1654:- Confederate artillery batteries were generally known by the name of their commander, so the unit simply renamed when Roberts resigned, which was the only significant change in the battery at the time. The "1st Missouri Field Battery" renaming was simply an administrative change (reasons aren't clearly given, but seem to be so that the unit could be better tracked in CSA gov't records). Of the two changes in cannons, the second was simply re-arming the unit, and the McGhee source makes it clear it kept lineage through the first change. McGhee contains a multipage work solely about this unit, and makes clear how the lineage stayed the same through the unit. It was not unusual for artillery batteries in the war to retain continuity after command or weapon changes. The overall strength and casualties are not always known - the Confederates kept very poor records as it was, and many were destroyed when the Confederacy fell. As to the other sources, Kennedy, Geise, Woodhead, and Ripley are only there for background information. There is significant coverage of this unit's actions in Shea (what it did during Prairie Grove), Bearss 1964 (its actions at Pine Bluff), and Forsyth for the whole Jenkins Ferry debacle (Forsyth isn't used as much in the article, as I wanted to keep source balance in the section by using McGhee and Johnson in there as well). So with McGhee's multipage complete history, and the coverage in Shea, Bearss 1964, and Forsyth, we have four sources that qualify for GNG, which is
1391:
bore and rammed home before being discharge. Cannons were in a period of transition during the ACW. Traditionally they were smoothbore, with the solid shot cannon ball necessarily being slightly smaller than the gun's bore to facilitate loading. This windage, as it was known, reduced the power, range and accuracy of cannon. They were considered to be mostly obsolete by that time. From XXXX some cannons were rifled, with a series of grooves engraved into the bore of the barrel of the piece; the grooves spun the projectile when it was fired. This allowed a smoother fit between the cannonball and the bore, which reduced the leakage of propellant gases and greatly improved the piece's weight of projectile, range, and accuracy. The 6-pounder smoothbores with which the battery was equipped fired a projectile that weighed about 6 pounds (2.7 kg) to a range of about 1,500 yards (1.4 km). The 12-pounder James guns were 6-pounder smoothbores that had undergone the rifling process and fired a 12 pounds (5.4 kg) projectile to a range of 1,700 yards (1.6 km).
1766:- I'll add at the strength, I could've sworn that was in there. The history-sites forum is not RS, but I'll see if I can track down details in RS. The "largely untrained in artillery matters" is referring to the unit when it was first formed, which is to be expected. The Confederacy was attempting a revolt, so of course it had to take the rocky process of training civilians to shoot large cannons, "improvised" is not a good way to describe this as it was a standard unit that was inexperienced when it formed. Do you intend to take this to FAR? I borrowed most of the books used to write this, so knowing if I should go pick stuff up from the library and my dad would be nice. (As an aside, McGhee's 170 figure is referring to over the source of the unit's life, not necessarily 170 at one time).
364:
612:
591:
21:
335:
622:
396:
227:
380:
493:
472:
503:
54:
436:
1400:) and required between four and six men each to fire. Cannons during the American Civil War were drawn by horses when they needed to move, and were generally slow-moving and easily hampered by muddy roads. Field batteries consisted of four to six cannon which were sufficiently manoeuvrable that they could be brought on campaigns and moved around on a battlefield. In use they would attempt to remain out of smallarms range and blah, blah.
