119:
jurisdiction to hear the current matter as the subject property was a domestic dwelling that was rateable. The High Court proposed that the
Circuit Court cannot proceed to judgment in relation to a domestic home that has been deemed unrateable by the Valuation Act 2001 when the defendant has contested the Circuit Court's jurisdiction. The Attorney General intervened in the Supreme Court appeal filed by Permanent TSB Plc, and the other Justices agreed with Clarke CJ's decision. The Circuit Court retained jurisdiction over the case if a property is not valued in accordance with the 2001 Act, and the plaintiff must demonstrate jurisdiction by providing a certificate of rateable valuation or solid proof that the property does not have a rateable valuation.
29:
599:
503:
333:
172:. The term "defaulting" refers to Mr. Langan's failure to make mortgage payments. The recovery of possession of the six homes he had pledged as security for the mortgage was the subject of the Circuit Court hearing. Permanent TSB Plc is required to be the owner of the properties, according to the Circuit Court.
262:
In order to address points (3) through (5), it was urged that it be made clear that the plaintiff in a possession action of the kind that is the subject of this appeal must demonstrate jurisdiction. To demonstrate that jurisdiction, a certificate of rateable valuation demonstrating that the property
118:
Mr. Langan took out a mortgage with
Permanent TSB and defaulted on the payments. He appealed to the High Court, but the High Court's ruling was against the rules of the Circuit Court. The case was referred to the Court of Appeal, and the High Court asked for clarifications. The Circuit Court lacked
247:
appeal filed by
Permanent TSB Plc on the basis that the issues raised were important to the general public. The other Justices agreed with Clarke CJ's decision, which would allow the appeal. The Court was persuaded to accept the following new responses instead of those offered by the
223:
The
Circuit Court cannot proceed to judgment in relation to a domestic home that has been deemed unrateable by the Valuation Act 2001 when the defendant has contested the Circuit Court's jurisdiction, unless the case falls within Part 10 of the 2009 Act or Section 3 of the 2013
179:
case. In a ruling claiming jurisdiction, the High Court's conclusion was against the rules of the
Circuit Court. Following the inconsistent High Court ruling, the case was referred to the Court of Appeal. The High Court asked for the following clarifications:
280:, it was determined that the matter should have been filed in the Circuit Court because of the complexity of the claim. In accordance with the Circuit Court scale and with a certificate for senior counsel, the plaintiff's request for expenses was granted.
201:
In accordance with
Section 31 of the County Officers and Courts (Ireland) Act 1877, is the plea in a civil bill admissible "legal evidence" when united with the testimony on affidavit of a preliminary estimate of rateable
184:
If a property is not rated because of the
Valuation Act 2001 or for any other reason, is the Circuit Court's authority under s. 22(1) of the Courts (Supplemental Provisions) Act 1961 excluded? Or for any other
267:
The
Circuit Court was granted jurisdiction to hear possession disputes in cases where the relevant property's rateable value was established to be either €253.95 or less or to have no rateable value at all.
263:
is assessed at €253.95 less may be employed. Providing solid proof that the subject property does not genuinely have a rateable valuation is a different way to demonstrate that jurisdiction.
380:
622:
574:
175:
In an appeal to the High Court, Mr. Langan claimed that the
Circuit Court lacked the authority to issue the types of orders that were upheld in the
366:
194:
How does the court use their authority to assess rateable valuation under
Section 31 of the County Officers and Courts (Ireland) Act 1877 (
657:
478:
667:
259:
The Circuit Court is fully qualified to consider the matter because the property's rateable value is not higher than €253.95.
525:
623:"Thomas Condron v Galway Holding Company Limited and Danmar Construction Limited and Stephen Treacy and Maureen Treacy"
575:"Insights - Repossessions Update: Relying on the Rateable Valuation of a property in proceedings in the Circuit Court"
504:"Cuprum Properties Limited (Acting by its Joint Receivers and Managers Tom O'Brien and Simon Coyle) v Noel Murray"
210:
lacked jurisdiction to hear the current matter as the subject property was a domestic dwelling that was rateable.
191:
Is the Circuit Court permitted to reach a decision unless it can be proved the rateable valuation exceeds €253.95?
