Knowledge

Green affordable housing

Source đź“ť

360:
option to use Weatherization funds to support appliance purchases. However, unlike weatherization programs, the gains in household budgets are often not worth the investment. A 2010 study examined the households' purchasing habits in regard to high-efficiency appliances. Using household-level data, this study determines that homeowners are significantly more likely to own energy efficient large appliances, such as refrigerators or washing machines. However, the results show that the cost of this problem is negligible compared to overall energy consumption. This finding is important considering the increasing efficiency standards for household appliances. A higher standard may put simple appliances out of the price range of low income households, while not offering much energy relief for households that do own them.
340:
effect of green standards on the costs of affordable housing projects in Seattle and Portland. This study compared "standard housing projects" (i.e. projects with no explicit sustainability goals) and projects attempting to achieve Built Green or LEED certification. The study includes both public and private affordable housing projects. At the time of the study, both cities had high sustainability standards for public projects, and Washington has only increased that standard since then. Construction cost analysis (in terms of cost per square foot) showed no significant difference between standard projects and green-rated projects. The study is limited by a small sample size, because of which they could not compare public and privately funded projects.
310:
housing projects. The improved quality and energy efficiency of these projects result in direct financial benefit in the form of reduced energy bills, reduced outlays for assistance to low-income households, reduced rates of shut-offs and thus reduced related administrative costs. Indirect financial co-benefits accrue to residents, property owners and tax-payers and society as a whole. Examples of these co-benefits are increased property values and economic activity, increased home and fire safety and reduced involuntary mobility for low-income households. Potential co-benefits for social welfare and livelihood include improved comfort, health and safety for the residents, community pride and improved health outcomes.
161:
households, who are particularly exposed to poor housing quality and increases in general life costs, e.g. for utilities or medical expenses. Economically, sustainable design lowers the lifetime cost of a building. Since the preservation of affordable housing is sensitive to public funding, making affordable housing greener is a logic step to reducing long-term costs and increasing stability. Green design increases the economics, social equity, and environmental impact of affordable housing projects.
432:, displacing low-income residents in the process and reducing the number of existing affordable housings. This limits opportunities for low-income residents to access affordable housing options. It can also indirectly influence the development of new affordable housing in these neighborhoods. The demand for housing in environmentally improved areas or with green housing may attract developers who prioritize higher-end or market-rate housing, rather than affordable or subsidized housing options. 390:, greenhouse gas emissions from the construction, operation, maintenance, and demolition of buildings and structures accounted for 37 percent of total energy and process-related CO2 emissions in 2021. Additionally, this sector contributes significantly to non-degradable waste. However, more and more construction companies diverge to a more sustainable and resilient construction when building new buildings or adapting existing buildings. Adapting existing buildings to make them greener or ' 129:, some elements recur in describing the concept. A Green Building can thus be defined as a high-performance building designed, built, operated and disposed of in a resource-efficient manner with the aim to minimize the overall (negative) impact on the built environment, human health and the natural environment. Some examples of green building features are choice of site and orientation, efficient use of materials and resources, indoor environmental quality and innovation. 24: 210:' (HHS) poverty guidelines rose from 10.7 percent in 1997 to 13.5 percent in 2009. Utilities are included in housing expenditures in calculations of housing affordability. However, higher energy costs mean that rents will be higher and/or that more assistance is needed to cover the difference between actual and "affordable" energy expenditures, assistance that already is insufficient to cover this gap. 194:, a phenomenomen that is more common among lower-income household than among households in general. Over the past decade home energy costs have risen in American homes in general. For low-income households this cost increase is even more pressing, for which home energy expenditures can be as high as a fifth of household income and more than a quarter of total housing costs. For that reason, improving 369:
seek to develop Green Affordable Housing while continuously evaluating the efforts. Some early learning point to the importance of training, outreach and resource coordination for the success of a green affordable housing program. For example, the government of Canada give out grants to retrofit existing homes as part of the Canada Greener Homes Initiative.
352:(WAP) offers the chance for low-income families to improve their housing in order to reduce energy consumption and costs. WAP uses funds from the federal Department of Energy. Federal funds are distributed by state offices and services are provided by local agencies. WAP has suffered because of increased competition for federal funds. The 182:
since 1995, but many of the remaining units are in older buildings. Due for example to differences in building standards, technical development and historical maintenance, the older building stock is generally of worse quality than newer buildings. Deficits include cold down draft, poor insulation and inefficient windows and appliances.
256:
housing and the type of transportation options that it supports. "Dispersed, low-density housing often cannot support viable public transit, biking, or pedestrian options, all but making auto ownership a necessary cost. The true cost of housing, therefore, is the combined cost of housing plus transportation."
