Knowledge

Karnoski v. Trump

Source 📝

449:), namely either that Secretary Mattis could exercise his independent authority to implement a further delay on accession of transgender candidates, or that the injunction could be narrowly restricted to allow the accession only of the Plaintiffs found to have standing. The Plaintiffs and the State of Washington filed opposing motions on December 19, 2017, stating "the constitutional defects in the accession ban cannot be cured by merely having another government official re-authorize its extension, even if acting on a supposedly independent basis" and noting that "hough the first ruling was over six weeks ago, Defendants waited until late last week to seek an emergency stay. In the meantime, Defendants issued detailed guidance to the military on how to comply with the court rulings, guidance that will come as no surprise given that the military has been preparing to allow accession of transgender individuals for 18 months." In the reply to support the motion to dismiss filed on December 20, USDOJ argued that "Plaintiffs cannot plausibly characterize as irrational the current accession policy—a rule that, until 2016, was upheld by military leadership under every president for decades. The mere fact that this policy was revised by former-Secretary Carter cannot foreclose Secretary Mattis and President Trump from reconsidering its validity." The day after Judge Pechman rejected the motion for clarification, USDOJ applied to withdraw their appeal with the 9th Circuit, which was granted. 342:, the Plaintiffs filed an opposing motion replying to the motion to dismiss, stating "The government's defense is most notable for what it lacks: factual support to justify the Ban. Instead, Defendants assert that courts must defer to the military in military affairs. But it is difficult to imagine a situation where the extraordinary deference sought by the government would be less appropriate than here, where the President has discarded the military's own considered judgment without any factual support for doing so." USDOJ filed a response in support of dismissal on November 9, again asserting that since the issue was still being studied, "it remains uncertain whether Plaintiffs will suffer a cognizable injury caused by the military's future policy." 491:
policy, like the Carter policy before it, would turn on the medical condition of gender dysphoria and contains a nuanced set of exceptions allowing some transgender individuals, including many Plaintiffs here, to serve." The court denied the motion on April 13, 2018, holding that "Each of the claims ... remains viable," and that "because transgender people have long been subjected to systemic oppression and forced to live in silence, they are a protected class. ... This means that before Defendants can implement the Ban, they must show that it was sincerely motivated by compelling interests, rather than by prejudice or stereotype, and that it is narrowly tailored to achieve those interests."
474:"significant advance notice" prior to the filing of the motion for summary judgment, but "Defendants took no steps to obtain any discovery whatsoever in the two months before their opposition deadline." The State of Washington, as the Intervenor, wrote "the Rule 56(d) request appears to be a strategy to buy time until defendants can finalize and produce the new "study" that they hope will provide the missing support for the Ban." On February 21, Judge Pechman denied the USDOJ motion to continue the motion for summary judgment, and ordered USDOJ to file any opposition to the motion for summary judgment within seven days. 338:. In the motion to dismiss, USDOJ called the challenge "premature several times over", asserting the Presidential Memorandum of August 25 merely ordered further studies and no policy changes would be implemented before March 18. In addition, USDOJ argued Secretary Mattis's Interim Guidance of September 14 prevented the involuntary discharge of any Service member on the basis of transgender status, and would continue to provide medical treatment to Service members who were diagnosed with gender dysphoria. Several days after the preliminary injunction was granted in 2484: 426:
opposition briefs to the Motion for Clarification on December 27, 2017. Judge Pechman rejected the appeal on December 29, writing that "Secretary Mattis does not have authority to effectuate an unconstitutional policy, and certainly not one which has been enjoined" and "Defendants have provided no evidence that the accessions criteria for transgender enlistees are any more complex or burdensome than the criteria for non-transgender enlistees."
466:
constitutional scrutiny when examined against that record." The State of Washington also filed a motion for summary judgment, noting "Defendants have simply presented no evidence whatsoever that military readiness and unit cohesion are actually put at risk by open service by transgender service members" and "the challenged policy undermines the important governmental interest purportedly served by the discriminatory policy."
487: 503:, along with a motion to stay the injunction and allow the ban to go into effect while their appeal was pending. A few days later on May 4, the defendants also asked the 9th Circuit for a stay pending appeal. Judge Pechman denied the stay on June 15, and the 9th Circuit denied the stay on July 19. The appellate court heard oral argument on October 10, 2018. 417:, 453 U.S. 57 (1981). The Order granted in part the Defendants' motion to dismiss as the Plaintiffs' Amended Complaint had not properly plead the procedural due process claim, but the Order also denied the other claims in the motion to dismiss and granted the motion for preliminary injunction in full. 490:
on March 23, 2018. On March 29, the defendants moved to dissolve the preliminary injunction, contending that any deficiencies in the original 2017 memorandum were now moot, and that the new policy was constitutional. The motion argued: "Far from a categorical ban based on transgender status, this new
31: 313:
The State of Washington filed a motion to intervene in the case "to protect its quasi-sovereign, proprietary, and sovereign interests from a policy that unconstitutionally targets transgender Washingtonians" on September 25, 2017. The Court granted the motion to intervene in an Order issued November