1130:
156:
75:
283:
727:
1103:
1095:
1084:
1059:
1051:
1043:
1025:
1017:
997:
986:
968:
960:
949:
297:
258:
1176:
had a range of 1,500 yards (1.4 km). They were considered to be mostly obsolete by that time. All of the pieces would generally have required between four and six men to fire each one. Cannons during the
American Civil War were drawn by horses when they needed to move, and were generally slow-moving and easily hampered by muddy roads. Field batteries consisted of
1597:
And the article doesn't seem to go into much detail about the unit's makeup. What was its official strength, for example – how many soldiers and casualties did it have? And none of the sources seem to be devoted specifically to the unit – they all seem to be more general works. So, how do we know
1166:
of the piece, which smoothbore guns lacked; the grooves spun the projectile when it was fired. Guns that had undergone the rifling process were viewed as desirable, as they had a greater effective range and were more accurate. The guns fired a 12 pounds (5.4 kg) projectile based on the design used
1175:
of 3.67 inches (9.3 cm), weighed slightly less than 884 pounds (401 kg), and had a range of 1,700 yards (1.6 km). The 6-pounder smoothbores fired a projectile that weighed about 6 pounds (2.7 kg) and had the same bore as the 12-pounder James rifles. The smoothbores weighed 884 pounds (401 kg) and
1390:
Cannon were long range weapons, at this period propelling projectiles about x to y feet. Most were direct fire weapons, except for howitzers, which used high-trajectory indirect fire. All cannon of the period were muzzle-loading, with the propellent and projectile being placed in the front of the
1623:
I agree. I still don't know why this was featured on the main page. What's so special about this unit? It seems like it was just another
Confederate artillery company, and as you mentioned this unit doesn't seem to have any medals or any other awards or distinctions. Perhaps it was just added as
1593:
According to the article, this unit started in
Arkansas as "Roberts' Missouri Battery". It then finished the war in Louisiana as the "1st Missouri Field Battery" with a different commander, cannons and name. In what sense can this be said to be the same unit? Is there something which gave it
1786:
for further effort. But it's on my watch list so I may do more as the fancy takes me. Anyway, we still have an unsettled question; what gives this unit its identity? It doesn't seem to be its commander, its name or its equipment so what is it?
1710:
which lists a variety of details and sources. It seems that a
Captain Reid was in command in the early days and that Roberts relieved him. There was some tension or dispute but this article does not explain this. For more details, see
1703:
1133:
Recent GA nominee approved, no neutrality problems, no grammar or spelling mistakes, and on obvious problems with the article. It is a really interesting article and I hope a lot of people see it when it goes up. IMO
371:
268:
387:
272:
747:
1605:
So, I'm not convinced that the unit was notable, let alone worthy of being featured. It doesn't seem to have won any battle honours or otherwise distinguished itself from numerous other small units. Right?
445:
122:
141:
35:
733:
403:
276:
1848:
1843:
1888:
1782:
I have no particular plans for this page; I was just reading it as it was featured. Now that it is off the main page, just about no-one is going to read it and so there will be
1838:
1495:
my area of familiarity. I also only have one in-depth book about ACW cannons, and it's a bit of a technical volume, so the basics stuff is actually harder for me to source.
1863:
828:
160:
1396:
Both types of gun could also fire canister shot or grape shot for anti-personal fire, up to about XXX yards. Both types of gun weighed about weighed 884 pounds (401 kg) (
1873:
1913:
1858:
1868:
450:
705:
652:
1754:
1662:. There's normally a two-week waiting period for FAR for the FAC nominator's sake, but I'm okay with waiving that because I'd rather just get it over with.
1419:
saying "Use this". I am offering it up as a, IMO, fuller and more digestible account of what these cannon things were, how they worked and what they did.
60:
1448:
669:
1812:
1796:
1777:
1673:
573:
1655:
309:
1633:
1566:
1552:
1538:
1521:
1504:
1483:
1466:
1428:
1883:
900:
844:
1594:
continuity throughout – a pennon, its caissons, its artillerymen, an entry in the paymaster's ledger or what? The article doesn't seem to say.
1908:
1693:
695:
177:
1878:
1529:- Yeah, that's fine by me. I'll read over it afterwards to make sure everything added reflects ACW norms, but I'd be grateful for the help.
824:
1918:
1853:
908:: This battery had three names during it's career, I've used the names in the hooks that were current at the time of the applicable event
659:
1453:
I'll take a look either tonight after work or tomorrow morning. I will note that a few breechloading cannons did see use, such as the
1898:
924:
563:
1617:
1903:
1150:
1145:
664:
812:
1512:, I have a good source for this sort of thing from the Napoleonic wars, so if you are OK with it, I may fill some of the gaps.
