131:
184:
202:
210:
At this point, the pedestrians' "Cross" signal began to flash. After a few seconds, the "Cross" light started to flash faster and the red traffic light was changed to a flashing amber (this "flashing" phase was considered distinct from the initial "pulsating" amber light). The "Cross" light flashed increasingly fast as crossing time ran out, and the traffic was allowed to proceed during the flashing amber phase if the crossing was clear. Eventually, all lights were extinguished as the crossing reset.
27:
230:, was introduced. The new system was not phased in gradually by replacement, rather the pandas were removed seemingly as a matter of urgency. The replacement was so urgent that although the X-way lights replaced the panda crossing lights, the road initially retained the black-and-white triangular markings until they could be removed at a later date.
195:. For distinction, the panda road pattern was different (triangles rather than stripes) and the beacons were striped, not plain. The main additions were the light signals on the beacon poles. The traffic signals consisted of two lamps, red and amber, while the pedestrians had a single signal displaying the word "Cross" when appropriate.
155:
design was not considered safe enough for busy roads and could create traffic delays as pedestrians crossed whenever they wanted. Off-the-shelf light-controlled systems were available but were too expensive for widespread use. Some cities had innovated with their own one-off crossings but the lack of
209:
The system allowed for a pause between crossings in order to avoid traffic delays, and so the pedestrian might wait a while before anything happened. The amber traffic light would pulsate for a few seconds to inform motorists that someone was about to cross; a red light was then the signal to stop.
213:
The panda crossing deliberately omitted any sort of "Don't cross" message for pedestrians in order to avoid breaching the aforementioned right-of-way laws. The measured pause between crossings helped to keep traffic flowing. The light sequence also prevented long delays by allowing traffic to move
222:
While the panda crossing was still being rolled out, the
Ministry of Transport also trialled a "Controlled Traffic Area" which legally restricted when and where pedestrians could cross. This met a widely negative response from the press and the trial abandoned after a year.
214:
after a few seconds if nobody was crossing. However, despite its apparent rationality, the design was not a success. In particular, the distinction between the flashing and pulsating amber phases was subtle yet highly significant.
156:
standardisation was considered a safety issue. Furthermore, all existing signalled crossings tended to have two major drawbacks: stopping traffic for long periods of time and appearing to violate contemporary
163:
The panda crossing was introduced in 1962 as an attempt to combine the best features of available and experimental crossing systems. The first public example was opened on 2 April of that year outside
198:
In the idle state, no lights were lit. A pedestrian wanting to cross would press a button on the beacon pole and be instructed to wait by an illuminated sign near the button.
320:
288:
351:
377:
255:
175:
where ten crossings were converted. Further sites across
England and Wales increased the size of the experiment to more than forty sites in all.
443:
481:
160:
law by signalling "Don't cross" to pedestrians (in reality: the 'Don't Cross' indication was not a legally enforceable instruction).
233:
Although the original version of the X-way was also short-lived, it survived with minor modifications to become the more successful
549:
618:
144:
91:
63:
406:
436:
328:
151:, was looking for a way to make pedestrian crossings safer under increasingly heavy traffic conditions. The successful
292:
226:
By 1967, the panda crossing was a matter of concern for the
Ministry of Transport, and so a new type of crossing, the
70:
110:
191:
The layout was superficially similar to a traditional zebra crossing, with a painted area on the road announced by
486:
164:
44:
77:
48:
613:
429:
410:
157:
511:
59:
623:
355:
381:
263:
415:
183:
628:
127:
was a type of signal-controlled pedestrian crossing used in the United
Kingdom from 1962 to 1967.
37:
227:
130:
201:
172:
84:
466:
8:
476:
452:
506:
496:
491:
234:
538:
559:
516:
501:
592:
544:
521:
192:
152:
148:
607:
587:
565:
554:
421:
168:
167:. The majority of the initial sites used for this experiment were in
237:, which was introduced in 1969 and remains in widespread use today.
26:
582:
187:
The driver's view of a Panda crossing beacon in the "stop" phase
171:
where all thirteen existing crossings were converted, and in
291:. BBC News. Associated Press. 2 April 1962. Archived from
205:
A pedestrian pressing the call button for a Panda crossing
409:- leaflet produced by the Ministry of Transport via the
314:
312:
310:
321:"Pedestrian Crossings: Harebrained and Most Dangerous"
307:
217:
51:. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed.
