Knowledge

Hal Pashler

Source 📝

142: 106: 181:
brain-behavior correlation values. The paper (published under the milder title "Puzzlingly Large Correlations...") produced an intense controversy that was covered in popular media as well as academic press. Some writers have pointed to this paper as having helped launch the current period of intensive methodological debate and controversy in behavioral science Statistical practices in brain imaging field appear to have changed in response to the paper with increased use of
124:(sometimes referred to as Retrieval Practice) directly strengthens associative learning, and does so more effectively than the same time spent re-studying the same associative links. In 2007, Liqiang Huang and Pashler proposed the Boolean Map Theory of visual attention and awareness. The theory argues that a specific type of abstract data structure (the Boolean Map) characterizes the contents of human visual awareness at any given instant in time. 149:(This implies, for example, that if one wishes to study information on two occasions with the goal of retaining it for 1 year, the best practice would be to separate the two study events by about 1 month, whereas if one wished to retain the information for a week, a 1-day gap would work better.) This research is relied upon by some software developers in building spaced-learning apps and websites to help people to retain information more efficiently 128: 193:
outspoken proponent of efforts to increase replicability in psychological research, arguing that many very well-known findings in areas like social cognition and social psychology should not be believed due to statistical errors, publication bias, and other problems. Together with E. J. Wagenmakers, he edited the special issue of the
27:
effect concluded that the brain has discrete "processing bottlenecks" associated with specific types of cognitive operations). and for his work on visual attention He has also developed and tested new methods for enhancing learning and reducing forgetting, focusing on the temporal spacing of learning
180:
In 2008, Pashler (along with Vul, Harris, and Winkielman) published a paper initially entitled “Voodoo Correlations in Social Neuroscience” arguing that many of the most prominent research articles in cognitive and social neuroscience had made statistical errors resulting in gross over-estimation of
135:
In 2008 (with Melody Wiseheart & other collaborators) Pashler carried out the most systematic and long-term studies of the effect of temporal spacing on human learning. Holding total time constant, the team found that when people study information on two occasions separated by a temporal gap G,
164:
could be elicited within a single individual. Averaging two estimates from the same person (their first-choice answer and a second answer elicited later) produced an improvement in accuracy equal to about 1/3 the benefit obtained by averaging estimates from two different people. This discovery,
192:
The review concluded that widely accepted ideas about learning styles lacked serious empirical support and recommended that educators should not base instructional practices on these notions. These conclusions have prompted extensive controversy in the education field. Pashler has also been an
152:
In 2006, US Department of Education commissioned Pashler to lead a review of cognitive science findings that could best help guide teachers in scientifically validated instructional practices. The resulting Practice Guide is distributed by the department and is available free of charge on the
171:
helped prompt follow-up research examining potential new methods of improving human judgment accuracy. Pashler has also published several articles on varied topics in political psychology, including biases in perception of newsworthiness and attitudes to pro-liberty views.
84:
in 1999; the academy cited his "many experimental breakthroughs in the study of spatial attention and executive control, and... his insightful analysis of human cognitive architecture." He also received the Chancellor's Associates Award for Research given by
117:, using displays of letters that appeared, disappeared, and reappeared (sometimes with alterations). He noted the contrast between observers' subjective sense of awareness of an entire display and their very limited ability to detect even large changes. 97:
In the 1980s, Pashler and several colleagues developed the Response Selection Bottleneck model of dual-task interference. The model, partly inspired by early work by Alan Welford, makes many predictions about patterns of behavioral response times in the
31:
Pashler is also known for influential critiques of methodological and statistical practices in behavioral science. His critiques have focused on statistical and logical issues in neuroimaging research ("voodoo correlations"), educational psychology
102:
experiment. The model has been supported by mathematical analyses of behavioral response times and studies of brain activity when people engage in multitasking.
1511: 23:. An experimental psychologist and cognitive scientist, Pashler is best known for his studies of human attentional limitations (his analysis of the 1389: 1285: 1067:
Pashler, Hal: “U.S. Immigrants’ Attitudes Toward Libertarian Values” (2013). Department of Psychology, University of California, San Diego.
1516: 1351: 1526: 299:"How to saw the Concept of Attention in Half without Sacrificing the Subject: Review of the Psychology of Attention by Harold Pashler" 197:
which appears to have introduced the term ‘Replicability Crisis’ in reference to the current state of social and behavioral science.