477:
The next day, the Plaintiffs filed a motion to compel initial disclosures from the Defendants, asking the Court to force the Defendants to identify the individuals, documents, and information that would be used to support their defense. On July 27, the court granted the motion to compel, and denied
425:
On December 14, 2017, USDOJ filed a notice declaring its intent to appeal the preliminary injunction. A Motion for Clarification and partial stay was filed the next day asking the same questions as the motion for emergency stay with the 9th Circuit. Both the plaintiffs and State of Washington filed
404:
issued a preliminary injunction blocking the Presidential Memorandum of August 25, stating the "Defendants have failed to demonstrate that the policy prohibiting transgender individuals from serving openly is substantially related to important government interests" and "the prohibition on military
305:
protects against unequal treatment by the federal government and protects against the deprivation "of life, liberty, and property"; and under the First Amendment, the ban on transgender service was stated to violate the plaintiffs' rights to free expression and association. The suit was amended on
473:
for the declarants in support of the motion were scheduled for mid-to-late March, saying the "lack of a fair opportunity to test these asserted facts will necessarily hinter Defendants' efforts to oppose Plaintiffs' and intervenor's summary judgment motions." The Plaintiffs noted that USDOJ had
465:
factual support that could not have actually motivated President Trump's decision because it did not exist when the decision was made. Instead, the Ban must be measured against the state of affairs that existed on July 26, 2017—and this Court has already confirmed that the Ban fails any level of
461:, arguing that "this Court concluded that the Ban was unsupported by any adequate justification; indeed, it also found that the proffered justifications were contradicted by the extant evidence, including the military's own comprehensive review. Defendants cannot rectify this deficiency with 374:
The Court concludes that the policy set forth in the Presidential Memorandum constitutes . The policy directly interferes with Plaintiffs' ability to define and express their gender identity, and penalizes Plaintiffs for exercising their fundamental right to do so openly by depriving them of
517:
On June 14, 2019, the Ninth Circuit Court issued a decision unanimously holding that the administration's ban targeted transgender people. Nevertheless, the 9th Circuit vacated the district court's ruling, holding that the differences between the 2017 and 2018 memoranda were sufficiently
381:
The policy penalizes transgender service members—but not others—for disclosing their gender identity, and is therefore a content-based restriction. Even giving the government the benefit of a more deferential standard of review under Brown, 444 U.S. at 355, the policy does not
510:, asking the Court to accept the case for review immediately, without waiting for the 9th Circuit to decide their appeal. The Supreme Court denied the petition on January 22, 2019, but issued a 5-4 order, split along ideological lines, that lifted the stay on the order while 300:
The complaint sought an immediate injunction based on the First and Fifth Amendments, and described the ban on transgender service as "ripping with animus" and "unsupported by any compelling, important, or even rational justification". Under the Fifth Amendment, the
275:
Trump first announced a policy banning transgender people from serving in the military in "any capacity" in a series of tweets on July 26, 2017, stating that allowing such service members would incur "tremendous medical costs and disruption". The decision reversed
1998: 690: 289: 353:
providing a preliminary injunction to the implementation of the Presidential Memorandum. Both the State of Washington and the Plaintiffs filed motions opposing the stay on November 9. The motion to stay was denied on November 11.
405:
service by transgender individuals was announced by President Trump on Twitter, abruptly and without any evidence of considered reason or deliberation. (See Dkt. No. 30 at ¶¶ 172-184.) The policy is therefore not entitled to
363:
Not only did the DoD previously conclude that allowing transgender individuals to serve openly would not impact military effectiveness and readiness, the working group tasked to evaluate the issue also concluded that
2188: 2315: 2310: 698: 2208: 2247: 2197: 2181: 1094: 2224: 442: 179: 42: 1305:; Plaintiffs-Appellees' Opposition to Defendants-Appellants' Emergency Motion Under Circuit Rule 27-3 for Administrative Stay and Motion for Stay Pending Appeal, Case No. 17-36009" 2174: 2488: 345:
On November 7, USDOJ filed a motion requesting a stay of proceedings, arguing "this Court should stay further proceedings in this case while the preliminary injunction in
1069:; Order Granting in Part and Denying in Part Defendants' Motion to Dismiss & Order Granting Plaintiffs' Motion for Preliminary Injunction, Case No. 2:17-cv-1297-MJP" 2530: 2431: 720: 581: 2252: 2090: 2363: 1215:; State of Washington's Response to Defendants' Motion for Clarification or Partial Stay of Preliminary Injunction Pending Appeal, Case No. 2:17-cv-1297-MJP" 434: 874:; Plaintiffs' Opposition to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss and Reply in Support of Plaintiffs' Motion for Preliminary Injunction, Case No. 2:17-cv-1297-MJP" 500: 430: 2297: 539: 2525: 1710: 323: 1186:; Plaintiff's Opposition to Defendants' Motion for Clarification and Partial Stay of Preliminary Injunction Pending Appeal, Case No. 2:17-cv-1297-MJP" 2520: 209: 2239: 2058: 990:; State of Washington's Response to Defendants' Notice of Supplemental Authority and Request for a Stay of Proceedings, Case No. 2:17-cv-1297-MJP" 1537:; Plaintiff's Reply to Defendant's Rule 56(d) Response to Plaintiff's and Intervenor's Motions for Summary Judgment, Case No. 2:17-cv-1297-MJP" 755: 1239: 1210: 2355: 1875: 285: 106: 1934: 2515: 368:
open service would have negative impacts including loss of qualified personnel, erosion of unit cohesion, and erosion of trust in command.
264: 244: 284:
to begin July 1, but was delayed by Defense Secretary Mattis. Trump issued formal guidance on the ban to the Secretaries of Defense and