1180:, which were cannons that were easy enough to move that they could be brought on campaigns and moved around on a battlefield."
304:
263:
1474:, yeah, I had a vague memory of that. I just wanted to get something down, even if it got the "grandfather's axe" treatment.
1348:
1329:
1310:
1291:
1269:
1250:
1206:
647:
313:
1833:
643:
on
Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
1543:
I couldn't see any obvious weaknesses. If you are aware of some, let me know what they are and I'll see what I have got.
1893:
635:
596:
539:
103:
755:
1491:- I've made another attempt. If this seems painfully slow progress to you, it's because ordnance is most definitely
1801:
The unit would have kept the same core of men, and was considered by the CSA to be a continuation of the same unit.
1707:
764:
1003:
535:
516:
477:
308:. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a
1434:
I will look in after Hog Farm has re-worked ... hard for me to digest in italics and without wikilinks :)
1011:
954:
238:
1722:
About 170 men served in the battery during the war. Known fatalities include 6 soldiers lost in battle...
1706:. This reads quite well but doesn't really explain the unit's formation. There's an interesting clue in
1037:
751:
1138:
is more interesting as all of the men being executed is more interesting than them manning some weapons.
787:
30:
1089:
134:
115:
96:
1454:
872:
857:
833:
743:
738:
188:
1792:
1750:
1613:
881:
197:
1712:
980:
943:
758:
for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists.
534:. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the
1586:
852:
848:
226:
20:
1415:
my specialist area, so treat with care. I have incorporated most of your very useful info. I am
1548:
1517:
1479:
1444:
1424:
1168:
521:
244:
170:
53:
40:
1788:
1761:
1746:
1734:
1649:
1609:
1007:
627:
8:
1783:
1599:
1223:
1720:
McGee does have some details of the unit's manpower though. For example, it says that "
1807:
1772:
1688:
1668:
1642:
1562:
1534:
1500:
1462:
920:
363:
155:
74:
1728:" and so the unit was improvised rather than being anything like a regular formation.
1544:
1526:
1513:
1488:
1475:
1435:
1420:
44:
772:
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below.
1629:
1172:
1142:
1557:
Well, that's good. The phrasing is gonna be really rough, but I'll work on that.
1587:
1177:
1078:
808:
508:
611:
590:
1658:. If you still have concerns with this article's FA status, you can take it to
991:
778:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
1827:
1802:
1767:
1683:
1663:
1659:
1558:
1530:
1509:
1496:
1471:
1458:
1406:
1158:"The 12-pounder James guns were 6-pounder smoothbores that had undergone the
916:
640:
639:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the
1679:
1625:
1139:
395:
334:
1163:
877:
804:
525:
193:
790:), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page.
379:
164:
1372:
The bore of a cannon is the hollow space within the cannon's barrel.
1162:
process. Rifled cannons had a series of grooves engraved into the
1129:
1071:
Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px.
530:
492:
471:
282:
1257:
1159:
435:
1602:
construct, cobbled together from a variety of passing mentions?
1715:
which does have an account of the Rains, Reid, Roberts rivalry.
1849:
Knowledge Did you know articles that are featured articles
1844:
Featured articles that have appeared on the main page once
1656:
certainly higher than standards you have applied elsewhere
1336:
538:, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the
296:
257:
1268:
sfn error: no target: CITEREFNational_Park_Service2008 (
1889:
Successful requests for military history A-Class review
1739:
comprehensive: it neglects no major facts or details...
1281:
1279:
1317:
1298:
1238:
1196:
1194:
1192:
1839:
Featured articles that have appeared on the main page
1263:
1276:
617:
498:
1864:
North
American military history task force articles
1189:
1874:United States military history task force articles
1411:OK, that is off the top of my head and the ACW is
1218:
1216:
59:This article appeared on Knowledge's Main Page as
1914:FA-Class United States articles of Low-importance
1859:FA-Class North American military history articles
1682:as well, if they aren't convinced by my defense.
