Knowledge

Frivolous litigation

Source 📝

1268:
sign saying "Satisfaction Guaranteed" in the window of the shop legally entitled him to a refund for the cost of the pants, estimated at $ 1,000. The $ 54 million total also included $ 2.0 million in "mental distress" and $ 15,000 which he estimated to be the cost of renting a car every weekend to go to another dry cleaners. The court ultimately ruled against Pearson, whose judgeship was subsequently not renewed due to this case and several other actions he filed during his divorce, which were found to demonstrate a lack of "judicial temperament".
999:, a litigant (or a litigant's attorney) who presents any pleading, written motion or other paper to the court is required, under Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, to certify that, to the best of the presenter's knowledge and belief, the legal contentions "are warranted by existing law or by a nonfrivolous argument for the extension, modification, or reversal of existing law or the establishment of new law". Monetary civil penalties for violation of this rule may in some cases be imposed on the litigant or the attorney under Rule 11. 25: 856: 1101:
no colorable claims of error and designed only to delay, obstruct, or incapacitate the operations of the courts or any other governmental authority. Crain's present appeal is of this sort. It is a hodgepodge of unsupported assertions, irrelevant platitudes, and legalistic gibberish. The government should not have been put to the trouble of responding to such spurious arguments, nor this court to the trouble of "adjudicating" this meritless appeal.
1318:" representation in A&W naming conventions, he demanded $ 50,000 in damages for injury to dignity and self-respect as well as an order requiring A&W to adopt naming conventions which include non-traditional families. One such product the claimant demanded was the "Pillow Biter", described by the claimant as "a large, dark slab of meat stuffed firmly between two, white, clenched buns". 1331:
was partially responsible for the assault he committed. Clardy said that Nike should have placed a label in his Jordan shoes warning consumers that they could be used as a dangerous weapon. He was wearing a pair when he repeatedly stomped the face of a client who was trying to leave a Portland hotel
1267:
business for $ 67 million for allegedly losing a pair of his pants. This case has been cited as an example of frivolous litigation. According to Pearson, the dry cleaners lost his pants (which he brought in for a $ 10.50 alteration) and refused his demands for a large refund. Pearson believed that a
1100:
We are sensitive to the need for the courts to remain open to all who seek in good faith to invoke the protection of law. An appeal that lacks merit is not always—or often—frivolous. However, we are not obliged to suffer in silence the filing of baseless, insupportable appeals presenting
1081:
merit. The constitutionality of our income tax system—including the role played within that system by the Internal Revenue Service and the Tax Court—has long been established. We affirm the dismissal of Crain's spurious "petition" and the assessment of a penalty imposed by the Tax Court
902:
is the use of legal processes with apparent disregard for the merit of one's own arguments. It includes presenting an argument with reason to know that it would certainly fail, or acting without a basic level of diligence in researching the relevant law and facts. That an argument was lost does not
1119:
hen a judge calls an argument "ridiculous" or "frivolous," it is absolutely the worst thing the judge could say. It means that the person arguing the position has absolutely no idea of what he is doing, and has completely wasted everyone's time. It doesn't mean that the case wasn't well argued, or
1010:
has enacted section 1912 of Title 28 of the U.S.C. providing that in the U.S. Supreme Court and in the U.S. Courts of Appeals where litigation by the losing party has caused damage to the prevailing party, the court may impose a requirement that the losing party pay the prevailing party for those
1368:
to disclose the identities of those 100 users. This resulted in Valve removing all published games from Digital Homicide Studios. In addition, Romine filed the lawsuit as an individual and not as a corporation, so such criticism was protected under the right to freedom of speech. The case was
1097:, 472 (5th Cir. 1984), we sounded "a cautionary note to those who would persistently raise arguments against the income tax which have been put to rest for years. The full range of sanctions in Rule 38 hereafter shall be summoned in response to a totally frivolous appeal." 1359:
law because he did not believe it was "fair" criticism. An additional lawsuit for $ 18 million was filed against 100 users on the Steam gaming platform for criticizing their games and business practices, which he had interpreted as "harassment". The judge issued a
1002:
In one case, the Seventh Circuit Court issued an order giving such an attorney "14 days to show cause why he should not be fined $ 10,000 for his frivolous arguments". A similar rule penalizing frivolous litigation applies in U.S. Bankruptcy Court under Rule 9011.
