Knowledge

Talk:1926 World Series

Source đź“ť

751:"The Cardinals got a complete game shutout performance from Jesse Haines in the third game of the series, which put St. Louis with a 2-1 advantage in the series." "Complete game shutout" seems redundant to me since its impossible for a pitcher to get a shutout unless he pitches the entire game. Could be "The Cardinals got a shutout performance from pitcher Jesse Haines in the third game of the series, which gave St. Louis a 2-1 advantage." adding pitcher informs the on-fan reader that the pitcher got the shutout and then maybe they won't feel the need to leave the article to understand what's going on. They can just say "OK the pitcher did very well." Also, notice how I eliminated a couple of redundant words in there, less words is almost always better. 761:"The Yankees were leading 3-2 after five games, but the Cardinals behind manager-player Rogers Hornsby put in Grover Cleveland Alexander as the starting pitcher in Game 6, and as the relief pitcher in Game Seven, both of which would result in Cardinal victories, and ultimately the series championship." This sentence is a little choppy, how about: "The Yankees led 3-2 in the series, but Cardinals' manager-player Rogers Hornsby used Grover Cleveland Alexander as the starting pitcher in Game 6, and as a relief pitcher in Game Seven. The Cardinal won both games, and the series championship." 160: 334: 541: 313: 344: 22: 439: 418: 574: 449: 184: 795:
Yankees led 10-4, and did not scrap up", "He then chugged home", "Hal Severeid made the easy grab.", "the Cardinals cracked through Pennock's tough pitching", "shortstop Mark Koenig booted the ball", "Lazzeri lashed the ball down", "and O'Farrell's gun to second base ", etc. The informal wording makes this read more like a sports page than an encyclopedia article. You could link some of these to help out perhaps;
709:"The 1926 World Series was the championship series of Major League Baseball, featuring the St. Louis Cardinals vs. the New York Yankees." This sentence should mention 1926 again, "The 1926 World Series was the championship series of the 1926 Major League Baseball season, featuring the St. Louis Cardinals vs. the New York Yankees." or somehting like it. I know avoiding redundancy but it reads awkwardly otherwise. 84: 53: 237: 216: 94: 803:"Pennock pitched a beautiful complete game three-hitter, with four strikeouts against the Cardinals." Beautiful is a weasel word, if you want to keep it in and its in the source you could put it in quotations and attribute it. Maybe it could just be removed though, although I'm aware sometimes apt descriptive terms are necessary for non-fans who don't understand mere stats. 756:"In Game Four, Babe Ruth had a three-home run game, a World Series record only equalled twice: by Ruth again in 1928, and by Reggie Jackson in 1977." There are some words that cna be eliminated in sentences like this try "In Game Four, Babe Ruth hit three-homes, a World Series record only equalled twice: by Ruth again in 1928, and Reggie Jackson in 1977. 731:"In Game Two, future Baseball Hall-of-Famer Grover Cleveland Alexander led the Cardinals to an easy defeat of the Yankees." I'm not sure future is necessary here. I would just say, "In Game Two, Hall of Famer Grover Cleveland Alexander led the Cardinals to an easy defeat of the Yankees." And I'm pretty sure Hall of Famer doesn't get hyphenated: 784:
I see use of the "would+" construction, I used to do this until I got slammed for it on a FAC, instead of saying "would lose" just say "lost", instead of "would entrust" say "entrusted" etc. Unless you're describing a person's later accomplishments in the middle of a sentence describing an event that
985:
Well, it appears that if a book is used as a reference, it can't be added to further reading, unless it provides some "significant usefulness beyond verification of the article". I would say it does, but I believe the rest of the book is too out of focus with this topic. This article covers the 1926
794:
There's some sports lingo and other wording in there that might be considered informal and/or be incomprehensible to a non-fan. "Knocked in a run...", "Liner", "drew the first blood" (incidentally "the" doesn't belong in there), "strikeout victim", "the Yankees could only scrounge five hits ", "The
1229:
Removal has generally been met with positive responses by editors. Does anyone object if I remove it from the main text in a few days’ time on a trial basis? The original input formatting would be seen by all WPians, not just the huge number of visitors; it would be plain, unobtrusive text, which
1326:
The infobox marked Billy Southworth as being elected as a manager, but not Miller Huggins. But I think that while Huggins was a great second baseman, I think he is more famous as a manager and was elected on that basis -- he would not have been elected to the Hall of Fame strictly as a second
1308:
I mean, I see where you're coming from, but "World Championship" is how it's called and we have to go along with that. And anyway, in fact, at this time there were no teams outside of MLB that would have been able to give even a creditable performance against a top MLB team, I think.