1370: 903: 498:
Bower, B. (19 May 2012). "The hot and cold of priming: Psychologists are divided on whether unnoticed cues can influence behavior".
36:
concept) testing of mathematical models, and the replicability of “behavioral priming” research in the field of social psychology.
136:
and then are given a memory test after a further delay D, performance on the test is best when the G is about 10-20% as long as D.
550: 564:
Welford, A. T. (1952). "The 'psychological Refractory Period' and the Timing of High-Speed Performance—a Review and a Theory".
433: 1130: 260: 188:
In 2009, Pashler chaired a review commissioned by the American Psychological Society examining the validity of the concept of
1456:
Bower, B. (2012). "The hot and cold of priming: Psychologists are divided on whether unnoticed cues can influence behavior".
145:
Human Memory as a Joint Function of Inter-Study Gap and Test Delay as revealed in data from Cepeda, Pashler, & Colleagues
69: 65: 1198: 757: 86: 53: 20: 1023:
Soll, J. B.; Larrick, R. P. (2009). "Strategies for revising judgment: how (and how well) people use others' opinions".
375:
Rohrer, D.; Pashler, H. (2010). "Recent Research on Human Learning Challenges Conventional Instructional Strategies".
1521: 1080: 1216: 141: 99: 24: 525: 182: 113:
In 1988, Pashler published the first demonstration of the perceptual phenomenon that later came to be called
81: 928:
Pashler, H.; Bain, P. M.; Bottge, B. A.; Graesser, A.; Koedinger, K.; McDaniel, M.; Metcalfe, J. (2007).
49: 937:. National Center for Education Research, Institute of Education Sciences, US Department of Education. 892: 1037: 966: 660: 279: 228: 318: 1326: 44:
Pashler was born in 1958 in New York. He received his BA in Logic and Philosophy of Science from
844: 77: 1531: 1032: 961: 655: 644:"A shared cortical bottleneck underlying Attentional Blink and Psychological Refractory Period" 313: 223: 1068: 929: 1081:"Puzzlingly High Correlations in fMRI Studies of Emotion, Personality, and Social Cognition" 1420: 334: 157: 8: 907: 214:
Pashler, H. (September 1994). "Dual-task interference in simple tasks: data and theory".
73: 1424: 1318: 1266: 1179: 1111: 987: 875: 790: 738: 689: 577: 480: 392: 1235: 619: 592: 1438: 1310: 1305: 1258: 1254: 1171: 1103: 1099: 1050: 979: 975: 867: 863: 825: 782: 730: 681: 669: 624: 472: 357: 241: 1484:"Special Section on Replicability in Psychological Science: A Crisis of Confidence?" 1270: 1183: 991: 794: 742: 693: 484: 1465: 1428: 1322: 1300: 1250: 1161: 1095: 1042: 971: 879: 859: 817: 772: 720: 673: 665: 614: 604: 573: 507: 464: 396: 384: 349: 233: 114: 45: 1115: 949: 609: 189: 33: 821: 643: 468: 353: 237: 105: 452: 161: 121: 931:
Organizing Instruction and Study to Improve Student Learning: A Practice Guide
1505: 388: 167: 1469: 511: 298: 1442: 1314: 1262: 1175: 1107: 1054: 983: 871: 829: 808:
Huang, L.; Pashler, H. (2007). "A Boolean map theory of visual attention".
685: 628: 476: 361: 786: 734: 245: 1483: 1005: 845:"Spacing effects in learning: a temporal ridgeline of optimal retention" 843:
Cepeda, N. J.; Vul, E.; Rohrer, D.; Wixted, J. T.; Pashler, H. (2008).
777: 725: 708: 677: 593:"Parsing a Cognitive Task: A Characterization of the Mind's Bottleneck" 1046: 529: 127: 1433: 1408: 1166: 1149: 414: 1025:
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition
551:"Chancellor's Associates Faculty Excellence Award Winners: 2005–06" 1284:
Pashler, H.; McDaniel, M.; Rohrer, D.; Bjork, R. (December 2009).
1390:"Matching teaching style to learning style may not help students" 261:"The Brain: The "Router" in Your Head—a Bottleneck of Processing" 1352:"Everything you've ever been told about how you learn is a lie" 109:
Response Selection Bottleneck Model of Dual-Task Interference
528:. The Society of Experimental Psychologists. Archived from 453:"How persuasive is a good fit? A comment on theory testing" 131:
Boolean Map Theory of Attention to Multidimensional Stimuli
1283: 1203:
Statistical Modeling, Causal Inference, and Social Science
1078: 1079:
Vul, E.; Harris, C.; Winkielman, P.; Pashler, H. (2009).
