1266:. According Garwych, the Egyptian army was deployed between Abu-Ageila and Kusseima. On the days before June 5 Israel made several steps that cause the Egyption to believe that the main battle will be at Kusseima, and therefor, the Egyptians moved big part of their power to Kusseima. Their wholle power was 16,000 men, but in the area where the battle took place in the end there were about 8,000 soldiers. Another point is that the whole tactic of the israely army (and probably other armies as well) was to have a decisive advantage in power at the crucial time and place. by stating that 14,000 israely soldiers won 8,000 egyptians you are saying that the israely army succeed in his plans to create this advantage. exectly the same way the Egyptian army did in 1973. The numbers of the soldiers don't mean anything about who was a better soldier or army, but about which commander was more bright by succeeding to create this advantage. Anyway, it will be most welcome if we could have the Egyption point of view on the battle.
1332:
divison 2nd is 16 thousend. The other way, is to see it as the troops that were battling around Um-katef (By the way, the hebrew wiki article name is Um-Katef battle, the name that is more common in Israel). In this option the
Egyption force is of 8,000 soldiers. we have to remember that Sharon ugda had a unit (a battlion+ in the comand of Uri Baidatz) near Kusseima that was exchanging fire with the Egyptian forces there with the aim to keep them busy and not let them assist the Um-Katef area. Michael oren wrote in Hebrew a book that i believe is more or less the same as the english version. i will try to locate it and see what he has to say.
2139:
could be crushed. Guarding the vital Abu' Ageila junction leading into the peninsula's interior, to the Mitla Pass and
Ismailiya, the stronghold had withstood repeated Israeli onslaughts in 1956, surrendering only when its supplies were exhausted. Since then, Umm Qatef had been further buttressed by powerful redoubt at Ruwafa Dam and at nearby al-Qusayma. Manning these positions were troops of the 2nd Infantry Division who, thought battle-ready, were commanded by Maj. Gen. Sa'di Nagib, a political appointee best known as one of Amer's drinking mates.
1742:
is arguing about is including the information in the infobox. if that information came from the IDF itself as an official report, or statement by an IDF spokesman or what ever, it would be considered as an official
Israeli estimate, and in that case we would be able to include it in the infobox representing Israeli official estimates; however it is not. the information comes from a reliable source, and that's why it is included in the article, and it is included in the article in a way that makes it a neutral article.
1434:'s book "Understanding War" which based on data base of the CAA (What is it?). As can be seen on table 2 (page 69), Personal Strength Ratio is 1.04, Force Strength (fire power) Ratio is 0.94 and Combat Power Ratio is 3.12. The last Ratio includs the element of surprise and other factors such as significant qualitative asymmetry in fighting forces. I must mention that Mearsheimer says that "An outside review cast serious doubt on the accuracy of the 598-battle data base used by the CAA study" (page 66).
2072:]. The main argument is about weather or not to include Oren's estimate in the infobox, and if done, how to include it, and preserve the neutrality of the article. That is a question i asked more than once, and did not receive an answer. An idea that might resolve the dispute is to add a brief note about according to whom is that number (16,000), and adding both numbers in a way of "8,000, or 16,000", since there are no estimates of numbers between them; and that is what id did for now.
1003:
461:
1019:
1852:{Wikimania 2008 conference}. The reader is the one who decides his own opinion about the neutrality or Michael Oren here, and therefor his/her own reliability on the information coming from him. The article mentions the estimate of Oren, therefor this is not a matter of reliability. The article does not say for example that that certain estimate according to the Israeli, or Pro-Israeli point of view, yet it mentions the author, and the reader has the final word.
348:
327:
243:
222:
191:
888:
358:
253:
960:
949:
938:
846:
818:
927:
916:
1520:
remove information sourced to relevant reliable sources, authored by professional military historians and published by an academic press, on the basis of that belief. Other editors have agreed with my position here, and on those other articles where we have had this discussion, so you might want to take note of that.
1859:
Illustration; It may be true that the total number of
Egyptian troops have been 16,000, and that is what Oren meant; but the number of Egyptian troops in Abu-Ageila alone was 8,000, and that's what Gawrych mentioned. Gawrych mentions that the number of troops comprising Sharon's ugdah was 19,000, and
1777:
You know what ,Canadian Monkey.......I think that we are very similar, yet having very different personal interests, and points of view; and that's a problem because, when an object is under the effect of two equal force, yet opposite in direction, the object does not move, and each force deletes the
1316:
Thanx for joining the discussion, Tushyk. What have you noted is exactly what i said in the
Neutrality section of this talk page, however i do not get your point correctly, i think. I believe that we agree on that the number of Egyptian troops in Abu-Ageila was 8,000, and the number is 14,000 for the
2065:
have numerously argued that, and claimed me to be questioning the reliability of the source citing Oren's estimate, some thing that is not true, and some thing i have denied, and stated that the source is reliable. Canadian Monkey stated that the importance goes to the reliability of the source, not
1499:
As you do not wish to discuss it, i do not have to. As i said, i did not remove the content. by the way, i believe that the other source (supposedly, the neutral one) is far more reliable than the non neutral source. just read the intro of the first PDF provided, and you might get an idea about what
1331:
We can see that
Garwych numbers are based on Israeli sources as well, even though that according his notes, he had some approch to Egyptian sources. The main issue, as I can see it, is how big the arena of the battle is. One way is to see Sharon ugda versus Saleh al-din mohsen 2nd division, and then
1317:
Israelis; That is what is mentioned in the article, and cited by
Gawrych's book. I have requested that some one who has access to Oren's book, or at least know for sure the exact phrase in that book to state it to me, since i do not have access to that book, yet no response have been given till now.