1569:
Anguelovski, Isabelle; Connolly, James J. T.; Cole, Helen; Garcia-Lamarca, Melissa; Triguero-Mas, Margarita; Baró, Francesc; Martin, Nicholas; Conesa, David; Shokry, Galia; del Pulgar, Carmen Pérez; Ramos, Lucia Argüelles; Matheney, Austin; Gallez, Elsa; Oscilowicz, Emilia; Máñez, Jésua López (2 July
339:
The potential problem with sustainability standards is that projects will be more costly and projects will become cost prohibitive. While units that are built will be higher efficiency, the number of available units could decrease because of costs. A 2009 study prepared by Davis Langdon examines the
359:
Energy-efficient appliances are another method for households to decrease energy use. Low-income households have trouble realizing this gain energy efficiency. Energy-efficient appliances require a large up-front investment, and savings will not be realized for many years. Local grantees have the
205:
Energy expenditures for low income households have risen over the past decades, and the energy burden (energy expenditures as share of household income) has increased since 1997. Mean residential energy expenditures increased by 27 percent from 2001 to 2005, to $ 1,522, and by almost 20 percent to $
173:
Policy programs that require green building standards in new construction will contribute to greening the affordable housing stock. However, new construction, whether green or conventional building, will in general be of higher quality, more efficient and healthier than older buildings. In contrast,
160:
Sustainability measures obviously help the environment, but they can help the economics and social equity of housing projects as well. Housing units with a better design can improve health outcomes. With lower utility costs and improved health outcomes, the projects are more beneficial to low-income
423:
projects and neighborhoods undergoing environmental improvements often become more attractive places to live, driving up property values, rent prices, and overall cost of living. However, urban greening it is important to note that urban greening can be a cause and effect of green gentrification as
181:
Existing low-cost units tend to be older than the housing stock in general. For example, in 1995, 68% of the affordable rental housing stock was constructed before 1970 and another 21% were built before 1980. A considerable share of the older affordable rental stock has been removed from the market
92:
and the cost of housing become alarming issues. For example, the United States adopted state and local policies that favor or require green building practices for publicly owned or funded buildings. Potential benefits of green affordable housing include lower energy cost burden and improved health.
368:
As Green Affordable Housing still is a rather marginal phenomenon the outcomes of policy programs and specific interventions remain to be examined and confirmed. However, a number of studies are underway to examine the effects on health, energy savings and project costs. Other research initiatives
318:
Governments, local housing authorities, and other interested parties can either begin new affordable housing projects with sustainable design, or retrofit the existing stock. While new projects require a larger upfront cost, these projects provide a greater return on investment than retrofitting.
255:
There are many new types of products in the market that offer green affordable housing. The type of area the housing is located in (rural versus suburban versus urban) can also play a big role in choosing the best resource in building affordable green housing. Other factors include the location of
309:
Energy efficiency and other sustainability improvements for low-income households have external benefits as well. Governments, energy-providers, property owners, and taxpayers all experience direct financial, indirect financial, and social welfare and livelihood co-benefits from green affordable
305:
The potential benefits of green affordable housing projects can be divided into direct, regional and global benefits. The direct benefits include lower utility costs, a healthier indoor environment and increased durability. Regional benefits include support for solid waste management and improved
135:
in the US is defined as dwelling units whose total housing costs fit within the budget of households at the local median income level. Affordability is commonly defined as not spending more than 30 percent of household income on housing. Given the higher exposure of low-income households and the
327:
To ensure the energy efficiency of affordable housing, state and local governments have implemented sustainability standards. Washington was the first state to enact green building legislation in the U.S., with its Evergreen Sustainability Development Standard. This standard requires that all
301:
potential benefits include improved health and comfort for residents, minimizing the burden on local infrastructure and improved aesthetics. Affordable housing projects emphasize all three benefits, because they replace deteriorating stock, which harm the environment most and provide the least
259:
Currently, one third of the human population resides in earthen houses; in developing countries this figure is more than one half. To build shelter in these developing countries with traditional industrial building materials (i.e. brick, concrete and steel) has proven impossible to fulfill the
222:
for those living in affordable housing. Green updates to existing units can improve health outcomes. In addition, new housing units that address the causes of health issues improve the sustainability of the house. These units will have a lower lifetime building cost (because they won't need
268:
Funds available to the development and maintenance of affordable housing are scarce and, in order to maximize the supply of housing, low construction costs are often favored in choosing projects. However, one of the main arguments for green affordable housing is that a higher upfront cost for
152:
Publicly sponsored affordable housing projects use public funds or tax breaks in order to increase the stock of housing available to low income people. In addition, these projects often seek to improve the quality of the stock, in order to offer "decent, safe, sanitary, and affordable living
538: 462:
By addressing the challenges of environmental gentrification and promoting affordable housing opportunities, stakeholders can work towards creating more inclusive, equitable, and sustainable communities where all residents can benefit from green affordable housing.
