Knowledge

Intertemporal consumption

Source ๐Ÿ“

138:
and actual behaviour is that people drastically 'underconsume' early and late in their lifetime by failing to borrow against future earnings and not saving enough to adequately finance retirement incomes respectively. People also seem to 'overconsume' during their highest earning years, the elderly do not consume from their assets as would be expected (particularly from their household equity) and also treat windfall gains in a manner inconsistent with the life-cycle model. Specific alterations to the theory have been proposed to help it accommodate the data; a
22: 137:
Attempts to test the life-cycle model against real world data have met with mixed success. In a review of the literature, Courant, Gramlich and Laitner (1984) note "but for all its elegance and rationality, the life-cycle model has not tested out very well". The main discrepancies between predicted
133:
instead of income at any given age. First, young people borrow to consume more than their income, next, as their income rises through the years, their consumption rises slowly and they begin to save more. Lastly, during their retirement these individuals live off of their savings. Furthermore this
176:
and windfall gains they hypothesize that the MPC is close to one out of current income, close to zero for future income and somewhere in between with respect to current assets. These differing MPCs explain why people 'overconsume' during their highest earning years, why increasing superannuation
177:
contributions does not cause current savings to be reduced (as the life-cycle model implies) and why small windfall gains (which are coded as current income) are consumed at a high rate but a higher proportion of larger gains is saved.
105:
theory and approached the question of inter-temporal consumption as a lifetime income optimization problem. Solving this problem mathematically, assuming that individuals are rational and have access to complete markets,
134:
theory implies that consumption is smoothed out relative to a person's income which is the reason economists set consumption proportional to potential income rather than actual income.
157: 32: 241:
Modigliani, F. & Brumberg, R. (1954): 'Utility analysis and the consumption function: An interpretation of cross-section data'. In: Kurihara, K.K (ed.):
98:, who described 'hump saving', hypothesizing that savings would be highest in the middle years of a person's life as they saved for retirement. 43: 123: 247:
Shefrin, H. & Thaler, R. (1992): 'Mental Accounting, Saving and Self-Control'. In: Lowenstein, G. & Elster, J. (eds.)
275: 61: 406: 385: 364: 169: 303: 359: 211: 201: 369: 349: 268: 39: 36:
that states a Knowledge editor's personal feelings or presents an original argument about a topic.
333: 284: 172:(MPC) out of each of these accounts is different. Drawing upon empirical studies of consumption, 130: 83: 323: 318: 308: 354: 411: 298: 261: 206: 196: 153: 143: 8: 328: 102: 161: 107: 160:
hypothesis. They propose that people mentally divide their assets into non-fungible
147: 129:
The life-cycle model of consumption suggests that consumption is based on average
115: 186: 173: 139: 111: 400: 165: 91: 156:
have proposed an alternate description of intertemporal consumption, the
79: 90:
over the course of their lives. The earliest work on the subject was by
95: 191: 124:
Intertemporal choice ยง Modigliani's life cycle income hypothesis
150:
over time or a particular form of expectation as to future income.
87: 253: 33:
personal reflection, personal essay, or argumentative essay
101:
In the 1950s, more well-defined models were built on
