498:
provide the link to my personal website. But it’s me tarnish and he is good name and I’m the one being threatened. I’m not sure who you’re used to dealing with Bud, but threatening an innocent person while defending someone who is clearly guilty isn’t how things work where I come from. And you can block or do whatever little power trips you have, but you can rest, assured that I will hire whatever lawyer I need to deal with you, and the other people who refuse to follow the rules that you swore to follow when you decided to do this power trip cleanup job.
188:
417:
this time because I am not mistaken, I know more of the rules, and I'm learning even more to fight this slander. You put a flag there with no proof. When removed, you put it back, stating that you're correct, despite having no evidence and failing to address the argument against your position. I've already read enough to know that what you did violates and abuses your limited authority. You should not have any ability to harass others on
Knowledge.
126:
95:
64:
208:
112:
619:
it's not against anyone's rules for me to copy a good writeup of myself and use it. It's certainly not the proof required for your COI tag. And YES, you ARE attacking me personally when you make as big of an effort to find evidence as you did. I suggest you provide the evidence or remove the tag. I'm pretty done messing with this and I'm pretty done with your abuse.
136:
443:. The citation says to have conversation here but there is none. It has been more than a year when I responded to this made up claim and nothing has been said or done. How does one resolve having their public image tarnished because some other person has personal problems? Thank you and I look forward to an honest moderator resolving this unfounded COI claim.
618:
Feel free to check how many days this has been down in the past 3-10 years. Zero. You just don't know what you're doing. But you sure like to blame and accuse based off of "the link must be wrong" - no - you are wrong. You have been wrong. And you will continue being wrong because the last I checked,
532:
And I’m gonna guess that you won’t read the rules. Because if you had, you would’ve noticed that they clearly state that if you use that tag the admin that uses it has to provide proof. The only thing provided was an opinion and then somebody saying I can’t find the website where I got the opinion.
497:
And if you don’t think it’s a personal attack, then you’re not paying attention. I was accused of a conflict of interest with zero evidence other than I copied the write up and use it as my biography on my personal webpage. That was this person’s evidence. But in all of his wisdom, he couldn’t even
493:
Plinkachoo isn’t the person who’s been made to look guilty when anyone clicks on the page. Read the full history before bragging on the good faith of your friend. You are all breaking the rules and, if necessary, I will hire an attorney. So block me if you want but if you don’t either provide proof
416:
This lack of logic should be enough to have your power abuse stopped. If you continue to accuse me, I will look at what I can do to deal with you. However, it's not the first problem we've had. Last time I backed away because I was in the wrong and didn't know the rules. I won't back down so easily
478:
I think it is pretty obvious that
Plinkachoo has a conflict of interest, and I think it is also pretty obvious that this complaint of yours, a year late, has no merit. If you continue to attack the good faith of Canterbury Tail and others, I will be more than happy to block you, because the
501:
He can’t provide the website where he got his opinion, and even if he could, that’s not proof of anything. I don’t know who the other person is. Apparently they can’t even find a recent picture of me or don’t care to because of all this damned drama.
642:
the link to the website, not removing it or saying its disappeared, you may wish to re-read things. I really don't know what your problem is, but if you continue with this accusatory approach to everything you may find yourself blocked from editing.
459:
Um I never accused you of anything, I accused User:Plinkachoo who should be a completely separate person than you. However you seem to have decided that that is an attack on you. That can't be possible unless there is a conflict of interest here.
390:
with regards to this article. They have only ever edited this article, and the text they have added has later appeared on Chris Sharp's official website, word for word, as their biography. That could be a coincidence, but seems unlikely.
637:
the link, i.e. adding it back in, because someone had removed it thinking it was dead but I reinserted it on the grounds that it was working so it was unlikely to have disappeared. Your message above is the personal attack here. I was
408:
The only thing that's pretty clear is that you have some problem with me. I have no idea who
Plinkachoo is, but they did a great job writing up my career highlights, so I used it for my webpage, which you couldn't even find using
494:
or remove me tag then I’ll do whatever I need to do to force right out of you. No matter the cost. If you can’t follow the rules and you’re unfit to judge anything. Hearsay and opinions are insufficient. Read the damned rules
111:
412:
Question: if I am responsible for this article and not the copy I placed on my website, why is the picture so outdated? I'm ten years older and 60 lbs lighter now. Why wouldn't I have my COI plant fix my
308:
326:
322:
686:
31:) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or
620:
534:
519:
503:
444:
418:
43:
696:
681:
383:
557:
Note the chrissharpmusic.net site was functional yesterday, it's still in my cache, something appears to just be wrong with its hosting today.