427:
Additionally, green gentrification can directly affect the availability and affordability of existing housing stock. As property values rise, landlords may be incentivized to convert affordable rental units into higher-priced green housing or green
169:
The affordable housing stock varies in terms of ownership, type and quality. However, financing of affordable housing has in most cases been constrained which means quality of affordable housing construction projects often has been compromised.
281:) for housing often require a longer term perspective from its builders. However, the need to preserve affordability of housing sometimes restricts value enhancement over time and may thus be a barrier to investing in green features. 443:. Policymakers, urban planners, and community stakeholders must implement strategies to preserve and expand affordable housing opportunities in environmentally improved neighborhoods. Strategies may include implementing inclusionary 252:. However, careful planning and deliberate choices can minimize these upfront costs. It is expected that the costs of building green will decrease over time, thanks to experience and the development of products and services. 206:
1,822 by fiscal year 2009. The mean group residential energy burden (the ratio between mean energy expenditures and mean income for a given set of households) for households with incomes at or below 150 percent of
93:
One challenge to green affordable housing is the tendency to prioritize short-term costs over long-term benefits, leading to higher upfront cost. The challenge for green housing advocates is to see to the
402:
One significant challenge facing green affordable housing initiatives is the phenomenon of urban greening (integration of green spaces and vegetation to improve the urban environment) which can lead to
385:
One significant aspect to consider in the context of green affordable housing is the environmental impact of building construction, operation, maintenance, and demolition. According to estimates by the
105:(also known as green gentrification), which can drive up housing prices and becomes a challenge for green affordable housing. Green affordable housing has taken form in traditionally wooden homes, 277:
and/or higher durability the higher upfront capital cost needed for construction or renovation can be justified. This is especially true considering that public funding and tax breaks (like the
424:
their relationship can be influenced by many factors such as "green space developments, including available suitable land, financial resources, political leadership, and policies and plans."
97:
of the building. Many affordable housing projects already find it a challenge to raise capital to finance basic affordable housing. This challenge is compounded by the phenomenon of
810: 293:
benefits are enhancement and protection of biodiversity and ecosystems; improved air and water quality; reduced waste stream and conservation and restoration of natural resources.
1079: 452: 1110: 297:
potential benefits include lower operation costs; a market for green products and services; enhanced occupier productivity and the optimization of life-cycle performance.
1347:
Svintsov, S. (2023). Affordable housing and its environmental impact. https://www.theseus.fi/bitstream/handle/10024/804371/Svintsov_Stepan.pdf?sequence=2&isAllowed=y
219: 1229: 456: 412: 429: 207: 1140: 153:
environments". Green Affordable Housing projects add to those goals by lowering the lifetime cost of units and improving the quality. The concept of the
1291: 157:
defines sustainability to include economics, social equity and the environment. Affordable housing already addresses economics and social equity.
650: 319:
Initiatives for Green Affordable Housing are becoming increasingly more common, supported for example by The Green Affordable Housing Coalition
1485:"Promotion of Green and Affordable Housing and Allied Sectors in India: For the Faster and Sustainable Economic Development in the Digital Era" 1198: 34: 1357: 821: 781: 723: 1076: 199: 377:
As green affordable housing is a tangable solution for better housing for humans and the environment, it comes with its challenges.
244:
premium compared to the cost of conventional buildings. Newer technology and the requirement of special labor skills are examples of
1444:"Closing the Affordable Housing Gap: Identifying the Barriers Hindering the Sustainable Design and Construction of Affordable Homes" 1320: 623: 1107: 1060: 356:(ARRA) designated funds for WAP. The program as a whole was criticized for its failure to distribute these funds effectively. 353: 1644: 1008: 955: 387: 847: 690: 435:
Efforts to address green gentrification and its impact on affordable housing require a collective approach that balances
175: 1237: 328:
buildings that receive public funding meet "79 criteria that safeguard health and safety, increase durability, promote
873: 349: 68: 269:
construction/renovation can be motivated by a lower operating cost over the life-time of the building, i.e. a lower
1260: 1141:"The MIGHHTY Study: Moving into Green Healthy Housing—The Yield in Reduced Medical Care Costs and Improved Health" 512: 1148: 562:
Energy Efficiency in Affordable Housing. A Guide to Developing and Implementing Greenhouse Gas Reduction Program
88:
that incorporates sustainable features. The phenomenon has become increasingly common in all over the world as
1639:. Routledge critical studies in urbanism and the city. London New York: Routledge Taylor & Francis Group. 306:
water quality. Globally benefits may include reduced energy use and carbon footprint and lower material use.
