1437:"When the Atomic Energy Act became law, it defined a new legal term “restricted data” as “all data concerning the manufacture or utilization of atomic weapons, the production of fissionable material, or the use of fissionable material in the production of power,” unless the information has been declassified. The phrase “all data” included every suggestion, speculation, scenario, or rumor—past, present, or future, regardless of its source, or even of its accuracy—unless it was declassified." This Knowledge article states "It defined a new legal term, "restricted data", as "all data concerning the manufacture or utilization of atomic weapons, the production of fissionable material, or the use of fissionable material in the production of power," unless the information has been declassified. The phrase "all data" included every suggestion, speculation, scenario or rumor—past, present or future, regardless of its source, or even of its accuracy—unless it was specifically declassified." This is almost a word-for-word copy; it needs to be completely rewritten to avoid using any of the source's creative language.
1428:"The Atomic Energy Act of 1954 in the US encouraged private corporations to build nuclear reactors... A significant learning phase followed with a slew of early meltdowns and accidents at experimental reactors and research facilities, leading to the introduction of the Price-Anderson Act in 1957, an implicit admission..." This Knowledge article states "The Atomic Energy Act of 1954 encouraged private corporations to build nuclear reactors; a significant learning phase followed, with many early partial core meltdowns and accidents at experimental reactors and research facilities. This led to the introduction of the Price–Anderson Nuclear Industries Indemnity Act of 1957, which was 'an implicit admission...'" This is way too close, and needs to be reworded from scratch, getting as far from the source's wording as possible.
1898:
to obtain details. Meanwhile, another committee member stated "we received definite and positive word without qualification to the effect that there was nothing affecting this legislation that had not been completely published and publicised". Gowing concludes this brief interlude on the details of House deliberations by stating that McMahon told the
British Minister of Defence in 1949 that had he known about the agreements, there would have been no act, and told Churchill the same in 1952. Currently, our article includes the very last element of this, the statement to Churchill, but I believe the rest is relevant and important to understanding the context in which the bill was signed in.
794:
981:
960:
916:
691:
664:
1977:
991:
701:
233:
390:
369:
932:
400:
1445:, got involved in the article, and they are not problems you introduced. I have also looked for close paraphrasing issues in Hewlett&Anderson, Jones, Miller, and Reubhausen (who together constitute most of the sourcing for the article), and have not found any further close-paraphrasing issues. If you can fix these two existing issues, I think we can consider the article to be copyvio-free. Once those are done, the less important issues below can be addressed.
190:
338:
491:
596:
470:
575:
501:
1103:
it is easier for the reader to make sense of what is being said. I also think that your sub heading the Born Secret and the information under it can be expanded a little bit more. You talk about the "second item" and then discuss section 9 but nothing in between. That could help expand on your article. It was a nice touch having all the links to other wikipedia articles within your article and good job so far.
1842:
854:
826:
1323:
1284:
Belgian reaction should be included. They controlled the most valuable uranium ore deposits at the time and in 1944 agreed to deliver exclusively to the United States and the United
Kingdom. In return Belgium would get access to nuclear know how for commercial, non-military applications. Most of the
1232:
Thank you for the review and suggestions. I've shortened the article's introduction and moved the extra information into different subheadings. Bryan Miller's article was a useful source in discussion of the public's involvement in the Act. I will do some more research on the implications of the act
1897:
Independence and
Deterrence by Margaret Gowing details enquires made by the US Congress about secret agreements regarding the bomb; enquiries to which May, the chairman of the house committee on military affairs replied that it was his understanding that such agreements existed, but had been unable
1688:
NPOV: The article states that the Price-Anderson act "was 'an implicit admission that nuclear power provided risks that producers were unwilling to assume without federal backing'." This is correctly cited to
Sovacool's statement, but it's Sovacol's interpretation, which could be contested. I don't
1200:
Be careful making assertions or guarded assertions without a source. saying the act was "probably a factor in the
American refusal to allow a French officer to take command of Allied Forces Southern Europe in 1997" requires some source otherwise I have no choice but to interpret the statement as a
1188:
of the article is too long. For an article of reasonably short length (~1000 words), you can use a 1 paragraph lead and should at most have a 2 paragraph lead. Imagine the lead as the executive summary. If someone lands on this article from a wikipedia link or a web search, what do you want them
1102:
I went through your article and did some copy editing in class today. I found that you often separate your sentences by multiple commas in order to fit all the information possible. I think that it is important to go through and figure out the best way possible to separate these sentences so that