987:
may impose penalties in which the taxpayer's appeal of a U.S. Tax Court decision was "maintained primarily for delay" or where "the taxpayer's position in the appeal is frivolous or groundless." A common example, as shown below, is an argument based on
1793:
It's nice to see that even the organized plaintiffs bar piously deplores Mr. Pearson's abuse of the law. It would be even nicer if they agreed to stop opposing reforms that would give the Chungs of the world a fighting chance the next time
2118: 1634: 1104:
Accordingly, we grant the government's request. The United States shall recover from appellant Crain twice its cost of this appeal. Additionally, we assess against Crain a damage award of $ 2000 in favor of the appellee United
1070:, taxation, nor regulation of the state," that the "Internal Revenue Service, Incorporated" lacks authority to exercise the judicial power of the United States, that the Tax Court is unconstitutionally attempting to exercise 1709: 1350:
for criticizing the games published under his studios' name, seeking $ 10 million in damages for "assault, libel, and slander" to Romine's business. He claimed that Sterling's coverage of his studio's game
1114:
Filing a claim that is ultimately deemed frivolous can be highly damaging to the attorney so filing. Most frivolous lawsuits that are successful are filed without an attorney. Attorney Daniel Evans writes:
1326:
In January 2014, Sirgiorgio Sanford Clardy, who is serving a 100-year prison sentence for a beating of a prostitute and her customer, filed a $ 100 million lawsuit against Nike, in which he claimed that
1403:
charities. He claimed that Twitch's "twisted programming and net code" made it "nearly impossible to use Twitch without being exposed to sexual content". Other claims included him "chaffing his
1862: 1646: 1150:
the court listed more than seventy-five frivolous "motions" (a request for a court to issue an order), all of which required the attention of the Court, including the following:
1910: 2055: 2024: 1829: 945:
investigation concerning the factual basis for any claim or defense. Jurisdictions differ on whether a claim or defense can be frivolous if the attorney acted in
1077:
We perceive no need to refute these arguments with somber reasoning and copious citation of precedent; to do so might suggest that these arguments have some
2200: 1093:
The government asks us to assess penalties against Crain for bringing this frivolous appeal, as is authorized by Fed. R. App. P. 38. In Parker v. C. I. R.,
1051: 1239:
Washington, an inmate from Georgia, was eventually prohibited from filing any future lawsuits or motions in any district court unless he first posted a
2122: 1963: 1158: 1071: 953:
may be imposed by a court upon the party or the lawyer who presents the frivolous defense or claim. The law firm may also be sanctioned, or even
2214: 1780: 35: 903:
imply the argument was frivolous; a party may present an argument with a low chance of success, so long as it proceeds from applicable law.
1852: 139: 279: 2039: 1884: 1688: 914:. A claim or defense may be frivolous because it had no underlying justification in fact, or because it was not presented with an 1746: 1332:
without paying Clardy's prostitute in June 2012. This lawsuit gained "considerable attention across the nation and the world".
