61:, and an asset split favoring the wife, when it was revealed to the husband's family, led to a challenge. Since the husband was alleged to not be mentally competent, this would mean that they were still married, unless the marriage was annulled. Various reputable rabbis in different countries disagreed on important legal details. The husband had left Poland and gone to London, while a major court in Germany, upon the request of a rabbi in Poland, had issued a controversial ruling nullifying the divorce.
64:
Further complications were that the Polish rabbi had written two identical letters, and the ruling in the second court was that the divorce was valid. Since the Polish rabbi died unexpectedly before either ruling came through, rabbis in many countries took sides.
236:
Deutsch, Gotthard; Schechter, Solomon; Seligsohn, M; Friedberg, Bernhard; London, N.T.; Rosenthal, Herman; Gottheil, Richard; Ginzberg, Louis; Singer, Isidore; Bamberger, Moses Löb (1906).
89:
Insanity pleas in the 20th and 21st centuries regarding marriage and divorce now have a better foundation, and it is still being discussed both in religious courts and academia.
77:, whose court accounted for the minority opinion that the divorce was invalid. As described in a book written a century later, the husband used a new ring and declared "
26:
was a contentious international 18th-century divorce case that ended when the allegedly insane husband remarried his "wife" in a marriage ceremony that omitted the
57:
A newly married man's odd behavior led to a secretive on-the-run divorce. The document was written in a bordertown between Dutch and German territories named
318:
298:
73:
Some time after talking with one rabbi in London, and subsequently with another, the husband returned to Poland, then traveled with his "wife" to
170:
218:
38:, fourteen days after the date on the 8 Elul 5526 (August 14, 1766) marriage document. The truncated ceremony was in 1767.
194:
41:
The central issue was whether the husband was of sound mind at the time of the divorce. Two books, published in 1769 (
343:
338:
333:
136:
262:
49:) gave extensive details of the case. A three-part article about this case was published in 2015.
31:
121:
81:(You remain betrothed to me with this ring in accordance with the laws of Moses and Israel).
8:
237:
267:
74:
327:
27:
171:"Jewish history: the infamous case of the 'Get of Cleves' part three"
34:
was 22 Elul 5526, and it was written in a German-Dutch border town,
283:
219:"Jewish history: the infamous case of the 'Get of Cleves' part two"
235:
112:
58:
35:
319:
a talk: Insanity and the Crazy Story of the Get of Cleves
150:
144:
137:"Mental Incompetence and Its Implications in Jewish Law"
79:
At od mekudeshes li betaba’as zo kedas Moshe ve-Yisrael
296:
212:
210:
208:
195:"The Infamous Case of the 'Get of Cleves' Part One"
188:
186:
184:
164:
162:
160:
216:
192:
168:
134:
325:
255:
205:
181:
157:
128:
108:
106:
104:
102:
30:of a standard Jewish wedding. The date on the
147:Journal of Halacha and Contemporary Society
99:
299:"Gersher 4.1 1969: The Cleves Get dilemma"
217:Rabbi Pini Dunner (September 25, 2015).
193:Rabbi Pini Dunner (September 10, 2015).
326:
169:Rabbi Pini Dunner (October 16, 2015).
281:
16:Contentious 18th-century divorce case
13:
14:
355:
312:
84:
52:
290:
275:
229:
1:
297:A. Rakeffet-Rothkoff (1969).
92:
68:
263:"Khelm, Shelomoh ben Mosheh"
7:
10:
360:
284:"Discovering Rav Elyashiv"
282:Bechhofer, Yosef Gavriel.
135:Rabbi J. David Bleich.
32:get (divorce document)
122:Encyclopaedia Judaica
242:Jewish Encyclopedia
124:. pp. 613–615.
344:Judaism in Germany
339:Divorce in Judaism
334:Jewish marital law
75:Frankfurt, Germany
268:YIVO Encyclopedia
351:
306:
305:
303:
294:
288:
287:
279:
273:
272:
259:
253:
252:
250:
248:
233:
227:
226:
214:
203:
202:
190:
179:
178:
166:
155:
154:
141:
132:
126:
125:
110:
359:
358:
354:
353:
352:
350:
349:
348:
324:
323:
315:
310:
309:
301:
295:
291:
280:
276:
261:
260:
256:
246:
244:
234:
230:
215:
206:
191:
182:
167:
158:
139:
133:
129:
120:. Vol. 5.
116:
111:
100:
95:
87:
71:
55:
17:
12:
11:
5:
357:
347:
346:
341:
336:
322:
321:
314:
313:External links
311:
308:
307:
289:
274:
254:
228:
223:Jewish Home LA
204:
199:Jewish Home LA
180:
175:Jewish Home LA
156:
127:
97:
96:
94:
91:
86:
83:
70:
67:
54:
51:
28:major portions
15:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
356:
345:
342:
340:
337:
335:
332:
331:
329:
320:
317:
316:
300:
293:
285:
278:
270:
269:
264:
258:
243:
239:
232:
224:
220:
213:
211:
209:
200:
196:
189:
187:
185:
176:
172:
165:
163:
161:
152:
148:
146:
138:
131:
123:
119:
114:
109:
107:
105:
103:
98:
90:
82:
80:
76:
66:
62:
60:
50:
48:
44:
39:
37:
33:
29:
25:
23:
292:
277:
266:
257:
247:November 15,
245:. Retrieved
241:
231:
222:
198:
174:
143:
130:
117:
88:
85:Aftereffects
78:
72:
63:
56:
53:Case summary
46:
45:) and 1770 (
43:Ohr HaYashar
42:
40:
21:
20:
18:
47:Ohr Yisroel
328:Categories
118:Cleves Get
93:References
69:Conclusion
238:"Landeau"
24:of Cleves
113:Cleves
59:Cleves
36:Cleves
302:(PDF)
140:(PDF)
249:2020
115:Get
19:The
151:RJJ
145:RJJ
22:Get
330::
265:.
240:.
221:.
207:^
197:.
183:^
173:.
159:^
149:.
142:.
101:^
304:.
286:.
271:.
251:.
225:.
201:.
177:.
153:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.