1934:
They are excellent books; engaging and informative; the only negative is their age, but given her access to confidential files I don't believe that is much of an impediment. But to return to the topic, my plan is to finish at least the McMahon Act section of the article I am drafting for the Modus
1529:
Organization: It seems to me that the May-Johnson Bill section is prelude to the bill, and should either be a subsection of the
Origins section, or should be organized in such a way as to make it clear that it's part of what led up to the AEA. Or perhaps the "May-Johnson Bill" and "MacMahon Bill"
1140:
contains some notable information on the 1946 act and the 1954 amendments. Full text of the book is not online but it should be available in any large university library. I list this source not because it is uniquely authoritative on the act alone but because it is brilliantly written and well
1626:
Clarity: When you say
Douglas "vigorously defended the section against counterarguments", do you mean Section 10? The previous paragraph said that the section "became 'Control of Information'" and by now "contained" the born secret doctrine and "defined" the term "restricted data". So when this
1192:
As you will notice from the sources above, there are other implications of the law not mentioned in the article. The article itself focuses on the "restricted data" component of the AEA and this should be a major focus, but other elements of the law need coverage and we should not give
1993:
1208:
of a thesis (masters or PhD) if it has never been published in any form. Usually a good bet for use of a thesis is to confine it to what you would were you publishing a book on the subject: a narrow point of interest left uncovered by other material, not broad support for major
1722:
Notes and
References: Most sources are fully cited in the References, with short harvard references in the "Notes". But Byrne&Hoffman and Sovacool are fully given in the Notes. I think it would be an improvement to treat those sources like the others (though this is
1471:
Oh jeez, that was actually
Morland himself? Yeah, it should probably be reworded for a number of reasons (tone, avoiding confusion, not having to submit an OTRS statement), but it's not as deal-breakingly important as if it had been a copy-vio.
1652:
Sourcing question: The last sentence of the "Private production of nuclear energy" section is quite a strong statement. I can't see the original source. Do you have that source? Does it fully back that statement? What does it say?
1768:
Excellent work. This article passes all our GA criteria—it's well-written, verifiable with no original research, broad in its coverage, neutral, stable, and appropriately illustrated. I'm pleased to promote it to GA status.
153:
923:
836:
2045:
939:
840:
1293:, the director of the company, shipped 1200 tons of high quality (65% U3O8) uranium ore to the US and stored it in a depot on Staten Island, where it remained until 1942 when the Manhatten project started.
308:
1080:
Anybody reading this have any suggestions on how to sub categorize this page. It's a very dense topic and I'm having trouble separating all the information. Any advise would be helpful.
2165:
1889:
1441:
It is acceptible to quickfail GA candidates with close paraphrasing issues, but I don't think that's appropriate here. I see that all these issues were already present by the time you,
147:
1279:
1918:
That sounds fine. The main thing is not to drift off-topic. If you are concerned about it, you can post the proposed text on the talk page here. I have Gowing's books here.
1912:
2135:
2145:
1605:
Clarity: I'm not sure what this means: "The 'wall of secrecy' set up by the Act confined research and development within the country and government." Could you reword?
2130:
2100:
1530:
sections should be subsections of a "Creation of the Act" section, or something, separating it from sections regarding the Act after its existance. What do you think?
243:
1901:
Would anyone object in principle to the inclusion of details relating to this, and would anyone object to a broader explanation of the
British reactions to the bill?
1328:
2140:
2110:
808:
1302:
1508:
Capitalization: Sometimes "Bill" is capitalized in the names of bills (e.g. May-Johnson Bill) and sometimes not (Royall-Marbury bill). This should be consistent.
646:
1333:
1047:
784:
2115:
731:
1361:
1511:
I'm not sure what the usual form is, but I have capitalised it whenever it is in a title (as above) but left it in lower case when it is just "the bill".
1124:
Hi, this is just a quick peer review. I'll try and point out some available sources which aren't in the article, some style issues and some other stuff.
2105:
1936:
1904:
201:
2035:
1156:, so while it is a secondary resource, it does not have a great deal of distance from the original act. In fact the whole issue of that law review is
748:
2050:
1985:
1970:
1807:
866:
44:
1960:
1944:
1929:
557:
2085:
2015:
636:
1743:
1713:
1665:
1643:
1617:
1596:
1561:
2155:
2095:
1677:
1573:
1540:
1037:
803:
774:
674:
1884:
1520:
1731:
1497:
1479:
1450:
1416:
I've read the article and made some notes. It's very strong, but the most important and troubling issue with the article is the existance of
1273:
1776:
452:
1351:
1174:
There are a number of other law reviews covering various provisions of the law (patents, industry connections, biomedical provisions, etc)
2125:
2120:
738:
168:
2040:
79:
1894:
I'm not sure of the process for making more than minor edits to good or featured articles, so I thought I would raise the topic here.