1869:FA-Class United States military history articles
1825:
1213:
901:Template:Did you know nominations/Royal B. Lord
792:No further edits should be made to this page
43:. Even so, if you can update or improve it,
39:as one of the best articles produced by the
33:; it (or a previous version of it) has been
1457:, so that part at least will be rephrased.
1347:sfn error: no target: CITEREFWoodhead1996 (
1328:sfn error: no target: CITEREFWoodhead1996 (
1309:sfn error: no target: CITEREFWoodhead1996 (
1249:sfn error: no target: CITEREFWoodhead1996 (
725:
372:North American military history task force
1724:" It also explains that the crews were "
1290:sfn error: no target: CITEREFRipley1970 (
1205:sfn error: no target: CITEREFRipley1970 (
388:United States military history task force
186:Did you know ... that some of the men of
1342:
1323:
1304:
1244:
732:Text and/or other creative content from
302:This article is within the scope of the
224:
1884:American Civil War task force articles
1826:
1726:largely untrained in artillery matters
1285:
1226:. National Park Service. June 12, 2019
1200:
322:Knowledge:WikiProject Military history
312:. To use this banner, please see the
1909:Low-importance United States articles
325:Template:WikiProject Military history
1879:FA-Class American Civil War articles
1741:" This article seems to fall short.
721:
633:This article is within the scope of
220:
880:forces after being captured at the
680:Knowledge:WikiProject United States
243:It is of interest to the following
13:
1919:WikiProject United States articles
1854:FA-Class military history articles
683:Template:WikiProject United States
434:
394:
378:
362:
14:
1930:
1624:trivia or something like that.
1899:Low-importance Missouri articles
1398:with or without their carriages?
1151:From FAC - describing the cannon
1128:
1101:
1093:
1082:
1057:
1049:
1041:
1023:
1015:
995:
984:
966:
958:
947:
620:
610:
589:
501:
491:
470:
333:
295:
281:
256:
225:
154:
73:
52:
19:
1904:FA-Class United States articles
1737:is that the article should be "
775:Please do not modify this page.
700:This article has been rated as
568:This article has been rated as
1366:
548:Knowledge:WikiProject Missouri
1:
1567:21:51, 22 December 2020 (UTC)
1553:20:19, 22 December 2020 (UTC)
1539:18:18, 22 December 2020 (UTC)
1522:18:13, 22 December 2020 (UTC)
1505:18:11, 22 December 2020 (UTC)
1484:18:47, 21 December 2020 (UTC)
1467:18:44, 21 December 2020 (UTC)
1449:18:29, 21 December 2020 (UTC)
1429:18:23, 21 December 2020 (UTC)
1386:think a reader might expect.
