24:
141:
products, but was unable to do so on the grounds that the trade mark was too descriptive. Instead, it registered the mark "NERIT", without any intention of using the mark, but in order to prevent other traders from using the mark "MERIT" because it would be considered too similar to the registered
152:
The court struck down the registration for "NERIT" on the basis that the plaintiff had no genuine intention to use the mark (despite some "trivial and insubstantial" efforts at launching a NERIT-branded product).
41:
225:
174:
230:
88:
60:
67:
74:
220:
56:
205:
195:
130:
149:
The defendant began using the mark "MERIT" for cigarettes and was sued by the plaintiff for infringing its mark "NERIT".
210:
107:
81:
45:
190:
200:
215:
34:
8:
175:
TRADE MARKS ACT 1995 DECISION OF A DELEGATE OF THE REGISTRAR OF TRADE MARKS WITH REASONS
184:
126:
177:
at ipaustralia.gov.au - Cited as a case study for this reference document.
162:
134:
138:
23:
143:
142:
mark "NERIT". The intention was to obtain a de facto
48:. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed.
182:
226:United Kingdom intellectual property case law
133:. The plaintiff endeavoured to register the
231:Court of Appeal (England and Wales) cases
108:Learn how and when to remove this message
57:"Imperial Group plc v Philip Morris Ltd"
183:
146:over the unregisterable mark "MERIT".
122:Imperial Group plc v Philip Morris Ltd
131:Court of Appeal of England and Wales
46:adding citations to reliable sources
17:
13:
14:
242:
22:
221:1982 in United Kingdom case law
33:needs additional citations for
206:United Kingdom health case law
1:
196:Tobacco in the United Kingdom
168:
7:
156:
10:
247:
211:Philip Morris litigation
129:, was a case of the
42:improve this article
191:Trademark case law
118:
117:
110:
92:
238:
201:Tobacco case law
113:
106:
102:
99:
93:
91:
50:
26:
18:
246:
245:
241:
240:
239:
237:
236:
235:
216:Imperial Brands
181:
180:
171:
159:
114:
103:
97:
94:
51:
49:
39:
27:
12:
11:
5:
244:
234:
233:
228:
223:
218:
213:
208:
203:
198:
193:
179:
178:
170:
167:
166:
165:
158:
155:
116:
115:
30:
28:
21:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
243:
232:
229:
227:
224:
222:
219:
217:
214:
212:
209:
207:
204:
202:
199:
197:
194:
192:
189:
188:
186:
176:
173:
172:
164:
161:
160:
154:
150:
147:
145:
140:
136:
132:
128:
124:
123:
112:
109:
101:
90:
87:
83:
80:
76:
73:
69:
66:
62:
59: –
58:
54:
53:Find sources:
47:
43:
37:
36:
31:This article
29:
25:
20:
19:
16:
151:
148:
137:"MERIT" for
121:
120:
119:
104:
98:January 2008
95:
85:
78:
71:
64:
52:
40:Please help
35:verification
32:
15:
127:1982 FSR 72
185:Categories
169:References
163:Ghost mark
135:trade mark
68:newspapers
139:cigarette
157:See also
144:monopoly
82:scholar
84:
77:
70:
63:
55:
89:JSTOR
75:books
61:news
44:by
187::
125:,
111:)
105:(
100:)
96:(
86:·
79:·
72:·
65:·
38:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