256:
The Circuit Court retains jurisdiction over the case if a property is not valued in accordance with the 2001 Act.
381:"Permanent TSB v Langan: Limited jurisdiction in Art 34.3.4 can mean limited by value or by category of case"
188:
Does the Circuit Court have jurisdiction because the property's rateable value is not greater than €253.95?
354:
662:
652:
149:
44:
320:
153:
72:
33:
213:
The questions posed by Baker J (High Court) it was proposed they may be answered as follows:
408:
152:
case decision. The Court allowed the appeal from the Court of Appeal. It was found that the
8:
307:
549:
479:"Rateable Valuation and the jurisdiction of the Circuit Court - The current position"
288:
550:"Permanent TSB plc -v- Langan & anor [2017] IESC 71 (12 December 2017)"
334:"Possession Proceedings in Respect of Residential Properties that are not Rateable"
240:
195:
249:
646:
244:
207:
169:
165:
28:
367:"Supreme Court: Circuit Court has jurisdiction to make possession orders"
454:
355:
http://www.arthurcox.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/PTSB-v-Langan.pdf
442:
156:
had the authority to conduct possession proceedings in this case.
321:
https://www.casemine.com/judgement/uk/5da02c2f4653d058440f9981
108:
O' Donnell Donal J, McKechnie J, MacMenamin J, O'Malley Iseult
73:
https://www.casemine.com/judgement/uk/5da02c2f4653d058440f9981
409:"Bank of Ireland Mortgage Bank v Laura Finnegan and Another"
137:
Practice Procedure, Post Hearing, Courts, Constitutional Law
55:
Permanent TSB Plc and David Langan and The Attorney General
198:
c. 56) if there is no certificate of rateable valuation?
644:
234:
217:Yes, subject to the response to question three.
627:VB Law - 150 years experienced firms in Dublin
597:
620:
271:
27:
331:
177:Bank of Ireland Mortgage Bank v. Finnegan
148:, IESC 71; 1 I.R. 375, is a reported
645:
508:Conveyancing and Property Law Journal
501:
338:Conveyancing and Property Law Journal
278:Condron v. Galway Holding Company Ltd
610:(1): 548–549 – via Westlaw IE.
438:
436:
434:
432:
430:
428:
403:
401:
289:Permanent TSB Plc v. Langan and anor
206:According to Hogan J.'s ruling, the
22:Permanent TSB Plc v. Langan and Anor
572:
145:Permanent TSB Plc v Langan and Anor
13:
658:Banking in the Republic of Ireland
14:
679:
425:
398:
283:
443:https://www.irishstatutebook.ie/
614:
591:
566:
542:
518:
495:
471:
668:Supreme Court of Ireland cases
447:
373:
359:
348:
325:
314:
300:
1:
293:
159:
514:: 25 – via Westlaw IE.
308:"Permanent TSB PLC v Langan"
235:Holding of the Supreme Court
7:
344:: 8 – via Westlaw IE.
10:
684:
621:exsite_ravi (2022-04-21).
604:Annual Review of Irish Law
598:O'HIGGINS, CONOR (2017).
332:Beechinor, Liosa (2018).
136:
131:
123:
117:
112:
104:
99:
91:
83:
78:
68:
60:
50:
40:
26:
21:
600:"Practice and Procedure"
45:Supreme Court of Ireland
16:Irish Supreme Court case
272:Subsequent developments
34:Coat of arms of Ireland
164:Mr. Langan took out a
502:Dwyer, Lucy (2018).
369:. 13 December 2017.
150:Irish Supreme Court
64:12th December, 2017
573:Digital, Granite.
243:intervened in the
663:2017 in Irish law
196:40 & 41 Vict.