870::... that some of the men of
551:Template:WikiProject Missouri
404:American Civil War task force
305:Military history WikiProject
196:after being captured at the
7:
1834:Knowledge featured articles
1813:14:56, 5 January 2022 (UTC)
1797:14:53, 5 January 2022 (UTC)
1778:17:06, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
1755:16:54, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
1694:14:31, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
1674:14:29, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
1634:14:19, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
1618:10:20, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
1112:
1064:
863:Source: ref 10 in the text
813:05:43, 18 August 2020 (UTC)
788:Knowledge talk:Did you know
780:this nomination's talk page
184:The text of the entry was:
10:
1935:
1894:FA-Class Missouri articles
1455:12-pounder Whitworth rifle
1264:National Park Service 2008
1146:21:35, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
925:01:38, 6 August 2020 (UTC)
873:Ruffner's Missouri Battery
744:1st Missouri Field Battery
706:project's importance scale
574:project's importance scale
189:Ruffner's Missouri Battery
142:Featured article candidate
123:WikiProject A-class review
27:1st Missouri Field Battery
1678:The FAR offer applies to
1155:What is currently there:
858:Roberts' Missouri Battery
742:was copied or moved into
739:User:Peacemaker67/sandbox
699:
636:WikiProject United States
605:
567:
486:
442:
417:
413:
402:
386:
370:
345:
341:
328:military history articles
290:
251:
207:
151:
71:
67:
882:Battle of Jenkins' Ferry
641:United States of America
514:This article is part of
198:Battle of Jenkins' Ferry
163:appeared on Knowledge's
61:Today's featured article
1713:Reid's Arkansas Battery
1224:"Artillery at Antietam"
853:Battle of Prairie Grove
784:the article's talk page
765:Did you know nomination
418:Additional information:
346:Associated task forces:
1169:14-pounder James rifle
915:Moved to mainspace by
686:United States articles
439:
399:
383:
367:
233:This article is rated
161:fact from this article
923:). Self-nominated at
886:Source 22 in the text
438:
398:
382:
366:
1004:copyright violations
935:General eligibility:
750:. The former page's
628:United States portal
517:WikiProject Missouri
104:Good article nominee
1784:diminishing returns
756:provide attribution
654:Articles Requested!
63:on January 4, 2022.
41:Knowledge community
1598:that this isn't a
1012:close paraphrasing
975:Policy compliance:
843:... that the only
440:
400:
384:
368:
310:list of open tasks
277:American Civil War
239:content assessment
79:Article milestones
1646:
1123:
1122:
1111:
1110:
1032:Hook eligibility:
981:Adequate sourcing
928:
887:
876:were executed by
864:
762:
761:
720:
719:
716:
715:
712:
711:
584:
583:
580:
579:
554:Missouri articles
465:
464:
461:
460:
457:
456:
409:
408:
314:full instructions
219:
218:
215:
214:
192:were executed by
1926:
1765:
1653:
1640:
1441:
1410:
1373:
1370:
1353:
1352:
1340:
1334:
1333:
1321:
1315:
1314:
1302:
1296:
1295:
1283:
1274:
1273:
1261:
1255:
1254:
1242:
1236:
1235:
1233:
1231:
1220:
1211:
1210:
1198:
1132:
1113:
1105:
1104:
1100:Clear at 100px:
1097:
1096:
1086:
1085:
1065:
1061:
1060:
1056:Other problems:
1053:
1052:
1045:
1044:
1027:
1026:
1022:Other problems:
1019:
1018:
999:
998:
988:
987:
970:
969:
965:Other problems:
962:
961:
951:
950:
914:
885:
862:
849:Confederate army
799:The result was:
777:
741:
729:
728:
722:
688:
687:
684:
681:
678:
630:
625:
624:
623:
614:
607:
606:
601:
593:
586:
585:
556:
555:
552:
549:
546:
511:
506:
505:
504:
495:
488:
487:
482:
474:
467:
466:
425:
415:
414:
353:
343:
342:
337:
330:
329:
326:
323:
320:
319:Military history
299:
292:
291:
286:
285:
284:
279:
264:Military history
260:
253:
252:
236:
230:
229:
221:
210:Featured article
208:Current status:
158:
137:
135:January 15, 2021
118:
116:October 26, 2020
99:
78:
77:
69:
68:
56:
31:featured article
23:
16:
15:
1934:
1933:
1929:
1928:
1927:
1925:
1924:
1923:
1824:
1823:
1811:
1776:
1762:Andrew Davidson
1759:
1708:this discussion
1704:McGee's account
1702:I read through
1692:
1672:
1650:Andrew Davidson
1647:
1591:
1588:Ship of Theseus
1565:
1537:
1503:
1465:
1439:
1404:
1378:
1377:
1376:
1371:
1367:
1358:
1357:
1356:
1346:
1341:
1337:
1327:
1322:
1318:
1308:
1303:
1299:
1289:
1284:
1277:
1267:
1262:
1258:
1248:
1243:
1239:
1229:
1227:
1222:
1221:
1214:
1204:
1199:
1190:
1178:field artillery
1153:
1148:
1102:
1094:
1090:Used in article
1083:
1079:Freely licensed
1058:
1050:
1042:
1024:
1016:
996:
985:
967:
959:
948:
855:were manned by
840:
838:
834:Article history
773:
767:
737:
726:
685:
682:
679:
676:
675:
674:
660:Become a Member
626:
621:
619:
599:
553:
550:
547:
544:
543:
524:related to the
509:Missouri portal
507:
502:
500:
480:
423:
351:
327:
324:
321:
318:
317:
280:
266:
237:on Knowledge's
234:
203:
202:
182:
178:August 29, 2020
133:
114:
95:
72:
12:
11:
5:
1932:
1922:
1921:
1916:
1911:
1906:
1901:
1896:
1891:
1886:
1881:
1876:
1871:
1866:
1861:
1856:
1851:
1846:
1841:
1836:
1822:
1821:
1820:
1819:
1818:
1817:
1816:
1815:
1805:
1770:
1743:
1742:
1730:
1729:
1717:
1716:
1699:
1698:
1697:
1696:
1686:
1666:
1637:
1636:
1590:
1585:
1584:
1583:
1582:
1581:
1580:
1579:
1578:
1577:
1576:
1575:
1574:
1573:
1572:
1571:
1570:
1569:
1561:
1533:
1499:
1461:
1375:
1374:
1364:
1363:
1359:
1355:
1354:
1345:, pp. 283–284.
1335:
1316:
1297:
1275:
1256:
1237:
1212:
1187:
1186:
1182:
1171:. They had a
1152:
1149:
1121:
1120:
1109:
1108:
1107:
1106:
1098:
1087:
1073:
1072:
1063:
1062:
1054:
1046:
1029:
1028:
1020:
1000:
989:
972:
971:
963:
952:
940:
939:
938:
937:
912:
911:
910:
909:
903:
891:
890:
889:
888:
845:rifled cannons
837:
836:
831:
821:
819:
815:
797:
796:
768:
766:
763:
760:
759:
754:now serves to
730:
718:
717:
714:
713:
710:
709:
702:Low-importance
698:
692:
691:
689:
673:
672:
667:
662:
657:
650:
648:Template Usage
644:
632:
631:
615:
603:
602:
600:Low‑importance
594:
582:
581:
578:
577:
570:Low-importance
566:
560:
559:
557:
513:
512:
496:
484:
483:
481:Low‑importance
475:
463:
462:
459:
458:
455:
454:
451:A-Class review