46: 554: 436: 404: 102: 141: 1707: 137: 939: 1171: 661: 416: 348:
Many jurisdictions offer options for updating the energy efficiency of existing housing stock. The US
1404: 1528: 543:
KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Department of Real Estate and Construction Management. 2011, p. 3f
487: 1529:"Livable streets? Green gentrification and the displacement of longtime residents in Ghent, Belgium" 1513: 1206: 411:
occurs when environmentally improved neighborhoods attract higher-income residents, which can cause
289:
General green building benefits include environmental, economic and social benefits. The potential
50: 734: 42: 1712: 1665:"Keeping policy commitments: An organizational capability approach to local green housing equity" 1033: 420: 260:
immense requirements for shelter in developing countries experiencing rapid population growth.
237: 174:
the existing affordable stock constitutes a challenge from many perspectives. According to the
1500: 1583: 1386:(p. 11). Urban Land. https://www.esbnyc.com/sites/default/files/uli_building_retro_fits.pdf 627: 482: 195: 336:.” This applies to all publicly subsidized affordable housing, but not private projects. 8: 1664: 1587: 948:
Building with Earth: Design and Technology of a Sustainable Architecture by Gernot Minke
780:
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Administration for Children and Families.
1612: 1571: 477: 329: 154: 132: 114: 85: 1199:"DC Green Housing Rehabilitation: Do Green Buildings Improve the Health of Residents?" 136:
need for public assistance, the most salient features of green affordable housing are
1684: 1640: 1617: 1599: 1548: 1465: 1424: 1420: 1014: 1004: 972: 951: 903: 394:' is also a more sustainable initiatives to minimize waste and cost of construction. 1663:
Deslatte, Aaron; Kim, Serena; Hawkins, Christopher V.; Stokan, Eric (January 2024).
1057: 1676: 1607: 1591: 1540: 1488: 1455: 1416: 1403:
Sharifi, Farahnaz; Nygaard, Andi; Stone, Wendy M.; Levin, Iris (1 September 2021).
540:
Low-energy residential buildings. Evaluation from investor and tenant perspectives.
459:
to ensure that low-income residents can continue to afford housing in these areas.
397: 333: 1544: 1484: 1114: 1095: 1083: 1064: 582: 363: 270: 94: 1595: 408: 391: 274: 213: 126: 98: 89: 1018: 380: 313: 1701: 1688: 1635:
Baeten, Guy; Listerborn, Carina; Persdotter, Maria; Pull, Emil, eds. (2021).
1603: 1552: 1469: 1428: 913: 440: 223:
updates) and cost less to inhabitants (because of improved health outcomes).
1492: 1621: 1358:"Three strategies to adapt social housing to the effects of climate change" 1126: 998: 472: 448: 249: 241: 191: 164: 198:
has been pointed out as one of the challenges for American housing by the
1292:"Boston's Green Affordable Housing Program: Challenges and Opportunities" 920: 492: 245: 896: 894: 779: 1680: 1460: 1443: 1268: 724:"Evaluating the co-benefits of low-income energy-efficiency programmes" 106: 1289: 1568: 1405:"Green gentrification or gentrified greening: Metropolitan Melbourne" 1230:"The GREAT Study: Green Rehabilitation of Elder Apartment Treatments" 891: 415:
and augmentation of housing costs for existing low-income residents.
178:(NCHH) 5.7 million of American families live in substandard housing. 110: 1527:
Goossens, Cedric; Oosterlynck, Stijn; Bradt, Lieve (20 April 2020).
759: 731:
Results of the Dublin Workshop on Fuel Poverty, 27–28 January 2011
1252: 226: 185: 1482: 1290:
Burke, Patricia M.; Nelson Galen; Wilson Rickerson (2007–2008).