1181: 985: 2414: 2305: 927: 326:(USDOJ) filed a motion to dismiss on October 16, 2017, repeating arguments made in similar motions to dismiss for the related suits 1742: 1329: 1300: 811: 2035: 1334:; State of Washington Response to Emergency Motion for Administrative Stay and Motion for Stay Pending Appeal, Case No. 17-36009" 1271: 534: 1148: 1619: 781: 1244:; Order Denying Motion for Clarification and Partial Stay of Preliminary Injunction Pending Appeal, Case No. 2:17-cv-1297-MJP" 2389: 845:; Defendants' Motion to Dismiss and Opposition to Plaintiffs' Motion for a Preliminary Injunction, Case No. 2:17-cv-1297-MJP" 307: 204:
from implementing the proposed ban on military service for transgender people under the auspices of the equal protection and
142: 1813: 1508:; Defendant's Rule 56(d) Response to Plaintiff's and Intervenor's Motions for Summary Judgment, Case No. 2:17-cv-1297-MJP" 1363:; Appellants' Reply In Support of their Motion for Administrative Stay and Partial Stay Pending Appeal, Case No. 17-36009" 1014: 2095: 1276:; Emergency Motion Under Circuit Rule 27-3 for Administrative Stay and Motion for Stay Pending Appeal, Case No. 17-36009" 281: 260: 201: 102: 1416: 1387: 589: 2409: 2160: 1999:"Supreme Court allows Trump restrictions on transgender troops in military to go into effect as legal battle continues" 507: 232: 1590: 1561: 2510: 2469: 869: 2384: 616: 1358: 932:; Defendants' Notice of Supplemental Authority and Request for a Stay of Proceedings, Case No. 2:17-cv-1297-MJP" 433:
on December 15, 2017. In the motion, USDOJ made similar arguments as those filed earlier in December before the
2535: 1064: 648: 1119: 840: 1532: 1503: 1846: 1784: 1755: 1680: 1648: 1474: 898: 2279: 1095:"Third federal district court orders Trump administration to allow transgenders to serve in US military" 2145: 956: 1019:; Notice of Supplemental Authority in Further Support of Plaintiffs' Supplemental Briefing Regarding 1789:; Defendants' Motion to Stay Preliminary Injunction Pending Appeal, Civil Action No. 17-cv-1297-MJP" 1653:; Order Granting Motion to Compel; Denying Motion for Protective Order, Case No. 2:17-cv-1297-MJP" 2285: 1908: 1445: 1969: 1760:; Defendants' Notice of Appeal – Preliminary Injunction Appeal, Civil Action No. 17-cv-1297-MJP" 2166: 2121: 2025: 2445: 2399: 2269: 1685:; Defendants' Motion to Dissolve the Preliminary Injunction, Civil Action No. 17-cv-1297-MJP" 721:"Presidential Memorandum for the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of Homeland Security" 280:
policy to allow the enlistment of transgender personnel, which was initially approved by the
217: 213: 138: 134: 518:"significant" that the lower court was required to consider the 2018 memorandum separately. 2229: 760:; First Amended Complaint for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief, Case No. 2:17-cv-1297-MJP" 277: 1624:; Plaintiffs' Motion to Compel Defendants' Initial Disclosures, Case No. 2:17-cv-1297-MJP" 1566:; Reply in Support of Washington's Motion for Summary Judgment, Case No. 2:17-cv-1297-MJP" 649:
Recent Social Media Posts: In Tweets, President Purports to Ban Transgender Servicemembers
8: 2321: 2259: 2003: 412: 1851:; Order Denying Motion to Stay Preliminary Injunction, Civil Action No. 17-cv-1297-MJP" 1153:; Defendants' Motion for Clarification and, if necessary, a Partial Stay of Prliminary 653: 302: 205: 2452: 2342: 2274: 1715: 1711:"Document: District Court Upholds Preliminary Injunction on Transgender Military Ban" 903:; Defendants' Reply in Support of Their Motion to Dismiss, Case No. 2:17-cv-1297-MJP" 559: 545: 401: 388: 196: 184: 165: 667: 521:
The case was still pending in district court as of January 25, 2021, when President
1946: 1023:, No. 17-cv-01597-CKK (D.D.C. Oct. 30, 2017), Civil Action No. 5:17-CV-1799-JGB-KK" 458: 248: 81: 2438: 470: 252: 88: 961:; Plaintiffs' Opposition to Defendants' Stay Request, Case No. 2:17-cv-1297-MJP" 688: 349:
remains in place", referring to the October 30 Order by Judge Kollar-Kotelly in
2328: 2264: 2068: 725: 552: 190: 691:"Trump's transgender military ban sparks outrage, applause from Hampton Roads" 2504: 2394: 2063: 225: 2439:
Unfriendly Fire: How the Gay Ban Undermines the Military and Weakens America
2030: 236: 221: 67: 61: 2379: 1595:; Order Denying Defendants' Rule 56(d) Motion, Case No. 2:17-cv-1297-MJP" 621:; Complaint for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief, Case No. 2:17-cv-1297" 231:
In addition to President Trump, the amended suit named as defendants the
469:
In their reply, USDOJ challenged the motion for summary judgment as the
212:. The suit was filed on the behalf of three transgender plaintiffs, the 1974: 786:; State of Washington's Motion to Intervene, Case No. 2:17-cv-1297-MJP" 240: 74: 1479:; Washington's Motion for Summary Judgment, Case No. 2:17-cv-1297-MJP" 689:
Mabeus, Courtney; Hafner, Katherine; Sidersky, Robyn (July 26, 2017).
1450:; Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment, Case No. 2:17-cv-1297-MJP" 522: 256: 95: 30: 429:
Meanwhile, USDOJ also filed a motion for an emergency stay with the
2404: 180:
United States District Court for the Western District of Washington
178:(2:17-cv-01297-MJP) was a lawsuit filed on August 29, 2017, in the 43:
United States District Court for the Western District of Washington
499:
On April 30, 2018, the defendants filed a notice of appeal to the
306:
September 14, 2017, to add six more transgender personnel and the
816:; Order Granting Motion to Intervene, Case No. 2:17-cv-1297-MJP" 2196: 2161:
Trump memorandum on Military Service by Transgender Individuals
582:"ACLU sues Trump over 'political' ban on transgender soldiers" 2091:"Biden Administration Overturns Transgender Exclusion Policy" 2059:"Trump Ban on Transgender Soldiers Returns to District Court" 1392:; Notice of voluntary dismissal of appeal, Case No. 17-36009" 525:
issued an executive order revoking Trump's transgender ban.
738: 2432:
Conduct Unbecoming: Gays and Lesbians in the U.S. Military
1124:; Defendants' Notice of Appeal, Case No. 2:17-cv-1297-MJP" 668:"Trump: Transgender people 'can't serve' in US military" 317: 1675: 1673: 1157:
Injunction Pending Appeal, Case No. 2:17-cv-1297-MJP"
1092: 1059: 1057: 2057:
Pazanowski, Bernie; Mulvaney, Erin (June 14, 2019).
1939:; Petition for a Writ of Certiorari Before Judgment" 514:
and the related cases were still being deliberated.
