: 270: 266: 265: 257: 251: 246: 244: 241: 237: 236: 232: 229: 226: 223: 219: 218: 206: 200: 197: 196: 193: 176: 172: 168: 167: 159: 153: 148: 146: 143: 139: 138: 134: 131: 128: 125: 121: 120: 109: 92: 91: 86: 82: 79: 75: 74: 70: 65: 60: 57: 54: 50: 49: 45: 41: 35: 27: 23: 18: 17: 579:Google Books 572: 553: 550: 547: 543: 421: 360: 262: 164: 96:Cooperatives 88: 59:Cooperatives 40:WikiProjects 569:Definition? 603:Categories 418:Expand tag 30:Stub-class 376:Sociology 367:sociology 326:Sociology 180:Economics 171:Economics 130:Economics 556:LAWinans 519:James084 499:James084 471:James084 451:James084 429:James084 278:Politics 269:politics 228:Politics 90:inactive 64:inactive 583:Google 495:WP:NOT 36:scale. 529:Kappa 508:Kappa 484:Kappa 460:Kappa 439:Kappa 424:Kappa 591:talk 587:Vipz 560:talk 395:??? 297:??? 199:??? 605:: 593:) 577:, 562:) 482:. 589:( 558:( 403:. 305:. 207:. 93:. 66:) 62:( 42::

Index


content assessment
WikiProjects
WikiProject icon
Cooperatives
inactive
WikiProject icon
WikiProject Cooperatives
inactive
WikiProject icon
Economics
WikiProject icon
icon
Business and economics portal
WikiProject Economics
Economics
the discussion
???
project's importance scale
WikiProject icon
Politics
WikiProject icon
icon
Politics portal
WikiProject Politics
politics
the discussion
???
project's importance scale
WikiProject icon

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.