441:
431:
430:
428:
426:
420:
419:
411:
410:
407:
406:
401:
391:
390:
385:
375:
374:
369:
359:
358:
356:
354:
348:
347:
339:
338:
331:
300:
288:
287:
261:
249:
248:
242:
231:
217:
216:
213:
212:
205:
204:
183:
153:
152:
149:
148:
145:
138:
130:
129:
126:
119:
111:
110:
107:
100:
97:August 7, 2020
92:
91:
88:
85:
81:
80:
65:
64:
57:
49:
48:
24:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1931:
1920:
1917:
1915:
1912:
1910:
1907:
1905:
1902:
1900:
1897:
1895:
1892:
1890:
1887:
1885:
1882:
1880:
1877:
1875:
1872:
1870:
1867:
1865:
1862:
1860:
1857:
1855:
1852:
1850:
1847:
1845:
1842:
1840:
1837:
1835:
1832:
1831:
1829:
1814:
1810:
1809:
1804:
1800:
1799:
1798:
1794:
1790:
1785:
1781:
1780:
1779:
1775:
1774:
1769:
1763:
1758:
1757:
1756:
1752:
1748:
1745:
1744:
1740:
1736:
1732:
1731:
1727:
1723:
1719:
1718:
1714:
1709:
1705:
1701:
1700:
1695:
1691:
1690:
1685:
1681:
1677:
1676:
1675:
1671:
1670:
1665:
1661:
1657:
1651:
1644:
1643:edit conflict
1639:
1638:
1635:
1631:
1627:
1622:
1621:
1620:
1619:
1615:
1611:
1607:
1603:
1601:
1595:
1589:
1568:
1564:
1560:
1556:
1555:
1554:
1550:
1546:
1542:
1541:
1540:
1536:
1532:
1528:
1525:
1524:
1523:
1519:
1515:
1511:
1508:
1507:
1506:
1502:
1498:
1494:
1490:
1487:
1486:
1485:
1481:
1477:
1473:
1470:
1469:
1468:
1464:
1460:
1456:
1452:
1451:
1450:
1446:
1442:
1438:
1433:
1432:
1431:
1430:
1426:
1422:
1418:
1414:
1408:
1402:
1401:
1399:
1393:
1392:
1387:
1385:
1384:
1369:
1365:
1362:
1350:
1344:
1343:Woodhead 1996
1339:
1331:
1325:
1324:Woodhead 1996
1320:
1312:
1306:
1305:Woodhead 1996
1301:
1293:
1287:
1282:
1280:
1271:
1265:
1260:
1252:
1246:
1245:Woodhead 1996
1241:
1225:
1219:
1217:
1208:
1202:
1197:
1195:
1193:
1188:
1185:
1181:
1179:
1174:
1170:
1165:
1161:
1156:
1147:
1144:
1141:
1137:
1131:
1126:
1118:
1115:
1114:
1099:
1091:
1088:
1080:
1077:
1076:
1075:
1074:
1070:
1067:
1066:
1055:
1048:Interesting:
1047:
1039:
1036:
1035:
1034:
1033:
1021:
1013:
1009:
1005:
1001:
993:
990:
982:
979:
978:
977:
976:
964:
956:
953:
945:
942:
941:
936:
933:
932:
931:
930:
929:
926:
922:
918:
907:
904:
902:
898:
895:
894:
893:
892:
883:
879:
875:
874:
869:
866:
865:
860:
859:
854:
850:
846:
842:
841:
835:
832:
830:
826:
823:
822:
818:
816:
814:
810:
806:
802:
795:
793:
789:
785:
781:
776:
770:
769:
757:
753:
749:
745:
740:
735:
731:
724:
723:
707:
703:
697:
694:
693:
690:
677:United States
671:
668:
666:
663:
661:
658:
656:
655:
651:
649:
646:
645:
642:
638:
637:
629:
618:
616:
613:
609:
608:
604:
598:
597:United States
595:
592:
588:
587:
575:
571:
565:
562:
561:
558:
541:
537:
533:
532:
527:
523:
519:
518:
510:
499:
497:
494:
490:
489:
485:
479:
476:
473:
469:
468:
452:
448:
447:
443:This article
437:
433:
432:
429:
427:
422:
421:
416:
412:
405:
397:
393:
392:
389:
381:
377:
376:
373:
365:
361:
360:
357:
355:
350:
349:
344:
340:
336:
332:
315:
311:
307:
306:
301:
298:
294:
293:
289:
278:
274:
273:United States
270:
269:North America
265:
262:
259:
255:
254:
250:
246:
240:
232:
228:
223:
222:
211:
206:
201:
199:
195:
191:
190:
180:
179:
174:
172:
171:Did you know?