698:
Okay, I figured I'd review this. Its GA quality but I think it needs some work before its FA quality. Here are some comments/suggestions. Feel free to strike these out as you address them, if you don't agree with one don't strike it out, just leave a comment below it saying why:
816:"By the morning of October 5, 1926, the sky was full of gray clouds, and it was chilly outside. However, the clouds cleared out by the time the game got underway." This seems trivial, unless there was some concern about the game being cancelled due to the weather or something. 790:"Hornsby threw to first base, but Gehrig beat the throw, and picked up his first World Series RBI after Combs scored." Really he did? How long after? One inning? Two innings? A week? Sorry, I'm just busting your chops. It should be "when Combs scored." 726:"The Babe Ruth-led Yankees had won their first World Series in 1923 in six games against the New York Giants, after attempts in the two previous years." I think this might be more direct if you just said, "after losing the two previous World Series." 1292:
The Cardinals beat the Yankees for the MLB title, but who’d they beat for world title? Don’t you have to play another nation? Or is it just good old fashioned American hyperbole? I’ve never understood the need to call domestic champs world champs.
886:
This could use a cite:"Alexander urged Hornsby that he would rather face Ruth, instead of intentionally walking him." Even if its cited in one of the citations in the surrounding, I would move the cite here or dupe it and out another one on this
841:
I think in each time section you should be able to do away with inning half the time or so, say it the first time in each section then you can say "with two outs in the bottom of the ninth..." People will get the idea, and this will avoid some
1183:(b) Once autoformatting is removed, mixtures of US and international formats are revealed in display mode, where they are much easier for WPians to pick up than in edit mode; so is the use of the wrong format in country-related articles. 880:
I added two fact tags in the game seven section. One is for a direct quote and the other one is probably from the same source but I think it would be good to have citation right on the statement in mid-sentence since it's somewhat
1079:
no longer encourages date autoformatting, having evolved over the past year or so from the mandatory to the optional after much discussion there and elsewhere of the disadvantages of the system. Related to this, MOSNUM prescribes
874:
In the game seven section, a couple of sentences begin with "At this point," fairly close together which is redundant and makes for weak prose. Find a similar term or just eliminate it the second time, it appears unnecessary
713:
I'm aware there's some debate about spelling out numbers less than ten in sports articles since many media outlets don't. But I always do unless thay're part of a series (Simms threw for 2,200 yards, 17 touchdowns, and
851:"Bob Meusel followed by drawing a walk, and was tagged out at home after a relay throw from a Lou Gehrig single to right field." This sentence needs work, it makes it seem like a Lou Gehrig single made a relay throw. 1298: 799:
is a necessary descriptive term. While you're at it, check out all terminology again to make sure its linked when it first appears, I think bunt isn't linked when it first appears and one or two others.
1119:(b) To our readers out there, it displays all-too-common inconsistencies in raw formatting in bright-blue underlined text, yet conceals them from WPians who are logged in and have chosen preferences. 1444: 1049:
While doing some cleanup work on the article, I noticed that some content added to the Game 7 summary was much better suited for an aftermath section. I split it into a new section.
856:"The following inning, Gehrig started the Yankees by being called out on strikes." This is a little choppy, could be "Gehrig led off the inning with a strikout." or womething better 811:"As the Cardinals were receiving their star treatment from St. Louisans," This is a little clunky, I would just change it to "from the people of St. Louis" or something even better. 1218:(a) It's incompatible with date ranges ("January 3–9, 1998", or "3–9 January 1998", and "February–April 2006") and slashed dates ("the night of May 21/22", or "... 21/22 May"). 1138:(a) It is trivial whether the order is day–month or month–day. It is more trivial than color/colour and realise/realize, yet our consistency-within-article policy on spelling ( 766:
There's a lot of use of "in the series". Obviously since we're talking about the 1926 World Series everything that happens, happens in the series so it's redundant to say that.