501:
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
100:
in capacity as acting Secretary of Homeland Security
93:
in capacity as acting Secretary of Homeland Security
1266: 1264: 750: 748: 540:
Transgender personnel in the United States military
2146:"Cameras in Courts: Karnoski et al v. Trump et al" 2056: 1849:Ryan Karnoski, et. al. v. Donald J. Trump, et. al. 1787:Ryan Karnoski, et. al. v. Donald J. Trump, et. al. 1758:Ryan Karnoski, et. al. v. Donald J. Trump, et. al. 1702: 1683:Ryan Karnoski, et. al. v. Donald J. Trump, et. al. 1670: 1612: 1583: 1554: 1525: 1496: 1467: 1438: 1409: 1232: 1203: 1174: 1141: 1112: 1054: 809: 611: 609: 607: 324:United States Department of Justice Civil Division 2531:Transgender people and the United States military 1997:Barnes, Robert; Lamothe, Dan (January 22, 2019). 1322: 1293: 978: 949: 920: 891: 862: 833: 803: 2502: 1261: 1007: 774: 745: 1818:, No. 18-35347; Motion for Stay Pending Appeal" 1380: 1351: 604: 478:the defendants' motion for a protective order. 457:On January 25, 2018, the Plaintiffs moved for 2182: 1996: 1651:Karnoski, et. al. v. Donald J. Trump, et. al. 1622:Karnoski, et. al. v. Donald J. Trump, et. al. 1593:Karnoski, et. al. v. Donald J. Trump, et. al. 1564:Karnoski, et. al. v. Donald J. Trump, et. al. 1535:Karnoski, et. al. v. Donald J. Trump, et. al. 1506:Karnoski, et. al. v. Donald J. Trump, et. al. 1477:Karnoski, et. al. v. Donald J. Trump, et. al. 1448:Karnoski, et. al. v. Donald J. Trump, et. al. 1419:Karnoski, et. al. v. Donald J. Trump, et. al. 1390:Karnoski, et. al. v. Donald J. Trump, et. al. 1361:Karnoski, et. al. v. Donald J. Trump, et. al. 1332:Karnoski, et. al. v. Donald J. Trump, et. al. 1303:Karnoski, et. al. v. Donald J. Trump, et. al. 1274:Karnoski, et. al. v. Donald J. Trump, et. al. 1242:Karnoski, et. al. v. Donald J. Trump, et. al. 1213:Karnoski, et. al. v. Donald J. Trump, et. al. 1184:Karnoski, et. al. v. Donald J. Trump, et. al. 1151:Karnoski, et. al. v. Donald J. Trump, et. al. 1122:Karnoski, et. al. v. Donald J. Trump, et. al. 1067:Karnoski, et. al. v. Donald J. Trump, et. al. 1017:Stockman, et. al. v. Donald J. Trump, et. al. 988:Karnoski, et. al. v. Donald J. Trump, et. al. 959:Karnoski, et. al. v. Donald J. Trump, et. al. 930:Karnoski, et. al. v. Donald J. Trump, et. al. 901:Karnoski, et. al. v. Donald J. Trump, et. al. 872:Karnoski, et. al. v. Donald J. Trump, et. al. 843:Karnoski, et. al. v. Donald J. Trump, et. al. 814:Karnoski, et. al. v. Donald J. Trump, et. al. 784:Karnoski, et. al. v. Donald J. Trump, et. al. 758:Karnoski, et. al. v. Donald J. Trump, et. al. 619:Karnoski, et. al. v. Donald J. Trump, et. al. 506:On November 7, the defendants petitioned the 107:United States Department of Homeland Security 86:In capacity as Secretary of Homeland Security 65:In capacity as President of the United States 660: 579: 265:United States Secretary of Homeland Security 2198:LGBT+ people and the United States military 1093:Correll, Diana Stancy (December 11, 2017). 713: 2189: 2175: 395:, Case 17-cv-01297-MJP (December 11, 2017) 29: 2526:United States transgender rights case law 2415:Transgender American Veterans Association 791:. Equality Case Files. September 25, 2017 357: 2521:Transgender history in the United States 2088: 1629:. Equality Case Files. February 22, 2018 1600:. Equality Case Files. February 21, 2018 1571:. Equality Case Files. February 12, 2018 1542:. Equality Case Files. February 12, 2018 1513:. Equality Case Files. February 16, 2018 1426:. Equality Case Files. December 30, 2017 1397:. Equality Case Files. December 29, 2017 1249:. Equality Case Files. December 29, 2017 1220:. Equality Case Files. December 27, 2017 1191:. Equality Case Files. December 27, 2017 1162:. Equality Case Files. December 15, 2017 1129:. Equality Case Files. December 14, 2017 1074:. Equality Case Files. December 11, 2017 1028:. Equality Case Files. November 14, 2017 810:Pechman, Marsha J. (November 27, 2017). 120:Laura Garza (on behalf of D.L., a minor) 2036:Lambda Legal Defense and Education Fund 1484:. Equality Case Files. January 25, 2018 1455:. Equality Case Files. January 25, 2018 995:. Equality Case Files. November 9, 2017 966:. Equality Case Files. November 9, 2017 937:. Equality Case Files. November 7, 2017 908:. Equality Case Files. November 9, 2017 879:. Equality Case Files. November 1, 2017 850:. Equality Case Files. October 16, 2017 535:List of lawsuits involving Donald Trump 481: 2503: 1051:, 444 U.S. 348 (1980). 2390:American Military Partner Association 2170: 375:employment and career opportunities. 