216:
671:
48:
601:
585:
286:
153:, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Knowledge's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to
701:
628:
452:
426:
154:
23:
691:
676:
158:
372:
654:
608:
Here's your "proof" that you couldn't even find. And if this isn't a witch hunt then why were you hunting? Keep going @
471:
162:
568:
249:
197:
149:
105:
100:
325:
to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
590:
Yeah I'm seeing the same thing, but it was definitely working yesterday. Maybe it has suddenly upped and gone.
542:
527:
511:
488:
75:
402:
344:
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
649:
596:
563:
466:
397:
42:. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to
518:
I just realized I had to login from my name to show up so I logged in. All the replies are from me.
287:
https://web.archive.org/20090908012847/http://www.grammy.com:80/GRAMMY_Awards/Winners/Results.aspx
46:.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see
32:
329:
before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template
624:
538:
523:
507:
448:
422:
345:
63:
552:
364:
332:
81:
644:
609:
591:
558:
461:
440:
432:
392:
352:
290:
8:
311:, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by
351:
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
268:
581:
484:
360:
141:
574:
I'm getting a bluehost landing page with a brief notice that the page has moved. —
276:
262:
39:
228:
220:
317:. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
665:
387:
576:
480:
436:
377:
318:
258:
273:
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add
187:
479:
combination of COI editing and personal attacks is not acceptable.
161:. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the
125:
94:
633:
Excuse me? What on earth are you on about? This discussion was me
281:
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
207:
613:
231:. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the
38:
from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially
431:
Can some
Knowledge moderator please look at this that isn't @
296:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the
291:
http://www.grammy.com/GRAMMY_Awards/Winners/Results.aspx
257:
I have just added archive links to one external link on
131:
321:using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
439:)? I think the real conflict here is this person @
687:Unknown-importance biography (musicians) articles
663:
533:If you can’t fulfill that then remove the tag
307:This message was posted before February 2018.
61:
697:Automatically assessed biography articles
682:Stub-Class biography (musicians) articles
664:
147:This article is within the scope of
57:
15:
672:Biography articles of living people
382:It appears to be pretty clear that
80:It is of interest to the following
13:
206:
186:
14:
713:
612:. Your day is on the say friend.
261:. Please take a moment to review
134:
124:
110:
93:
62:
21:This article must adhere to the
171:Knowledge:WikiProject Biography
702:WikiProject Biography articles
174:Template:WikiProject Biography
1:
692:Musicians work group articles
677:Stub-Class biography articles
602:21:57, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
586:20:41, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
569:20:37, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
427:11:54, 9 September 2022 (UTC)
403:20:35, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
195:This article is supported by
24:biographies of living persons
655:14:39, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
629:13:12, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
614:https://chrissharpmusic.com/
543:12:27, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
528:12:04, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
512:12:29, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
489:21:06, 21 October 2023 (UTC)
472:21:33, 21 October 2023 (UTC)
453:21:01, 21 October 2023 (UTC)
373:08:31, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
159:contribute to the discussion
7:
36:must be removed immediately
10:
718:
338:(last update: 5 June 2024)
279:|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
254:Hello fellow Wikipedians,
214:
194:
119:
88:
250:External links modified
215:This article has been
211:
191:
70:This article is rated
210:
198:WikiProject Musicians
190:
150:WikiProject Biography
388:Conflict of interest
319:regular verification
304:to let others know.