970: 552: 398:
Addressing the Impact of Urban Greening on Housing Affordability
621: 444: 1634: 1299:
New York University Journal of Legislation & Public Policy
1031: 364:
Evaluation of Green Affordable Housing policies and incentives
125:
Although there is no single definition for what constitutes a
1108:
Obama's Weatherizing Program Lags Far behind on its Job Goals
802: 278: 33:
deal primarily with the United States and do not represent a
1572:"Green gentrification in European and North American cities" 1172:"An Evaluation of Green Housing Rehabilitation in Minnesota" 1127:
Evaluating the Slow Adoption of Energy Efficient Investments
752: 688: 648: 214:
Housing conditions and health problems in affordable housing
381:
Environmental Impact of Building Construction and Operation
314:
Measures and strategies to achieve Green Affordable Housing
218:
The deterioration of the existing stock has contributed to
1637:
Housing displacement: conceptual and methodological issues
1117:, Garance Burke, 28 March 2010, retrieved 21 November 2011 717: 715: 372: 1662: 1526: 1402: 165:
Characteristics of the existing affordable housing stock
1129:, Lucas W. Davis, June 2010, retrieved 21 November 2011 808: 583:"25 CFR § 700.55 - Decent, safe, and sanitary dwelling" 1086:, Davis Langdon, July 2009, retrieved 21 November 2011 712: 236:
Depending on the extent of sustainability design, the
1236:. National Center for Healthy Housing. Archived from 1205:. National Center for Healthy Housing. Archived from 1147:. National Center for Healthy Housing. Archived from 555:"Local Government Climate and Energy Strategy Series" 546: 332:, preserve the environment, and increase energy and 190:
Poor housing quality and low incomes contributes to
1483:William George A J; Dr. Manoj P. K (1 March 2024). 1258: 733:. International Energy Agency (IEA). Archived from 902: 721: 642: 343: 1067:, 17 November 2011, retrieved on 21 November 2011 684: 682: 1699: 789:LIHEAP Home Energy Notebook For Fiscal Year 2009 609:Housing Policy in the United States. 2nd edition 519:. Green. A Blog About Energy and the Environment 1098:, 14 September 2010, retrieved 21 November 2011 1319:Canada, Natural Resources (28 December 2022). 1003:(Revised ed.). Washington: Island Press. 679: 504: 227:Costs and benefits of Green Affordable Housing 186:Utility expenditures for low-income households 1058:Evergreen Sustainability Development Standard 925:United States Environmental Protection Agency 773: 31:The examples and perspective in this article 996: 322: 208:U.S. Department of Health and Human Services 782:"Low Income Home Energy Assistance Program" 273:. If the initial investment leads to lower 1611: 1459: 1000:Blueprint for greening affordable housing 997:Wells, Walker; Vermeer, Kimberly (2020). 964: 905:Blueprint for Greening Affordable Housing 510: 69:Learn how and when to remove this message 865: 606: 140:, material use/durability and a healthy 1169: 845: 600: 1700: 1398: 1396: 1394: 1392: 1318: 1077:Cost of Green Affordable Housing Study 1034:"Green Affordable housing description" 971:U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 848:"Cost of building green homes falling" 698:The State of the Nation's Housing 2011 658:The State of the Nation's Housing 2008 553:U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 373:Challenges of Green Affordable Housing 354:American Recovery and Reinvestment Act 1658: 1656: 1564: 1562: 1343: 1341: 1178:. National Center for Healthy Housing 945: 921:"Smart Growth and Affordable Housing" 900: 622:National Center for Healthy Housing. 513:"Debating the Green Building Premium" 1441: 1032:Green Affordable Housing Coalition. 1025: 660:. Harvard University. Archived from 511:Galbraith, Kate (20 November 2008). 17: 1389: 1227: 615: 176:National Center for Healthy Housing 13: 1653: 1559: 1338: 1261:"University of Minnesota overview" 1170:Breysse, Jill (16 February 2022). 1138: 871: 689:Joint Center for Housing Studies. 