2188:
It is understandable if the people - undertrained for their current level and before that disaster for years overconfident - panicked when it happened. But I think Amer didn't panic alone, and his panic didn't cause the order to withdraw. It was a general panic, which contributed the order to being
2138:
A similar balance prevailed further to the south, in the heavily fortified area, six miles deep and two wide, of Umm Qatef. This was the first line of Egypt's
Conqueror strategy, and its defenses were a microcosm of Sinai's: three stations, 80 guns, 90 tanks, and 16,000 men -between which the enemy
1866:
And if providing a back ground about that source only bothers you, Canadian Monkey, you can give a back ground about
Gawrych's estimates as well, however i think that this would greatly weaken the situation of Oren's estimate if a reader is to decide which source is more reliable; I for one believe
1741:
I have not deleted the information from the article. the article still have the information but in a way that shows the background of it's author, which in this case is an
Israeli, and an officer in the IDF. i have not said, or concluded that the information comes from the IDF. What Canadian Monkey
1519:
Indeed, there's no need to discuss this - only to edit according to policy. You certainly did remove the content - the info box stated 8,000-16,000, and you removed the 16,000 number, sourced to Oren. You are welcome to believe whatever you like regarding the reliability of sources, but you may not
1295:
In page 82 of "Key to the Sinai..." Garwych writes: "With the standard size of an infantry division around 11,000 men, the 2d Infantry Division, with its attached units, numbered around 16,000 men.(37) Of these, approximately 8,000 were stationed in the Abu Ageila area. Note 37 says: "Dayan, Diary,
1113:
First, I'd like to agree with Canadian Monkey's recent change to convey conflicting sources. I have a question concerning Gawrych's source (Key to the Sinai). According to Eric Hammel, an Egyptian infantry division was 11,800 troops (Six Days in June, p. 141). He later gives the order of battle for
2056:
guidelines, i have stated that this information comes from Michael Oren, who in an American-Isaerli scholar, and an IDF officer. Since the information does not represent an official Israeli estimate, i did not include it in the infobox, because i am not very sure how to include it, and in the same
1855:
Canadian Monkey, i am not hearing you, i am reading what you write. the way of representing information in a neutral way from two sources; A, and B; source A is not information coming from any official government report/statement, or individual belonging to any side of the dispute. Source A states
1781:
Let's join our efforts, and try to find that neutral point. you want Oren's estimate to be included in the infobox; your reason is that it comes from a reliable source, and therefor neutrality is not a concern -which is against WP guidelines-. I see that it is not neutral in this article, and have
1753:
In a matter of fact, maybe Oren was talking about the full Egyptian force, not only the part stationed in Abu-Ageila. Gawrych records two figures for the number of Israeli troops, one for the force attacking Abu-Ageila, and the other for the ugdah, but records an exact number of Egyptian troops in
1144:
I did not read the whole source, but i think that the Egyptian force was supposed to guard at least three position in which Abu-Ageila was only one of them. the source speaks about the fighting in the three position, and puts higher emphasise on the Abu-Ageila battle, however this article in about
1822:
Michael Oren's book is a reliable source. In fact, since it's more recent, it might be more up-to-date. Maybe he used sources that were not available to Gawrych 12 years earlier. He's not infallible, of course, but there's no reason to relegate him to some sort of a propagandist. There's a way to
1749:
The article already represents different estimates according to reliable sources in a way that makes it a neutral article. both estimates are represented in the article, and the infobox holds the neutral estimates, and again no change should be expected unless Canadian Monkey explains why do not
2184:
By looking into that background it seems the reason for the order being issued, and the disastrous form it was issued in, was complex and probably one of the main reasons for that was insufficient training and experience of people giving the order. Several or most of Free Officers were promoted
1856:
that the number is X1. Source B estimates that the number is X2, however X2 = 2 X1. Source A estimates another number to be Y, yet another is W where W = Y + Z. It maybe true that X2 is a fact as well as X1 because X2 is in the general formula, but X1 is true when calculating on a smaller scale.
1661:
This is exactly what I am doing here. I have included varying estimates from different reliable sources, and presented them in a neutral fashion. In contrast to this, you have in one place removed sources based on your personal belief that they are not neutral, and in another place presented
1069:
Since there are 2 battles of Abu-Ageila I suggest the article should be renamed to "Second Battle of Abu-Ageila (1967)" to make it absolutely clear which battle we are talking about. If you disagree, maybe we can have the option of removing the disamb. page of this article. I hope to see some
1360:
I agree with you, however i think it would be much more complicated. To state the total number of Iraeli troops in the attack opposed to the total number of Egyptian troops defending the positions, we might actually need to re-write the whole article; And that would take
1052:
Hi, if you read it, what do you think of the article, clear enough? I'll add a picture of movements later. And terms like division and brigade may have different meanings in different languages, so if anyone can tell the difference between dutch and english, please help.
1261:
My two cents. First, I am from Israel and my English is not so good, so forgive me my mistakes. I wrote most of the Hebrew wiki article which is not finished yet. A very important point that is missing in the article itself and from this debate is the point of
2108:
In history, there is no such guarantee of a purely unbiased source, and any differences that might arise should be noted and sourced, if those sources are legitimate per Knowledge standards. I am totally in favor of the "8,000-16,000" with all sources noted.
1484:
and edit in accordance with what it says - you can't remove material sourced to relevant reliable sources, authored by professional military historians and published by an academic press, based on your personal feeling that the author is not "neutral".
1778:
effect of the other. When each of these forces change it's direction towards the other's a little bit, they may come to a point neutralizing their differ in direction, and the object is then subjected to the combined effect of both forces.
1504:
have we "been over this", and for the October war, i just am not free enough to get back to it thanks to how openly minded responses i got there, so it might need some effort from me, and that's some thing i am not able to afford right
2047:
see that his point of view, and estimates cannot be neutral in this certain article, and article like it (about battle directly involving Israel, specifically the IDF). Because the information comes from a reliable source, following
2196:
has the same problem: two adjacent sentences contradict each other (first lacking citation about Amer panicking to issue order to withdraw from Sinai, the other supported by citation, that the decission was made by him and Naser).