135:
2160:
2080:
1236:
If you have any more suggestions I'd appreciate them. Thank you for taking the time to read this and to provide some good sources.
612:
2150:
2090:
1255:
1013:
743:
2075:
547:
861:
831:
1584:
Repitition: In the first paragraph of the "May-Johnson Bill" section, it twice says the commission could "acquire property".
870:
726:
85:
2060:
1631:
pro-secrecy provisions. But the next sentence makes it sound like she was opposing the new secrecy. This could be clearer.
722:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
603:
580:
442:
129:
1213:
Thats all for now. I think this is a great start to an article and should only improve as breadth and coverage increase.
1222:
1114:
1004:
965:
714:
669:
219:
1178:
1092:
1379:
1247:
1119:
293:
30:
1466:
125:
2070:
2065:
1762:
1404:
523:
1799:
2030:
1656:
No, I don't. It seems debatable even if supported by the source, and is wandering off-topic. So I have removed it.
1808:
https://web.archive.org/web/20130702164759/http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/fact-sheets/funds-fs.html
1286:
1782:
1356:
207:
175:
99:
1204:
Also, you have used a thesis as a source. while not completely forbidden, we have a lot of trouble judging the
2055:
104:
20:
1981:
1400:
74:
865:. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a
417:, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the
1879:
1811:
1417:
514:
475:
349:
65:
1854:
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
1935:
Vivendi, and then use that as a springboard for to propose changes for this; thank you for the advice.
1798:. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit
286:
141:
1791:
413:
374:
249:
24:
1012:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
611:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
522:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
1870:
232:
109:
1425:
1940:
1908:
1855:
1375:
1009:
1453:
on 7 December. I have re-worded it. The second has been there since 2007, and was inserted by
1989:
1260:
The act is from 1946, but a 1943 Churchill decision ins mentioned as a consequence. How so?
355:
253:
793:
1862:
1832:
1457:, who probably saw no problem in using his own creative language. Should I re-word it too?
1298:
1243:
1097:
1088:
996:
706:
189:
8:
55:
2011:
1955:
1924:
1739:
1709:
1661:
1639:
1613:
1592:
1557:
1516:
1493:
1462:
1454:
1269:
1110:
915:
70:
1861:
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
1394:
1307:
1218:
1075:
980:
959:
257:
211:
51:
1976:
1549:
Lead: The lead does not adequately cover material from all sections of the article.
1201:
supposition on the part of a wikipedia author, which does not carry a lot of weight.
1227:
1127:
161:
1795:
1294:
1239:
1194:
1168:
1084:
1755:. I think all that's left is to reword Morland's bit, and it'll be good to go.
690:
663:
1724:
1185:
1133:
608:
2024:
2007:
1950:
1919:
1752:
1735:
1705:
1657:
1635:
1609:
1588:
1553:
1512:
1489:
1458:
1442:
1411:
1290:
1265:
1164:
1141:
researched. Should be more fun to look up than the average secondary source.
1106:
719:
506:
1627:
paragraph says she defended the section, it sounds like she's defending the
1434:
1772:
1758:
1673:
1569:
1536:
1475:
1390:
1382:. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
1214:
1205:
718:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the
252:. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the
1552:
Expanded. Let me know if there is something else that should be covered.
2046:
Knowledge featured topics History of the Manhattan Project good content
1812:
http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/fact-sheets/funds-fs.html
405:
1849:
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
1157:
1734:'s recent amendments. I have moved the references down to the notes.
1167:
of the NRC/AEC. Also there is a government document floating around
931:
389:
368:
399:
1693:
an implicit admission, though we could say that it was interpreted
1149:
595:
574:
500:
490:
469:
519:
1533:
I see this has been fixed. I like the organization you used.
1949:
That would be a great article. I look forward to seeing it.
1817:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the
1992:
during the 2011 Spring term. Further details are available
1890:
Congressional requests for information pertinent to the act
2166:
Knowledge Ambassador Program student projects, 2011 Spring
1802:
for additional information. I made the following changes:
853:
825:
418:
1148:
in the University of Chicago Law Review--it is on JSTOR
1008:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the
1144:
A somewhat more bespoke source might be Bryon Miller's
160:
1280:
Control of information and allies' reaction: Belgium?