1439: 1331:
starts off with his managerial accomplishment. Contemporary sources could probably confirm or refute this, but for now I have marked Huggins as being "elected as manager".
1294: 704:
Right off the bat I've never been a big fan of the years linked into the season, so I'd do away with that. If its a religion to you that's I just think its overlinking.
1186:(c) Many WPians don't understand date-autoformatting—in particular, how if differs from ordinary linking; often it's applied simply because it's part of the furniture. 718:
interceptions). Also what's there is inconsistent for instance the first para has 4 games to 3 then the first section has sixteen wins and twelve losses. Generally,
1321: 1180:(a) There's a disappointing error-rate in keying in the auto-function; not bracketing the year, and enclosing the whole date in one set of brackets, are examples. 1081: 1076: 635: 555: 400: 1384: 198: 1302: 580: 1340: 295: 519: 150: 1369: 174: 1142:) has worked very well. English-speakers readily recognise both date formats; all dates after our signatures are international, and no one objects. 1272:, where (I) represents its 1882–1892 years; (II) represents its 1902–1908 years; and (III), aka Busch Stadium I, represents its 1909–1966 years.-- 1085: 1414: 1379: 1068: 390: 674:
Thanks. I've fixed the reference now. It appears I had deleted the original in one of my previous edits, and forgot to check for duplicates.
1248: 257: 1062: 911: 687: 1419: 1364: 999: 1243: 1021: 846:
Combine these two sentences: "Hoyt had sixteen wins and twelve losses in the season. He pitched 218 innings and had a 3.85 ERA in 1926."
1404: 1359: 900:
Also, put a citation close to the fact that Ruth was thrown out by 10 feet, either right after the comma or at the end of the sentence.
739:
I deleted the HOF reference entirely, nearly every player named in the opening of the article is in the HOF, why note it for Alexander.
285: 140: 1429: 785:
happened earlier. (e.g. "Reggie WHite, who would go on to a Hall of Fame career in the NFL, led the Vols defense during the season.")
509: 193: 67: 1202:(a) It's more work to enter an autoformatted date, and it doesn't make the edit-mode text any easier to read for subsequent editors. 807:
So the first game didn't sell out? How did game one draw 61,658 and the second draw 63,600? Makes me wonder if either was a sellout.
1409: 1281: 1262: 366: 1221:(b) By policy, we avoid date autoformatting in such places as quotations; the removal of autoformatting avoids this inconsistency. 722:
recommends spelling out everything under 10. Just be aware of that because people will most likely request you do that during FAC.
1394: 836:"Ruether was then replaced by Bob Shawkey, who closed out the inning by yielding two weak ground balls in the infield." --: --> 169: 63: 822: 1389: 1434: 1399: 261: 1424: 1354: 1089: 668: 485: 357: 318: 116: 1374: 979: 937: 365:-related articles on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join 664:
Ref 43 is blank. Just thought I'd notify the editors as I'm too lazy to look for it and since it's a repeated ref.
986:
World Series, while the Levenson book covers 1926 (in only seven pages) and 34 other World Series championships.
732: 244: 221: 1043: 1287: 743: 481: 462: 423: 107: 58: 1005: 837:"Ruether was then replaced by Bob Shawkey, who closed out the inning by yielding two weak infield groundouts." 33: 550: 1327:
baseman, I am confident, whereas he probably would have been if he had only managed, I think. And his
896:, I'm pretty sure we don't use the double dash here (--) but instead use the one in the edit box (—). 659: 959: 480:. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the 115:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
919: 540: 21: 628: 609: 1336: 1314: 573: 560: 467: 39: 1095:
There are at least six disadvantages in using date-autoformatting, which I've capped here:
1056: 1039: 975: 349: 8: 1328: 1277: 1016: 994: 681: 947: 861:
Are you sure the both words get capitalized in "Game One" and "Game Four" all the time?