927: 434:"If you're an aural learner, read this aloud to yourself" 156:
In 2008 (with Edward Vul) Pashler showed that the famous
1199:"What has happened down here is the winds have changed" 1409:"Disputed results a fresh blow for social psychology" 1371:"Is teaching to student's learning stye a bogus idea" 842: 120:
In 1992, Pashler (with Mark Carrier) showed that the
641: 1503: 755: 450: 590: 374: 68:in 2000. He is also an elected Fellow of the 1293:Psychological Science in the Public Interest 807: 332: 19:is Distinguished Professor of Psychology at 1512:University of California, San Diego faculty 1022: 642:Marti, S.; Sigman, M.; Dehaene, S. (2012). 48:in 1980 and his PhD in psychology from the 1233: 947: 335:"A Boolean map theory of visual attention" 1432: 1304: 1165: 1036: 965: 776: 758:"The influence of retrieval on retention" 724: 709:"Familiarity and visual change detection" 659: 618: 608: 317: 227: 64:Pashler was elected to membership in the 1131:"Doubts raised over brain scan findings" 408: 406: 140: 126: 104: 706: 563: 213: 1504: 1406: 1368: 1217:"Voodoo Correlations: Two Years Later" 1196: 1147: 412: 258: 52:in 1985. He joined the faculty of the 1488:Perspectives on Psychological Science 1455: 1387: 1349: 1128: 1088:Perspectives on Psychological Science 497: 403: 195:Perspectives on Psychological Science 70:Association for Psychological Science 66:Society of Experimental Psychologists 431: 296: 277: 1517:21st-century American psychologists 165:termed the “Inner Crowd Effect” by 87:University of California, San Diego 54:University of California, San Diego 21:University of California, San Diego 13: 1150:"Brain imaging studies under fire" 578:10.1111/j.2044-8295.1952.tb00322.x 92: 14: 1543: 1527:University of Pennsylvania alumni 756:Carrier, M.; Pashler, H. (1992). 451:Roberts, S.; Pashler, H. (2000). 1369:Guteri, S. (20 September 2013). 1306:10.1111/j.1539-6053.2009.01038.x 1255:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.01.027 1197:Gelman, A. (21 September 2016). 1100:10.1111/j.1745-6924.2009.01125.x 976:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02136.x 864:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02209.x 670:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.09.063 591:Sigman, M.; Dehaene, S. (2005). 175: 1476: 1449: 1400: 1381: 1362: 1350:Ferro, S. (12 September 2013). 1343: 1277: 1236:"Voodoo and circularity errors" 1227: 1209: 1190: 1141: 1122: 1072: 1061: 1016: 998: 941: 921: 896: 886: 836: 801: 749: 700: 635: 584: 557: 543: 518: 491: 333:Huang, L.; Pashler, H. (2007). 259:Zimmer, C. (15 November 2010). 100:Psychological Refractory Period 25:Psychological refractory period 1388:Glenn, D. (15 December 2009). 713:Perception & Psychophysics 444: 425: 413:Begley, S. (20 January 2009). 368: 326: 290: 271: 252: 207: 1: 1394:Chronicle of Higher Education 1234:Vul, E.; Pashler, H. (2012). 1129:Giles, J. (14 January 2009). 948:Vul, E.; Pashler, H. (2008). 566:British Journal of Psychology 200: 950:"Measuring the Crowd Within" 610:10.1371/journal.pbio.0030037 82:National Academy of Sciences 39: 7: 822:10.1037/0033-295x.114.3.599 469:10.1037/0033-295X.107.2.358 432:Cosh, C. (6 January 2010). 