986:
696:
607:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
518:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
496:
395:
15:
2136:
North American military history task force articles
2146:United States military history task force articles
1285:uranium for the Manhattan project (70%) came from
2131:GA-Class North American military history articles
2101:GA-Class United States articles of Mid-importance
1171:written in 1963 to serve as a history of the AEC.
2141:GA-Class United States military history articles
2111:Low-importance United States Government articles
2022:
1163:You can also go to the NRC's webpage and find a
33:for general discussion of the article's subject.
1971:Knowledge Ambassador Program course assignment
1146:A Law Is Passed: The Atomic Energy Act of 1946
217:If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
2116:WikiProject United States Government articles
1233:and add that information in the next week.
1189:to know after reading for only a few seconds.
174:
1449:The first one was only recently inserted by
1152:. Bear in mind the article was written in
2106:GA-Class United States Government articles
1790:I have just modified one external link on
1484:Yes, it was Howard himself, so no copyvio
924:North American military history task force
2036:Social sciences and society good articles
1984:at James Madison University supported by
1138:Dark Sun: The Making of the Hydrogen Bomb
940:United States military history task force
202:Social sciences and society good articles
2051:High-importance Featured topics articles
859:This article is within the scope of the
2000:The above message was substituted from
1986:WikiProject United States Public Policy
2086:Low-importance Science Policy articles
2023:
879:Knowledge:WikiProject Military history
869:. To use this banner, please see the
2156:Low-importance U.S. Congress articles
2096:Mid-importance United States articles
1829:to let others know (documentation at
882:Template:WikiProject Military history
1289:, a Belgian mining company. In 1939
1057:This article is about one (or many)
1002:This article is within the scope of
712:This article is within the scope of
621:Knowledge:WikiProject Science Policy
601:This article is within the scope of
512:This article is within the scope of
411:This article is within the scope of
337:
335:
331:
1022:Knowledge:WikiProject U.S. Congress
759:Knowledge:WikiProject United States
624:Template:WikiProject Science Policy
421:and the subjects encompassed by it.
354:It is of interest to the following
256:. If you can update or improve it,
23:for discussing improvements to the
13:
2126:GA-Class military history articles
2121:WikiProject United States articles
1980:This article is the subject of an
1380:Talk:Atomic Energy Act of 1946/GA1
1025:Template:WikiProject U.S. Congress
930:
914:
792:
762:Template:WikiProject United States
14:
2177:
2041:GA-Class Featured topics articles
1794:. Please take a moment to review
1160:to the atomic energy act of 1946.
210:. If you can improve it further,
2161:WikiProject U.S. Congress things
2081:GA-Class Science Policy articles
1975:
1840:
1751:Your improvements are terrific,
1689:think we can state that the act
1256:Chronological internal coherence
989:
979:
958:
852:
824:
699:
689:
662:
594:
573:
499:
489:
468:
398:
388:
367:
336:
244:History of the Manhattan Project
231:
188:
45:Click here to start a new topic.
2151:GA-Class U.S. Congress articles
2091:GA-Class United States articles
1042:This article has been rated as
779:This article has been rated as
641:This article has been rated as
552:This article has been rated as
447:This article has been rated as
2076:Low-importance energy articles
1727:a requirement for GA status).
1303:19:58, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
198:has been listed as one of the
1:
1961:05:50, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
1945:03:31, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
1930:06:47, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
1913:05:20, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
1777:15:00, 14 December 2013 (UTC)
1763:23:11, 11 December 2013 (UTC)
1744:20:58, 11 December 2013 (UTC)
1714:20:58, 11 December 2013 (UTC)
1678:23:11, 11 December 2013 (UTC)
1666:20:58, 11 December 2013 (UTC)
1644:20:58, 11 December 2013 (UTC)
1618:20:58, 11 December 2013 (UTC)
1597:20:58, 11 December 2013 (UTC)
1574:23:11, 11 December 2013 (UTC)
1562:20:58, 11 December 2013 (UTC)
1541:23:11, 11 December 2013 (UTC)
1521:20:58, 11 December 2013 (UTC)
1498:07:54, 14 December 2013 (UTC)
1480:23:11, 11 December 2013 (UTC)
1467:20:58, 11 December 2013 (UTC)
1405:23:28, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
1287:Union_Minière_du_Haut_Katanga
1093:21:20, 28 February 2011 (UTC)
1016:and see a list of open tasks.
801:This article is supported by
615:and see a list of open tasks.
526:and see a list of open tasks.
42:Put new text under old text.