318:Defendant motions to dismiss and stay 308:American Military Partner Association 143:American Military Partner Association 1708: 645: 2516:United States LGBTQ rights case law 452: 261:United States Department of Defense 182:. The suit, like the similar suits 103:United States Department of Defense 79:In capacity as Secretary of Defense 72:In capacity as Secretary of Defense 13: 2410:American Veterans for Equal Rights 2089:Garamone, Jim (January 25, 2021). 762:. Lambda Legal. September 14, 2017 508:Supreme Court of the United States 494: 14: 2547: 2114: 2483: 2482: 2470:LGBT people and military service 1741: (W.D. Wash. 2018), 1709:Ford, William (April 17, 2018). 580:Larson, Erik (August 28, 2017). 200:, sought to block Trump and top 91:(replacing Nielsen, now removed) 16:Lawsuit filed on August 29, 2017 2385:Veterans Benevolent Association 2082: 2050: 2018: 1990: 1962: 1927: 1901: 1868: 1839: 1806: 1777: 1748: 1730: 1641: 1086: 1040: 627:. Lambda Legal. August 28, 2017 486:Meanwhile, Donald Trump issued 290:a memorandum on August 25, 2017 53:Pending (filed August 29, 2017) 24:Karnoski, et al v. Trump, et al 682: 639: 573: 245:Secretary of Homeland Security 1: 1909:"18-35347, Karnoski v. Trump" 566: 488:a new Presidential Memorandum 270: 2148:. United States Courts. 2017 1368:. 9th Cir. December 20, 2017 1339:. 9th Cir. December 19, 2017 1310:. 9th Cir. December 19, 2017 1281:. 9th Cir. December 15, 2017 400:On December 11, 2017, Judge 7: 1421:; Order, Case No. 17-36009" 588:. Bloomberg. Archived from 528: 310:to the list of plaintiffs. 10: 2552: 2096:U.S. Department of Defense 420: 295: 2478: 2462: 2423: 2372: 2354: 2296: 2238: 2217: 2204: 670:. BBC News. July 26, 2017 409:deference," referring to 161: 156: 148: 112: 57: 49: 37: 28: 23: 2364:Ban on "hermaphroditism" 2225:LGBT veterans healthcare 647: 2511:Donald Trump litigation 2286:United States v. Marcum 586:San Francisco Chronicle 1880:, No. 18-35347; Order" 398: 358:Preliminary injunction 2536:2017 in LGBTQ history 2446:Coming Out Under Fire 2400:Servicemembers United 2289: (C.A.A.F. 2004) 2280:Don't ask, don't tell 2270:Executive Order 10450 821:. Equality Case Files 361: 282:Department of Defense 218:Gender Justice League 214:Human Rights Campaign 139:Gender Justice League 135:Human Rights Campaign 98:(replacing McAleenan) 2132:. Lambda Legal. 2017 482:New Trump memorandum 278:Obama administration 233:Secretary of Defense 2260:Newport sex scandal 2130:Lambda Legal Legacy 2026:"Karnoski v. Trump" 2004:The Washington Post 1970:"Trump v. Karnoski" 1099:Washington Examiner 695:The Virginian-Pilot 625:Lambda Legal Legacy 592:on November 7, 2017 413:Rostker v. Goldberg 206:due process clauses 2240:Sexual orientation 1978:. January 22, 2019 1950:. November 7, 2018 1915:. October 10, 2018 303:Due Process Clause 202:Pentagon officials 77:(replacing Mattis) 2498: 2497: 2453:OutServe Magazine 2343:Stockman v. Trump 2336:Karnoski v. Trump 2275:Crittenden Report 2163:, August 25, 2017 2124:Karnoski v. Trump 1937:Trump v. Karnoski 1878:Karnoski v. Trump 1816:Karnoski v. Trump 1738:Karnoski v. Trump 739:National Archives 729:. August 25, 2017 560:Stockman v. Trump 546:Jane Doe v. Trump 471:discovery process 447:Jane Doe v. Trump 402:Marsha J. Pechman 389:Marsha J. Pechman 351:Jane Doe v. Trump 336:Stockman v. Trump 328:Jane Doe v. Trump 286:Homeland Security 197:Stockman v. Trump 185:Jane Doe v. Trump 175:Karnoski v. Trump 171: 170: 166:Marsha J. Pechman 152:2:17-cv-01297-MJP 2543: 2486: 2485: 2424:Works on subject 2191: 2184: 2177: 2168: 2167: 2157: 2155: 2153: 2141: 2139: 2137: 2108: 2107: 2105: 2103: 2086: 2080: 2079: 2077: 2075: 2054: 2048: 2047: 2045: 2043: 2022: 2016: 2015: 2013: 2011: 1994: 1988: 1987: 1985: 1983: 1966: 1960: 1959: 1957: 1955: 1947:supremecourt.gov 1943: 1931: 1925: 1924: 1922: 1920: 1913:ca9.uscourts.gov 1905: 1899: 1898: 1896: 1894: 1887:ca9.uscourts.gov 1884: 1872: 1866: 1865: 1863: 1861: 1855: 1843: 1837: 1836: 1834: 1832: 1825:ca9.uscourts.gov 1822: 1810: 1804: 1803: 1801: 1799: 1794:. April 30, 2018 1793: 1781: 1775: 1774: 1772: 1770: 1765:. April 30, 2018 1764: 1752: 1746: 1740: 1734: 1728: 1727: 1725: 1723: 1706: 1700: 1699: 1697: 1695: 1690:. March 29, 2018 1689: 1677: 1668: 1667: 1665: 1663: 1657: 1645: 1639: 1638: 1636: 1634: 1628: 1616: 1610: 1609: 1607: 1605: 1599: 1587: 1581: 1580: 1578: 1576: 1570: 1558: 1552: 1551: 1549: 1547: 1541: 1529: 1523: 1522: 1520: 1518: 1512: 1500: 1494: 1493: 1491: 1489: 1483: 1471: 1465: 1464: 1462: 1460: 1454: 1442: 1436: 1435: 1433: 1431: 1425: 