Knowledge

Gapping

Source πŸ“

298:, as many of the examples above illustrate. Faced with this challenge, one prominent approach is to assume some sort of movement. The remnants are moved out of an encompassing parent constituent so that the parent constituent can then be deleted. In other words, there is an ordering of transformations. First the remnants are moved out of their parent constituent and then that parent constituent is elided. The difficulty with such movement analyses concerns the nature of the movement mechanisms, since the movement mechanism needed to vacate the parent constituent would be unlike the recognized movement mechanisms (fronting, scrambling, extraposition). 31:. Gapping usually elides minimally a finite verb and further any non-finite verbs that are present. This material is "gapped" from the non-initial conjuncts of a coordinate structure. Gapping exists in many languages, but by no means in all of them, and gapping has been studied extensively and is therefore one of the more understood ellipsis mechanisms. 329:
The a-clause is from Ross, whereas the clauses b-i have been added to illustrate the role that the catena plays. The (at least somewhat) acceptable clauses a-d have the elided material corresponding to a catena each time, whereas the clauses e-i are unacceptable each time because the elided material
85:, but the verb has been 'gapped', that is, omitted. Gapping can span several verbs and nonfinite clause boundaries, as the second and third sentence illustrate, but it cannot apply across a finite clause boundary, as seen in the next sentence: 191:(= bare argument ellipsis) to be a particular manifestation of gapping where only one remnant appears instead of two or more. If this assumption is correct, then the same ellipsis mechanism is at work in the following cases: 293:
theories of syntax because it is not evident how one might produce a satisfactory analysis of the material that can be gapped. The problem concerns the fact that the elided material often does not qualify as a
229:
In its manifestation as stripping, the gapping mechanism occurs frequently. Gapping is widely assumed to obligatorily elide a finite verb. However, gapping can also occur when no finite verb is involved, e.g.
321: 313:. The elided material of gapping always qualifies as a catena. This situation is illustrated with the following tree, which shows the dependency structure of a well-known example from Ross 1970: 105:
Gapping is also incapable of operating backwards, which means that the antecedent to the gap must precede the gap. Attempts at gapping where the gap precedes its antecedent are quite bad, e.g.
511:
Ross, J. 1970. Gapping and the order of constituents. In M. Bierwisch & K Heidolph (eds.), Progress in linguistics: A collection of papers, pp. 249–259, The Hague: Mouton.
428:
For prominent studies of gapping, see for instance Ross (1970), Jackendoff (1971), Kuno (1976), Hankamer (1979), Hartmann (2000), Osborne (2006), Johnson (2009).
446:
That the gap often does not qualify as a constituent is a widely acknowledged fact of gapping. See for instance Kroeger (2004:1935) and Carnie (2013:459).
35:
is viewed as a particular manifestation of the gapping mechanism where just one remnant (instead of two or more) appears in the gapped/stripped conjunct.
419:
Gapping is limited to coordinate structures; it does not occur independent of coordination, as noted by McCawley (1988:48f.) and Kroeger (2004:35).
47:
to its left and a remnant to its right. The elided material of gapping in all the examples below is indicated with subscripts and a smaller font:
350:, etc.) can also all be investigated in terms of the catena. The elided material of most if not all ellipsis mechanisms corresponds to catenae. 455:
See Osborne et al. (2012) argue that the catena is the relevant unit of syntactic analysis for all types of ellipsis, not just for gapping.
43:
Canonical examples of gapping have a true "gap", which means the elided material appears medially in the non-initial conjuncts, with a
505:
Osborne, T., M. Putnam, and T. Groß 2012. Catenae: Introducing a novel unit of syntactic analysis. Syntax 15, 4, 354-396.
330:
does not correspond to a catena. The star * indicates that the clauses are bad. For instance, the elided material
525: 370: 28: 365: 295: 530: 385: 290: 188: 32: 499:
McCawley, J. 1988. The syntactic phenomena of English. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
380: 339: 130:
While the canonical cases of gapping have medial gaps, the gap can also be discontinuous, e.g.
24: 508:
Sag, I. 1976 Deletion and logical form. Doctoral Dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
477:
Hartmann, K. 2000. Right Node Raising and gapping: Interface conditions on prosodic deletion.
468:
Carnie, A. 2013. Syntax: A generative introduction. 3rd edition. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
502:
Osborne, T. 2006. Gapping vs. non-gapping coordination. Linguistische Berichte 207, 307-338.
400: 360: 347: 302: 8: 474:
Hankamer, J. 1979. Deletion in coordinate structures. New York: Garland Publishing, Inc.
375: 306: 320: 493: 311:
any word or any combination of words that is continuous with respect to dominance
519: 489:
Kuno, S. 1976. Gapping: A functional analysis. Linguistic Inquiry 7, 300–318.