354:10.1037/0033-295X.114.3.599 238:10.1037/0033-2909.116.2.220 10: 1548: 50:University of Pennsylvania 904:"Courses - MyTools2Learn" 415:"Of Voodoo and the Brain" 278:Bush, C. (8 April 2001). 59: 389:10.3102/0013189X10374770 28:and retrieval practice. 1522:Brown University alumni 1470:10.1002/scin.5591811025 512:10.1002/scin.5591811025 78:Troland Research Awards 76:. Pashler received the 765:Memory & Cognition 377:Educational Researcher 216:Psychological Bulletin 160:Effect first noted by 153:department's website. 146: 132: 110: 954:Psychological Science 852:Psychological Science 144: 130: 108: 810:Psychological Review 707:Pashler, H. (1988). 457:Psychological Review 342:Psychological Review 1425:2013Natur.497...16A 1407:Abbott, A. (2013). 1375:Scientific American 1148:Abbott, A. (2009). 280:"HOW TO; Multitask" 74:Psychonomic Society 1006:"The crowd within" 778:10.3758/BF03202713 726:10.3758/BF03210419 284:The New York Times 147: 133: 111: 1286:"Learning Styles" 438:MacLeans Magazine 297:Moss, S. (1999). 265:Discover Magazine 1539: 1496: 1495: 1480: 1474: 1473: 1453: 1447: 1446: 1436: 1404: 1398: 1397: 1385: 1379: 1378: 1366: 1360: 1359: 1347: 1341: 1340: 1338: 1337: 1331: 1325:. Archived from 1308: 1290: 1281: 1275: 1274: 1240: 1231: 1225: 1224: 1213: 1207: 1206: 1194: 1188: 1187: 1169: 1145: 1139: 1138: 1126: 1120: 1119: 1085: 1076: 1070: 1065: 1059: 1058: 1047:10.1037/a0015145 1040: 1020: 1014: 1013: 1002: 996: 995: 969: 945: 939: 938: 936: 925: 919: 918: 916: 915: 906:. Archived from 900: 894: 890: 884: 883: 858:(11): 1095–102. 849: 840: 834: 833: 805: 799: 798: 780: 762: 753: 747: 746: 728: 704: 698: 697: 663: 639: 633: 632: 622: 612: 588: 582: 581: 561: 555: 554: 547: 541: 540: 538: 537: 522: 516: 515: 495: 489: 488: 448: 442: 441: 429: 423: 422: 410: 401: 400: 372: 366: 365: 339: 330: 324: 323: 321: 303: 294: 288: 287: 275: 269: 268: 256: 250: 249: 231: 211: 183:cross-validation 158:Wisdom of Crowds 115:change blindness 46:Brown University 1547: 1546: 1542: 1541: 1540: 1538: 1537: 1536: 1502: 1501: 1500: 1499: 1482: 1481: 1477: 1454: 1450: 1434:10.1038/497016a 1405: 1401: 1386: 1382: 1367: 1363: 1356:Popular Science 1348: 1344: 1335: 1333: 1329: 1288: 1282: 1278: 1238: 1232: 1228: 1221:The Neurocritic 1215: 1214: 1210: 1195: 1191: 1167:10.1038/457245a 1146: 1142: 1127: 1123: 1083: 1077: 1073: 1066: 1062: 1038:10.1.1.153.8244 1021: 1017: 1012:. 26 June 2008. 1004: 1003: 999: 967:10.1.1.408.4760 946: 942: 934: 926: 922: 913: 911: 902: 901: 897: 891: 887: 847: 841: 837: 806: 802: 760: 754: 750: 705: 701: 661:10.1.1.397.4239 640: 636: 589: 585: 562: 558: 553:. UC San Diego. 549: 548: 544: 535: 533: 524: 523: 519: 496: 492: 449: 445: 430: 426: 411: 404: 373: 369: 337: 331: 327: 301: 295: 291: 276: 272: 257: 253: 229:10.1.1.324.4916 212: 208: 203: 190:learning styles 178: 95: 93:Research career 62: 42: 34:learning styles 12: 11: 5: 1545: 1535: 1534: 1529: 1524: 1519: 1514: 1498: 1497: 1475: 1448: 1399: 1380: 1361: 1342: 1299:(3): 105–119. 1276: 1249:(2): 945–948. 1226: 1208: 1189: 1140: 1121: 1071: 1060: 1031:(3): 780–805. 