1990:Knowledge Ambassador Program
1885:00:39, 21 October 2016 (UTC)
862:Military history WikiProject
532:Knowledge:WikiProject Energy
7:
2061:Low-importance law articles
2016:16:27, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
804:WikiProject U.S. Government
535:Template:WikiProject Energy
50:New to Knowledge? Welcome!
10:
2182:
1787:Hello fellow Wikipedians,
1248:18:50, 23 March 2011 (UTC)
1223:18:03, 21 March 2011 (UTC)
1120:Online ambassador comments
1115:20:42, 16 March 2011 (UTC)
1048:project's importance scale
785:project's importance scale
647:project's importance scale
604:WikiProject Science Policy
558:project's importance scale
453:project's importance scale
1792:Atomic Energy Act of 1946
1056:
1041:
1005:WikiProject U.S. Congress
974:
938:
922:
897:
893:
885:military history articles
847:
800:
778:
715:WikiProject United States
684:
640:
589:
551:
484:
446:
427:Knowledge:WikiProject Law
383:
362:
322:
268:
264:
239:Atomic Energy Act of 1946
196:Atomic Energy Act of 1946
80:Be welcoming to newcomers
25:Atomic Energy Act of 1946
2071:GA-Class energy articles
2066:WikiProject Law articles
1274:18:07, 14 May 2011 (UTC)
720:United States of America
430:Template:WikiProject Law
309:Featured topic candidate
2031:Knowledge good articles
1783:External links modified
1701:an implicit admission.
1566:That's great, thanks.
1433:Howard Morland's essay
898:Associated task forces:
627:Science Policy articles
1982:educational assignment
1028:U.S. Congress articles
1010:United States Congress
935:
919:
797:
765:United States articles
344:This article is rated
75:avoid personal attacks
2056:GA-Class law articles
1488:. I've re-worded it.
934:
918:
796:
208:good article criteria
100:Neutral point of view
997:United States portal
707:United States portal
294:Good article nominee
105:No original research
1821:parameter below to
733:Articles Requested!
254:Knowledge community
2003:{{WAP assignment}}
1994:on the course page
1873:InternetArchiveBot
1418:close paraphrasing
936:
920:
867:list of open tasks
798:
515:WikiProject Energy
350:content assessment
269:Article milestones
86:dispute resolution
47:
1424:Sovacool's paper
1370:
1369:
1266:Leandro GFC Dutra
1073:
1072:
1069:
1068:
1065:
1064:
953:
952:
949:
948:
945:
944:
871:full instructions
819:
818:
815:
814:
657:
656:
653:
652:
568:
567:
564:
563:
463:
462:
459:
458:
330:
329:
318:
317:
287:December 14, 2013
226:
183:
182:
66:Assume good faith
43:
2173:
2018:
2005:
2004:
1979:
1958:
1953:
1927:
1922:
1883:
1874:
1847:
1844:
1843:
1836:
1775:
1761:
1676:
1572:
1539:
1478:
1324:Copyvio detector
1312:
1311:
1030:
1029:
1026:
1023:
1020:
999:
994:
993:
992:
983:
976:
975:
970:
962:
955:
954:
905:
895:
894:
887:
886:
883:
880:
877:
876:Military history
856:
849:
848:
843:
832:Military history
828:
821:
820:
767:
766:
763:
760:
757:
709:
704:
703:
702:
693:
686:
685:
680:
677:
666:
659:
658:
629:
628:
625:
622:
619:
598:
591:
590:
585:
577:
570:
569:
540:
539:
538:energy articles
536:
533:
530:
509:
504:
503:
493:
486:
485:
480:
472:
465:
464:
435:
434:
431:
428:
425:
408:
403:
402:
392:
385:
384:
379:
371:
364:
363:
347:
341:
340:
339:
332:
323:Current status:
289:
266:
265:
235:
215:
192:
185:
184:
179:
178:
164:
95:Article policies
16:
2181:
2180:
2176:
2175:
2174:
2172:
2171:
2170:
2021:
2020:
2002:
2001:
1999:
1973:
1956:
1951:
1925:
1920:
1892:
1877:
1872:
1845:
1841:
1830:
1800:this simple FaQ
1785:
1770:
1756:
1671:
1567:
1534:
1473:
1374:This review is
1366:
1338:
1310:
1282:
1258:
1230:
1197:to one section.