649:Joint Center for Housing Studies. 263: 14: 1724: 1321:"Canada Greener Homes Initiative" 1265:The Affordable Housing Initiative 1196: 587:LII / Legal Information Institute 350:Weatherization Assistance Program 1421:10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105577 846:Wellman, Alex (26 August 2011). 200:Joint Center for Housing Studies 22: 1628: 1520: 1476: 1435: 1376: 1350: 1312: 1283: 1221: 1190: 1163: 1132: 1120: 1101: 1089: 1070: 1051: 990: 839: 818:LIHEAP Coverage (state ranking) 811:"Home Energy Affordability Gap" 344:Updating existing housing stock 231: 1442:Reid, Alasdair (29 May 2023). 909:. Washington DC: Island Press. 575: 531: 1: 1545:10.1080/02723638.2019.1686307 809:Fischer, Sheehan and Colton. 537:Zalejska-Jonsson, Agnieszka. 498: 302:economic and social benefit. 279:low-income housing tax credit 147: 120: 874:"Building Green on a Budget" 437:environmental sustainability 405:environmental gentrification 103:environmental gentrification 7: 1325:natural-resources.canada.ca 878:Environmental Building News 466: 453:affordable housing mandates 284: 45:, discuss the issue on the 10: 1729: 1596:10.1038/s41467-022-31572-1 624:"State of Healthy Housing" 607:Schwartz, Alex F. (2010). 417:Energy-efficient buildings 1669:Review of Policy Research 1259:University of Minnesota. 1096:Weatherization Assistance 488:Climate change mitigation 323:Standards for new housing 86:reasonably priced housing 722:Heffner & Campbell. 388:UN Environment Programme 109:and most recently with ' 82:Green affordable housing 1493:10.5281/ZENODO.10780776 1063:5 November 2011 at the 852:Inside Housing magazine 760:"US Energy Price Trend" 421:sustainable development 240:often imply an initial 238:costs of green building 1508:Cite journal requires 946:Minke, Gernot (2009). 901:Wells, Walker (2007). 611:. New York: Routledge. 1576:Nature Communications 1382:Lockwood, C. (n.d.). 457:community land trusts 1362:Ciudades Sostenibles 700:. Harvard University 691:"Housing Challenges" 483:Green infrastructure 51:create a new article 43:improve this article 1588:2022NatCo..13.3816A 1151:on 12 November 2011 1113:6 June 2012 at the 1082:3 July 2011 at the 1038:About the Coalition 630:on 21 November 2011 430:luxury developments 115:shipping containers 1708:Affordable housing 1681:10.1111/ropr.12499 1461:10.3390/su15118754 1384:Building Retrofits 1240:on 9 November 2011 1209:on 3 November 2011 973:"Why Build Green?" 740:on 3 November 2011 478:Sustainable living 330:sustainable living 155:triple bottom line 142:indoor environment 133:Affordable Housing 1646:978-0-429-42704-6 1139:Jacobs, David E. 1010:978-1-64283-039-2 957:978-3-7643-8992-5 407:. Environmental 250:building projects 196:energy efficiency 79: 78: 71: 53:, as appropriate. 1720: 1693: 1692: 1660: 1651: 1650: 1632: 1626: 1625: 1615: 1566: 1557: 1556: 1524: 1518: 1517: 1511: 1506: 1504: 1496: 1480: 1474: 1473: 1463: 1439: 1433: 1432: 1400: 1387: 1380: 1374: 1373: 1371: 1369: 1354: 1348: 1345: 1336: 1335: 1333: 1331: 1316: 1310: 1309: 1307: 1305: 1296: 1287: 1281: 1280: 1278: 1276: 1271:on 26 April 2012 1267:. Archived from 1256: 1250: 1249: 1247: 1245: 1225: 1219: 1218: 1216: 1214: 1194: 1188: 1187: 1185: 1183: 1167: 1161: 1160: 1158: 1156: 1136: 1130: 1124: 1118: 1105: 1099: 1093: 1087: 1074: 1068: 1055: 1049: 1048: 1046: 1044: 1029: 1023: 1022: 994: 988: 987: 985: 983: 968: 962: 961: 943: 937: 936: 934: 932: 917: 911: 910: 908: 898: 889: 888: 886: 884: 869: 863: 862: 860: 858: 843: 837: 836: 834: 832: 827:on 26 April 2012 826: 820:. Archived from 815: 806: 800: 799: 797: 795: 786: 777: 771: 770: 768: 766: 756: 750: 749: 747: 745: 739: 728: 719: 710: 709: 707: 705: 695: 686: 677: 676: 674: 672: 666: 655: 651:"Rental Housing" 646: 640: 639: 637: 635: 626:. Archived from 619: 613: 612: 604: 598: 597: 595: 593: 579: 573: 572: 570: 568: 559: 550: 544: 535: 529: 528: 526: 524: 508: 334:water efficiency 74: 67: 63: 60: 54: 26: 25: 18: 1728: 