1885:
Both sources are reliable sources. The way we deal with conflicting estimates from reliable sources on Wikipedua is by presenting both estimates, in a neutral fashion. "giving the reader a background" about one source is called
1128:
Update: I just noticed that the book is available on PDF and linked (is that a copyvio?). Anyway, Chapter 4, Page 93, gives a number around 19,000 by both sides. It refers to another book, which I can look up. Any thoughts? --
1193:"The Israelis not only had the advantage in leadership but also in manpower and weapons. Sharon's plan gave the Israelis a marked superiority in numbers of troops at Abu Ageila—14,000 Israelis pitted against 8,000 Egyptians."
153:
1379:
I commend you on your wellingness to improve the article, and positivly interatcing with it's issues, and am thanking you for your civil way of discussion; So good luck with Oren, and hope me good luck with the college :D.
1870:
So, the situation here, is that either some one comes with an idea to satisfy what was mentioned above, or the issue sands still since it is not against any WP rules. In Fact, your suggestion is provoking WP:Neutrality.
2018:
1757:
One more thing, is that supposing that in another article where Oren can be considered neutral, Gawrych's book stills far more reliable, and when it comes to choosing a source, it would definitely be the right choice.
1010:
828:
1860:
that the number of israeli troops participating in the fighting in Abu-ageila was 14,000. I have no access to Oren's book, so i would be grateful if some one mentioned the exact original statement in that source.
615:
1745:
Correct me if i am wrong, but Nudve was talking about the numbers of troops according to Gawrych's book; and any way we are solving what i think was a slight misunderstanding right now, so why do not you join
1209:
Sharon's ugda alone could not have been bigger than the total. Gawrych isn't clear here, but I think the 19,000 refers to the entire battle, including Um-Katef, which seems to be included in this article. --
1557:
BTW, why you seamed like having no problem at all, when only the 16,000 number was mentioned? in fact, why did you delete the 8,000 sourced figure, and include the 16,000 figure sourced to the non neutral
1114:
Abu-Ageila, which seems to coincide with what the article currently says. How can one division, two brigades and three companies amount to only 8,000 troops? Does Gawrych or anyone else explain it? --
2091:
I support having it say "8000—16000" if you have conflicting estimates, however, the suitability of a source has nothing to do with its neutrality. Practically everything on the internet is biased.--
2028:
Michael Oren has stated that the number of Egyptian troops in the battle of Abu-Ageila was 16,000 according to the person who added that in the article -I have no access to that book right now-.
1195:. clear enough that it states that the number of Egyptian troops in the Abu-Ageila was 8,000, and that the Israelis had a marked superiority in the number of troops thanks to Sharon's plan.
2200:
Probably there somebody like me looked into citation needed and found it, and added info from this source, but didn't ammend the previous senetnce (text marked as lacking citation), yet.
1453:
one question needs to be answered: is an israeli scholar, and an IDF military officer representing a neutral point of view in an article concerning a conflict directly involving israel ?
2181:
I have been lead to an AlAhram article that both shows the background and a bit different event - that according to this source the decision to whthdraw was joint Amer's and Naser's.
759:
1863:
I have requested an idea that solves this issue by finding a way to include Oren's estimate in the infobox, and giving the reader a background about where this information comes from.
1538:. the article still includes the statement, so check the link out, and come back when you are ready to discuss weather that source can be considered neutral in this article or not.
147:
2143:
I take back thinking of the book as being non neutral, as it is very clear now that the editor who used that source was the one being non neutral, and lying to the encyclopedia.
1806:". What you are doing is presenting one source's claim as fact, and the other claim using a well-poisoning "background", which consists of a cherry-picked older affiliation.
2302:
1238:
Yes, but Gawrych also mentions the original lineups. I think that's relevant. Also, you have not provided an explanation for removing the other sources (Dupuy and Oren). --
2307:
625:
2185:
several grades instantly after succesfull overthrow of King Farouk in 1952, and in positions of power by the source without necessary training neither then nor later.
1732:
Neutrality requires views to be represented without bias. All editors and all sources have biases (in other words, all editors and all sources have a point of view') —
1026:
832:
901:
541:
1930:
2086:
1880:
1791:
1767:
1204:
1913:
1899:
1815:
1697:
1584:
1570:
1552:
1529:
1514:
1494:
2023:
1163:'s book, which is more specific, so I cited it. The 8,000 figure refers to the actual engagement as result of Sharon's plan, according to Gawrych (p. 98). --
1904:
Call it whatever you want, it is a wikipedia policy, and you still did not give alternatives. "poisoning the well" link does not lead to a wikipedia policy.
526:
642:
487:
44:
727:
1403:
1389:
1341:
1296:
91, 210; and Wallach interview (Yehudah Wallach, interview with author, Tel Aviv, Israel, 7 November 1986). Israel's numbers are from the same source.
1832:
1326:
1247:
1233:
1219:
1172:
1154:
858:
1715:
2120:
414:
2287:
1997:. As there are more than two editors involved, and a RfC has already been requested, I believe this issue is outside of the normal bounds of the
1394:
Good luck with your exams. As can be seen in my discussion page, I don't really edit here. If I will find more information, I will write it here.
404:
1084:
309:
2297:
634:
1435:
1395:
1347:
1333:
1297:
1267:
887:
556:
1355:
2282:
1867:
that the institutions backing Gawrych's book are significantly more reliable than any university press, even if that university was Oxford.
1305:
1290:
712:
697:
481:
1224:
Nudve, i have copied the exact phrase found in the source. How can it be clearer than leteralystating that information, as Gawrych did?
168:
1662:
material from those sources in a non-neutral way (by describing them as an "IDF source" when in fact they are an academic publication).
1281:
I think you (Tushyk) are correct. What is your source for the figure of 16,000, and what does it say about the total Israeli force? --
676:
659:
79:
135:
1080:
It's ok you moved this. I tried to make a distinction in the battles by date, but this is more clearly and like other wiki articles.