1029: 934: 693: 564: 253: 1269: 1332: 1310: 1139: 908: 719: 665: 1238: 1050: 1035: 971: 830:"The Cardinals were leading 3-0 on the Yankees by the end of the inning." --: --> 454: 99: 1273: 1258: 1010: 988: 893: 821:"in a little bit over 180 innings of work." There's some extra words here, see 776: 740: 677: 1348: 362: 159: 1253:
Just wondering what the (III) in the "Series statistics" section is for.
1122:(c) It causes visitors to query why dates are bright-blue and underlined. 930: 333: 312: 1231: 796: 471: 831:"The Cardinals were leading the Yankees 3–0 by the end of the inning." 1254: 249: 476: 438: 417: 112: 927:
The Seventh Game: The 35 World Series That Have Gone the Distance
966:
I do not understand why this entry should not be included under
183: 1150:(3) Colour-clutter: the bright-blue underlining of all dates 1084:, irrespective of whether a date is autoformatted or not). 236: 215: 1445:
Featured articles that have appeared on the main page once
484:, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the 83: 52: 869:
I'm not sure if a 3–1 lead is "commanding" (game seven).
1230:
would give greater prominence to the high-value links.
1440:
Featured articles that have appeared on the main page
248:, a project to build and improve articles related to 775:
days with a month and day should be wiki-linked see
444: 361:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 339: 111:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 89: 1164:(c) It doesn't improve the appearance of the page. 579:This article appeared on Knowledge's Main Page as 970:. Pages 33-39 deal specifically with this topic. 1346: 1161:(b) It makes the text slightly harder to read. 1158:(a) It dilutes the impact of high-value links. 1130:(2) Avoids what are merely trivial differences 1034:There really should be an aftermath section. 865:Why did so few people show up for game seven? 563:. Even so, if you can update or improve it, 559:as one of the best articles produced by the 553:; it (or a previous version of it) has been 1385:Top-importance St. Louis Cardinals articles 907:Okay, that's it. Nice work, and good luck! 1370:Top-importance New York Yankees articles 924: 19: 1347: 1322:"Elected as manager" (to Hall of Fame) 1295:2001:569:F8C5:1200:D1E4:72C9:A091:E833 1069:Proposal to remove date-autoformatting 1006:WP:CITE#Further reading/External links 1415:Mid-importance New York City articles 1380:FA-Class St. Louis Cardinals articles 1116:(a) It works only for the WP "elite". 1099:Disadvantages of date-autoformatting 355:This article is within the scope of 242:This article is within the scope of 105:This article is within the scope of 15: 375:Knowledge:WikiProject New York City 38:It is of interest to the following 13: 1420:WikiProject New York City articles 1365:FA-Class New York Yankees articles 1172:(4) Typos and misunderstood coding 378:Template:WikiProject New York City 182: 158: 14: 1456: 1405:Mid-importance St. Louis articles 1360:High-importance Baseball articles 1430:Low-importance Missouri articles 572: 539: 447: 437: 416: 342: 332: 311: 235: 214: 92: 82: 51: 20: 1410:FA-Class New York City articles 514:This article has been rated as 395:This article has been rated as 290:This article has been rated as 270:Knowledge:WikiProject St. Louis 194:WikiProject St. Louis Cardinals 145:This article has been rated as 494:Knowledge:WikiProject Missouri 273:Template:WikiProject St. Louis 125:Knowledge:WikiProject Baseball 1: 1395:WikiProject Baseball articles 497:Template:WikiProject Missouri 369:and see a list of open tasks. 