416:Interactive Panda Crossing Light Sequence (Flash)
605:
370:
380:. roads.org.uk (Chris Marshall). Archived from
354:. roads.org.uk (Chris Marshall). Archived from
283:
281:
343:
437:
289:"1962: New pedestrian crossings cause chaos"
278:
256:"Pedestrian Crossings: A Lesson in patience"
134:A man crossing the road at a Panda crossing
482:Pedestrian crossings in the United Kingdom
444:
430:
349:
318:
253:
378:"Pedestrian Crossings: Green man at last"
352:"Pedestrian Crossings: A risky operation"
111:Learn how and when to remove this message
451:
200:
182:
129:
550:Embedded pavement flashing-light system
178:
606:
407:Panda Crossings: operation and signals
425:
418:- from Chris's British Road Directory
49:adding citations to reliable sources
20:
13:
218:Alternative systems and successors
14:
640:
400:
143:In the early-1960s, the British
25:
487:Pedestrian separation structure
165:London Waterloo railway station
36:needs additional citations for
247:
1:
619:Walking in the United Kingdom
411:Central Office of Information
240:
138:
7:
16:Type of pedestrian crossing
10:
645:
575:
530:
459:
206:
188:
135:
204:
186:
145:Ministry of Transport
133:
614:Pedestrian crossings
467:Guerrilla crosswalks
453:Pedestrian crossings
179:Design and operation
45:improve this article
477:Pedestrian scramble
624:1962 introductions
207:
189:
136:
601:
600:
331:on 31 August 2018
266:on 31 August 2018
121:
120:
113:
95:
636:
497:Pelican crossing
492:Pegasus crossing
446:
439:
432:
423:
422:
394:
393:
391:
389:
374:
368:
367:
365:
363:
350:Chris Marshall.
347:
341:
340:
338:
336:
327:. Archived from
319:Chris Marshall.
316:
305:
304:
302:
300:
285:
276:
275:
273:
271:
262:. Archived from
254:Chris Marshall.
251:
235:pelican crossing
116:
109:
105:
102:
96:
94:
60:"Panda crossing"
53:
29:
21:
644:
643:
639:
638:
637:
635:
634:
633:
629:1962 neologisms
604:
603:
602:
597:
571:
560:Portland Orange
526:
517:Toucan crossing
502:Puffin crossing
455:
450:
403:
398:
397:
387:
385:
376:
375:
371:
361:
359:
358:on 18 June 2024
348:
344:
334:
332:
317:
308:
298:
296:
287:
286:
279:
269:
267:
252:
248:
243:
220:
193:Belisha beacons
181:
141:
117:
106:
100:
97:
54:
52:
42:
30:
17:
12:
11:
5:
642:
632:
631:
626:
621:
616:
599:
598:
596:
595:
593:Tactile paving
590:
585:
579:
577:
573:
572:
570:
569:
562:
557:
552:
547:
545:Belisha beacon
542:
534:
532:
528:
527:
525:
524:
522:Zebra crossing
519:
514:
512:Tiger crossing
509:
504:
499:
494:
489:
484:
479:
474:
472:Panda crossing
469:
463:
461:
457:
456:
449:
448:
441:
434:
426:
420:
419:
413:
402:
401:External links
399:
396:
395:
384:on 6 June 2024
369:
342:
306:
295:on 22 May 2012
277:
245:
244:
242:
239:
219:
216:
180:
177:
153:zebra crossing
149:Ernest Marples
140:
137:
125:panda crossing
119:
118:
33:
31:
24:
15:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
641:
630:
627:
625:
622:
620:
617:
615:
612:
611:
609:
594:
591:
589:
588:Refuge island
586:
584:
581:
580:
578:
576:Other aspects
574:
568:
567:
563:
561:
558:
556:
553:
551:
548:
546:
543:
541:
540:
539:Ampelmännchen
536:
535:
533:
529:
523:
520:
518:
515:
513:
510:
508:
505:
503:
500:
498:
495:
493:
490:
488:
485:
483:
480:
478:
475:
473:
470:
468:
465:
464:
462:
458:
454:
447:
442:
440:
435:
433:
428:
427:
424:
417:
414:
412:
408:
405:
404:
383:
379:
373:
357:
353:
346:
330:
326:
322:
315:
313:
311:
294:
290:
284:
282:
265:
261:
257:
250:
246:
238:
236:
231:
229:
224:
215:
211:
203:
199:
196:
194:
185:
176:
174:
170:
166:
161:
159:
154:
150:
146:
132:
128:
126:
115:
112:
104:
93:
90:
86:
83:
79:
76:
72:
69:
65:
62: –
61:
57:
56:Find sources:
50:
46:
40:
39:
34:This article
32:
28:
23:
22:
19:
564:
537:
471:
386:. Retrieved
382:the original
372:
360:. Retrieved
356:the original
345:
333:. Retrieved
329:the original
325:Roads.org.uk
324:
297:. Retrieved
293:the original
268:. Retrieved
264:the original
260:Roads.org.uk
259:
249:
232:
225:
221:
212:
208:
197:
190:
162:
158:right-of-way
147:, headed by
142:
124:
122:
107:
98:
88:
81:
74:
67:
55:
43:Please help
38:verification
35:
18:
555:HAWK beacon
608:Categories
241:References
139:Background
71:newspapers
566:XiaolĂĽren
460:Crossings
335:30 August
270:30 August
169:Guildford
583:Curb cut
362:2 August
101:May 2012
388:29 July
173:Lincoln
85:scholar
531:Lights
507:Subway
87:
80:
73:
66:
58:
299:4 May
228:X-way
92:JSTOR
78:books
390:2024
364:2024
337:2018
301:2012
272:2018
123:The
64:news
47:by
610::
323:.
309:^
280:^
258:.
445:e
438:t
431:v
392:.
366:.
339:.
303:.
274:.
114:)
108:(
103:)
99:(
89:·
82:·
75:·
68:·
41:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
