167:
that they only consider that view likely or probable. An example is La Sor. Laurie Guy says immersion was probably the norm, but that at various times and places full immersion, partial immersion and affusion were probably in use. Tischler says that modes other than total immersion may also have been used. "We are not told what method of baptism was used, whether it was by total immersion or by some form of pouring or sprinkling. Probably each of these was used at one time or another depending on the circumstances"; "Although the descriptions of New
Testament baptisms indicate that baptism occurred with both the officiator and the candidate standing in water, they do not state specifically what happened in the act"; "It can be questioned whether the NT proves immersion was used at all"; "The New Testament considers it enough to establish it as the initiatory title of Christianity, outline its significance in broad touches, and let it go at that" - these are some of the expressions that others have used.
74:
53:
395:
84:
22:
194:"The philological evidence is technical and inconclusive. But the archaeological and Mishnaic evidence seems to support the argument for immersion. That is clearly what occurred in the contemporaneous Jewish miqva’ot, so that is probably what happened in early Jewish Christian baptism", Sanford La Sor, 'Discovering What Jewish Miqva’ot Can Tell Us About Christian Baptism', Biblical Archaeology Review, (1987), 13.01
203:
247:
227:
457:
We had already been through this before. Your repeated insertion of separate citation tags for each source demonstrates that you were calling into question the statement which preceded each citation. If that's not what you meant, then you were using the tags inappropriately. If that's what you meant,
166:
Maxwell
Johnson states: "We do not know enough about specific baptismal practices within the various New Testament communities to suggest that one mode of baptismal administration was normatively practiced over another." Even among those who express a preference for one view or another, some indicate
336:
In any case, by talking of that, you are avoiding the point. Why do you delete sourced information that shows that many sources, even among those that you decorate with the description "standard reference works", indicate that their conclusions are only tentative? That is the point of the passage
413:
The statement they were cited for was: "While other forms were occasionally used, standard reference works commenting on early church practice agree that full immersion was the usual mode of baptism." Not one of them says this: all they show is that immersion was used. This I indicated in my edit
442:
That's what I thought. But now you tell me that what followed the statement "While other forms were occasionally used, standard reference works commenting on early church practice agree that full immersion was the usual mode of baptism" was not meant as support for it. Since you say so, I must
285:
Do you mean "Your citation is mischievous; the article goes on to prove it with numerous citations" (a comment, rather than an edit summary, that does not seem to presume good faith) and "The statement is substantiated by the standard reference works which follow"? And the following
179:
472:
I accept your reproof for not having tagged in the clearest and best way the fact that these three, out of the nine that seemed to be cited as proof of the opening statement, did not in fact support the opening statement.
386:
either in the river or in the bath-house of a large house", Dowley (ed.), "Eerdman's
Handbook to the History of Christianity", p.10 (1977). Clearly the statement is in the citation given.
555:
573:
569:
374:", Jewett, "Baptism", in Murray (ed.), "Zondervan Pictorial Encyclopedia of the Bible, volume 1, p.466 (rev. ed. 2009). Clearly the statement is in the citation given.
366:"A recent Bible encyclopedia speaks of the "consensus of scholarly opinion" that the baptismal practice of John the Baptist and the apostles was by immersion."
140:
370:
The citation given is "Lexicographers universally agree that the primary meaning of baptizo G966 is 'to dip' or 'to immerse", and there is a similar
265:
482:
467:
452:
437:
423:
280:
621:
346:
640:
130:
398:. Clearly the statement is in the citation given. All three citation tags were completely spurious. These references were tagged falsely.--
157:
407:
645:
428:
That is completely false. None of them were cited for that statement. Each citation was preceded by a completely different statement.--
327:
In general, your citations speak of "immersion", not, as claimed, of "full immersion". Yet you claim that they "agree" that it was
106:
635:
521:
97:
58:
298:
standard reference works commenting on early church practice agree that full immersion was the usual mode of baptism.