141:
140:
675:
653:2017 in case law
637:
636:
634:
633:
618:
612:
611:
595:
589:
588:
586:
585:
570:
564:
563:
561:
560:
546:
540:
539:
537:
536:
522:
516:
515:
499:
493:
492:
490:
489:
483:www.linkedin.com
475:
469:
468:
466:
465:
451:
445:
440:
423:
422:
420:
419:
405:
396:
395:
393:
392:
377:
371:
370:
363:
357:
352:
346:
345:
329:
323:
318:
312:
311:
304:
241:Attorney General
100:Court membership
31:
19:
18:
683:
682:
678:
677:
676:
674:
673:
672:
643:
642:
641:
640:
631:
629:
619:
615:
596:
592:
583:
581:
571:
567:
558:
556:
548:
547:
543:
534:
532:
524:
523:
519:
500:
496:
487:
485:
477:
476:
472:
463:
461:
453:
452:
448:
441:
426:
417:
415:
407:
406:
399:
390:
388:
379:
378:
374:
365:
364:
360:
353:
349:
330:
326:
319:
315:
306:
305:
301:
296:
286:
274:
250:Court of Appeal
237:
230:Does not arise.
227:Does not arise.
162:
87:Court of Appeal
36:
17:
12:
11:
5:
681:
671:
670:
665:
660:
655:
639:
638:
613:
590:
565:
554:www.bailii.org
541:
530:app.justis.com
517:
494:
470:
446:
424:
397:
372:
358:
347:
324:
313:
298:
297:
295:
292:
285:
284:External links
282:
273:
270:
265:
264:
260:
257:
236:
233:
232:
231:
228:
225:
221:
218:
204:
203:
199:
192:
189:
186:
161:
158:
139:
138:
134:
133:
129:
128:
125:
121:
120:
115:
114:
110:
109:
106:
105:Judges sitting
102:
101:
97:
96:
93:
89:
88:
85:
81:
80:
76:
75:
70:
66:
65:
62:
58:
57:
52:
51:Full case name
48:
47:
42:
38:
37:
32:
24:
23:
15:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
680:
669:
666:
664:
661:
659:
656:
654:
651:
650:
648:
628:
624:
617:
609:
605:
601:
594:
580:
576:
569:
555:
551:
545:
531:
527:
521:
513:
509:
505:
498:
484:
480:
474:
460:
456:
450:
444:
439:
437:
435:
433:
431:
429:
414:
410:
404:
402:
386:
382:
376:
368:
362:
356:
351:
343:
339:
335:
328:
322:
317:
309:
303:
299:
291:
290:
281:
279:
269:
261:
258:
255:
254:
253:
251:
246:
245:Supreme Court
242:
229:
226:
222:
219:
216:
215:
214:
211:
209:
208:Circuit Court
200:
197:
193:
190:
187:
183:
182:
181:
178:
173:
171:
170:Permanent TSB
167:
157:
155:
154:Circuit Court
151:
147:
146:
135:
130:
126:
122:
116:
113:Case opinions
111:
107:
103:
98:
95:Supreme Court
94:
90:
86:
84:Appealed from
82:
77:
74:
71:
67:
63:
59:
56:
53:
49:
46:
43:
39:
35:
30:
25:
20:
630:. Retrieved
626:
616:
607:
603:
593:
582:. Retrieved
578:
568:
557:. Retrieved
553:
544:
533:. Retrieved
529:
520:
511:
507:
497:
486:. Retrieved
482:
473:
462:. Retrieved
459:app.vlex.com
458:
449:
416:. Retrieved
412:
389:. Retrieved
387:. 2017-12-13
384:
375:
361:
350:
341:
337:
327:
316:
302:
287:
277:
275:
266:
238:
212:
205:
176:
174:
163:
144:
143:
142:
79:Case history
54:
526:"JustisOne"
202:assessment?
124:Decision by
92:Appealed to
647:Categories
632:2023-01-30
584:2019-11-15
579:www.rdj.ie
559:2019-11-15
535:2019-11-15
488:2019-11-15
464:2023-01-30
418:2023-01-30
391:2019-11-15
385:SCOIRLBLOG
294:References
160:Background
127:Clarke CJ
166:mortgage
132:Keywords
69:Citation
185:reason?
61:Decided
455:"vLex"
252::
168:with
41:Court
413:vLex
239:The
224:Act.
276:In
220:No.
649::
625:.
606:.
602:.
577:.
552:.
528:.
510:.
506:.
481:.
457:.
427:^
411:.
400:^
383:.
340:.
336:.
635:.
608:1
587:.
562:.
538:.
512:1
491:.
467:.
421:.
394:.
342:1
310:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