191:This article is supported by 167:This article is supported by 128:Template:WikiProject Baseball 119:and see a list of open tasks. 1390:St. Louis Cardinals articles 1303:06:12, 15 January 2022 (UTC) 1082:rules for the raw formatting 1063:21:50, 17 October 2016 (UTC) 1017:Make articles, not wikidrama 995:Make articles, not wikidrama 170:WikiProject New York Yankees 7: 1435:Knowledge featured articles 1400:FA-Class St. Louis articles 1092:are consistent with this. 10: 1461: 1425:FA-Class Missouri articles 1355:FA-Class Baseball articles 1282:20:33, 16 March 2009 (UTC) 1263:07:55, 15 March 2009 (UTC) 1004:Here's the relevant link: 636:Featured article candidate 520:project's importance scale 401:project's importance scale 296:project's importance scale 151:project's importance scale 1375:New York Yankees articles 1341:14:24, 10 June 2022 (UTC) 1244:12:57, 21 July 2008 (UTC) 1073:Dear fellow contributors 1044:21:44, 18 June 2008 (UTC) 1022:15:04, 15 June 2008 (UTC) 1000:15:04, 15 June 2008 (UTC) 980:16:29, 13 June 2008 (UTC) 892:Dashes are incorrect see 649: 591: 587: 513: 432: 394: 358:WikiProject New York City 327: 289: 230: 190: 166: 144: 77: 46: 1249:"Sportsman's Park (III)" 925:Levenson, Barry (2004). 912:07:43, 2 June 2007 (UTC) 744:16:44, 2 June 2007 (UTC) 688:13:54, 30 May 2007 (UTC) 669:04:49, 30 May 2007 (UTC) 581:Today's featured article 460:This article is part of 1268:the notation came from 1210:(6) Limited application 1288:World Championship???? 381:New York City articles 260:and contribute to the 187: 163: 28:This article is rated 1194:(5) Edit-mode clutter 245:WikiProject St. Louis 186: 162: 617:Good article nominee 463:WikiProject Missouri 350:New York City portal 252:and the surrounding 108:WikiProject Baseball 583:on October 2, 2017. 561:Knowledge community 256:. We invite you to 592:Article milestones 276:St. Louis articles 188: 164: 34:content assessment 1108:(1) In-house only 933:. pp. pp. 33–39. 660:Reference problem 657: 656: 645: 644: 547:1926 World Series 534: 533: 530: 529: 526: 525: 500:Missouri articles 411: 410: 407: 406: 306: 305: 302: 301: 254:metropolitan area 209: 208: 205: 204: 131:Baseball articles 1452: 1241: 1236: 1059: 1053: 1013: 991: 963: 958:has extra text ( 957: 953: 951: 943: 686: 685: 652:Featured article 650:Current status: 631: 612: 589: 588: 576: 551:featured article 543: 536: 535: 502: 501: 498: 495: 492: 457: 452: 451: 450: 441: 434: 433: 428: 420: 413: 412: 383: 382: 379: 376: 373: 352: 347: 346: 345: 336: 329: 328: 323: 315: 308: 307: 278: 277: 274: 271: 268: 258:join the project 239: 232: 231: 226: 218: 211: 210: 133: 132: 129: 126: 123: 102: 97: 96: 95: 86: 79: 78: 73: 70: 55: 48: 47: 31: 25: 24: 16: 1460: 1459: 1455: 1454: 1453: 1451: 1450: 1449: 1345: 1344: 1324: 1290: 1251: 1239: 1232: 1227: 1226: 1100: 1071: 1057: 1051: 1032: 1020: 