513:
318:
496:
572:
to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
357:
505:
162:
Taiwan boi has three times successively removed the following material (which initially had fewer sources):
616:
33:
591:
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
443:
accept that in fact you were uncharacteristically leaving that statement with no source to back it up.
512:. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit
458:
you should have tagged the relevant statement as unsourced. But it appears that's not what you meant.--
337:
that you have deleted. A well-sourced point that has every right to be maintained in the article.
390:"Grimes says "There is little doubt that early Christian baptism was adult baptism by immersion"."
105:
on
Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
607:
372:
consensus of scholarly opinion that both the baptism of John and of the apostles was by immersion
576:
before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template
592:
579:
39:
599:
546:
463:
433:
403:
314:
306:
276:
522:
https://web.archive.org/web/20101203091327/http://www.vatican.va/archive/ENG0015/__P3I.HTM
218:
Tischler, ‘All Things in the Bible: An
Encyclopedia of the Biblical World’, volume 1, 2006
8:
89:
21:
558:, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by
598:
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
478:
448:
419:
342:
261:
256:
What appearance of justification can be adduced for removing this sourced material?
206:
Introducing Early
Christianity: A Topical Survey of Its Life, Beliefs, and Practices
353:
Infant baptism is one sided. Many documents that are pro infant baptism are jumped.
525:
509:
459:
429:
399:
310:
272:
564:. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
629:
474:
444:
415:
396:
Grimes, "Deeply Into the Bone: Re-Inventing Rites of
Passage", p. 50 (2002)
338:
257:
102:
378:"a standard Bible dictionary says that baptism was normally by immersion."
565:
362:
The following referenced statements are tagged "not in citation given".
182:
The Rites of
Christian Initiation: Their Evolution and Interpretation
238:
Stanley J. Grenz, 'Theology for the
Community of God', 1994), p. 530
228:
Hughes
Oliphant Old, Worship: Reformed according to Scripture, p. 10
73:
52:
83:
531:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the
302:
This statement is substantiated by citations which follow.
516:
for additional information. I made the following changes:
184:(Liturgical Press 2007 ISBN 978-0-8146-6215-1), p. 34
101:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
79:
568:using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
627:
526:http://www.vatican.va/archive/ENG0015/__P3I.HTM
554:This message was posted before February 2018.
504:I have just modified one external link on
248:Eerdman's Dictionary of the Bible, p.148
19:
628:
173:
641:High-importance Christianity articles
543:to let others know (documentation at
158:Repeated removal of sourced material
95:This article is within the scope of
15:
38:It is of interest to the following
13:
115:Knowledge:WikiProject Christianity
14:
657:
646:WikiProject Christianity articles
508:. Please take a moment to review
384:Baptism was normally by immersion
118:Template:WikiProject Christianity
271:Please read my edit summaries.--
82:
72:
51:
20:
135:This article has been rated as
241:
232:
221:
212:
197:
188:
1:
636:B-Class Christianity articles
506:Baptism in early Christianity
109:and see a list of open tasks.
622:12:14, 25 October 2016 (UTC)
483:12:07, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
468:06:49, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
453:12:48, 26 January 2011 (UTC)
438:03:17, 26 January 2011 (UTC)
424:13:54, 25 January 2011 (UTC)
408:09:16, 25 January 2011 (UTC)
347:11:28, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
281:08:45, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
266:08:38, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
7:
10:
662:
585:(last update: 5 June 2024)
501:Hello fellow Wikipedians,
141:project's importance scale
134:
67:
46:
293:Standard reference works
98:WikiProject Christianity
497:External links modified
382:The citation given is "
394:The citation given is
358:Not in citation given?