1015: 997: 960:(7): 645–647. 940: 920: 895: 885: 835: 816:(3): 599–631. 800: 771:(6): 633–642. 748: 719:(4): 369–378. 699: 654:(3): 2883–98. 634: 583: 556: 542: 517: 490: 443: 424: 402: 383:(5): 406–412. 367: 348:(3): 599–631. 325: 319:10.1.1.518.665 289: 270: 251: 205: 204: 202: 199: 177: 174: 162:Francis Galton 122:testing effect 94: 91: 61: 58: 41: 38: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1544: 1533: 1532:Living people 1530: 1528: 1525: 1523: 1520: 1518: 1515: 1513: 1510: 1509: 1507: 1493: 1489: 1485: 1479: 1471: 1467: 1464:(10): 26–29. 1463: 1459: 1452: 1444: 1440: 1435: 1430: 1426: 1422: 1418: 1414: 1410: 1403: 1395: 1391: 1384: 1376: 1372: 1365: 1357: 1353: 1346: 1332:on 2018-10-19 1328: 1324: 1320: 1316: 1312: 1307: 1302: 1298: 1294: 1287: 1280: 1272: 1268: 1264: 1260: 1256: 1252: 1248: 1244: 1237: 1230: 1222: 1218: 1212: 1204: 1200: 1193: 1185: 1181: 1177: 1173: 1168: 1163: 1160:(7227): 245. 1159: 1155: 1151: 1144: 1136: 1135:New Scientist 1132: 1125: 1117: 1113: 1109: 1105: 1101: 1097: 1094:(3): 274–90. 1093: 1089: 1082: 1075: 1069: 1064: 1056: 1052: 1048: 1044: 1039: 1034: 1030: 1026: 1019: 1011: 1010:The Economist 1007: 1001: 993: 989: 985: 981: 977: 973: 968: 963: 959: 955: 951: 944: 933: 932: 924: 910:on 2016-10-24 909: 905: 899: 893: 889: 881: 877: 873: 869: 865: 861: 857: 853: 846: 839: 831: 827: 823: 819: 815: 811: 804: 796: 792: 788: 784: 779: 774: 770: 766: 759: 752: 744: 740: 736: 732: 727: 722: 718: 714: 710: 703: 695: 691: 687: 683: 679: 675: 671: 667: 662: 657: 653: 649: 645: 638: 630: 626: 621: 616: 611: 606: 602: 598: 594: 587: 579: 575: 571: 567: 560: 552: 546: 532:on 2013-06-14 531: 527: 521: 513: 509: 506:(10): 26–29. 505: 501: 494: 486: 482: 478: 474: 470: 466: 463:(2): 358–67. 462: 458: 454: 447: 439: 435: 428: 420: 416: 409: 407: 398: 394: 390: 386: 382: 378: 371: 363: 359: 355: 351: 347: 343: 336: 329: 320: 315: 311: 307: 300: 293: 285: 281: 274: 266: 262: 255: 247: 243: 239: 235: 230: 225: 222:(2): 220–44. 221: 217: 210: 206: 198: 196: 191: 186: 184: 176:Controversies 173: 170: 169: 168:The Economist 163: 159: 154: 150: 143: 139: 137: 129: 125: 123: 118: 116: 107: 103: 101: 90: 88: 83: 79: 75: 71: 67: 57: 55: 51: 47: 37: 35: 29: 26: 22: 18: 1491: 1487: 1478: 1461: 1458:Science News 1457: 1451: 1419:(7447): 16. 1416: 1412: 1402: 1393: 1383: 1374: 1364: 1355: 1345: 1334:. Retrieved 1327:the original 1296: 1292: 1279: 1246: 1242: 1229: 1220: 1211: 1202: 1192: 1157: 1153: 1143: 1134: 1124: 1091: 1087: 1074: 1063: 1028: 1024: 1018: 1009: 1000: 957: 953: 943: 930: 923: 912:. Retrieved 908:the original 898: 888: 855: 851: 838: 813: 809: 803: 768: 764: 751: 716: 712: 702: 651: 647: 637: 600: 597:PLOS Biology 596: 586: 569: 565: 559: 545: 534:. Retrieved 530:the original 520: 503: 500:Science News 499: 493: 460: 456: 446: 437: 427: 418: 380: 376: 370: 345: 341: 328: 309: 305: 292: 283: 273: 264: 254: 219: 215: 209: 194: 187: 179: 166: 155: 151: 148: 138: 134: 119: 112: 96: 63: 43: 30: 16: 15: 678:11336/56976 572:(1): 2–19. 17:Hal Pashler 1506:Categories 1336:2016-12-04 1243:NeuroImage 914:2016-11-30 648:NeuroImage 603:(2): e37. 