2217:
1462:
2312:
2272:
1986:
1702:
Canadian Monkey is right. An article should represent different estimates. It does not become non-neutral just because someone
853:
823:
548:
299:
2081:
1074:
2317:
2253:
1958:
862:
85:
2166:
1468:
No, this question does not need to be answered, as the source is a reliable one, from a peer-reviewed academic publication.
2292:
1798:
I don't think you're hearing me. The way to present different estimates in a neutral way is "Source X claims the number is
1443:
1275:
1103:
129:
1473:
1179:
The size of Sharon's ugdah numbered around 19,000 men, a force somewhat larger than the Egyptians' 2d Infantry Division.11
1138:
1123:
2277:
2267:
651:
2177:
Regarding Citation needed there, about Abdel Hakim Amer's panics as the (sole?) reason for the order for withdrawal: at
2102:
30:
1477:
1059:
125:
2013:
565:
380:
439:
275:
449:
444:
2053:
1606:
1535:
706:
692:
434:
175:
99:
2192:
I am not sure yet how to introduce this change into the section in a concise way. Also, that section in article
104:
20:
1669:
writes, above, 'I'd like to agree with Canadian Monkey's recent change to convey conflicting sources.' On the
1181:". I did not note that statement at the beginning, but i think it is very clear that Gawrych is talking about
74:
857:. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a
719:
473:
371:
332:
202:
1975:) in that including estimates from both sources is appropriate for this article. However, I also commend
1972:
611:
535:
266:
227:
65:
24:
2077:
2049:
1980:
1926:
1909:
1876:
1787:
1763:
1580:
1566:
1548:
1510:
1458:
1385:
1322:
1229:
1200:
1150:
685:
575:
141:
2189:
issued as to "withdraw in 24 hours", without instruction (or even hint about) how to accomplish that.
2249:
2061:
9it would look like that neutral estimates vary, not one neutral estimate, and another that is not).
1952:
1895:
1811:
1693:
1525:
1490:
1368:
As can be known from my user page, i am a student; And i am having "some things to keep me bussy".
518:
1472:
requires reliable sources, not "neutral" ones, whatever you might imagine those to be. We've been
379:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
274:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
1998:
1575:
Please help me a little bit, and mention which editors are agreeing with you "here & there".
1064:
603:
510:
190:
109:
1782:
stated my reasons. If some one suggested a way to resolve that, i would be happy to go with it.
1108:
2147:
2073:
2044:
2034:
1976:
1922:
1905:
1872:
1783:
1759:
1576:
1562:
1544:
1506:
1454:
1381:
1318:
1225:
1196:
1146:
744:
668:
208:
2245:
2193:
2178:
2172:
2062:
2058:
1948:
1891:
1807:
1689:
1521:
1486:
8:
2097:
55:
1091:
1947:. Based on my review of the comments above and the articles edit history, I agree with
1887:
1678:
1448:
70:
2225:
1090:
Actually, since it was the only battle at Abu-Ageila during the Six-Day War, then per
1850:
the reader is the one who decides his/her own opinions about information, and persons
591:
496:
51:
1439:
1427:
1399:
1351:
1337:
1301:
1271:
607:
161:
2110:
2052:
guidelines, i did not remove the information from the article . In order to meat
1994:
1966:
1843:
The neutrality is a basic guideline for every single wikimedia foundation project
1828:
1711:
1423:
1286:
1243:
1215:
1168:
1134:
1119:
1099:
1047:
779:
753:
619:
587:
571:
616:
Day to Mark the Departure and Expulsion of Jews from the Arab Countries and Iran
2092:
2011:
1670:
736:
2261:
2129:
2002:
1703:
1081:
1071:
1070:
comments in the coming 12 hours, if not I will move this article. Sincerely,
1056:
599:
595:
363:
2068:]. Canadian Monkey has refused to discuss the neutrality of the information
2019:
RfC: Can an IDF officer be considered neutral in a battle involving the IDF?
1370:
That means; final exams, mid terms, reprts, copy books, and practical exams.
2030:
1944:
1674:
1481:
1469:
1431:
1160:
583:
506:
502:
258:
1631:
Neutrality requires views to be represented without bias. All editors and
1002:
460:
1962:
1824:
1707:
1682:
1666:
1282:
1239:
1211:
1164:
1130:
1115:
1095:
787:
579:
2006:
783:
1639:) — what matters is how we combine them to create a neutral article.
1159:
Gawrych puts the numbers at around 19,000 (p. 93). He cites them to
1094:
it should be named"Battle of Abu-Ageila (1967)". Any objections? --
1018:
1263:
760:
Basic Law proposal: Israel as the Nation-State of the Jewish People
2066:
the neutrality of the information according to what i understood
347:
326:
242:
221:
1734:
what matters is how we combine them to create a neutral article
376:
271:
845:
817:
1921:
I think it's time to undergo dispute resolution steps.
1376:
should be expected from me from now to up to one month.
1346:
I coudn't find Oren's book yet. It will take some time.
1841:
I have not questioned the reliability of Oren's book.
160:
2098:
2093:
2303:
Start-Class Middle Eastern military history articles
2134:On page 182 of Michael Oren book, Six Days of War;
899:
This article has been checked against the following
542:
Timeline of the Israeli–Palestinian conflict in 2005
375:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
353:
270:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
248:
15:
2308:
Middle Eastern military history task force articles
1688:Finally, please avoid personalizing this dispute.
1534:OK let me make it easier for you, check this out:
626:Articles needing translation from Hebrew Knowledge
1750:he/she consider Oren non neutral in this article.
1561:is some one affected by his own interests here ?
2259:
1500:i mean. get your self some more attention about
33:for general discussion of the article's subject.
2215:
174:
1426:. The relevant pages are 65-70. The writer,
713:Jewish exodus from Arab and Muslim countries
188:
1011:Middle Eastern military history task force
643:Israel articles missing geocoordinate data
527:WikiProject Israel Palestine Collaboration
488:Unknown-importance Israel-related articles
468:Here are some tasks awaiting attention:
1943:Thanks for requesting a third opinion at
1188:, not the number of troops by both sides.