1727: 1723: 1722: 1721: 1719: 1718: 1717: 1698: 1697: 1696: 1661: 1654: 1647: 1633: 1629: 1567: 1560: 1533:Urban Geography 1525: 1521: 1509: 1507: 1498: 1497: 1481: 1477: 1440: 1436: 1409:Land Use Policy 1401: 1390: 1381: 1377: 1367: 1365: 1356: 1355: 1351: 1346: 1339: 1329: 1327: 1317: 1313: 1303: 1301: 1294: 1288: 1284: 1274: 1272: 1257: 1253: 1243: 1241: 1228:Breysse, Jill. 1226: 1222: 1212: 1210: 1195: 1191: 1181: 1179: 1168: 1164: 1154: 1152: 1137: 1133: 1125: 1121: 1115:Wayback Machine 1106: 1102: 1094: 1090: 1084:Wayback Machine 1075: 1071: 1065:Wayback Machine 1056: 1052: 1042: 1040: 1030: 1026: 1011: 995: 991: 981: 979: 969: 965: 958: 944: 940: 930: 928: 919: 918: 914: 899: 892: 882: 880: 870: 866: 856: 854: 844: 840: 830: 828: 824: 813: 807: 803: 793: 791: 784: 778: 774: 764: 762: 758: 757: 753: 743: 741: 737: 726: 720: 713: 703: 701: 693: 687: 680: 670: 668: 667:on 30 June 2010 664: 653: 647: 643: 633: 631: 620: 616: 605: 601: 591: 589: 581: 580: 576: 566: 564: 557: 551: 547: 536: 532: 522: 520: 509: 505: 501: 469: 400: 383: 375: 366: 346: 325: 316: 287: 275:operating costs 271:life-cycle cost 266: 264:Life cycle cost 234: 229: 220:health problems 216: 188: 167: 150: 123: 95:life cycle cost 75: 64: 58: 55: 40: 27: 23: 12: 11: 5: 1726: 1716: 1715: 1713:Green politics 1710: 1695: 1694: 1675:(1): 135–159. 1652: 1645: 1627: 1558: 1539:(4): 550–572. 1519: 1510:|journal= 1475: 1448:Sustainability 1434: 1388: 1375: 1364:. 25 July 2023 1349: 1337: 1311: 1282: 1251: 1220: 1197:Aceti, Susan. 1189: 1162: 1131: 1119: 1100: 1088: 1069: 1050: 1024: 1009: 989: 977:Green Building 963: 956: 950:. De Gruyter. 938: 927:. 5 April 2013 912: 890: 872:Wilson, Alex. 864: 838: 801: 772: 751: 711: 678: 641: 614: 599: 574: 545: 530: 517:New York Times 502: 500: 497: 496: 495: 490: 485: 480: 475: 468: 465: 409:gentrification 399: 396: 392:green retrofit 382: 379: 374: 371: 365: 362: 345: 342: 324: 321: 315: 312: 286: 283: 265: 262: 233: 230: 228: 225: 215: 212: 187: 184: 166: 163: 149: 146: 127:Green Building 122: 119: 99:urban greening 90:climate change 77: 76: 37:of the subject 35:worldwide view 30: 28: 21: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1725: 1714: 1711: 1709: 1706: 1705: 1703: 1690: 1686: 1682: 1678: 1674: 1670: 1666: 1659: 1657: 1648: 1642: 1638: 1631: 1623: 1619: 1614: 1609: 1605: 1601: 1597: 1593: 1589: 1585: 1581: 1577: 1573: 1565: 1563: 1554: 1550: 1546: 1542: 1538: 1534: 1530: 1523: 1515: 1502: 1494: 1490: 1486: 1479: 1471: 1467: 1462: 1457: 1453: 1449: 1445: 1438: 1430: 1426: 1422: 1418: 1414: 1410: 1406: 1399: 1397: 1395: 1393: 1385: 1379: 1363: 1359: 1353: 1344: 1342: 1326: 1322: 1315: 1300: 1293: 1286: 1270: 1266: 1262: 1255: 1239: 1235: 1231: 1224: 1208: 1204: 1200: 1193: 1177: 1173: 1166: 1150: 1146: 1142: 1135: 1128: 1123: 1116: 1112: 1109: 1104: 1097: 1092: 1085: 1081: 1078: 1073: 1066: 1062: 1059: 1054: 1039: 1035: 1028: 1020: 1016: 1012: 1006: 1002: 1001: 993: 978: 974: 967: 959: 953: 949: 942: 926: 922: 916: 907: 906: 897: 895: 879: 875: 868: 853: 849: 842: 823: 819: 812: 805: 790: 783: 776: 761: 755: 736: 732: 725: 718: 716: 699: 692: 685: 683: 663: 659: 652: 645: 629: 625: 618: 610: 603: 588: 584: 578: 563: 556: 549: 542: 541: 534: 518: 514: 507: 503: 494: 491: 489: 486: 484: 481: 479: 476: 474: 471: 470: 464: 460: 458: 454: 450: 446: 442: 441:social equity 438: 433: 431: 425: 422: 418: 414: 410: 406: 395: 393: 389: 378: 370: 361: 357: 355: 351: 341: 337: 335: 331: 320: 311: 307: 303: 300: 296: 292: 291:environmental 282: 280: 276: 272: 261: 257: 253: 251: 247: 243: 239: 224: 221: 211: 209: 203: 201: 197: 193: 183: 179: 177: 171: 162: 158: 156: 145: 143: 139: 134: 130: 128: 118: 116: 112: 108: 104: 100: 96: 91: 87: 83: 73: 70: 62: 52: 48: 44: 38: 36: 29: 20: 19: 16: 1672: 1668: 1636: 1630: 1579: 1575: 1536: 1532: 1522: 1501:cite journal 1478: 1454:(11): 8754. 