300:
28:This article is rated
296:
121:Christianity articles
566:regular verification
556:After February 2018
535:parameter below to
208:(2004), pp. 224-225
90:Christianity portal
610:InternetArchiveBot
561:InternetArchiveBot
34:content assessment
586:
323:
309:comment added by
155:
154:
151:
150:
147:
146:
653:
620:
611:
584:
583:
562:
550:
322:
303:
250:
245:
239:
236:
230:
225:
219:
216:
210:
201:
195:
192:
186:
177:
123:
122:
119:
116:
113:
92:
87:
86:
76:
69:
68:
63:
55:
48:
47:
31:
25:
24:
16:
661:
660:
656:
655:
654:
652:
651:
650:
626:
625:
614:
609:
577:
570:have permission
560:
544:
514:this simple FaQ
499:
360:
304:
254:
253:
246:
242:
237:
233:
226:
222:
217:
213:
202:
198:
193:
189:
178:
174:
160:
137:High-importance
120:
117:
114:
111:
110:
88:
81:
62:High‑importance
61:
32:on Knowledge's
29:
12:
11:
5:
659:
649:
648:
643:
638:
604:
603:
596:
529:
528:
520:Added archive
498:
495:
494:
493:
492:
491:
490:
489:
488:
487:
486:
485:
392:
391:
380:
379:
368:
367:
359:
356:
355:
354:
350:
349:
333:
332:
295:
294:
290:
289:
288:
287:
252:
251:
240:
231:
220:
211:
196:
187:
171:
170:
169:
168:
159:
156:
153:
152:
149:
148:
145:
144:
133:
127:
126:
124:
107:the discussion
94:
93:
77:
65:
64:
56:
44:
43:
37:
26:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
658:
647:
644:
642:
639:
637:
634:
633:
631:
624:
623:
618:
613:
612:
601:
597:
594:
590:
589:
588:
581:
575:
571:
567:
563:
557:
552:
548:
542:
538:
534:
527:
523:
519:
518:
517:
515:
511:
507:
502:
484:
480:
476:
471:
470:
469:
465:
461:
456:
455:
454:
450:
446:
441:
440:
439:
435:
431:
427:
426:
425:
421:
417:
412:
411:
410:
409:
405:
401:
397:
389:
388:
387:
385:
377:
376:
375:
373:
365:
364:
363:
352:
351:
348:
344:
340:
335:
334:
330:
326:
325:
324:
320:
316:
312:
308:
299:
292:
291:
284:
283:
282:
278:
274:
270:
269:
268:
267:
263:
259:
249:
244:
235:
229:
224:
215:
209:
207:
200:
191:
185:
183:
176:
172:
165:
164:
163:
142:
138:
132:
129:
128:
125:
108:
104:
100:
99:
91:
85:
80:
78:
75:
71:
70:
66:
60:
57:
54:
50:
49:
45:
41:
35:
27:
23:
18:
17:
608:
605:
580:source check
559:
553:
540:
536:
532:
530:
503:
500:
393:
383:
381:
371:
369:
361:
328:
305:— Preceding
301:
297:
255:
243:
234:
223:
214:
205:
199:
190:
181:
180:E. Johnson,
175:
161:
136:
112:Christianity
103:Christianity
96:
59:Christianity
40:WikiProjects
547:Sourcecheck
630:Categories
617:Report bug
460:Taiwan boi
430:Taiwan boi
414:summary.
400:Taiwan boi
331:immersion.
311:Taiwan boi
273:Taiwan boi
600:this tool
593:this tool
606:Cheers.—
319:contribs
307:unsigned
533:checked
510:my edit
475:Esoglou
445:Esoglou
416:Esoglou
339:Esoglou
258:Esoglou
139:on the
30:B-class
541:failed
286:claim?
36:scale.
204:Guy,
537:true
479:talk
464:talk
449:talk
434:talk
420:talk
404:talk
343:talk
329:full
315:talk
277:talk
262:talk
131:High
574:RfC
551:).
539:or
524:to
632::
587:.
582:}}
578:{{
549:}}
545:{{
481:)
466:)
451:)
436:)
422:)
406:)
345:)
321:)
317:•
279:)
264:)
619:)
615:(
602:.
595:.
477:(
462:(
447:(
432:(
418:(
402:(
341:(
313:(
275:(
260:(
143:.
42::
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