214: 1724: 2047: 2016: 2166: 2270: 2084: 1026:) sometimes make frivolous arguments due to their limited knowledge of the law and procedure. The particular tendency of 2008: 1807: 2260: 2145: 1616: 886: 69: 1289: 934: 2228: 2076: 1443:. All of these lawsuits were dismissed with prejudice. This case was dismissed as frivolous in January of 2021. 1094: 938: 605: 1911:"Heteronormative' Burger Family no threat to LGBT, rights tribunal says after receiving 'outrageous' complaint" 537: 1993: 1936: 1130:. The judge is not telling you that you were "wrong." The judge is telling you that you are out of your mind. 949:. Because such a defense or claim wastes the court's and the other parties' time, resources and legal fees, 2180: 1971: 1490: 1031: 395: 906:
Frivolous litigation may be based on absurd legal theories, may involve a superabundance or repetition of
428: 611: 1314:" and promoted "cross-sectional hegemony". Citing feelings of distress and alienation over the lack of " 922:. A claim may be deemed frivolous because existing laws unequivocally prohibit such a claim, such as a 2048:"Portland pimp sues Nike for $ 100 million for lack of warning label after beating victim with Jordans" 385: 2092: 700: 549: 47: 1772: 2265: 1480: 1347: 1343: 1293: 1226: 1063: 1062:
petition challenging the constitutional authority of that body and defying the jurisdiction of the
733: 717: 284: 244: 51: 1520: 1399:, with damages of $ 25 million, which was to be split between him, Twitch Prime subscribers, and 1059: 966: 598: 423: 390: 2093:"Portland pimp story goes global after he sues Nike for lack of shoe warning label (with links)" 1635:"The Prison Litigation Reform Act of 1995: Doing Away with More Than Just Crunchy Peanut Butter" 1475: 1168: 984: 879: 794: 616: 527: 370: 315: 219: 114: 43: 1556: 1485: 1465: 1243:
bond of $ 1,500. To be deemed frivolous, a litigant's arguments must strike beyond the pale.
1083: 971: 754: 728: 647: 532: 494: 289: 249: 236: 1535: 1459: 226: 166: 2017:"Portland pimp who beat teen until ears bled, yelled expletives at jurors, gets 100 years" 8: 1888: 1812: 1277: 1222:"Motion to Invoke and Execute Rule 15—Retroactive Note: The Court's School Days are Over" 996: 960: 591: 585: 544: 481: 304: 105: 1428: 980: 923: 834: 721: 652: 621: 512: 476: 452: 408: 191: 133: 975: 2275: 1821: 1750: 1365: 1240: 1016: 954: 872: 779: 774: 764: 759: 575: 554: 418: 364: 351: 299: 259: 910:
or additional suits, may be uncivil or harassing to the court, or may claim extreme
1817: 1515: 1453: 1412: 1392: 1260: 1255: 1074:
powers, and that jurisdiction over his person has never been affirmatively proven.
789: 769: 642: 570: 522: 471: 404: 346: 254: 231: 173: 161: 1620: 1560: 1087: 1857: 1728: 1721: 1470: 1307: 1303: 1280:
from filing any more lawsuits, arguing that his frequent filings were frivolous.
1042:
An example of a Court's treatment of frivolous arguments is found in the case of
1034:
of 1995, which limits the ability of prisoners to bring actions without payment.
950: 784: 446: 375: 358: 1684: 1370: 1342:
In March 2016, James Romine, one-half of the independent video games developer
1202: 1195: 907: 824: 580: 462: 380: 182: 128: 123: 2254: 1825: 1525: 1500: 1424: 1396: 1311: 1188: 1007: 989: 942: 930: 664: 1593:, 507 F.3d 1092, 2007-2 U.S. Tax Cas. (CCH) paragr. 50,806 (7th Cir. 2007), 2215:"Twitch sued for $ 25m over "suggestive" streamers Alinity, Pokimane, more" 1264: 1067: 911: 842: 829: 819: 738: 324: 1964:"Fake lesbian feminist's human rights complaint against A&W dismissed" 1066:
to levy taxes on his income. Crain asserts that he "is not subject to the
2185: 1530: 1510: 1408: 1209: 1078: 1047: 979:. Similarly, section 7482 of the Internal Revenue Code provides that the 695: 294: 209: 1670:, 737 F.2d 1417, 84-2 U.S. Tax Cas. (CCH) paragr. 9721 (5th Cir. 1984) ( 1606:
Rule 9011(b)(2) and Rule 9011(c), Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure.