1009: 998: 987: 968:Further reading 955: 954: 945: 944: 940: 922: 920:Further reading 696: 676: 675: 662: 627: 608: 499: 496: 493: 490: 489: 470:related to the 455:Missouri portal 453: 448: 446: 426: 380: 377: 374: 371: 370: 348: 343: 341: 321: 275: 272: 269: 266: 265: 224: 147:High-importance 130: 127: 124: 121: 120: 100:Baseball portal 98: 93: 91: 72:High‑importance 71: 61: 32:on Knowledge's 29: 12: 11: 5: 1458: 1448: 1447: 1442: 1437: 1432: 1427: 1422: 1417: 1412: 1407: 1402: 1397: 1392: 1387: 1382: 1377: 1372: 1367: 1362: 1357: 1323: 1320: 1319: 1318: 1289: 1286: 1285: 1284: 1250: 1247: 1225: 1224: 1223: 1222: 1219: 1213: 1212: 1206: 1205: 1204: 1203: 1197: 1196: 1190: 1189: 1188: 1187: 1184: 1181: 1175: 1174: 1168: 1167: 1166: 1165: 1162: 1159: 1153: 1152: 1146: 1145: 1144: 1143: 1133: 1132: 1126: 1125: 1124: 1123: 1120: 1117: 1111: 1110: 1103: 1101: 1098: 1097: 1070: 1067: 1066: 1065: 1031: 1028: 1027: 1026: 1025: 1024: 1014: 992: 938: 921: 918: 917: 916: 915: 914: 902: 901: 898: 889: 883: 877: 871: 866: 863: 858: 853: 848: 843: 839: 833: 827: 818: 813: 808: 805: 800: 792: 787: 781: 768: 763: 758: 753: 747: 746: 736: 735: 728: 723: 711: 706: 695: 692: 691: 690: 661: 658: 655: 654: 647: 646: 643: 642: 639: 632: 624: 623: 620: 613: 605: 604: 601: 598: 594: 593: 585: 584: 577: 569: 568: 544: 532: 531: 528: 527: 524: 523: 516:Low-importance 512: 506: 505: 503: 459: 458: 442: 430: 429: 427:Low‑importance 421: 409: 408: 405: 404: 397:Mid-importance 393: 387: 386: 384: 367:the discussion 354: 353: 337: 325: 324: 322:Mid‑importance 316: 304: 303: 300: 299: 292:Mid-importance 288: 282: 281: 279: 240: 228: 227: 225:Mid‑importance 219: 207: 206: 203: 202: 199:Top-importance 189: 179: 178: 175:Top-importance 165: 155: 154: 143: 137: 136: 134: 117:the discussion 104: 103: 87: 75: 74: 56: 44: 43: 37: 26: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1457: 1446: 1443: 1441: 1438: 1436: 1433: 1431: 1428: 1426: 1423: 1421: 1418: 1416: 1413: 1411: 1408: 1406: 1403: 1401: 1398: 1396: 1393: 1391: 1388: 1386: 1383: 1381: 1378: 1376: 1373: 1371: 1368: 1366: 1363: 1361: 1358: 1356: 1353: 1352: 1350: 1343: 1342: 1338: 1334: 1330: 1316: 1312: 1307: 1306: 1305: 1304: 1300: 1296: 1283: 1279: 1275: 1271: 1267: 1266: 1265: 1264: 1260: 1256: 1246: 1245: 1242: 1237: 1235: 1220: 1217: 1216: 1215: 1214: 1211: 1208: 1207: 1201: 1200: 1199: 1198: 1195: 1192: 1191: 1185: 1182: 1179: 1178: 1177: 1176: 1173: 1170: 1169: 1163: 1160: 1157: 1156: 1155: 1154: 1151: 1148: 1147: 1141: 1137: 1136: 1135: 1134: 1131: 1128: 1127: 1121: 1118: 1115: 1114: 1113: 1112: 1109: 1106: 1105: 1104: 1096: 1093: 1091: 1087: 1083: 1078: 1074: 1064: 1060: 1054: 1048: 1047: 1046: 1045: 1041: 1037: 1023: 1018: 1012: 1007: 1003: 1002: 1001: 996: 990: 984: 983: 982: 981: 977: 973: 969: 964: 961: 949: 941: 939:0-07-141271-9 936: 932: 928: 913: 910: 906: 905: 904: 903: 899: 897: 895: 890: 888: 884: 882: 878: 876: 872: 870: 867: 864: 862: 859: 857: 854: 852: 849: 847: 844: 840: 838: 834: 832: 828: 826: 824: 819: 817: 814: 812: 809: 806: 804: 801: 798: 793: 791: 788: 786: 782: 780: 778: 774: 769: 767: 764: 762: 759: 757: 754: 752: 749: 748: 745: 742: 738: 737: 734: 733: 729: 727: 724: 721: 717: 712: 