390: 483:
Jackendoff, R. 1971. Gapping and related rules. Linguistic Inquiry 2, 21-35.
471:
Hankamer, J. 1973. Unacceptable ambiguity. Linguistic Inquiry, 4, 17–68.
305:
is the basic unit of syntactic analysis. The catena is associated with
486:
Johnson, K. 2009. Gapping is not (VP) ellipsis. Linguistic Inquiry.
395: 343: 243:
It is impossible for Connor to be nice to Jilian, or Jilian
77:
In the first sentence, the second conjunct has the subject
301:
An alternative analysis of gapping assumes that the
437:The first example here is taken from Hudson (???). 338:, is not a catena in (g). The other main forms of 517: 270:*Pictures of friends should make you smile, and 494:Analyzing syntax: A lexical-functional approach 253:The gap of gapping cannot, however, cut into a 91:*Sam said that they spoke German, and Charlene 496:. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. 204:Sophie barks at racoons in the morning, and 162:He believes her to know the answer, and she 27:that occurs in the non-initial conjuncts of 284: 263:*I read the story about elves, and you 518: 16:Ellipsis that occurs in some languages 67:Jim has been observed by me, and Tom 60:Fred likes to pet the cat, and Sally 125: 13: 14: 542: 38: 319: 240:on her, the party should be fun. 215:Did Frank get married first, or 197:Sam has done the work, and Bill 147:Will Jimmy greet Jill first, or 449: 440: 431: 422: 413: 236:With her keen on him, and him 173:I expect you to help, and you 1: 461: 115:beer, and she orders wine. ( 7: 353: 53:Some ate bread, and others 10: 547: 479:Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 371:Coordination (linguistics) 366:Constituent (linguistics) 407: 386:Phrase structure grammar 342:(e.g. answer fragments, 187:Many syntacticians take 381:Ellipsis (linguistics) 334:, to the exclusion of 136:Should I call you, or 29:coordinate structures 401:Verb phrase ellipsis 361:Catena (linguistics) 285:Theoretical analyses 93:said that they spoke 307:dependency grammars 289:Gapping challenges 492:Kroeger, P. 2004: 376:Dependency grammar 309:and is defined as 168:to know the answer 526:Generative syntax 255:major constituent 221:get married first 199:has done the work 69:has been observed 538: 456: 453: 447: 444: 438: 435: 429: 426: 420: 417: 332:wants...to begin 323: 291:phrase structure 126:Further examples 19:In linguistics, 546: 545: 541: 540: 539: 537: 536: 535: 531:English grammar 516: 515: 514: 464: 459: 454: 450: 445: 441: 436: 432: 427: 423: 418: 414: 410: 405: 356: 287: 277: 276:should make you 273: 266: 246: 239: 222: 218: 211: 207: 200: 180: 176: 169: 165: 158: 154: 150: 143: 139: 128: 114: 94: 70: 63: 56: 41: 17: 12: 11: 5: 544: 534: 533: 528: 513: 512: 509: 506: 503: 500: 497: 490: 487: 484: 481: 475: 472: 469: 465: 463: 460: 458: 457: 448: 439: 430: 421: 411: 409: 406: 404: 403: 398: 393: 388: 383: 378: 373: 368: 363: 357: 355: 352: 327: 326: 325: 324: 286: 283: 282: 281: 280: 279: 275: 271: 268: 267:about dwarves. 265:read the story 264: 251: 250: 249: 248: 244: 241: 237: 227: 226: 225: 224: 220: 216: 213: 210:in the morning 209: 205: 202: 198: 185: 184: 183: 182: 178: 174: 171: 167: 163: 160: 156: 152: 148: 145: 141: 137: 127: 124: 123: 122: 121: 120: 112: 103: 102: 101: 100: 92: 75: 74: 73: 72: 68: 65: 61: 58: 54: 40: 39:Basic examples 37: 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 543: 532: 529: 527: 524: 523: 521: 510: 507: 504: 501: 498: 495: 491: 488: 485: 482: 480: 476: 473: 470: 467: 466: 452: 443: 434: 425: 416: 412: 402: 399: 397: 394: 392: 391:Pseudogapping 389: 387: 384: 382: 379: 377: 374: 372: 369: 367: 364: 362: 359: 358: 351: 349: 345: 341: 337: 333: 322: 318: 317: 316: 315: 314: 312: 308: 304: 299: 297: 292: 269: 262: 261: 260: 259: 258: 256: 242: 235: 234: 233: 232: 231: 214: 208:at squirrels 203: 196: 195: 194: 193: 192: 190: 172: 161: 146: 135: 134: 133: 132: 131: 118: 110: 109: 108: 107: 106: 98: 90: 89: 88: 87: 86: 84: 81:, the object 80: 66: 59: 52: 51: 50: 49: 48: 46: 36: 34: 30: 26: 23:is a type of 22: 478: 451: 442: 433: 424: 415: 335: 331: 328: 310: 300: 288: 254: 252: 228: 206:Sophie barks 186: 129: 116: 104: 96: 82: 78: 76: 62:likes to pet 44: 42: 20: 18: 348:VP-ellipsis 296:constituent 274:of enemies 520:Categories 462:References 247:to Connor. 245:to be nice 117:disallowed 97:disallowed 95:Spanish. ( 189:stripping 33:Stripping 396:Sluicing 354:See also 344:sluicing 340:ellipsis 272:pictures 164:believes 64:the dog. 25:ellipsis 257:, e.g. 179:to help 71:by you. 45:remnant 21:gapping 336:to try 303:catena 278:frown. 219:Larry 212:, too. 201:, too. 175:expect 155:Jimmy 138:should 113:orders 79:others 408:Notes 157:first 153:greet 151:Jill 57:rice. 238:keen 166:him 149:will 142:call 140:you 111:*He 83:rice 217:did 177:me 144:me? 55:ate 522:: 346:, 223:? 181:. 170:. 159:? 119:) 99:)

Index

ellipsis
coordinate structures
Stripping
stripping
phrase structure
constituent
catena
dependency grammars
Gapping examples
ellipsis
sluicing
VP-ellipsis
Catena (linguistics)
Constituent (linguistics)
Coordination (linguistics)
Dependency grammar
Ellipsis (linguistics)
Phrase structure grammar
Pseudogapping
Sluicing
Verb phrase ellipsis
Analyzing syntax: A lexical-functional approach
Categories
Generative syntax
English grammar

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