1415:. The filing contained pictures of the female Twitch streamers (such as 1298: 946: 860: 804: 707: 659: 329: 270: 196: 88: 2146:"Court Throws Out Digital Homicide's Case Against Critic Jim Sterling" 969:, frivolous arguments may result in a penalty of up to $ 25,000 under 961:
US Federal statutes and rules of court penalizing frivolous litigation
1495: 1432: 1416: 1328: 1292:
dismissed a complaint laid by a man posing as Gloria Dawn Ironbox, a
1175: 838: 1887:. KKCO 11 News. Associated Press. September 14, 2010. Archived from 855: 503: 1440: 1420: 1400: 1361: 1356: 915: 814: 674: 437: 334: 156: 1120:
that judge simply decided for the other side, it means that there
1378: 669: 637: 517: 339: 2150: 1395:, claiming that the streaming platform was responsible for his 1216: 1027: 1022: 712: 679: 2181:"Twitch Faces a Ridiculous Lawsuit over "Scantily Clad Women"" 1505: 1404: 1276:
In 2010, federal prosecutors asked a judge to help them stop
489: 34:
deal primarily with the United States and do not represent a
1436: 1374: 1373:
in February 2017. This case is also an example of abuse of
1315: 96: 1355:
as "Worst Game of 2014 Contender" was not protected under
1037: 919: 2245: 2143: 1808:"Wearing Down the Judicial System With a Pair of Pants" 1749:. dumb-lawsuits.com. December 13, 2005. Archived from 918:
for a reasonable extension or reinterpretation of the
1943:. Canadian Legal Information Institute. July 19, 2013 1740:
Weblogger Chris Pearson quotes more extensively from
1391:
In June 2020, Erik Estavillo filed a lawsuit against
1052:
United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1994:"Doe v. A & W Canada, 2013 HRTO 1259 (CanLII)" 1302:. The claimant alleged that a marketing scheme by 1030:to bring baseless lawsuits led to passage of the 2252: 1572:Rule 11(b)(2), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. 1384: 1109: 1058:Glenn Crain appeals from the dismissal of his 2158: 1961: 1581:Rule 11(c), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. 880: 32:The examples and perspective in this article 2164: 2116: 2090: 2045: 2014: 1685:"Daniel B. Evans, The Tax Protester FAQ, at" 1321: 140:Intentional infliction of emotional distress 2229:"Erik Estavillo vs Twitch Interactive, Inc" 16:Litigating for little to no meritful reason 2144:D'Anastalso, Cecilia (February 21, 2017). 887: 873: 280:Negligent infliction of emotional distress 2110: 1937:"Doe v. A & W Canada, 2013 HRTO 1259" 1850: 70:Learn how and when to remove this message 1851:Alexander, Keith L. (October 23, 2007). 1082:for instituting a frivolous proceeding. 937:and similar state rules require that an 1597:, 552 U.S. 1280, 128 S.Ct. 1721 (2008). 1555:See paragraph (4) of subsection (c) of 1407:every day with " and causing a fire by 1139: 2253: 2137: 1832:from the original on February 16, 2011 1805: 1283: 1271: 1038:Court treatment of frivolous arguments 2246:Lawsuit.no: Frivolous lawsuit archive 2119:"Free speech or criminal harassment?" 2058:from the original on January 21, 2014 2027:from the original on February 2, 2014 1885:"Feds seek to halt inmate's lawsuits" 1853:"Judge Set to Lose Job, Sources Say" 1632: 1335: 1014:Litigants who represent themselves ( 18: 2117:White, Kaila (September 21, 2016). 1731:, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. 