Knowledge

Research ethics consultation

Source 📝

58:, in that it is typically available at any point during a study (planning, conducting, interpreting, or disseminating results), and can relate to any ethical question. While little is known about the range and distribution of topics put forth for REC, such services may be particularly important and useful for studies of known regulatory and ethical uncertainty (e.g. assessment of minimal risk in pediatric studies) and frontier research for which there is little if any regulation or expert consensus. The recommendations that result from the consultation are non-binding, meaning that the researcher may choose to follow the recommendation, or to pursue a different approach. 107: 32:(NIH) Clinical Center in 1997. Today, most REC services are found at academic institutions, and the majority of current services were originally launched in response to the 2006 NIH 102: 77: 36:
program, as applicants to that program were required to have procedures in place to address ethical concerns raised by their research.
33: 97: 180: 72: 47:
and ethical analysis; knowledgeable about the applicable regulations, laws, and policies; and ideally also have some
82: 29: 55: 92: 67: 24:(REC) describes a formal way for researchers to solicit and receive expert ethical guidance related to 295: 108:
National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research
128: 8: 300: 48: 25: 224: 197: 153: 272: 229: 176: 145: 157: 262: 219: 211: 137: 87: 39:
While still a young discipline with no explicit standards, individuals serving as
267: 248: 44: 40: 17: 253: 215: 289: 276: 233: 149: 141: 202: 126:
Emanuel, EJ (Dec 1998). "The blossoming of bioethics at NIH".
198:"Strangers at the benchside: Research ethics consultation" 54:
REC is distinct from related services, such as those of
195: 246: 196:Cho, MK; Tobin SL; Greely HT; et al. (2008a). 103:Ethical problems using children in clinical trials 287: 28:. The first REC service was established at the 43:consultants are expected to be familiar with 249:"Triggers for research ethics consultation" 247:Havard, M; Cho MK; Magnus D (25 Jan 2012). 78:Human experimentation in the United States 266: 223: 173:Research Ethics Consultation: A Casebook 34:Clinical and Translational Science Award 125: 288: 170: 98:Office for human research protections 51:experience and scientific expertise. 13: 14: 312: 73:Ethics Committee (European Union) 175:. USA: Oxford University Press. 83:IRB: Ethics & Human Research 240: 189: 164: 119: 1: 113: 30:National Institutes of Health 268:10.1126/scitranslmed.3002734 22:Research Ethics Consultation 7: 61: 56:Institutional Review Boards 10: 317: 93:Data Monitoring Committees 68:Institutional Review Board 216:10.1080/15265160802132951 171:Danis, Marion (2012). 142:10.1353/ken.1998.0030 129:Kennedy Inst Ethics J 49:biomedical research 26:biomedical research 308: 281: 280: 270: 244: 238: 237: 227: 193: 187: 186: 168: 162: 161: 123: 88:Informed consent 316: 315: 311: 310: 309: 307: 306: 305: 296:Research ethics 286: 285: 284: 261:(118): 118cm1. 245: 241: 194: 190: 183: 169: 165: 124: 120: 116: 64: 45:research ethics 41:research ethics 18:clinical ethics 12: 11: 5: 314: 304: 303: 298: 283: 282: 254:Sci Transl Med 239: 188: 182:978-0199798032 181: 163: 117: 115: 112: 111: 110: 105: 100: 95: 90: 85: 80: 75: 70: 63: 60: 20:consultation, 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 313: 302: 299: 297: 294: 293: 291: 278: 274: 269: 264: 260: 256: 255: 250: 243: 235: 231: 226: 221: 217: 213: 209: 205: 204: 199: 192: 184: 178: 174: 167: 159: 155: 151: 147: 143: 139: 136:(4): 455–66. 135: 131: 130: 122: 118: 109: 106: 104: 101: 99: 96: 94: 91: 89: 86: 84: 81: 79: 76: 74: 71: 69: 66: 65: 59: 57: 52: 50: 46: 42: 37: 35: 31: 27: 23: 19: 16:Analogous to 258: 252: 242: 207: 201: 191: 172: 166: 133: 127: 121: 53: 38: 21: 15: 210:(3): 4–13. 203:Am J Bioeth 301:Consulting 290:Categories 114:References 277:22277965 234:18570086 158:12392680 150:11657322 62:See also 225:2585006 275:  232:  222:  179:  156:  148:  154:S2CID 273:PMID 230:PMID 177:ISBN 146:PMID 263:doi 220:PMC 212:doi 138:doi 292:: 271:. 257:. 251:. 228:. 218:. 206:. 200:. 152:. 144:. 132:. 279:. 265:: 259:4 236:. 214:: 208:8 185:. 160:. 140:: 134:8

Index

clinical ethics
biomedical research
National Institutes of Health
Clinical and Translational Science Award
research ethics
research ethics
biomedical research
Institutional Review Boards
Institutional Review Board
Ethics Committee (European Union)
Human experimentation in the United States
IRB: Ethics & Human Research
Informed consent
Data Monitoring Committees
Office for human research protections
Ethical problems using children in clinical trials
National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research
Kennedy Inst Ethics J
doi
10.1353/ken.1998.0030
PMID
11657322
S2CID
12392680
ISBN
978-0199798032
"Strangers at the benchside: Research ethics consultation"
Am J Bioeth
doi
10.1080/15265160802132951

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.