1413: 1407: 1406: 1404: 1402: 1396: 1384: 1378: 1377: 1375: 1373: 1367: 1355: 1349: 1348: 1346: 1344: 1338: 1326: 1320: 1319: 1317: 1315: 1309: 1297: 1291: 1290: 1288: 1286: 1280: 1268: 1259: 1258: 1256: 1254: 1248: 1236: 1230: 1229: 1227: 1225: 1219: 1207: 1201: 1200: 1198: 1196: 1190: 1178: 1172: 1171: 1169: 1167: 1161: 1145: 1139: 1138: 1136: 1134: 1128: 1116: 1110: 1109: 1107: 1105: 1090: 1084: 1083: 1081: 1079: 1073: 1061: 1052: 1050: 1044: 1038: 1037: 1035: 1033: 1027: 1011: 1005: 1004: 1002: 1000: 994: 982: 976: 975: 973: 971: 965: 953: 947: 946: 944: 942: 936: 924: 918: 917: 915: 913: 907: 895: 889: 888: 886: 884: 878: 866: 860: 859: 857: 855: 849: 837: 831: 830: 828: 826: 820: 807: 801: 800: 798: 796: 790: 778: 772: 771: 769: 767: 752: 743: 742: 736: 734: 717: 711: 710: 708: 706: 701:on July 27, 2017 697:. Archived from 686: 680: 679: 677: 675: 664: 658: 657: 651: 643: 637: 636: 634: 632: 613: 602: 601: 599: 597: 577: 459:summary judgment 453:Summary judgment 416: 396: 249:Kirstjen Nielsen 157:Court membership 126:Phillip Stephens 82:Kirstjen Nielsen 45: 33: 21: 20: 2551: 2550: 2546: 2545: 2544: 2542: 2541: 2540: 2501: 2500: 2499: 2494: 2474: 2458: 2419: 2368: 2356:Intersex people 2350: 2292: 2234: 2213: 2200: 2195: 2151: 2149: 2144: 2135: 2133: 2120: 2117: 2112: 2111: 2101: 2099: 2087: 2083: 2073: 2071: 2055: 2051: 2041: 2039: 2038:. June 14, 2019 2024: 2023: 2019: 2009: 2007: 1995: 1991: 1981: 1979: 1968: 1967: 1963: 1953: 1951: 1941: 1933: 1932: 1928: 1918: 1916: 1907: 1906: 1902: 1892: 1890: 1889:. July 18, 2018 1882: 1874: 1873: 1869: 1859: 1857: 1856:. June 15, 2018 1853: 1845: 1844: 1840: 1830: 1828: 1820: 1812: 1811: 1807: 1797: 1795: 1791: 1783: 1782: 1778: 1768: 1766: 1762: 1754: 1753: 1749: 1736: 1735: 1731: 1721: 1719: 1707: 1703: 1693: 1691: 1687: 1679: 1678: 1671: 1661: 1659: 1658:. July 27, 2018 1655: 1647: 1646: 1642: 1632: 1630: 1626: 1618: 1617: 1613: 1603: 1601: 1597: 1589: 1588: 1584: 1574: 1572: 1568: 1560: 1559: 1555: 1545: 1543: 1539: 1531: 1530: 1526: 1516: 1514: 1510: 1502: 1501: 1497: 1487: 1485: 1481: 1473: 1472: 1468: 1458: 1456: 1452: 1444: 1443: 1439: 1429: 1427: 1423: 1415: 1414: 1410: 1400: 1398: 1394: 1386: 1385: 1381: 1371: 1369: 1365: 1357: 1356: 1352: 1342: 1340: 1336: 1328: 1327: 1323: 1313: 1311: 1307: 1299: 1298: 1294: 1284: 1282: 1278: 1270: 1269: 1262: 1252: 1250: 1246: 1238: 1237: 1233: 1223: 1221: 1217: 1209: 1208: 1204: 1194: 1192: 1188: 1180: 1179: 1175: 1165: 1163: 1159: 1147: 1146: 1142: 1132: 1130: 1126: 1118: 1117: 1113: 1103: 1101: 1091: 1087: 1077: 1075: 1071: 1063: 1062: 1055: 1048:Brown v. Glines 1046: 1045: 1041: 1031: 1029: 1025: 1013: 1012: 1008: 998: 996: 992: 984: 983: 979: 969: 967: 963: 955: 954: 950: 940: 938: 934: 926: 925: 921: 911: 909: 905: 897: 896: 892: 882: 880: 876: 868: 867: 863: 853: 851: 847: 839: 838: 834: 824: 822: 818: 808: 804: 794: 792: 788: 780: 779: 775: 765: 763: 754: 753: 746: 732: 730: 719: 718: 714: 704: 702: 687: 683: 673: 671: 666: 665: 661: 656:934 (2018). 644: 640: 630: 628: 615: 614: 605: 595: 593: 578: 574: 569: 531: 497: 495:Further appeals 484: 455: 423: 410: 397: 386: 360: 320: 298: 273: 253:Kevin McAleenan 210:Fifth Amendment 141: 137: 133: 132:Conner Callahan 131: 129: 127: 125: 123: 121: 119: 118:Cathrine Schmid 117: 105: 101: 99: 94: 92: 89:Kevin McAleenan 87: 85: 80: 78: 73: 71: 66: 64: 41: 17: 12: 11: 5: 2549: 2539: 2538: 2533: 2528: 2523: 2518: 2513: 2496: 2495: 2493: 2492: 2479: 2476: 2475: 2473: 2472: 2466: 2464: 2460: 2459: 2457: 2456: 2449: 2442: 2435: 2427: 2425: 2421: 2420: 2418: 2417: 2412: 2407: 2402: 2397: 2392: 2387: 2382: 2376: 2374: 2370: 2369: 2367: 2366: 2360: 2358: 2352: 2351: 2349: 2348: 2347: 2346: 2339: 2332: 2329:Stone v. Trump 2325: 2318: 2313: 2306:Ban on service 2302: 2300: 2294: 2293: 2291: 2290: 2282: 2277: 2272: 2267: 2265:Blue discharge 2262: 2257: 2256: 2255: 2244: 2242: 2236: 2235: 2233: 2232: 2227: 2221: 2219: 2215: 2214: 2212: 2211: 2205: 2202: 2201: 2194: 2193: 2186: 2179: 2171: 2165: 2164: 2158: 2142: 2116: 2115:External links 2113: 2110: 2109: 2081: 2069:Bloomberg L.P. 2049: 2017: 1989: 1961: 1926: 1900: 1867: 1838: 1805: 1776: 1747: 1729: 1701: 1669: 1640: 1611: 1582: 1553: 1524: 1495: 1466: 1437: 1408: 1379: 1350: 1321: 1292: 1260: 1231: 1202: 1173: 1140: 1111: 1085: 1053: 1039: 1006: 977: 948: 919: 890: 861: 832: 802: 773: 744: 726:whitehouse.gov 712: 681: 659: 638: 603: 571: 570: 568: 565: 564: 563: 556: 553:Stone v. Trump 549: 542: 537: 530: 527: 496: 493: 483: 480: 454: 451: 439:Stone v. Trump 422: 419: 384: 359: 356: 332:Stone