728:Knowledge requested photographs in Israel
1541:Meanwhile, you can check this link too:
851:This article is within the scope of the
1993:attacks and to resolve this issue with
2288:Mid-importance Israel-related articles
2260:
871:Knowledge:WikiProject Military history
861:. To use this banner, please see the
2298:Start-Class military history articles
2209:
874:Template:WikiProject Military history
1823:deal with conflicting estimates. --
1609:? Did you see the section that reads
369:This article is within the scope of
264:This article is within the scope of
184:
2283:Start-Class Israel-related articles
1848:According to Knowledge guidelines,
557:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Israel
207:It is of interest to the following
23:for discussing improvements to the
13:
2216:Mubasher, Abdou (7–13 June 2007).
2001:project. Please be mindful of the
1665:Since you seem to have missed it,
1017:
1001:
886:
698:Knowledge requested maps in Israel
482:Unassessed Israel-related articles
14:
2329:
1635:(in other words, all editors and
677:Israel articles needing attention
660:Israel articles needing infoboxes
1802:, source Y claims the number is
1637:all sources have a point of view
1177:In p.93, the first line reads: "
958:
947:
936:
925:
914:
844:
816:
503:Cleanup listing for this project
459:
356:
346:
325:
251:
241:
220:
189:
45:Click here to start a new topic.
2054:Knowledge:Neutral point of view
1607:Knowledge:Neutral point of view
1536:Knowledge:Neutral point of view
693:Module:Location map/data/Israel
409:This article has been rated as
304:This article has been rated as
2167:15:31, 15 September 2009 (UTC)
640:Add geographic coordinates to
554:Participate in discussions at
1:
2313:Start-Class Cold War articles
2273:Low-importance Egypt articles
2179:Six-Day War#The Egyptian Army
2121:19:28, 26 December 2008 (UTC)
2103:19:33, 16 December 2008 (UTC)
2082:21:31, 11 December 2008 (UTC)
2014:21:43, 11 December 2008 (UTC)
1931:20:27, 11 December 2008 (UTC)
1914:20:27, 11 December 2008 (UTC)
1900:18:07, 11 December 2008 (UTC)
1881:14:02, 11 December 2008 (UTC)
1833:13:35, 10 December 2008 (UTC)
1816:18:57, 10 December 2008 (UTC)
1792:11:25, 10 December 2008 (UTC)
1768:11:09, 10 December 2008 (UTC)
1716:08:03, 10 December 2008 (UTC)
1698:01:25, 10 December 2008 (UTC)
1585:01:14, 10 December 2008 (UTC)
1571:01:13, 10 December 2008 (UTC)
1553:01:09, 10 December 2008 (UTC)
1530:00:55, 10 December 2008 (UTC)
1515:00:44, 10 December 2008 (UTC)
1495:00:09, 10 December 2008 (UTC)
1444:19:22, 24 December 2008 (UTC)
1420:One more piece of information
1404:12:11, 16 December 2008 (UTC)
1390:16:42, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
1356:20:14, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
1342:09:21, 13 December 2008 (UTC)
1327:00:22, 13 December 2008 (UTC)
1306:21:04, 12 December 2008 (UTC)
1291:16:53, 12 December 2008 (UTC)
1276:16:40, 12 December 2008 (UTC)
1248:13:35, 10 December 2008 (UTC)
1234:11:54, 10 December 2008 (UTC)
1220:10:57, 10 December 2008 (UTC)
1205:10:47, 10 December 2008 (UTC)
1173:08:03, 10 December 2008 (UTC)
383:and see a list of open tasks.
278:and see a list of open tasks.
42:Put new text under old text.
2318:Cold War task force articles
2254:13:50, 25 January 2023 (UTC)
1463:23:40, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
1191:In p.98, the source states:
1155:23:59, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
1139:19:14, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
1124:18:43, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
854:Military history WikiProject
725:Add pictures to articles in
389:Knowledge:WikiProject Israel
7:
2293:WikiProject Israel articles
1989:) for his efforts to avoid
612:Trial of Benjamin Netanyahu
392:Template:WikiProject Israel
284:Knowledge:WikiProject Egypt
50:New to Knowledge? Welcome!
25:Battle of Abu-Ageila (1967)
10:
2334:
2278:WikiProject Egypt articles
2268:Start-Class Egypt articles
2050:Knowledge:Reliable sources
1060:23:52, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
919:Referencing and citation:
695:. Add maps to articles in
576:Diamond industry in Israel
415:project's importance scale
310:project's importance scale
287:Template:WikiProject Egypt
1845:as it's article suggests.
1476:several times before, on
1104:07:21, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
1025:
1009:
984:
980:
898:
877:military history articles
839:
421:
408:
341:
303:
236:
215:
80:Be welcoming to newcomers
1430:, gives ratios based on
1085:19:17, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
1075:18:33, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
635:Geographical coordinates
1706:one of the sources. --
1633:all sources have biases
985:Associated task forces:
930:Coverage and accuracy:
604:Public Defence (Israel)
505:is available. See also
395:Israel-related articles
1890:, and is not neutral.
1730:Well, the NPOV says: "
1605:Did you actually read
1022:
1006:
963:Supporting materials:
891:
197:This article is rated
75:avoid personal attacks
1021:
1005:
890:
426:Project Israel To Do:
100:Neutral point of view
1372:In another word, no
1145:this single battle.
511:the tool's wiki page
507:the list by category
105:No original research
2218:"The road to Naksa"
1029:(c. 1945 – c. 1989)
1027:Cold War task force
952:Grammar and style:
905:for B-class status:
775:Translate to Hebrew
2039:, and an American-
1918:stop edit warring.