166:
162:
157:
150:
146:
144:
143:
139:
136:
132:
131:
127:
125:
124:
120:
117:
113:
112:
108:
106:
105:
101:
98:
94:
93:
89:
86:
83:
82:
76:
70:
66:
62:
58:
55:
51:
50:
46:
42:
38:
37:
32:
28:
25:
22:
18:
17:
1806:
1771:
1738:
1725:
1721:
1687:
1667:
1608:
1604:
1596:
1592:
1545:Gog the Mild
1527:Gog the Mild
1514:Gog the Mild
1492:
1489:Gog the Mild
1476:Gog the Mild
1436:
1421:Gog the Mild
1416:
1412:
1403:
1397:
1395:
1394:
1389:
1388:
1382:
1381:
1379:
1368:
1360:
1338:
1319:
1300:
1259:
1240:
1228:. Retrieved
1183:
1157:
1154:
1135:
1124:
1116:
1068:
1031:
1030:
974:
973:
934:
913:
905:
896:
871:
867:
856:
817:
800:
798:
791:
783:
779:
774:
771:
734:this version
701:
665:Project Talk
653:
634:
569:
536:project page
529:
515:
444:
303:
245:WikiProjects
209:
194:Union forces
187:
185:
176:
168:
140:
121:
102:
45:please do so
34:
26:
1735:FA criteria
1733:One of the
1286:Ripley 1970
1230:17 December
1201:Ripley 1970
955:Long enough
522:WikiProject
1828:Categories
1184:References
1164:gun barrel
1008:plagiarism
944:New enough
540:discussion
526:U.S. state
446:has passed
175:column on
36:identified
1600:synthetic
1326:, p. 284.
1307:, p. 285.
1288:, p. 366.
1247:, p. 287.
748:this edit
165:Main Page
1803:Hog Farm
1768:Hog Farm
1684:Hog Farm
1664:Hog Farm
1559:Hog Farm
1531:Hog Farm
1510:Hog Farm
1497:Hog Farm
1472:Hog Farm
1459:Hog Farm
1407:Hog Farm
1203:, p. 19.
1167:for the
1119:: Done.
1002:Free of
917:Hog Farm
897:Reviewed
801:promoted
545:Missouri
531:Missouri
478:Missouri
235:FA-class
147:Promoted
128:Approved
1440:Georgia
1266:, p. 2.
1160:rifling
1125:Overall
992:Neutral
906:Comment
851:at the
847:in the
825:Comment
752:history
704:on the
572:on the
167:in the
87:Process
1789:Andrew
1747:Andrew
1680:A2Bros
1660:WP:FAR
1626:A2Bros
1610:Andrew
1140:Jon698
1069:Image:
1010:, and
670:Alerts
241:scale.
109:Listed
90:Result
1563:Bacon
1535:Bacon
1501:Bacon
1463:Bacon
1437:Sandy
1380:What
1361:Notes
1038:Cited
878:Union
805:Amkgp
746:with
29:is a
1808:Talk
1793:talk
1773:Talk
1751:talk
1689:Talk
1669:Talk
1630:talk
1614:talk
1549:talk
1518:talk
1480:talk
1445:Talk
1425:talk
1349:help
1330:help
1311:help
1292:help
1270:help
1251:help
1232:2020
1207:help
1173:bore
1143:talk
1136:ALT1
921:talk
868:ALT1
829:view
809:talk
520:, a
84:Date
1791:🐉(
1749:🐉(
1612:🐉(
1493:not
1447:)
1417:not
1413:not
1117:QPQ
884:?
861:?
827:or
803:by
786:or
736:of
696:Low
564:Low
528:of
449:an
1830::
1795:)
1753:)
1632:)
1616:)
1551:)
1520:)
1482:)
1427:)
1278:^
1215:^
1191:^
1127::
1092::
1081::
1040::
1014::
1006:,
994::
983::
957::
946::
899::
820:(
811:)
782:,
424:/
352:/
275:/
271:/
267::
159:A
1764::
1760:@
1652::
1648:@
1645:)
1641:(
1628:(
1547:(
1516:(
1478:(
1443:(
1423:(
1409::
1405:@
1383:I
1351:)
1332:)
1313:)
1294:)
1272:)
1253:)
1234:.
1209:)
927:.
919:(
839:)
807:(
794:.
708:.
576:.
542:.
453:.
316:.
247::
200:?
181:.
173:"
169:"
47:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
