339:
via a hash function, and writing these partitions out to disk. The algorithm then loads pairs of partitions into memory, builds a hash table for the smaller partitioned relation, and probes the other relation for matches with the current hash table. Because the partitions were formed by hashing on
352:
The hybrid hash join algorithm is a combination of the classical hash join and grace hash join. It uses minimal amount of memory for partitioning like in grace hash join and uses the remaining memory to initialize a classical hash join during partitioning phase. During the partitioning phase, the
447:
Note that this algorithm is memory-sensitive, because there are two competing demands for memory (the hash table for partition 0, and the output buffers for the remaining partitions). Choosing too large a hash table for partition 0 might cause the algorithm to recurse because one of the non-zero
343:
It is possible that one or more of the partitions still does not fit into the available memory, in which case the algorithm is recursively applied: an additional orthogonal hash function is chosen to hash the large partition into sub-partitions, which are then processed as before. Since this is
456:
Hash joins can also be evaluated for an anti-join predicate (a predicate selecting values from one table when no related values are found in the other). Depending on the sizes of the tables, different algorithms can be applied:
532:
Hash semi-join is used to return the records found in the other table. Unlike the plain join, it returns each matching record from the leading table only once, regardless of how many matches there are in the
99:
This algorithm is simple, but it requires that the smaller join relation fits into memory, which is sometimes not the case. A simple approach to handling this situation proceeds as follows:
38:
from the tuples of one or both of the joined relations, and subsequently probing those tables so that only tuples with the same hash code need to be compared for equality in equijoins.
444:
fits nearly fully into memory hybrid hash join has a similar behavior like the classical hash join which is more beneficial. Otherwise hybrid hash join imitates grace hash join.
442:
418:
395:
375:
337:
317:
297:
266:
238:
212:
189:
163:
141:
121:
69:
using the contents of one relation, ideally whichever one is smaller after applying local predicates. This relation is called the build side of the join. The
344:
expensive, the algorithm tries to reduce the chance that it will occur by forming the smallest partitions possible during the initial partitioning phase.
80:
is built, scan the other relation (the probe side). For each row of the probe relation, find the relevant rows from the build relation by looking in the
648:
DeWitt, D.J.; Katz, R.; Olken, F.; Shapiro, L.; Stonebraker, M.; Wood, D. (June 1984). "Implementation techniques for main memory database systems".
96:. Similarly, the join relation on which the hash table is built is called the "build" input, whereas the other input is called the "probe" input.
73:
entries are mappings from the value of the (composite) join attribute to the remaining attributes of that row (whichever ones are needed).
49:
comparing records from one table with those from the other table using a conjunction of equality operators '=' on one or more columns).
41:
Hash joins are typically more efficient than nested loops joins, except when the probe side of the join is very small. They require an
424:
Because partition 0 is never written to disk, hybrid hash join typically performs fewer I/O operations than grace hash join. When
276:
A better approach is known as the "grace hash join", after the GRACE database machine for which it was first implemented.
683:
560:
The records are returned right after they produced a hit. The actual records from the hash table are ignored.
679:
477:
Scan the other table, selecting any rows where the join attribute hashes to an empty entry in the hash table.
31:
726:
340:
the join key, it must be the case that any join output tuples must belong to the same partition.
8:
619:
46:
28:
427:
403:
380:
360:
322:
302:
282:
251:
223:
197:
174:
148:
126:
106:
245:
721:
657:
624:
58:
629:
591:
table, returning the corresponding records from the hash table and removing them.
509:
table, removing the corresponding records from the hash table on each hash hit.
715:
599:
table) can only be returned once, since it is removed after being returned.
661:
694:
467:
81:
77:
70:
66:
35:
24:
42:
647:
556:
Scan the other table, returning any rows that produce a hash hit.
168:
If the size of the hash table equals the maximum in-memory size:
595:
With this algorithm, each record from the hash table (that is,
540:
As with the anti-join, semi-join can also be left and right:
353:
hybrid hash join uses the available memory for two purposes:
684:"An Adaptive Hash Join Algorithm for Multiuser Environments"
194:
Reset the hash table, and continue scanning the build input
240:
and add the resulting join tuples to the output relation
34:. All variants of hash join algorithms involve building
677:
430:
406:
383:
363:
325:
305:
285:
254:
226:
200:
191:, and add matching join tuples to the output relation
177:
151:
129:
109:
436:
412:
389:
369:
331:
311:
291:
260:
232:
206:
183:
157:
135:
115:
713:
512:Return everything that left in the hash table.
448:partitions is too large to fit into memory.
279:This algorithm avoids rescanning the entire
248:join algorithm. This algorithm may scan
691:Proceedings of the 16th VLDB conference
574:
492:
57:The classic hash join algorithm for an
27:and is used in the implementation of a
714:
543:
460:
88:The first phase is usually called the
61:of two relations proceeds as follows:
16:Algorithm used in relational databases
299:relation by first partitioning both
244:This is essentially the same as the
52:
693:. Brisbane: 186–197. Archived from
347:
220:Do a final scan of the probe input
13:
271:
14:
738:
671:
527:
451:
420:in-memory, known as "partition 0"
400:To hold an entire partition from
92:, while the second is called the
602:This is more efficient when the
563:This is more efficient when the
516:This is more efficient when the
481:This is more efficient when the
641:
1:
635:
580:Prepare a hash table for the
549:Prepare a hash table for the
498:Prepare a hash table for the
357:To partition both relations
7:
613:
268:more times than necessary.