1888:Poisoning the well
1679:Operation Bulmus 6
1023:
1007:
892:
859:list of open tasks
691:See discussion at
372:WikiProject Israel
203:content assessment
86:dispute resolution
47:
2173:Section Aftermath
2161:
2003:Three Revert Rule
1045:
1044:
1041:
1040:
1037:
1036:
1033:
1032:
976:
975:
932:criterion not met
921:criterion not met
863:full instructions
811:
810:
807:
806:
803:
802:
799:
798:
657:Add infoboxes to
620:Pre-Modern Aliyah
592:Sephardic Haredim
320:
319:
316:
315:
267:WikiProject Egypt
183:
182:
66:Assume good faith
43:
2325:
2238:
2237:
2235:
2233:
2224:. Archived from
2213:
2160:
2159:
2154:
2148:
2118:
2116:
2100:
2095:
2074:One last pharaoh
1999:WP:Third opinion
1977:One last pharaoh
1923:One last pharaoh
1906:One last pharaoh
1873:One last pharaoh
1784:One last pharaoh
1760:One last pharaoh
1577:One last pharaoh
1563:One last pharaoh
1545:One last pharaoh
1507:One last pharaoh
1455:One last pharaoh
1428:John Mearsheimer
1382:One last pharaoh
1319:One last pharaoh
1226:One last pharaoh
1197:One last pharaoh
1147:One last pharaoh
992:
982:
981:
966:
962:
961:
955:
951:
950:
944:
940:
939:
933:
929:
928:
922:
918:
917:
896:
895:
879:
878:
875:
872:
869:
868:Military history
848:
841:
840:
835:
824:Military history
820:
813:
812:
608:Prisoner of Zion
549:Deletion sorting
463:
456:
455:
423:
422:
397:
396:
393:
390:
387:
366:
361:
360:
359:
350:
343:
342:
337:
329:
322:
321:
292:
291:
288:
285:
282:
261:
256:
255:
254:
245:
238:
237:
232:
224:
217:
216:
200:
194:
193:
185:
179:
178:
164:
95:Article policies
16:
2333:
2332:
2328:
2327:
2326:
2324:
2323:
2322:
2258:
2257:
2246:Marjan Tomki SI
2243:
2242:
2241:
2231:
2229:
2214:
2210:
2175:
2155:
2150:
2149:
2132:
2114:
2111:
2089:
2063:Canadian Monkey
2026:
2021:
1949:Canadian Monkey
1892:Canadian Monkey
1808:Canadian Monkey
1690:Canadian Monkey
1673:article it was
1522:Canadian Monkey
1487:Canadian Monkey
1451:
1111:
1067:
1065:Change the name
1050:
990:
964:
959:
953:
948:
942:
937:
931:
926:
920:
915:
876:
873:
870:
867:
866:
826:
795:
780:David Bar-Hayim
588:Rami Kleinstein
572:Ayala Procaccia
524:Participate in
454:
394:
391:
388:
385:
384:
362:
357:
355:
335:
289:
286:
283:
280:
279:
257:
252:
250:
230:
201:on Knowledge's
198:
121:
116:
115:
114:
91:
61:
12:
11:
5:
2331:
2321:
2320:
2315:
2310:
2305:
2300:
2295:
2290:
2285:
2280:
2275:
2270:
2240:
2239:
2228:on 24 May 2017
2207:
2206:
2202:
2174:
2171:
2131:
2128:
2126:
2124:
2123:
2088:
2085:
2025:
2022:
2020:
2017:
1938:
1937:
1936:
1935:
1934:
1933:
1919:
1916:
1868:
1864:
1861:
1857:
1853:
1846:
1838:
1837:
1836:
1835:
1820:
1819:
1818:
1779:
1773:
1771:
1770:
1755:
1751:
1747:
1743:
1739:
1728:
1727:
1726:
1725:
1724:
1723:
1722:
1721:
1720:
1719:
1718:
1686:
1681:it was again
1671:Yom Kippur War
1663:
1650:
1649:
1648:
1647:
1646:
1645:
1644:
1643:
1642:
1641:
1619:
1618:
1617:
1616:
1615:
1614:
1613:
1612:
1611:
1610:
1594:
1593:
1592:
1591:
1590:
1589:
1588:
1587:
1573:
1559:
1555:
1539:
1480:. Please read
1478:other articles
1450:
1447:
1417:
1416:
1415:
1414:
1413:
1412:
1411:
1410:
1409:
1408:
1407:
1406:
1377:
1366:
1311:
1310:
1309:
1308:
1259:
1258:
1257:
1256:
1255:
1254:
1253:
1252:
1251:
1250:
1189:
1175:
1110:
1109:Egyptian force
1107:
1092:WP:MILMOS#NAME
1088:
1087:
1066:
1063:
1049:
1046:
1043:
1042:
1039:
1038:
1035:
1034:
1031:
1030:
1024:
1014:
1013:
1008:
998:
997:
995:
993:
987:
986:
978:
977:
974:
973:
971:
969:
968:
967:
956:
945:
934:
923:
909:
908:
906:
893:
883:
882:
880:
849:
837:
836:
821:
809:
808:
805:
804:
801:
800:
797:
796:
794:
793:
792:
791:
770:
762:
749:
732:
715:
702:
681:
664:
647:
630:
622:
561:
544:
531:
514:
492:
467:
465:
464:
453:
452:
447:
442:
437:
431:
428:
427:
419:
418:
411:Mid-importance
407:
401:
400:
398:
381:the discussion
368:
367:
351:
339:
338:
336:Mid‑importance
330:
318:
317:
314:
313:
306:Low-importance
302:
296:
295:
293:
290:Egypt articles
276:the discussion
263:
262:
246:
234:
233:
231:Low‑importance
225:
213:
212:
206:
195:
181:
180:
118:
117:
113:
112:
107:
102:
93:
92:
90:
89:
82:
77:
68:
62:
60:
59:
48:
39:
38:
35:
34:
28:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
2330:
2319:
2316:
2314:
2311:
2309:
2306:
2304:
2301:
2299:
2296:
2294:
2291:
2289:
2286:
2284:
2281:
2279:
2276:
2274:
2271:
2269:
2266:
2265:
2263:
2256:
2255:
2251:
2247:
2227:
2223:
2219:
2212:
2208:
2205:
2201:
2198:
2195:
2190:
2186:
2182:
2180:
2170:
2169:
2168:
2164:
2163:
2158:
2153:
2146:
2141:
2140:
2135:
2127:
2122:
2119:
2117:
2107:
2106:
2105:
2104:
2101:
2096:
2084:
2083:
2079:
2075:
2071:
2069:
2067:
2064:
2060:
2059:WP:Neutrality
2055:
2051:
2046:
2042:
2038:
2036:
2032:
2016:
2015:
2012:
2010:
2009:
2005:. Good luck!