1246: 1127:absolutely, positively, incompetent 13: 2167:"Filing A False DMCA Consequences" 1783:from the original on June 20, 2007 1232:"Motion for Catered Food Services" 1164:"Motion for Restoration of Sanity" 1154:"Motion to Behoove an Inquisition" 14: 2287: 2239: 2165:Kelly, Aaron (October 28, 2011). 2091:Green, Aimee (January 13, 2014). 2046:Green, Aimee (January 10, 2014). 1865:from the original on May 31, 2016 1710:934 F. Supp. 1395 (S.D. Ga. 1996) 1941:Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario 1691:from the original on May 2, 2016 1427:. Estavillo had previously sued 1290:Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario 935:Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 854: 23: 2221: 2207: 2193: 2173: 2070: 1986: 1955: 1929: 1903: 1877: 1844: 1799: 1773:"The Great American Pants Suit" 1765: 1734: 1715: 1703: 1181:"Motion to Vacate Jurisdiction" 606:Ex turpi causa non oritur actio 2015:Green, Aimee (July 19, 2013). 1962:Daro, Ishmael (July 5, 2013). 1806:Fisher, Marc (June 14, 2007). 1677: 1661: 1626: 1609: 1600: 1584: 1575: 1566: 1549: 1: 1386:Erik Estavillo vs Twitch, Inc 1184:"Motion for Cesset processus" 716:(term used for torts in some 1491:Michigan Lawsuit Abuse Watch 1032:Prison Litigation Reform Act 7: 1633:Chen, Cindy (Winter 2004). 1446: 1294:fictional feminist attorney 1134: 1110:Impact upon filing attorney 995:In a noncriminal case in a 612:Joint and several liability 46:, discuss the issue on the 10: 2292: 2271:American legal terminology 386:Comparative responsibility 2261:Abuse of the legal system 1591:United States v. Patridge 1346:, sued video game critic 1322:Sirgiorgio Sanford Clardy 701:Non-economic damages caps 1542: 1481:Judith Richardson Haimes 1425:banned from the platform 1353:The Slaughtering Grounds 1348:James Stephanie Sterling 1344:Digital Homicide Studios 1064:Internal Revenue Service 734:Private attorney general 688:Other topics in tort law 316:Principles of negligence 245:Alienation of affections 2077:$ 100 million pimp suit 1747:"Motion to Kiss My Ass" 1521:Tax protester arguments 1235:"Motion to Kiss My Ass" 967:United States Tax Court 599:Volenti non fit injuria 424:Ultrahazardous activity 391:Contributory negligence 1476:Frivolous or vexatious 1169:Deinstitutionalization 1132: 1107: 985:U.S. Courts of Appeals 617:Market share liability 550:Shopkeeper's privilege 528:Statute of limitations 371:Restitutio ad integrum 220:Intrusion on seclusion 115:Trespass to the person 1974:on September 28, 2013 1668:Crain v. Commissioner 1639:St. John's Law Review 1486:Malicious prosecution 1377:takedown requests on 1296:on television series 1227:Skin Change Operation 1219:Body of Alex Hodgson" 1117: 1056: 1044:Crain v. Commissioner 729:Conflict of tort laws 495:Tortious interference 250:Criminal conversation 237:Malicious prosecution 2125:on November 30, 2016 1742:Washington v. Alaimo 1536:Vexatious litigation 1460:Anders v. California 1208:"Motion to Renounce 1148:Washington v. Alaimo 1141:Washington v. Alaimo 900:Frivolous litigation 227:Breach of confidence 52:create a new article 44:improve this article 1813:The Washington Post 1777:Wall Street Journal 1649:on January 10, 2019 1304:A&W Restaurants 1284:Gloria Dawn Ironbox 1278:Jonathan