29:
251:
257:
136:. O’Connor was accused of and charged with rape and indecent assault of four women. The Court held that the medical and counselling records of a complainant in a sexual assault case that are held by a third party can be disclosed by order of the judge if they meet two requirements.
139:
First, the applicant must establish, without seeing them, that the records are likely to be relevant to the case. Second, the judge must review the records and decide whether to disclose them based on the balancing the right to make full answer and defence, and the right to
344:
168:
339:
217:
300:
319:
334:
324:
125:
293:
349:
191:
148:
286:
236:
329:
232:
129:
34:
204:
8:
274:
50:
28:
173:
156:
270:
133:
313:
266:
250:
152:
141:
97:
La Forest, L'Heureux-Dube, Gonthier and McLachlin JJ.
71:
APPEAL from the COURT OF APPEAL FOR BRITISH COLUMBIA
169:
List of
Supreme Court of Canada cases (Lamer Court)
311:
294:
345:Sexual abuse of women in the Catholic Church
159:who was found guilty of sex crimes in 1991.
301:
287:
218:Disgraced B.C. bishop dead of heart attack
312:
147:The O'Connor involved in the case was
340:Publication bans in Canadian case law
244:
113:Lamer C.J. and Sopinka and Major JJ.
192:SCC Case Information - Docket 24114
13:
14:
361:
225:
255:
249:
27:
211:
197:
185:
1:
320:Supreme Court of Canada cases
205:"R v O'Connor [1995]"
179:
273:. You can help Knowledge by
45:Judgment: 1995: December 14.
16:Supreme Court of Canada case
7:
162:
43:Hearing: 1995: February 1;
10:
366:
335:Canadian evidence case law
243:
132:decision on disclosure of
325:1995 in Canadian case law
109:
101:
93:
88:
83:
75:
67:
59:
49:
42:
26:
21:
233:Supreme Court of Canada
194:Supreme Court of Canada
149:Hubert Patrick O'Connor
130:Supreme Court of Canada
35:Supreme Court of Canada
105:Cory and Iacobucci JJ
265:This article about
350:Canadian law stubs
282:
281:
128:411 is a leading
117:
116:
357:
303:
296:
289:
261:
260:
259:
258:
253:
245:
220:
215:
209:
208:
201:
195:
189:
174:R v Mills (1999)
157:British Columbia
84:Court membership
79:Appeal dismissed
31:
19:
18:
365:
364:
360:
359:
358:
356:
355:
354:
310:
309:
308:
307:
256:
254:
248:
228:
223:
216:
212:
203:
202:
198:
190:
186:
182:
165:
134:medical records
44:
38:
17:
12:
11:
5:
363:
353:
352:
347:
342:
337:
332:
330:Rape in Canada
327:
322:
306:
305:
298:
291:
283:
280:
279:
262:
240:
239:
227:
226:External links
224:
222:
221:
210:
196:
183:
181:
178:
177:
176:
171:
164:
161:
115:
114:
111:
107:
106:
103:
99:
98:
95:
91:
90:
86:
85:
81:
80:
77:
73:
72:
69:
65:
64:
61:
57:
56:
53:
47:
46:
40:
39:
32:
24:
23:
15:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
362:
351:
348:
346:
343:
341:
338:
336:
333:
331:
328:
326:
323:
321:
318:
317:
315:
304:
299:
297:
292:
290:
285:
284:
278:
276:
272:
268:
263:
252:
247:
246:
242:
238:
234:
231:Full text of
230:
229:
219:
214:
206:
200:
193:
188:
184:
175:
172:
170:
167:
166:
160:
158:
154:
150:
145:
143:
137:
135:
131:
127:
123:
122:
112:
108:
104:
100:
96:
92:
89:Reasons given
87:
82:
78:
74:
70:
68:Prior history
66:
62:
58:
54:
52:
48:
41:
37:
36:
30:
25:
20:
275:expanding it
267:Canadian law
264:
241:
235:decision at
213:
199:
187:
155:bishop from
146:
138:
121:R v O'Connor
120:
119:
118:
33:
22:R v O'Connor
102:Concurrence
314:Categories
180:References
60:Docket No.
55:4 SCR 411
51:Citations
163:See also
153:Catholic
94:Majority
142:privacy
110:Dissent
126:S.C.R.
76:Ruling
63:24114
269:is a
237:LexUM
124:, 4
271:stub
151:, a
316::
144:.
302:e
295:t
288:v
277:.
207:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
.svg){kind=small}