v. Trump 319: 316: 297: 294: 272: 269: 191:Stone v. Trump 169: 168: 163: 159: 158: 154: 153: 150: 146: 145: 122:Lindsey Muller 114: 110: 109: 59: 55: 54: 51: 47: 46: 39: 35: 34: 26: 25: 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 2548: 2537: 2534: 2532: 2529: 2527: 2524: 2522: 2519: 2517: 2514: 2512: 2509: 2508: 2506: 2491: 2490: 2481: 2480: 2477: 2471: 2468: 2467: 2465: 2461: 2455: 2454: 2450: 2448: 2447: 2443: 2441: 2440: 2436: 2434: 2433: 2429: 2428: 2426: 2422: 2416: 2413: 2411: 2408: 2406: 2403: 2401: 2398: 2396: 2395:Blue Alliance 2393: 2391: 2388: 2386: 2383: 2381: 2378: 2377: 2375: 2373:Organizations 2371: 2365: 2362: 2361: 2359: 2357: 2353: 2345: 2344: 2340: 2338: 2337: 2333: 2331: 2330: 2326: 2324: 2323: 2319: 2317: 2314: 2312: 2309: 2308: 2307: 2304: 2303: 2301: 2299: 2295: 2288: 2287: 2283: 2281: 2278: 2276: 2273: 2271: 2268: 2266: 2263: 2261: 2258: 2254: 2251: 2250: 2249: 2248:Ban on sodomy 2246: 2245: 2243: 2241: 2237: 2231: 2228: 2226: 2223: 2222: 2220: 2216: 2210: 2207: 2206: 2203: 2199: 2192: 2187: 2185: 2180: 2178: 2173: 2172: 2169: 2162: 2159: 2147: 2143: 2131: 2127: 2125: 2119: 2118: 2098: 2097: 2092: 2085: 2070: 2066: 2065: 2064:Bloomberg Law 2060: 2053: 2037: 2033: 2032: 2027: 2021: 2006: 2005: 2000: 1993: 1977: 1976: 1971: 1965: 1949: 1948: 1940: 1938: 1930: 1914: 1910: 1904: 1888: 1881: 1879: 1871: 1852: 1850: 1842: 1827:. May 4, 2018 1826: 1819: 1817: 1809: 1790: 1788: 1780: 1761: 1759: 1751: 1744: 1739: 1733: 1718: 1717: 1712: 1705: 1686: 1684: 1676: 1674: 1654: 1652: 1644: 1625: 1623: 1615: 1596: 1594: 1586: 1567: 1565: 1557: 1538: 1536: 1528: 1509: 1507: 1499: 1480: 1478: 1470: 1451: 1449: 1441: 1422: 1420: 1412: 1393: 1391: 1383: 1364: 1362: 1354: 1335: 1333: 1325: 1306: 1304: 1296: 1277: 1275: 1267: 1265: 1245: 1243: 1235: 1216: 1214: 1206: 1187: 1185: 1177: 1158: 1156: 1155:[sic] 1152: 1144: 1125: 1123: 1115: 1100: 1096: 1089: 1070: 1068: 1060: 1058: 1049: 1043: 1024: 1022: 1018: 1010: 991: 989: 981: 962: 960: 952: 933: 931: 923: 904: 902: 894: 875: 873: 865: 846: 844: 836: 817: 815: 806: 787: 785: 777: 761: 759: 751: 749: 740: 728: 727: 722: 716: 700: 696: 692: 685: 669: 663: 655: 654:Harv. L. Rev. 650: 642: 626: 622: 620: 612: 610: 608: 591: 587: 583: 576: 572: 562: 561: 557: 555: 554: 550: 548: 547: 543: 541: 538: 536: 533: 532: 526: 524: 519: 515: 513: 509: 504: 502: 492: 489: 479: 475: 472: 467: 464: 460: 450: 448: 444: 440: 436: 432: 427: 418: 415: 414: 408: 403: 394: 390: 383: 379: 376: 372: 369: 367: 355: 352: 348: 343: 341: 337: 333: 329: 325: 315: 311: 309: 304: 293: 291: 287: 283: 279: 268: 266: 262: 258: 254: 250: 246: 242: 238: 234: 229: 227: 226:OutServe-SLDN 223: 219: 215: 211: 207: 203: 199: 198: 193: 192: 187: 186: 181: 177: 176: 167: 164: 162:Judge sitting 160: 155: 151: 147: 144: 140: 136: 128:Megan Winters 116:Ryan Karnoski 115: 111: 108: 104: 97: 90: 84:(now removed) 83: 76: 70:(now removed) 69: 63: 60: 56: 52: 48: 44: 40: 36: 32: 27: 22: 19: 2487: 2451: 2444: 2437: 2430: 2341: 2335: 2334: 2327: 2322:Doe v. Trump 2320: 2284: 2209:Bibliography 2152:November 27, 2150:. Retrieved 2134:. Retrieved 2129: 2123: 2102:February 18, 2100:. Retrieved 2094: 2084: 2074:February 18, 2062: 2052: 2042:February 18, 2040:. Retrieved 2031:Lambda Legal 2029: 2020: 2008:. Retrieved 2002: 1992: 1982:February 18, 1980:. Retrieved 1973: 1964: 1954:November 26, 1952:. Retrieved 1945: 1936: 1929: 1919:November 26, 1917:. Retrieved 1912: 1903: 1893:November 26, 1891:. Retrieved 1886: 1877: 1870: 1860:November 26, 1858:. Retrieved 1848: 1841: 1831:November 26, 1829:. Retrieved 1824: 1815: 1808: 1798:November 26, 1796:. Retrieved 1786: 1779: 1769:November 26, 1767:. Retrieved 1757: 1750: 1737: 1732: 1722:November 26, 1720:. Retrieved 1714: 1704: 1694:November 26, 1692:. Retrieved 1682: 1662:November 26, 1660:. Retrieved 1650: 1643: 1631:. Retrieved 1621: 1614: 1602:. Retrieved 1592: 1585: 1573:. Retrieved 1563: 1556: 1544:. Retrieved 1534: 1527: 1515:. Retrieved 1505: 1498: 1486:. Retrieved 1476: 1469: 1457:. Retrieved 1447: 1440: 1428:. Retrieved 1418: 1411: 1401:February 23, 1399:. Retrieved 1389: 1382: 1370:. Retrieved 1360: 1353: 1343:December 27, 1341:. Retrieved 1331: 1324: 1314:December 27, 1312:. Retrieved 1302: 1295: 1285:December 27, 1283:. Retrieved 1273: 1251:. Retrieved 1241: 1234: 1222:. Retrieved 1212: 1205: 1193:. Retrieved 1183: 1176: 1164:. Retrieved 1154: 1150: 1143: 1133:December 18, 1131:. Retrieved 1121: 1114: 1104:December 12, 1102:. Retrieved 1098: 1088: 1078:December 12, 1076:. Retrieved 1066: 1047: 1042: 1030:. Retrieved 