2004:
2000:
1996:
1992:
1988:
1985:
1982:
1978:
1974:
1971:
1968:
1964:
1960:
1957:
1954:
1950:
1946:
1942:
1941:Third Opinion
1932:
1928:
1924:
1920:
1917:
1915:
1911:
1907:
1903:
1902:
1901:
1897:
1893:
1889:
1884:
1883:
1882:
1878:
1874:
1869:
1865:
1862:
1858:
1854:
1851:
1847:
1844:
1840:
1839:
1834:
1830:
1826:
1821:
1817:
1813:
1809:
1805:
1801:
1797:
1796:
1795:
1794:
1793:
1789:
1785:
1780:
1776:
1775:
1774:
1769:
1765:
1761:
1756:
1752:
1748:
1744:
1740:
1737:
1735:
1729:
1717:
1713:
1709:
1705:
1701:
1700:
1699:
1695:
1691:
1687:
1684:
1680:
1676:
1672:
1668:
1664:
1660:
1659:
1658:
1657:
1656:
1655:
1654:
1653:
1652:
1651:
1640:
1638:
1634:
1629:
1628:
1627:
1626:
1625:
1624:
1623:
1622:
1621:
1620:
1608:
1604:
1603:
1602:
1601:
1600:
1599:
1598:
1597:
1596:
1595:
1586:
1582:
1578:
1574:
1572:
1568:
1564:
1560:
1556:
1554:
1550:
1546:
1542:
1540:
1537:
1533:
1532:
1531:
1527:
1523:
1518:
1517:
1516:
1512:
1508:
1503:
1498:
1497:
1496:
1492:
1488:
1483:
1479:
1475:
1471:
1467:
1466:
1465:
1464:
1460:
1456:
1446:
1445:
1441:
1437:
1433:
1429:
1425:
1422:can be found
1421:
1405:
1401:
1397:
1393:
1392:
1391:
1387:
1383:
1378:
1375:
1371:
1367:
1364:
1359:
1358:
1357:
1353:
1349:
1345:
1344:
1343:
1339:
1335:
1330:
1329:
1328:
1324:
1320:
1315:
1314:
1313:
1312:
1307:
1303:
1299:
1294:
1293:
1292:
1288:
1284:
1280:
1279:
1278:
1277:
1273:
1269:
1265:
1249:
1245:
1241:
1237:
1236:
1235:
1231:
1227:
1223:
1222:
1221:
1217:
1213:
1208:
1207:
1206:
1202:
1198:
1194:
1190:
1187:
1186:
1180:
1176:
1174:
1170:
1166:
1162:
1158:
1157:
1156:
1152:
1148:
1143:
1142:
1141:
1140:
1136:
1132:
1126:
1125:
1121:
1117:
1106:
1105:
1101:
1097:
1093:
1086:
1083:
1079:
1078:
1077:
1076:
1073:
1062:
1061:
1058:
1054:
1028:
1020:
1016:
1015:
1012:
1004:
1000:
999:
996:
994:
989:
988:
983:
979:
972:
970:
965:criterion met
957:
954:criterion met
946:
943:criterion met
935:
924:
913:
912:
911:
910:
907:
904:
903:
897:
894:
889:
885:
884:
881:
864:
860:
856:
855:
850:
847:
843:
842:
838:
834:
830:
825:
822:
819:
815:
814:
789:
785:
781:
778:
776:
772:
771:
769:
767:
763:
761:
758:
756:
755:
750:
747:
746:
741:
739:
738:
733:
730:
729:
724:
722:
721:
716:
714:
711:
709:
708:
703:
700:
699:
694:
690:
688:
687:
682:
679:
678:
673:
671:
670:
665:
662:
661:
656:
654:
653:
648:
645:
644:
639:
637:
636:
631:
628:
627:
621:
617:
613:
609:
605:
601:
600:Nachum Heiman
597:
596:Zman Tel Aviv
593:
589:
585:
581:
577:
573:
570:
568:
567:
562:
559:
558:
553:
551:
550:
545:
543:
540:
538:
537:
532:
529:
528:
523:
521:
520:
515:
512:
508:
504:
501:
499:
498:
493:
490:
489:
484:
483:
478:
476:
475:
470:
469:
466:
462:
458:
457:
451:
448:
446:
443:
441:
438:
436:
433:
432:
430:
429:
425:
424:
420:
416:
412:
406:
403:
402:
399:
382:
378:
374:
373:
365:
364:Israel portal
354:
352:
349:
345:
344:
340:
334:
331:
328:
324:
323:
311:
307:
301:
298:
297:
294:
277:
273:
269:
268:
260:
249:
247:
244:
240:
239:
235:
229:
226:
223:
219:
218:
214:
210:
204:
196:
192:
187:
186:
177:
173:
170:
167:
163:
159:
155:
152:
149:
146:
143:
140:
137:
134:
131:
127:
124:
123:Find sources:
120:
119:
111:
110:Verifiability
108:
106:
103:
101:
98:
97:
96:
87:
83:
81:
78:
76:
72:
69:
67:
64:
63:
57:
53:
52:Learn to edit
49:
46:
41:
40:
37:
36:
32:
26:
22:
18:
17:
2244:
2230:. Retrieved
2226:the original
2221:
2211:
2203:
2199:
2191:
2187:
2183:
2176:
2165:
2162:
2156:
2151:
2144:
2142:
2137:
2136:
2133:
2125:
2112:
2090:
2040:
2031:Michael Oren
2029:
2027:
2007:
1990:
1983:
1969:
1955:
1940:
1939:
1849:
1842:
1803:
1799:
1772:
1733:
1731:
1704:doesn't like
1675:User:Raul654
1636:
1632:
1630:
1501:
1452:
1432:Trevor Dupuy
1419:
1418:
1374:"big effort"
1373:
1369:
1363:alot of work
1362:
1260:
1192:
1184:
1182:
1178:
1161:Trevor Dupuy
1127:
1112:
1089:
1068:
1055:
1051:
900:
852:
774:
773:
765:
764:
752:
751:
745:Israel stubs
743:
735:
734:
726:
718:
717:
705:
704:
696:
684:
683:
675:
667:
666:
658:
650:
649:
641:
633:
632:
624:
584:Levin Kipnis
564:
563:
555:
547:
546:
534:
533:
525:
517:
516:
495:
494:
486:
480:
472:
471:
410:
370:
305:
265:
259:Egypt portal
209:WikiProjects
171:
165:
157:
150:
144:
138:
132:
122:
94:
19:This is the
2194:Six-Day War
2057:way follow
1754:Abu-Ageila.