1181:
1130:
1122:
1100:
1078:
1027:
1024:
1021:
1018:
1017:
995:
990:
988:
968:
903:
884:
881:
878:
875:
874:
834:
764:
761:
758:
755:
754:
753:
739:Become a Member
705:
700:
698:
678:
672:
626:
623:
620:
617:
616:
583:
537:
534:
531:
528:
527:
505:
498:
478:
432:
429:
426:
423:
422:
414:WikiProject Law
404:
397:
377:
348:on Knowledge's
345:
285:
241:is part of the
121:
116:
115:
114:
91:
61:
12:
11:
5:
2179:
2169:
2168:
2163:
2158:
2153:
2148:
2143:
2138:
2133:
2128:
2123:
2118:
2113:
2108:
2103:
2098:
2093:
2088:
2083:
2078:
2073:
2068:
2063:
2058:
2053:
2048:
2043:
2038:
2033:
1972:
1969:
1968:
1967:
1966:
1965:
1964:
1963:
1891:
1888:
1867:
1866:
1859:
1815:
1814:
1806:Added archive
1784:
1781:
1780:
1779:
1749:
1748:
1747:
1746:
1719:
1718:
1717:
1716:
1685:
1684:
1683:
1682:
1681:
1680:
1649:
1648:
1647:
1646:
1623:
1622:
1621:
1620:
1602:
1601:
1600:
1599:
1581:
1580:
1579:
1578:
1577:
1576:
1546:
1545:
1544:
1543:
1526:
1525:
1524:
1523:
1505:
1504:
1503:
1502:
1501:
1500:
1439:
1438:
1430:
1429:
1407:
1385:
1384:
1368:
1367:
1365:
1364:
1359:
1354:
1348:
1345:
1344:
1340:
1339:
1337:
1336:
1334:External links
1331:
1326:
1320:
1317:
1316:
1309:
1306:
1281:
1278:
1277:
1276:
1257:
1254:
1252:
1229:
1226:
1211:
1210:
1202:
1198:
1190:
1180:
1177:
1176:
1175:
1172:
1161:
1142:
1134:Richard Rhodes
1129:
1126:
1121:
1118:
1099:
1096:
1077:
1074:
1071:
1070:
1067:
1066:
1063:
1062:
1055:
1052:
1051:
1044:Low-importance
1040:
1034:
1033:
1031:
1014:the discussion
1001:
1000:
984:
972:
971:
969:Low‑importance
963:
951:
950:
947:
946:
943:
942:
937:
927:
926:
921:
911:
910:
908:
906:
900:
899:
891:
890:
888:
857:
845:
844:
829:
817:
816:
813:
812:
809:Low-importance
799:
789:
788:
781:Mid-importance
777:
771:
770:
768:
752:
751:
746:
741:
736:
729:
727:Template Usage
723:
711:
710:
694:
682:
681:
679:Mid‑importance
667:
655:
654:
651:
650:
643:Low-importance
639:
633:
632:
630:
618:Science Policy
613:the discussion
609:Science policy
599:
587:
586:
584:Low‑importance
581:Science Policy
578:
566:
565:
562:
561:
554:Low-importance
550:
544:
543:
541:
524:the discussion
511:
510:
494:
482:
481:
479:Low‑importance
473:
461:
460:
457:
456:
449:Low-importance
445:
439:
438:
436:
410:
409:
393:
381:
380:
378:Low‑importance
372:
360:
359:
353:
342:
328:
327:
320:
319:
316:
315:
312:
305:
301:
300:
297:
290:
282:
281:
278:
275:
271:
270:
262:
261:
250:featured topic
236:
228:
227:
193:
181:
180:
118:
117:
113:
112:
107:
102:
93:
92:
90:
89:
82:
77:
68:
62:
60:
59:
48:
39:
38:
35:
34:
28:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
2178:
2167:
2164:
2162:
2159:
2157:
2154:
2152:
2149:
2147:
2144:
2142:
2139:
2137:
2134:
2132:
2129:
2127:
2124:
2122:
2119:
2117:
2114:
2112:
2109:
2107:
2104:
2102:
2099:
2097:
2094:
2092:
2089:
2087:
2084:
2082:
2079:
2077:
2074:
2072:
2069:
2067:
2064:
2062:
2059:
2057:
2054:
2052:
2049:
2047:
2044:
2042:
2039:
2037:
2034:
2032:
2029:
2028:
2026:
2019:
2017:
2013:
2009:
1997:
1995:
1991:
1987:
1983:
1978:
1962:
1959:
1954:
1948:
1947:
1946:
1942:
1938:
1933:
1932:
1931:
1928:
1923:
1917:
1916:
1915:
1914:
1910:
1906:
1902:
1899:
1895:
1887:
1886:
1881:
1876:
1875:
1864:
1860:
1857:
1853:
1852:
1851:
1850:
1838:
1834:
1828:
1824:
1820:
1813:
1809:
1805:
1804:
1803:
1801:
1797:
1793:
1788:
1778:
1774:
1767:
1766:
1765:
1764:
1760:
1754:
1745:
1741:
1737:
1733:
1729:
1728:
1726:
1721:
1720:
1715:
1711:
1707:
1703:
1702:
1700:
1696:
1692:
1687:
1686:
1679:
1675:
1669:
1668:
1667:
1663:
1659:
1655:
1654:
1651:
1650:
1645:
1641:
1637:
1633:
1632:
1630:
1625:
1624:
1619:
1615:
1611:
1607:
1606:
1604:
1603:
1598:
1594:
1590:
1586:
1585:
1583:
1582:
1575:
1571:
1565:
1564:
1563:
1559:
1555:
1551:
1550:
1548:
1547:
1542:
1538:
1532:
1531:
1528:
1527:
1522:
1518:
1514:
1510:
1509:
1507:
1506:
1499:
1495:
1491:
1487:
1483:
1482:
1481:
1477:
1470:
1469:
1468:
1464:
1460:
1456:
1455:HowardMorland
1452:
1448:
1447:
1446:
1444:
1436:
1432:
1431:
1427:
1423:
1422:
1421:
1419:
1414:
1413:
1410:
1406:
1402:
1399:
1396:
1392:
1389:
1383:
1381:
1377:
1372:
1371:
1363:
1360:
1358:
1355:
1353:
1350:
1349:
1347:
1346:
1342:
1341:
1335:
1332:
1330:
1327:
1325:
1322:
1321:
1319:
1318:
1314:
1313:
1305:
1304:
1300:
1296:
1292:
1291:Edgar_Sengier
1288:
1275:
1271:
1267:
1263:
1262:
1261:
1253:
1250:
1249:
1245:
1241:
1237:
1234:
1225:
1224:
1220:
1216:
1207:
1203:
1199:
1196:
1191:
1187:
1183:
1182:
1179:Style/content
1173:
1170:
1166:
1165:short history
1162:
1159:
1155:
1151:
1147:
1143:
1139:
1135:
1132:
1131:
1125:
1117:
1116:
1112:
1108:
1104:
1095:
1094:
1090:
1086:
1081:
1060:
1054:
1053:
1049:
1045:
1039:
1036:
1035:
1032:
1019:U.S. Congress
1015:
1011:
1007:
1006:
998:
987:
985:
982:
978:
977:
973:
967:
966:U.S. Congress
964:
961:
957:
956:
941:
933:
929:
928:
925:
917:
913:
912:
909:
907:
902:
901:
896:
892:
889:
872:
868:
864:
863:
858:
855:
851:
850:
846:
842:
841:United States
838:
837:North America
833:
830:
827:
823:
822:
810:
807:(assessed as
806:
805:
795:
791:
790:
786:
782:
776:
773:
772:
769:
756:United States
750:
747:
745:
742:
740:
737:
735:
734:
730:
728:
725:
724:
721:
717:
716:
708:
697:
695:
692:
688:
687:
683:
676:
671:
670:United States
668:
665:
661:
660:
648:
644:
638:
635:
634:
631:
614:
610:
606:
605:
600:
597:
593:
592:
588:
582:
579:
576:
572:
571:
559:
555:
549:
546:
545:
542:
525:
521:
517:
516:
508:
507:Energy portal
502:
497:
495:
492:
488:
487:
483:
477:
474:
471:
467:
466:
454:
450:
444:
441:
440:
437:
420:
416:
415:
407:
401:
396:
394:
391:
387:
386:
382:
376:
373:
370:
366:
365:
361:
357:
351:
343:
334:
333:
326:
321:
313:
311:
310:
306:
303:
302:
298:
296:
295:
291:
288:
284:
283:
279:
276:
273:
272:
267:
263:
259:
255:
251:
247:
245:
240:
237:
234:
230:
229:
224:
222:
221:
213:
209:
205:
204:
203:
197:
194:
191:
187:
186:
177:
173:
170:
167:
163:
159:
155:
152:
149:
146:
143:
140:
137:
134:
131:
127:
124:
123:Find sources:
120:
119:
111:
110:Verifiability
108:
106:
103:
101:
98:
97:
96:
87:
83:
81:
78:
76:
72:
69:
67:
64:
63:
57:
53:
52:Learn to edit
49:
46:
41:
40:
37:
36:
32:
26:
22:
18:
17:
1998:
1974:
1937:BilledMammal
1905:BilledMammal
1903:
1900:
1896:
1893:
1871:
1868:
1848:
1839:
1826:
1822:
1818:
1816:
1789:
1786:
1750:
1698:
1694:
1690:
1628:
1485:
1440:
1415:
1408:
1397:
1387:
1386:
1373:
1362:Instructions
1283:
1259:
1251:
1238:
1235:
1231:
1212:
1195:undue weight
1153:
1145:
1137:
1123:
1105:
1101:
1098:Peer Editing
1082:
1079:
1058:
1043:
1003:
860:
802:
780:
744:Project Talk
732:
713:
642:
602:
553:
513:
448:
433:law articles
412:
356:WikiProjects
325:Good article
324:
307:
304:May 29, 2018
292:
258:please do so
242:
238:
218:
216:
212:please do so
200:
199:
195:
171:
165:
157:
150:
144:
138:
132:
122:
94:
19:This is the
1833:Sourcecheck
1704:Re-worded.