1451: 1447: 1437: 1412: 1408: 1383: 1378: 1366:. Retrieved 1361: 1352: 1328:. Retrieved 1324: 1314: 1302:. Retrieved 1298: 1285: 1273:. Retrieved 1269:the original 1264: 1254: 1242:. Retrieved 1238:the original 1233: 1223: 1211:. Retrieved 1207:the original 1202: 1192: 1180:. Retrieved 1175: 1165: 1153:. Retrieved 1149:the original 1144: 1134: 1122: 1103: 1091: 1072: 1053: 1041:. Retrieved 1037: 1027: 999: 992: 980:. Retrieved 976: 966: 947: 941: 929:. Retrieved 924: 915: 904: 881:. Retrieved 877: 867: 855:. Retrieved 851: 841: 829:. Retrieved 822:the original 817: 804: 792:. Retrieved 788: 775: 763:. Retrieved 754: 742:. Retrieved 735:the original 730: 702:. Retrieved 697: 669:. Retrieved 662:the original 657: 644: 632:. Retrieved 628:the original 617: 608: 602: 590:. Retrieved 586: 577: 565:. Retrieved 561: 548: 539: 533: 521:. Retrieved 516: 506: 473:Urbanization 461: 449:rent control 434: 426: 413:displacement 401: 384: 376: 367: 358: 347: 338: 326: 317: 308: 304: 298: 295:Economically 294: 290: 288: 267: 258: 254: 246:cost drivers 242:capital cost 235: 232:Upfront cost 217: 204: 192:fuel poverty 189: 180: 172: 168: 159: 151: 131: 124: 81: 80: 65: 59:January 2012 56: 32: 15: 1582:(1): 3816. 1487:: 251–266. 831:21 November 794:21 November 765:21 November 704:21 November 671:30 November 634:30 November 567:21 November 523:22 November 493:Placemaking 107:green homes 1702:Categories 1415:: 105577. 1304:3 December 1275:7 December 1244:3 December 1213:3 December 1155:3 December 1043:7 December 1019:1255777151 982:1 December 931:1 November 883:1 December 857:7 December 744:1 December 499:References 451:measures, 447:policies, 148:Background 138:energy use 121:Definition 1689:1541-132X 1604:2041-1723 1553:0272-3638 1470:2071-1050 1429:0264-8377 248:in green 111:upcycling 47:talk page 1622:35780176 1368:15 April 1330:15 April 1234:Research 1203:Research 1182:1 August 1176:Research 1145:Research 1111:Archived 1080:Archived 1061:Archived 592:2 August 467:See also 285:Benefits 41:You may 1613:9250502 1584:Bibcode 1570:2022). 1687:  1643:  1620:  1610:  1602:  1551:  1468:  1427:  1017:  1007:  954:  455:, and 445:zoning 299:Social 1295:(PDF) 825:(PDF) 814:(PDF) 785:(PDF) 738:(PDF) 727:(PDF) 694:(PDF) 665:(PDF) 654:(PDF) 558:(PDF) 439:with 49:, or 1685:ISSN 1641:ISBN 1618:PMID 1600:ISSN 1549:ISSN 1514:help 1466:ISSN 1425:ISSN 1370:2024 1332:2024 1306:2011 1277:2011 1246:2011 1215:2011 1184:2022 1157:2011 1045:2011 1015:OCLC 1005:ISBN 984:2011 952:ISBN 933:2013 885:2011 859:2011 833:2011 796:2011 767:2011 746:2011 706:2011 673:2011 636:2011 594:2022 569:2011 525:2011 101:and 1677:doi 1608:PMC 1592:doi 1541:doi 1489:doi 1456:doi 1417:doi 1413:108 84:is 1704:: 1683:. 1673:41 1671:. 1667:. 1655:^ 1616:. 1606:. 1598:. 1590:. 1580:13 1578:. 1574:. 1561:^ 1547:. 1537:41 1535:. 1531:. 1505:: 1503:}} 1499:{{ 1464:. 1452:15 1450:. 1446:. 1423:. 1411:. 1407:. 1391:^ 1360:. 1340:^ 1323:. 1297:. 1263:. 1232:. 1201:. 1174:. 1143:. 1036:. 1013:. 975:. 923:. 893:^ 876:. 850:. 816:. 787:. 729:. 714:^ 696:. 681:^ 656:. 585:. 560:. 515:. 419:, 202:. 144:. 117:. 113:' 1691:. 1679:: 1649:. 1624:. 1594:: 1586:: 1555:. 1543:: 1516:) 1512:( 1495:. 1491:: 1472:. 1458:: 1431:. 1419:: 1372:. 1334:. 1308:. 1279:. 1248:. 1217:. 1186:. 1159:. 1047:. 1021:. 986:. 960:. 935:. 887:. 861:. 835:. 798:. 769:. 748:. 708:. 675:. 638:. 596:. 571:. 527:. 72:) 66:( 61:) 57:( 39:.

Index

worldwide view
improve this article
talk page
create a new article
Learn how and when to remove this message
reasonably priced housing
climate change
life cycle cost
urban greening
environmental gentrification
green homes
upcycling
shipping containers
Green Building
Affordable Housing
energy use
indoor environment
triple bottom line
National Center for Healthy Housing
fuel poverty
energy efficiency
Joint Center for Housing Studies
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
health problems
costs of green building
capital cost
cost drivers
building projects
life-cycle cost
operating costs

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