165:to the in-memory hash table
10:
743:
567:table is smaller than the
485:table is smaller than the
32:database management system
606:table is larger than the
520:table is larger than the
438:
414:
391:
371:
333:
313:
293:
262:
234:
208:
185:
159:
137:
117:
662:10.1145/971697.602261
650:Proc. ACM SIGMOD Conf
439:
415:
392:
372:
334:
314:
294:
263:
235:
209:
186:
171:Scan the probe input
160:
138:
118:
575:Hash right semi-join
493:Hash right anti-join
428:
404:
381:
361:
323:
303:
283:
252:
224:
198:
175:
149:
127:
107:
620:Symmetric hash join
544:Hash left semi-join
461:Hash left anti-join
123:in the build input
23:is an example of a
434:
410:
387:
367:
329:
309:
289:
258:
230:
204:
181:
155:
133:
113:
678:Hansjörg Zeller;
584:side of the join.
553:side of the join.
502:side of the join.
474:side of the join.
437:{\displaystyle R}
413:{\displaystyle R}
390:{\displaystyle S}
370:{\displaystyle R}
332:{\displaystyle S}
312:{\displaystyle R}
292:{\displaystyle S}
261:{\displaystyle S}
246:block nested loop
233:{\displaystyle S}
207:{\displaystyle R}
184:{\displaystyle S}
158:{\displaystyle r}
136:{\displaystyle R}
116:{\displaystyle r}
65:First, prepare a
53:Classic hash join
734:
708:
706:
705:
699:
688:
666:
665:
645:
625:Nested loop join
443:
441:
440:
435:
419:
417:
416:
411:
396:
394:
393:
388:
376:
374:
373:
368:
348:Hybrid hash join
338:
336:
335:
330:
318:
316:
315:
310:
298:
296:
295:
290:
267:
265:
264:
259:
239:
237:
236:
231:
213:
211:
210:
205:
190:
188:
187:
182:
164:
162:
161:
156:
142:
140:
139:
134:
122:
120:
119:
114:
742:
741:
737:
736:
735:
733:
732:
731:
727:Join algorithms
712:
711:
703:
701:
697:
686:
674:
669:
646:
642:
638:
630:Sort-merge join
616:
577:
546:
530:
495:
463:
454:
429:
426:
425:
405:
402:
401:
382:
379:
378:
362:
359:
358:
350:
324:
321:
320:
304:
301:
300:
284:
281:
280:
274:
272:Grace hash join
253:
250:
249:
225:
222:
221:
199:
196:
195:
176:
173:
172:
150:
147:
146:
128:
125:
124:
108:
105:
104:
103:For each tuple
55:
17:
12:
11:
5:
740:
730:
729:
724:
710:
709:
673:
672:External links
670:
668:
667:
639:
637:
634:
633:
632:
627:
622:
615:
612:
593:
592:
585:
576:
573:
558:
557:
554:
545:
542:
529:
528:Hash semi-join
526:
514:
513:
510:
503:
494:
491:
479:
478:
475:
462:
459:
453:
452:Hash anti-join
450:
433:
422:
421:
409:
398:
386:
366:
349:
346:
328:
308:
288:
273:
270:
257:
242:
241:
229:
218:
217:
216:
215:
214:
203:
192:
180:
166:
154:
132:
112:
86:
85:
74:
54:
51:
25:join algorithm
15:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
739:
728:
725:
723:
720:
719:
717:
700:on 2012-03-11
696:
692:
685:
681:
676:
675:
663:
659:
655:
651:
644:
640:
631:
628:
626:
623:
621:
618:
617:
611:
609:
605:
600:
598:
590:
586:
583:
579:
578:
572:
570:
566:
561:
555:
552:
548:
547:
541:
538:
536:
525:
523:
519:
511:
508:
504:
501:
497:
496:
490:
488:
484:
476:
473:
469:
465:
464:
458:
449:
445:
431:
407:
399:
384:
364:
356:
355:
354:
345:
341:
326:
306:
286:
277:
269:
255:
247:
227:
219:
201:
193:
178:
170:
169:
167:
152:
144:
143:
130:
110:
102:
101:
100:
97:
95:
94:"probe" phase
91:
90:"build" phase
83:
79:
75:
72:
68:
64:
63:
62:
60:
50:
48:
45:predicate (a
44:
39:
37:
33:
30:
26:
22:
702:. Retrieved
695:the original
690:
653:
649:
643:
607:
603:
601:
596:
594:
588:
581:
568:
564:
562:
559:
550:
539:
534:
531:
521:
517:
515:
506:
499:
486:
482:
480:
471:
455:
446:
423:
351:
342:
278:
275:
243:
98:
93:
89:
87:
56:
40:
20:
18:
36:hash tables
716:Categories
704:2008-09-21
656:(4): 1–8.
636:References
468:hash table
466:Prepare a
82:hash table
78:hash table
71:hash table
67:hash table
59:inner join
29:relational
587:Scan the
505:Scan the
76:Once the
47:predicate
21:hash join
682:(1990).
680:Jim Gray
614:See also
470:for the
43:equijoin
722:Hashing
610:table.
571:table.
537:table.
524:table.
489:table.
518:NOT IN
507:NOT IN
483:NOT IN
472:NOT IN
698:(PDF)
687:(PDF)
608:FROM
597:FROM
582:FROM
569:FROM
522:FROM
500:FROM
487:FROM
377:and
319:and
145:Add
19:The
658:doi
397:and
718::
689:.
654:14
652:.
604:IN
589:IN
565:IN
551:IN
535:IN
707:.
664:.
660::
432:R
408:R
385:S
365:R
327:S
307:R
287:S
256:S
228:S
202:R
179:S
153:r
131:R
111:r
84:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.