265:. If necessary, add
309:After February 2018
300:parameter below to
217:automatically rated
314:InternetArchiveBot
227:because it uses a
212:
192:
177:biography articles
76:content assessment
386:has some sort of
371:
339:
247:
246:
243:
242:
239:
238:
223:or other tool as
56:
55:
709:
367:
366:Talk to my owner
362:
337:
336:
315:
280:
272:
234:
179:
178:
175:
172:
169:
155:join the project
144:
142:Biography portal
139:
138:
137:
128:
121:
120:
115:
114:
113:
108:
97:
90:
89:
73:
67:
66:
58:
44:this noticeboard
16:
717:
716:
712:
711:
710:
708:
707:
706:
662:
661:
646:Canterbury Tail
610:Canterbury Tail
593:Canterbury Tail
560:Canterbury Tail
555:
463:Canterbury Tail
441:Canterbury Tail
433:Canterbury Tail
394:Canterbury Tail
384:USer:Plinkachoo
380:
370:
365:
330:
323:have permission
313:
274:
266:
252:
232:
176:
173:
170:
167:
166:
140:
135:
133:
109:
103:
74:on Knowledge's
71:
12:
11:
5:
715:
705:
704:
699:
694:
689:
684:
679:
674:
660:
659:
658:
657:
616:
606:
605:
604:
554:
551:
550:
549:
548:
547:
546:
545:
530:
516:
515:
514:
499:
476:
475:
474:
429:
414:
410:
379:
376:
363:
357:
356:
349:
294:
293:
285:Added archive
251:
248:
245:
244:
241:
240:
237:
236:
213:
203:
202:
193:
183:
182:
180:
146:
145:
129:
117:
116:
98:
86:
85:
79:
68:
54:
53:
49:this help page
33:poorly sourced
19:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
714:
703:
700:
698:
695:
693:
690:
688:
685:
683:
680:
678:
675:
673:
670:
669:
667:
656:
653:
652:
648:
647:
641:
636:
632:
631:
630:
626:
622:
617:
615:
611:
607:
603:
600:
599:
595:
594:
589:
588:
587:
583:
579:
578:
573:
572:
571:
570:
567:
566:
562:
561:
553:External link
544:
540:
536:
531:
529:
525:
521:
517:
513:
509:
505:
500:
496:
495:
492:
491:
490:
486:
482:
477:
473:
470:
469:
465:
464:
458:
457:
456:
455:
454:
450:
446:
442:
438:
434:
430:
428:
424:
420:
415:
411:
407:
406:
405:
404:
401:
400:
396:
395:
389:
385:
375:
374:
368:
361:
354:
350:
347:
343:
342:
341:
334:
328:
324:
320:
316:
310:
305:
303:
299:
292:
288:
284:
283:
282:
278:
270:
264:
260:
255:
230:
229:stub template
226:
222:
218:
209:
205:
204:
200:
199:
189:
185:
184:
181:
164:
163:documentation
160:
156:
152:
151:
143:
132:
130:
127:
123:
122:
118:
107:
102:
99:
96:
92:
91:
87:
83:
77:
69:
65:
60:
59:
51:
50:
45:
41:
37:
34:
30:
26:
25:
20:
18:
17:
650:
645:
639:
634:
621:Chrissharp80
597:
592:
575:
564:
559:
556:
535:Chrissharp80
520:Chrissharp80
504:Chrissharp80
467:
462:
445:Chrissharp80
419:Chrissharp80
398:
393:
381:
358:
333:source check
312:
306:
301:
297:
295:
256:
253:
224:
196:
148:
82:WikiProjects
47:
35:
28:
22:
635:reinstating
259:Chris Sharp
666:Categories
435:(perhaps @
235:parameter.
225:Stub-class
72:Stub-class
640:defending
353:this tool
346:this tool
168:Biography
106:Musicians
101:Biography
40:libellous
359:Cheers.—
269:cbignore
409:Google.
369::Online
298:checked
263:my edit
577:C.Fred
481:Drmies
437:C.Fred
413:image?
277:nobots
233:|auto=
78:scale.
219:by a
651:talk
625:talk
598:talk
582:talk
565:talk
539:talk
524:talk
508:talk
485:talk
468:talk
449:talk
423:talk
399:talk
302:true
157:and
378:COI
327:RfC
289:to
221:bot
29:BLP
668::
627:)
584:)
541:)
526:)
510:)
487:)
451:)
425:)
340:.
335:}}
331:{{
275:{{
271:}}
267:{{
104::
623:(
580:(
537:(
522:(
506:(
483:(
447:(
421:(
355:.
348:.
201:.
165:.
84::
52:.
27:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
