Knowledge

Re Peveril Gold Mines Ltd

Source 📝

149:
protection just as much as creditors—perhaps even more; shareholders are not partners for all purposes; they have not all the rights of partners; they have practically no voice in the management of the concern. Their security in a great measure depends on the directors adhering to the requirements of the Act.” Any one who is familiar with the Companies Acts knows perfectly well that these registered limited companies are incorporated on certain conditions; they continue to exist on certain conditions; and they are liable to be dissolved on certain conditions. The important sections of the Act of 1862, with regard to dissolution, are ss. 79 and 82. Sect. 79 states the circumstances under which such a company may be dissolved by the Court, and s. 82 states the persons who may petition for a dissolution. Any article contrary to these sections—any article which says that the company is formed on the condition that its life shall not be terminated when any of the circumstances mentioned in s. 79 exist, or which limits the right of a contributory under s. 82 to petition for a winding-up, would be an attempt to enforce on all the shareholders that which is at variance with the statutory conditions, and is invalid. It is no answer to say that the right to petition may be waived by any contributory personally. I do not intend to decide whether a valid contract may or may not be made between the company and an individual shareholder that he shall not petition for the winding up of the company. That point does not arise now. But to say that a company is formed on the condition that its existence shall not be terminated under the circumstances, or on the application of the persons, mentioned in the Act is to say that it is formed contrary to the provisions of the Act, and upon conditions which the Court is bound to ignore. The view taken by Byrne J. was right, and the appeal must be dismissed.
28: 108:
case concerning liquidation when a company is unable to repay its debts. It held that a member cannot be prevented by a company constitution from bringing a winding up petition. It is, however, possible for a member to make a shareholder agreement and thus contract out of the right to bring a winding
148:
AC 324: “These companies are the creature of statute, and by the statute to which they owe their being they must be bound in regard to shareholders as well as in regard to creditors in all matters coming within the conditions of the memorandum of association. Shareholders in these companies require
121:
of Peveril Gold Mines Ltd said no member should petition for winding up unless two directors had consented or the general meeting had resolved or a petitioner held at least 20% of issued capital. A member asked for winding up without satisfying any of these conditions.
133:
held that the member was entitled to do so. He said ‘these registered limited companies are incorporated on certain conditions; they continue to exist on certain conditions; and they are liable to be dissolved on certain conditions.’ He pointed to the predecessors of
267: 138:
sections 122 and sections 124 and said they set out circumstance when a company can be dissolved by the court and who can petition. A member could not be restricted.
291: 255: 398: 144: 231: 393: 189: 38: 305: 130: 61: 182: 408: 175: 403: 219: 157: 118: 69: 153: 65: 8: 205: 135: 209: 363: 328: 317: 105: 142:
I will begin by reading the following passage from the speech of Lord Macnaghten in
279: 387: 91: 373: 27: 167: 293:
Ayerst (Inspector of Taxes) v C&K (Construction) Ltd
385: 183: 190: 176: 26: 399:Court of Appeal (England and Wales) cases 386: 378:Principles of Corporate Insolvency Law 197: 171: 109:up petition outside of the company. 268:Re Windsor Steam Coal Co (1901) Ltd 13: 394:United Kingdom insolvency case law 380:(4th edn Sweet & Maxwell 2011) 368:Cases and Materials in Company Law 348:Cases and Materials in Company Law 306:Stonegate Securities Ltd v Gregory 14: 420: 340: 1: 356: 7: 346:L Sealy and S Worthington, 163: 125: 10: 425: 350:(9th edn OUP 2010) 745-746 314: 302: 288: 276: 264: 252: 244:Re Peveril Gold Mines Ltd 240: 228: 216: 203: 101:Re Peveril Gold Mines Ltd 90: 85: 80: 75: 57: 52: 44: 34: 25: 21:Re Peveril Gold Mines Ltd 20: 334: 112: 220:Re Rica Gold Washing Co 119:articles of association 151: 140: 409:1898 in British law 256:Pulsford v Devenish 206:Insolvency Act 1986 158:Vaughan Williams LJ 136:Insolvency Act 1986 70:Vaughan Williams LJ 370:(9th edn OUP 2010) 329:UK insolvency law 324: 323: 318:UK insolvency law 223:(1879) 11 Ch D 36 198:Liquidation cases 106:UK insolvency law 97: 96: 416: 404:1898 in case law 351: 344: 294: 280:Mann v Goldstein 192: 185: 178: 169: 168: 145:Welton v Saffery 53:Court membership 30: 18: 17: 424: 423: 419: 418: 417: 415: 414: 413: 384: 383: 359: 354: 345: 341: 337: 325: 320: 310: 298: 292: 284: 272: 260: 248: 236: 232:Knowles v Scott 224: 212: 199: 196: 166: 131:Lord Lindley MR 128: 115: 81:Lord Lindley MR 68: 64: 62:Lord Lindley MR 39:Court of Appeal 12: 11: 5: 422: 412: 411: 406: 401: 396: 382: 381: 371: 358: 355: 353: 352: 338: 336: 333: 332: 331: 322: 321: 315: 312: 311: 303: 300: 299: 289: 286: 285: 277: 274: 273: 265: 262: 261: 253: 250: 249: 241: 238: 237: 229: 226: 225: 217: 214: 213: 204: 201: 200: 195: 194: 187: 180: 172: 165: 162: 127: 124: 114: 111: 104:1 Ch 122 is a 95: 94: 88: 87: 83: 82: 78: 77: 73: 72: 59: 58:Judges sitting 55: 54: 50: 49: 46: 42: 41: 36: 32: 31: 23: 22: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 421: 410: 407: 405: 402: 400: 397: 395: 392: 391: 389: 379: 375: 372: 369: 365: 364:S Worthington 361: 360: 349: 343: 339: 330: 327: 326: 319: 313: 308: 307: 301: 296: 295: 287: 282: 281: 275: 270: 269: 263: 258: 257: 251: 246: 245: 239: 234: 233: 227: 222: 221: 215: 211: 207: 202: 193: 188: 186: 181: 179: 174: 173: 170: 161: 159: 155: 150: 147: 146: 139: 137: 132: 123: 120: 110: 107: 103: 102: 93: 89: 84: 79: 76:Case opinions 74: 71: 67: 63: 60: 56: 51: 47: 43: 40: 37: 33: 29: 24: 19: 16: 377: 367: 362:L Sealy and 347: 342: 304: 290: 278: 266: 254: 243: 242: 230: 218: 152: 143: 141: 129: 116: 100: 99: 98: 15: 160:concurred. 92:Liquidation 388:Categories 357:References 283:1 WLR 1091 154:Chitty LJ 66:Chitty LJ 259:2 Ch 625 247:1 Ch 122 235:1 Ch 717 164:See also 126:Judgment 86:Keywords 48:1 Ch 122 45:Citation 374:R Goode 309:Ch 576 297:AC 167 271:Ch 609 210:73-174 335:Notes 113:Facts 35:Court 316:see 156:and 117:The 208:ss 390:: 376:, 366:, 191:e 184:t 177:v

Index


Court of Appeal
Lord Lindley MR
Chitty LJ
Vaughan Williams LJ
Liquidation
UK insolvency law
articles of association
Lord Lindley MR
Insolvency Act 1986
Welton v Saffery
Chitty LJ
Vaughan Williams LJ
v
t
e
Insolvency Act 1986
73-174
Re Rica Gold Washing Co
Knowles v Scott
Re Peveril Gold Mines Ltd
Pulsford v Devenish
Re Windsor Steam Coal Co (1901) Ltd
Mann v Goldstein
Ayerst (Inspector of Taxes) v C&K (Construction) Ltd
Stonegate Securities Ltd v Gregory
UK insolvency law
UK insolvency law
S Worthington
R Goode

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