1021:Doe v. Trump 1020: 1016: 1009: 999:November 30, 997:. Retrieved 987: 980: 970:November 30, 968:. Retrieved 958: 951: 941:November 30, 939:. Retrieved 929: 922: 912:November 30, 910:. Retrieved 900: 893: 883:November 30, 881:. Retrieved 871: 864: 852:. Retrieved 842: 835: 825:November 30, 823:. Retrieved 813: 805: 793:. Retrieved 783: 776: 764:. Retrieved 757: 737:– via 731:. Retrieved 724: 715: 703:. Retrieved 699:the original 694: 684: 672:. Retrieved 662: 641: 629:. Retrieved 624: 618: 594:. Retrieved 590:the original 585: 575: 558: 551: 544: 520: 516: 511: 505: 498: 485: 476: 468: 462: 456: 446: 443:D.C. Circuit 438: 428: 424: 411: 406: 399: 392: 380: 377: 373: 370: 365: 362: 350: 346: 344: 340:Doe v. Trump 339: 335: 331: 327: 321: 312: 299: 274: 247:(originally 237:James Mattis 235:(originally 230: 222:Lambda Legal 195: 189: 183: 174: 173: 172: 124:Terece Lewis 68:James Mattis 62:Donald Trump 18: 2380:Knights Out 2298:Transgender 2136:November 1, 2010:January 22, 1488:January 29, 1459:January 29, 1430:January 29, 1253:January 29, 1224:January 29, 1195:January 29, 1166:January 29, 1032:December 4, 854:November 6, 795:November 6, 766:November 2, 631:November 2, 596:November 2, 435:4th Circuit 431:9th Circuit 366:prohibiting 263:, and the 2505:Categories 2072:Retrieved 1975:SCOTUSblog 1372:January 2, 733:August 28, 567:References 314:27, 2017. 271:Background 241:Mark Esper 216:, and the 113:Plaintiffs 75:Mark Esper 58:Defendants 2316:2018 Memo 2311:2017 Memo 2230:Section 8 1633:April 23, 523:Joe Biden 257:Chad Wolf 96:Chad Wolf 2489:Category 2463:See also 2405:USNA Out 1604:March 7, 1575:March 7, 1546:March 7, 1517:March 7, 705:July 27, 674:July 27, 529:See also 512:Karnoski 463:post hoc 385:—  382:survive. 239:, later 149:Citation 130:Jane Doe 2218:Overall 1716:Lawfare 421:Appeals 407:Rostker 296:History 259:), the 255:, then 251:, then 208:of the 50:Decided 2253:repeal 652:, 131 646:Note, 441:) and 387:Judge 334:, and 194:, and 1942:(PDF) 1883:(PDF) 1854:(PDF) 1821:(PDF) 1792:(PDF) 1763:(PDF) 1688:(PDF) 1656:(PDF) 1627:(PDF) 1598:(PDF) 1569:(PDF) 1540:(PDF) 1511:(PDF) 1482:(PDF) 1453:(PDF) 1424:(PDF) 1395:(PDF) 1366:(PDF) 1337:(PDF) 1308:(PDF) 1279:(PDF) 1247:(PDF) 1218:(PDF) 1189:(PDF) 1160:(PDF) 1127:(PDF) 1072:(PDF) 1026:(PDF) 993:(PDF) 964:(PDF) 935:(PDF) 906:(PDF) 877:(PDF) 848:(PDF) 819:(PDF) 789:(PDF) 393:Order 38:Court 2154:2017 2138:2017 2104:2023 2076:2023 2044:2023 2012:2019 1984:2023 1956:2018 1921:2018 1895:2018 1862:2018 1833:2018 1800:2018 1771:2018 1743:Text 1724:2018 1696:2018 1664:2018 1635:2018 1606:2018 1577:2018 1548:2018 1519:2018 1490:2018 1461:2018 1432:2018 1403:2018 1374:2018 1345:2017 1316:2017 1287:2017 1255:2018 1226:2018 1197:2018 1168:2018 1135:2017 1106:2017 1080:2017 1034:2017 1001:2017 972:2017 943:2017 914:2017 885:2017 856:2017 827:2017 797:2017 768:2017 735:2017 707:2017 676:2017 633:2017 598:2017 445:(in 437:(in 378:... 371:... 322:The 224:and 347:Doe 288:in 243:), 220:by 2507:: 2128:. 2093:. 2067:. 2061:. 2034:. 2028:. 2001:. 1972:. 1944:. 1911:. 1885:. 1823:. 1713:. 1672:^ 1263:^ 1097:. 1056:^ 747:^ 723:. 693:. 623:. 606:^ 584:. 391:, 330:, 292:. 267:. 228:. 188:, 2190:e 2183:t 2176:v 2156:. 2140:. 2126:" 2122:" 2106:. 2078:. 2046:. 2014:. 1986:. 1958:. 1935:" 1923:. 1897:. 1876:" 1864:. 1847:" 1835:. 1814:" 1802:. 1785:" 1773:. 1756:" 1745:. 1726:. 1698:. 1681:" 1666:. 1649:" 1637:. 1620:" 1608:. 1591:" 1579:. 1562:" 1550:. 1533:" 1521:. 1504:" 1492:. 1475:" 1463:. 1446:" 1434:. 1417:" 1405:. 1388:" 1376:. 1359:" 1347:. 1330:" 1318:. 1301:" 1289:. 1272:" 1257:. 1240:" 1228:. 1211:" 1199:. 1182:" 1170:. 1149:" 1137:. 1120:" 1108:. 1082:. 1065:" 1036:. 1015:" 1003:. 986:" 974:. 957:" 945:. 928:" 916:. 899:" 887:. 870:" 858:. 841:" 829:. 812:" 799:. 782:" 770:. 756:" 741:. 709:. 678:. 635:. 617:" 600:.

Index


United States District Court for the Western District of Washington
Donald Trump
James Mattis
Mark Esper
Kirstjen Nielsen
Kevin McAleenan
Chad Wolf
United States Department of Defense
United States Department of Homeland Security
Human Rights Campaign
Gender Justice League
American Military Partner Association
Marsha J. Pechman
United States District Court for the Western District of Washington
Jane Doe v. Trump
Stone v. Trump
Stockman v. Trump
Pentagon officials
due process clauses
Fifth Amendment
Human Rights Campaign
Gender Justice League
Lambda Legal
OutServe-SLDN
Secretary of Defense
James Mattis
Mark Esper
Secretary of Homeland Security
Kirstjen Nielsen

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.