941:Structure:
829:Middle East
519:Collaborate
199:Start-class
148:free images
31:not a forum
2262:Categories
2204:References
2157:The Muslim
1991:ad hominem
1738:", right ?
1683:User:Nudve
1667:User:Nudve
1449:Neutrality
788:Guy Oseary
580:Edna Arbel
2043:scholar.
1677:, and on
1474:over this
1183:Sharon's
784:Guy Bavli
623:See also
479:Rate the
88:if needed
71:Be polite
21:talk page
2222:Al-Ahram
2113:Monsieur
2087:Comments
1995:civility
1987:contribs
1973:contribs
1959:contribs
1264:Kusseima
1082:Wiki1609
1072:Daimanta
1057:Wiki1609
902:criteria
833:Cold War
669:Maintain
536:Copyedit
56:get help
29:This is
27:article.
2152:ΡHARAOH
2041:Israeli
2037:officer
2024:Summery
1558:source?
1048:Comment
652:Infobox
497:Cleanup
440:history
413:on the
308:on the
154:WPÂ refs
142:scholar
2232:24 May
2094:Patton
2033:is an
2008:(EhJJ)
1961:) and
1436:Tushyk
1396:Tushyk
1348:Tushyk
1334:Tushyk
1298:Tushyk
1268:Tushyk
786:, and
754:Update
566:Expand
474:Assess
386:Israel
377:Israel
333:Israel
205:scale.
126:Google
2130:Lying
1963:Nudve
1945:WP:3O
1825:Nudve
1708:Nudve
1482:WP:RS
1470:WP:RS
1283:Nudve
1240:Nudve
1212:Nudve
1185:ugdah
1165:Nudve
1131:Nudve
1116:Nudve
1096:Nudve
766:Other
737:Stubs
720:Photo
450:purge
445:watch
281:Egypt
272:Egypt
228:Egypt
169:JSTOR
130:books
84:Seek
2250:talk
2234:2017
2078:talk
1981:talk
1967:talk
1953:talk
1927:talk
1910:talk
1896:talk
1877:talk
1829:talk
1812:talk
1788:talk
1764:talk
1712:talk
1694:talk
1581:talk
1567:talk
1549:talk
1526:talk
1511:talk
1505:now.
1491:talk
1459:talk
1440:talk
1424:here
1400:talk
1386:talk
1352:talk
1338:talk
1323:talk
1302:talk
1287:talk
1272:talk
1244:talk
1230:talk
1216:talk
1201:talk
1169:talk
1151:talk
1135:talk
1120:talk
1100:talk
742:See
707:NPOV
674:See
509:and
485:and
435:edit
162:FENS
136:news
73:and
2099:123
2035:IDF
1746:us.
1502:why
686:Map
405:Mid
300:Low
176:TWL
2264::
2252:)
2220:.
2115:dl
2080:)
2070:]
1929:)
1912:)
1898:)
1879:)
1831:)
1814:)
1804:mm
1800:nn
1790:)
1766:)
1714:)
1696:)
1583:)
1569:)
1551:)
1543:]
1528:)
1513:)
1493:)
1461:)
1442:)
1402:)
1388:)
1354:)
1340:)
1325:)
1304:)
1289:)
1274:)
1246:)
1232:)
1218:)
1203:)
1171:)
1153:)
1137:)
1122:)
1102:)
991:/
831:/
827::
782:,
618:,
614:,
610:,
606:,
602:,
598:,
594:,
590:,
586:,
582:,
578:,
574:,
156:)
54:;
2248:(
2236:.
2145:(
2076:(
2045:I
1984:·
1979:(
1970:·
1965:(
1956:·
1951:(
1925:(
1908:(
1894:(
1875:(
1827:(
1810:(
1786:(
1762:(
1736:.
1710:(
1692:(
1685:.
1579:(
1565:(
1547:(
1524:(
1509:(
1489:(
1457:(
1438:(
1398:(
1384:(
1365:.
1350:(
1336:(
1321:(
1300:(
1285:(
1270:(
1242:(
1228:(
1214:(
1199:(
1167:(
1149:(
1133:(
1118:(
1098:(
865:.
790:.
777::
768::
757::
748:.
740::
731:.
723::
710::
701:.
689::
680:.
672::
663:.
655::
646:.
638::
629:.
569::
560:.
552::
539::
530:.
522::
513:.
500::
491:.
477::
417:.
312:.
211::
172:·
166:·
158:·
151:·
145:·
139:·
133:·
128:(
58:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
