621:, I shortened the SD because the target is 40 characters. The prior one was around 60, and it did not even align with the main topic of the article - per the hatnote, the article is about the metaphor. The long SD was about the literal meaning, which is just stated in the beginning of the article as an introduction to explain the metaphor. SDs can be imprecise, they just need to tell the reader they are at the right article (just like the hatnote "This article is about the metaphor").
253:
191:
348:
327:
469:
edit the main page of this article to reflect that meaning, but I couldn't figure out how to phrase it, or which section to put it in. It's sort of half-way between the literal and metaphorical meanings. Perhaps we need a disambiguation page, or a new article for the various meanings of the phrase "carte blanche" rather than just having it be part of the "Blank check" article... and shouldn't that be "cheque" anyway?
243:
222:
658:
540:
Per the manual of style, one spelling of the word cheque/check should be adopted throughout the article. While most of the article uses the "que" version, the title is the "ck" version. Opinions? Unless someone wants to move the article, or sees something I don't, I'll go ahead and standardize it to
448:
I thought that the term Carte
Blanche came from a practice in France where under limited circumstances the king would give a powerful person a White Card with the royal seal (proof of issuance from the king) that said (roughly) "What this man has done, he has done for the good of France." Thus, one
468:
stories, when someone who is royalty, or just plain wealthy, hires Holmes to investigate or accomplish something, they will sometimes say something like "You have carte blanche", roughly meaning "whatever expenses you incur during this case, no matter how much, will be covered by me." I wanted to
449:
who was able to secure a CB would be able to assassinate an opponent with impunity. I could be wrong about it. But I do think that a carte blanche is completely seperate from a blank check. Generally, "Carte
Blanche" implies unlimited permission, whilst "Blank Check" implies unlimited funding.
479:"...cheque anyway?" British/American variation in spelling is usually a first come first served affair. Meaning the original author gets to choose how to spell words like color, odor, or fertilisation. Spellings are only changed after lengthy and sometimes heated debate (see aluminium).--
429:
Also, I thought the origin of the carte blanche phrase was during the french revolution when it was a travel permit allowing the holder to go wherever they pleased. I can't remember where I heard this though. So the blank cheque comparison doesn't sit quite right.
424:
Is this page really relevant for carte blanche?, which as I understood things referred to a persons ability or authority to do anything he/she pleased. A blank cheque is similar in principle but can only refer to financial outlay.
153:
439:
A quick search seems to reveal that this was all in my imagination. It seems to have originated as a French phrase for unconditional surrender, and I'll try not to make any jokes about that.
648:
402:
147:
666:
712:
392:
678:
717:
707:
309:
497:
453:
368:
634:
618:
527:
355:
332:
697:
299:
515:
490:
79:
702:
692:
605:
583:
275:
642:
473:
443:
85:
597:
452:
Yes, but "blank check" also means unlimited permission by generalization from just the literal monetary sense of the term.
168:
44:
135:
434:
650:
419:
30:
266:
227:
99:
104:
20:
556:
129:
562:
Actually, if there's no objection, I'm going to change it to "cheque" and move the article. The consensus at
74:
627:
530:
202:
576:
125:
65:
669:
until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.
613:
175:
601:
367:
on
Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
274:
on
Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
674:
554:
190:
109:
504:
have a broader interpretation than just financial (when not used in a
Sherlock Holmes novel). --
592:
I added the "USA" reference because, well, it's never "cheque" here unless it's some brands of
510:
485:
566:
uses that spelling, so it would seem to make sense to mirror that spelling here. Thoughts? --
208:
638:
521:
141:
8:
593:
55:
670:
548:
543:
258:
70:
535:
505:
480:
51:
470:
161:
574:
465:
686:
662:
24:
440:
431:
271:
359:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to
568:
364:
252:
622:
360:
667:
Knowledge:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 June 8#Carte blanche
563:
347:
326:
657:
242:
221:
541:
the "ck" version in a couple of days if no one objects.
160:
661:
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect
270:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
248:
15:
713:Low-importance Finance & Investment articles
684:
33:for general discussion of the article's subject.
377:Knowledge:WikiProject Finance & Investment
718:WikiProject Finance & Investment articles
708:Start-Class Finance & Investment articles
380:Template:WikiProject Finance & Investment
174:
633:You make a good case. I'll revert myself.--
188:
685:
526:Please, someone clean up this mess!
356:WikiProject Finance & Investment
353:This article is within the scope of
264:This article is within the scope of
184:
698:Low-importance Linguistics articles
207:It is of interest to the following
23:for discussing improvements to the
13:
14:
729:
383:Finance & Investment articles
284:Knowledge:WikiProject Linguistics
703:WikiProject Linguistics articles
693:Start-Class Linguistics articles
656:
346:
325:
287:Template:WikiProject Linguistics
251:
241:
220:
189:
45:Click here to start a new topic.
665:. The discussion will occur at
500:has a valid point. Blank check
397:This article has been rated as
304:This article has been rated as
1:
606:19:20, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
371:and see a list of open tasks.
278:and see a list of open tasks.
42:Put new text under old text.
516:01:48, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
491:01:48, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
474:13:28, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
7:
50:New to Knowledge? Welcome!