710: 707: 705: 702: 701: 700: 689: 683: 679: 673: 672: 671: 670: 667: 653: 648: 640: 638: 637: 633: 630: 629:June 25, 2008 626: 625: 621: 619: 618: 614: 611: 607: 606: 602: 599: 596: 595: 590: 586: 582: 578: 575: 571: 570: 566: 562: 558: 557: 552: 548: 545: 542: 538: 537: 521: 517: 511: 508: 507: 504: 487: 483: 479: 478: 473: 469: 465: 464: 456: 445: 443: 440: 436: 435: 431: 425: 422: 419: 415: 414: 402: 398: 392: 389: 388: 385: 372:New York City 368: 364: 363:New York City 360: 359: 351: 340: 338: 335: 331: 330: 326: 320: 319:New York City 317: 314: 310: 309: 297: 293: 287: 284: 283: 280: 263: 259: 255: 251: 247: 246: 241: 238: 234: 233: 229: 223: 220: 217: 213: 212: 200: 197:(assessed as 196: 195: 185: 181: 180: 176: 173:(assessed as 172: 171: 161: 157: 156: 152: 148: 142: 139: 138: 135: 118: 114: 110: 109: 101: 90: 88: 85: 81: 80: 76: 69: 65: 60: 57: 54: 50: 49: 45: 41: 35: 27: 23: 18: 17: 1325: 1291: 1252: 1233: 1228: 1209: 1193: 1171: 1149: 1129: 1107: 1102: 1094: 1075: 1072: 1033: 967: 965: 929:. New York: 926: 923: 891: 885: 879: 873: 868: 860: 855: 850: 845: 835: 829: 820: 815: 810: 802: 789: 783: 779:(October 2). 772: 770: 765: 760: 755: 750: 730: 725: 715: 708: 703: 697: 663: 651: 634: 616: 615: 610:June 2, 2007 565:please do so 554: 546: 515: 482:project page 475: 461: 396: 356: 291: 243: 192: 168: 146: 106: 40:WikiProjects 1333:Herostratus 1329:Hall plaque 1311:Herostratus 931:McGraw-Hill 909:Quadzilla99 842:redundancy. 771:Full dates 666:Quadzilla99 468:WikiProject 1349:Categories 1270:retrosheet 1052:Giants2008 1036:Kingturtle 972:Kingturtle 797:line drive 556:identified 486:discussion 472:U.S. state 262:discussion 1274:NullSpace 1140:WP:ENGVAR 1030:Aftermath 1011:Nishkid64 989:Nishkid64 948:cite book 887:sentence. 881:negative. 741:Timpcrk87 720:WP:MOSNUM 694:GA review 678:Nishkid64 267:St. Louis 250:St. Louis 222:St. Louis 68:Cardinals 875:anyways. 641:Promoted 491:Missouri 477:Missouri 424:Missouri 122:Baseball 113:baseball 59:Baseball 30:FA-class 1090:CONTEXT 1086:MOSLINK 956:|pages= 894:WP:DASH 777:WP:DATE 600:Process 518:on the 399:on the 294:on the 149:on the 64:Yankees 1240:(talk) 1077:MOSNUM 622:Listed 603:Result 36:scale. 549:is a 1337:talk 1315:talk 1299:talk 1278:talk 1259:talk 1234:Tony 1088:and 1058:Talk 1040:talk 976:talk 960:help 935:ISBN 823:here 682:talk 597:Date 466:, a 141:High 1255:BUC 773:and 510:Low 474:of 391:Mid 286:Mid 1351:: 1339:) 1301:) 1280:) 1261:) 1061:) 1042:) 1008:. 978:) 952:: 950:}} 946:{{ 201:). 177:). 66:/ 62:: 1335:( 1317:) 1313:( 1297:( 1276:( 1257:( 1055:( 1038:( 1019:) 1015:( 997:) 993:( 974:( 962:) 942:. 825:. 716:8 684:) 680:( 567:. 522:. 488:. 403:. 298:. 264:. 153:. 42::

Index


content assessment
WikiProjects
WikiProject icon
Baseball
Yankees
Cardinals
WikiProject icon
Baseball portal
WikiProject Baseball
baseball
the discussion
High
project's importance scale
Taskforce icon
WikiProject New York Yankees
Top-importance
Taskforce icon
WikiProject St. Louis Cardinals
Top-importance
WikiProject icon
St. Louis
WikiProject icon
WikiProject St. Louis
St. Louis
metropolitan area
join the project
discussion
Mid
project's importance scale

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