536:2016-11-30 201:References 1033:CiteSeerX 962:CiteSeerX 656:CiteSeerX 526:"Fellows" 314:CiteSeerX 224:CiteSeerX 80:from the 56:in 1985. 40:Education 1443:23636371 1315:26162104 1271:18230380 1263:22270348 1184:10076461 1176:19148065 1108:26158964 1055:19379049 992:44718192 984:18727777 872:19076480 830:17638498 795:15893469 743:17545490 694:15024677 686:21988891 629:15719056 485:14741205 477:10789200 419:Newsweek 362:17638498 72:and the 1421:Bibcode 1323:2112166 880:3163864 787:1435266 735:3226885 397:2982177 246:7972591 1441:  1413:Nature 1321:  1313:  1269:  1261:  1182:  1174:  1154:Nature 1116:242553 1114:  1106:  1053:  1035:  990:  982:  964:  878:  870:  828:  793:  785:  741:  733:  692:  684:  658:  627:  620:546328 617:  483:  475:  395:  360:  316:  312:(13). 306:Psyche 244:  226:  60:Honors 1330:(PDF) 1319:S2CID 1289:(PDF) 1267:S2CID 1239:(PDF) 1180:S2CID 1112:S2CID 1084:(PDF) 988:S2CID 935:(PDF) 876:S2CID 848:(PDF) 791:S2CID 761:(PDF) 739:S2CID 690:S2CID 481:S2CID 393:S2CID 338:(PDF) 302:(PDF) 1494:(6). 1439:PMID 1311:PMID 1259:PMID 1172:PMID 1104:PMID 1051:PMID 980:PMID 868:PMID 826:PMID 783:PMID 731:PMID 682:PMID 625:PMID 473:PMID 358:PMID 242:PMID 1466:doi 1462:181 1429:doi 1417:497 1301:doi 1251:doi 1162:doi 1158:457 1096:doi 1043:doi 972:doi 860:doi 818:doi 814:114 773:doi 721:doi 674:hdl 666:doi 615:PMC 605:doi 574:doi 508:doi 504:181 465:doi 461:107 385:doi 350:doi 346:114 234:doi 220:116 1508:: 1490:. 1486:. 1460:. 1437:. 1427:. 1415:. 1411:. 1392:. 1373:. 1354:. 1317:. 1309:. 1295:. 1291:. 1265:. 1257:. 1247:62 1245:. 1241:. 1219:. 1201:. 1178:. 1170:. 1156:. 1152:. 1133:. 1110:. 1102:. 1090:. 1086:. 1049:. 1041:. 1029:35 1027:. 1008:. 986:. 978:. 970:. 958:19 956:. 952:. 874:. 866:. 856:19 854:. 850:. 824:. 812:. 789:. 781:. 769:20 767:. 763:. 737:. 729:. 717:44 715:. 711:. 688:. 680:. 672:. 664:. 652:59 650:. 646:. 623:. 613:. 599:. 595:. 570:43 568:. 502:. 479:. 471:. 459:. 455:. 436:. 417:. 405:^ 391:. 381:39 379:. 356:. 344:. 340:. 308:. 304:. 282:. 263:. 240:. 232:. 218:. 185:. 89:. 1492:7 1472:. 1468:: 1445:. 1431:: 1423:: 1396:. 1377:. 1358:. 1339:. 1303:: 1297:9 1273:. 1253:: 1223:. 1205:. 1186:. 1164:: 1137:. 1118:. 1098:: 1092:4 1057:. 1045:: 994:. 974:: 917:. 882:. 862:: 832:. 820:: 797:. 775:: 745:. 723:: 696:. 676:: 668:: 631:. 607:: 601:3 580:. 576:: 539:. 514:. 510:: 487:. 467:: 440:. 421:. 399:. 387:: 364:. 352:: 322:. 310:5 286:. 267:. 248:. 236:: 32:(

Index

University of California, San Diego
Psychological refractory period
learning styles
Brown University
University of Pennsylvania
University of California, San Diego
Society of Experimental Psychologists
Association for Psychological Science
Psychonomic Society
Troland Research Awards
National Academy of Sciences
University of California, San Diego
Psychological Refractory Period

change blindness
testing effect


Wisdom of Crowds
Francis Galton
The Economist
cross-validation
learning styles
CiteSeerX
10.1.1.324.4916
doi
10.1037/0033-2909.116.2.220
PMID
7972591
"The Brain: The "Router" in Your Head—a Bottleneck of Processing"

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