10:
734:
649:"Carte blanche" listed at
420:Relevancy to carte blanche
403:project's importance scale
310:project's importance scale
584:21:59, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
531:08:38, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
396:
341:
303:
236:
215:
80:Be welcoming to newcomers
679:07:25, 8 June 2021 (UTC)
651:Redirects for discussion
643:03:20, 8 June 2021 (UTC)
628:03:17, 8 June 2021 (UTC)
456:06:04, 23 Nov 2005 (UTC)
444:13:50, 27 May 2005 (UTC)
435:10:46, 27 May 2005 (UTC)
374:Finance & Investment
333:Finance & Investment
557:23:20, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
267:WikiProject Linguistics
197:This article is rated
75:avoid personal attacks
100:Neutral point of view
290:Linguistics articles
105:No original research
594:traveler's cheques
259:Linguistics portal
203:content assessment
86:dispute resolution
47:
614:Short description
581:
514:
489:
417:
416:
413:
412:
409:
408:
320:
319:
316:
315:
183:
182:
66:Assume good faith
43:
725:
660:
573:
553:
551:
546:
508:
483:
385:
384:
381:
378:
375:
350:
343:
342:
337:
329:
322:
321:
292:
291:
288:
285:
282:
261:
256:
255:
245:
238:
237:
232:
224:
217:
216:
200:
194:
193:
185:
179:
178:
164:
95:Article policies
16:
733:
732:
728:
727:
726:
724:
723:
722:
683:
682:
654:
616:
579:
549:
544:
542:
538:
524:
466:Sherlock Holmes
422:
382:
379:
376:
373:
372:
335:
289:
286:
283:
280:
279:
257:
250:
230:
201:on Knowledge's
198:
121:
116:
115:
114:
91:
61:
12:
11:
5:
731:
721:
720:
715:
710:
705:
700:
695:
653:
647:
646:
645:
615:
612:
611:
610:
609:
608:
598:207.210.134.83
587:
586:
577:
537:
534:
523:
520:
519:
518:
494:
493:
462:
461:
460:
459:
458:
457:
437:
421:
418:
415:
414:
411:
410:
407:
406:
399:Low-importance
395:
389:
388:
386:
369:the discussion
351:
339:
338:
336:Low‑importance
330:
318:
317:
314:
313:
306:Low-importance
302:
296:
295:
293:
276:the discussion
263:
262:
246:
234:
233:
231:Low‑importance
225:
213:
212:
206:
195:
181:
180:
118:
117:
113:
112:
107:
102:
93:
92:
90:
89:
82:
77:
68:
62:
60:
59:
48:
39:
38:
35:
34:
28:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
730:
719:
716:
714:
711:
709:
706:
704:
701:
699:
696:
694:
691:
690:
688:
681:
680:
676:
672:
671:Shhhnotsoloud
668:
664:
663:Carte blanche
659:
652:
644:
640:
636:
632:
631:
630:
629:
626:
625:
620:
607:
603:
599:
595:
591:
590:
589:
588:
585:
582:
580:
575:
571:
570:
565:
561:
560:
559:
558:
555:
552:
547:
533:
532:
529:
517:
512:
507:
503:
499:
498:68.114.222.95
496:
495:
492:
487:
482:
478:
477:
476:
475:
472:
467:
455:
454:68.114.222.95
451:
450:
447:
446:
445:
442:
438:
436:
433:
428:
427:
426:
404:
400:
394:
391:
390:
387:
370:
366:
362:
358:
357:
352:
349:
345:
344:
340:
334:
331:
328:
324:
323:
311:
307:
301:
298:
297:
294:
277:
273:
269:
268:
260:
254:
249:
247:
244:
240:
239:
235:
229:
226:
223:
219:
218:
214:
210:
204:
196:
192:
187:
186:
177:
173:
170:
167:
163:
159:
155:
152:
149:
146:
143:
140:
137:
134:
131:
127:
124:
123:Find sources:
120:
119:
111:
110:Verifiability
108:
106:
103:
101:
98:
97:
96:
87:
83:
81:
78:
76:
72:
69:
67:
64:
63:
57:
53:
52:Learn to edit
49:
46:
41:
40:
37:
36:
32:
26:
22:
18:
17:
655:
623:
617:
572:
567:
539:
525:
522:Poor grammar
506:TheLimbicOne
501:
481:TheLimbicOne
471:Ugliness Man
463:
423:
398:
354:
305:
265:
209:WikiProjects
171:
165:
157:
150:
144:
138:
132:
122:
94:
25:Blank cheque
19:This is the
281:Linguistics
272:linguistics
228:Linguistics
199:Start-class
148:free images
31:not a forum
687:Categories
635:Quisqualis
619:Quisqualis
365:Investment
545:Goodnight
536:Spellings
88:if needed
71:Be polite
21:talk page
56:get help
29:This is
27:article.
528:Lindenb
464:In the
401:on the
361:Finance
308:on the
154:WP refs
142:scholar
564:cheque
441:Leithp
432:Leithp
205:scale.
126:Google
569:Ckatz
169:JSTOR
130:books
84:Seek
675:talk
639:talk
602:talk
550:mush
511:talk
502:does
486:talk
363:and
162:FENS
136:news
73:and
578:spy
393:Low
300:Low
176:TWL
689::
677:)
641:)
624:MB
604:)
596:!
156:)
54:;
673:(
637:(
600:(
513:)
509:(
488:)
484:(
405:.
312:.
211::
172:·
166:·
158:·
151:·
145:·
139:·
133:·
128:(
58:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