1608:Re-worded.
1587:Re-worded.
1376:transcluded
1206:reliability
1083:Thank you!
419:legal field
148:free images
31:not a forum
2025:Categories
1880:Report bug
1670:Perfect.
1409:Nominator:
1329:Authorship
1315:GA toolbox
1295:DS Belgium
1240:Ohheyheidi
1085:Ohheyheidi
675:Government
406:Law portal
206:under the
1957:(discuss)
1926:(discuss)
1863:this tool
1856:this tool
1388:Reviewer:
1352:Templates
1343:Reviewing
1308:GA Review
1169:copy here
1076:Sub-pages
88:if needed
71:Be polite
21:talk page
2008:PrimeBOT
1988:and the
1952:Hawkeye7
1921:Hawkeye7
1869:Cheers.—
1753:Hawkeye7
1736:Hawkeye7
1706:Hawkeye7
1697:Sovacol
1658:Hawkeye7
1636:Hawkeye7
1610:Hawkeye7
1589:Hawkeye7
1554:Hawkeye7
1513:Hawkeye7
1490:Hawkeye7
1459:Hawkeye7
1443:Hawkeye7
1412:Hawkeye7
1401:contribs
1357:Criteria
1228:Response
1107:Michalge
1059:thing(s)
346:GA-class
314:Promoted
220:reassess
56:get help
29:This is
27:article.
1819:checked
1796:my edit
1773:Quadell
1759:Quadell
1730:Due to
1674:Quadell
1570:Quadell
1537:Quadell
1476:Quadell
1391:Quadell
1215:Protonk
1209:claims.
1158:devoted
1128:Sources
1046:on the
783:on the
645:on the
556:on the
451:on the
277:Process
154:WPÂ refs
142:scholar
1827:failed
1732:Johfos
1634:Done.
1486:per se
1451:Johfos
749:Alerts
529:Energy
520:Energy
476:Energy
352:scale.
299:Listed
280:Result
246:series
126:Google
2014:) on
1378:from
169:JSTOR
130:books
84:Seek
2012:talk
1941:talk
1909:talk
1823:true
1740:talk
1710:talk
1662:talk
1640:talk
1614:talk
1593:talk
1558:talk
1517:talk
1494:talk
1463:talk
1435:says
1426:says
1395:talk
1299:talk
1270:talk
1244:talk
1219:talk
1186:lead
1184:The
1154:1948
1150:here
1111:talk
1089:talk
274:Date
248:, a
162:FENS
136:news
73:and
2006:by
1996:.
1837:).
1825:or
1810:to
1725:not
1691:was
1629:new
1038:Low
775:Mid
637:Low
548:Low
443:Low
424:Law
375:Law
176:TWL
2027::
1943:)
1911:)
1835:}}
1831:{{
1771:–
1757:–
1742:)
1712:)
1699:as
1695:by
1672:–
1664:)
1642:)
1616:)
1595:)
1568:–
1560:)
1535:–
1519:)
1496:)
1474:–
1465:)
1420:.
1403:)
1301:)
1272:)
1264:—
1246:)
1221:)
1136:'
1113:)
1091:)
904:/
839:/
835::
811:).
673::
223:it
214:.
156:)
54:;
2010:(
1939:(
1907:(
1882:)
1878:(
1865:.
1858:.
1846:Y
1738:(
1708:(
1660:(
1638:(
1612:(
1591:(
1556:(
1515:(
1492:(
1461:(
1398:·
1393:(
1297:(
1268:(
1242:(
1217:(
1109:(
1087:(
1061:.
1050:.
873:.
787:.
649:.
560:.
455:.
358::
260:.
225:.
172:·
166:·
158:·
151:·
145:·
139:·
133:·
128:(
58:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