398: 269: 276: 262: 118:(1957) developed what became known as the 62:Learn how and when to remove this message 142:, capital market imperfections such as 399: 257: 237:A Theory of the Consumption Function 15: 13: 14: 423: 168:(savings) and future income. The 386:List of largest consumer markets 365:Random walk model of consumption 20: 283: 170:marginal propensity to consume 1: 304:Final consumption expenditure 217: 7: 360:Permanent income hypothesis 231:Towards a Dynamic Economics 212:Wealth elasticity of demand 202:Permanent income hypothesis 180: 10: 428: 370:Relative income hypothesis 350:Absolute income hypothesis 378: 342: 314:Intertemporal consumption 291: 78:seek to explain people's 76:intertemporal consumption 243:Post-Keynesian Economics 146:, a changing individual 407:Intertemporal economics 334:Conspicuous consumption 110:& Brumberg (1954), 324:Autonomous consumption 319:Random walk hypothesis 225:The Theory of Interest 158:behavioural life cycle 154:Behavioural economists 42:by rewriting it in an 355:Life-cycle hypothesis 309:Instant gratification 235:Friedman, M. (1957): 144:liquidity constraints 74:Economic theories of 299:Consumption function 207:Temporal discounting 197:Intertemporal choice 329:Induced consumption 229:Harrod, R. (1948): 223:Fisher, I (1930): 164:โ€“ current income, 103:discounted utility 44:encyclopedic style 31:is written like a 394: 393: 72: 71: 64: 419: 278: 271: 264: 255: 254: 249:Choice over Time 148:utility function 120:life-cycle model 67: 60: 56: 53: 47: 24: 23: 16: 427: 426: 422: 421: 420: 418: 417: 416: 397: 396: 395: 390: 374: 338: 287: 282: 220: 183: 162:mental accounts 131:lifetime income 116:Milton Friedman 82:in relation to 68: 57: 51: 48: 40:help improve it 37: 25: 21: 12: 11: 5: 425: 415: 414: 409: 392: 391: 389: 388: 382: 380: 376: 375: 373: 372: 367: 362: 357: 352: 346: 344: 340: 339: 337: 336: 331: 326: 321: 316: 311: 306: 301: 295: 293: 289: 288: 281: 280: 273: 266: 258: 252: 251: 245: 239: 233: 227: 219: 216: 215: 214: 209: 204: 199: 194: 189: 182: 179: 174:superannuation 166:current assets 140:bequest motive 70: 69: 28: 26: 19: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 424: 413: 410: 408: 405: 404: 402: 387: 384: 383: 381: 377: 371: 368: 366: 363: 361: 358: 356: 353: 351: 348: 347: 345: 341: 335: 332: 330: 327: 325: 322: 320: 317: 315: 312: 310: 307: 305: 302: 300: 297: 296: 294: 290: 286: 279: 274: 272: 267: 265: 260: 259: 256: 250: 246: 244: 240: 238: 234: 232: 228: 226: 222: 221: 213: 210: 208: 205: 203: 200: 198: 195: 193: 190: 188: 185: 184: 178: 175: 171: 167: 163: 159: 155: 151: 149: 145: 141: 135: 132: 127: 126:for details. 125: 121: 117: 113: 109: 104: 99: 97: 93: 92:Irving Fisher 89: 85: 81: 77: 66: 63: 55: 52:December 2021 45: 41: 35: 34: 29:This article 27: 18: 17: 313: 248: 242: 236: 230: 224: 152: 136: 128: 119: 100: 75: 73: 58: 49: 30: 412:Consumption 285:Consumption 187:Albert Ando 112:Albert Ando 84:consumption 80:preferences 401:Categories 218:References 108:Modigliani 96:Roy Harrod 192:Dissaving 343:Theories 181:See also 38:Please 292:Topics 122:. See 114:, and 88:saving 379:Lists 94:and 86:and 403:: 277:e 270:t 263:v 65:) 59:( 54:) 50:( 46:.

Index

personal reflection, personal essay, or argumentative essay
help improve it
encyclopedic style
Learn how and when to remove this message
preferences
consumption
saving
Irving Fisher
Roy Harrod
discounted utility
Modigliani
Albert Ando
Milton Friedman
Intertemporal choice ยง Modigliani's life cycle income hypothesis
lifetime income
bequest motive
liquidity constraints
utility function
Behavioural economists
behavioural life cycle
mental accounts
current assets
marginal propensity to consume
superannuation
Albert Ando
Dissaving
Intertemporal choice
Permanent income hypothesis
Temporal discounting
Wealth elasticity of demand

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

โ†‘