Lee Riches 1272:Jonathan Lee Riches 1201:"Motion to Impeach 1124:. The argument was 997:U.S. District Court 722:mixed legal systems 592:Respondeat superior 586:Vicarious liability 545:Defence of property 482:Insurance bad faith 396:Attractive nuisance 215:Invasion of privacy 1727:2017-07-05 at the 1288:In July 2013, the 981:U.S. Supreme Court 924:Good Samaritan law 622:Transferred intent 513:Assumption of risk 477:Restraint of trade 453:Rylands v Fletcher 285:Employment-related 134:False imprisonment 1779:. June 18, 2007. 1753:on March 18, 2007 1423:), who he wanted 1337:Romine v. Stanton 1259:, Roy Pearson, a 1122:was no other side 1050:(1984), from the 1017:in forma pauperis 976:§ 6673(a)(1) 933:, Rule 11 of the 897: 896: 770:England and Wales 725: 576:Last clear chance 571:Intentional torts 555:Neutral reportage 538:Defense of others 486: 419:Product liability 365:Res ipsa loquitur 352:Reasonable person 260:Breach of promise 109: 80: 79: 72: 54:, as appropriate. 2283: 2233: 2232: 2225: 2219: 2218: 2217:. June 24, 2020. 2211: 2205: 2204: 2197: 2191: 2190: 2189:. June 25, 2020. 2177: 2171: 2170: 2162: 2156: 2155: 2141: 2135: 2134: 2132: 2130: 2121:. Archived from 2114: 2108: 2107: 2105: 2103: 2088: 2082: 2074: 2068: 2067: 2065: 2063: 2043: 2037: 2036: 2034: 2032: 2012: 2006: 2005: 2003: 2001: 1990: 1984: 1983: 1981: 1979: 1970:. Archived from 1959: 1953: 1952: 1950: 1948: 1933: 1927: 1926: 1924: 1922: 1907: 1901: 1900: 1898: 1896: 1881: 1875: 1874: 1872: 1870: 1848: 1842: 1841: 1839: 1837: 1818:Washington, D.C. 1803: 1797: 1796: 1790: 1788: 1769: 1763: 1762: 1760: 1758: 1738: 1732: 1719: 1713: 1707: 1701: 1700: 1698: 1696: 1681: 1675: 1665: 1659: 1658: 1656: 1654: 1645:. Archived from 1630: 1624: 1613: 1607: 1604: 1598: 1588: 1582: 1579: 1573: 1570: 1564: 1553: 1516:Summary judgment 1454:Abuse of process 1413:computer monitor 1261:Washington, D.C. 1256:Pearson v. Chung 1248:Pearson v. Chung 978: 955:held in contempt 889: 882: 875: 859: 858: 715: 484: 347:Standard of care 232:Abuse of process 142: 103: 84: 83: 75: 68: 64: 61: 55: 27: 26: 19: 2291: 2290: 2286: 2285: 2284: 2282: 2281: 2280: 2266:Civil procedure 2251: 2250: 2242: 2237: 2236: 2227: 2226: 2222: 2213: 2212: 2208: 2199: 2198: 2194: 2179: 2178: 2174: 2163: 2159: 2142: 2138: 2128: 2126: 2115: 2111: 2101: 2099: 2089: 2085: 2075: 2071: 2061: 2059: 2044: 2040: 2030: 2028: 2013: 2009: 1999: 1997: 1996:. July 19, 2013 1992: 1991: 1987: 1977: 1975: 1960: 1956: 1946: 1944: 1935: 1934: 1930: 1920: 1918: 1917:. July 25, 2013 1909: 1908: 1904: 1894: 1892: 1891:on June 4, 2016 1883: 1882: 1878: 1868: 1866: 1858:Washington Post 1849: 1845: 1835: 1833: 1804: 1800: 1786: 1784: 1771: 1770: 1766: 1756: 1754: 1745: 1739: 1735: 1729:Wayback Machine 1720: 1716: 1708: 1704: 1694: 1692: 1683: 1682: 1678: 1666: 1662: 1652: 1650: 1631: 1627: 1614: 1610: 1605: 1601: 1589: 1585: 1580: 1576: 1571: 1567: 1554: 1550: 1545: 1540: 1471:Franchise fraud 1449: 1389: 1340: 1324: 1308:heteronormative 1286: 1274: 1251: 1159:Judex Delegatus 1144: 1137: 1112: 1040: 970: 963: 893: 853: 747:By jurisdiction 447:Public nuisance 376:Rescue doctrine 359:Proximate cause 271:Negligent torts 183:Dignitary torts 138: 76: 65: 59: 56: 41: 28: 24: 17: 12: 11: 5: 2289: 2279: 2278: 2273: 2268: 2263: 2249: 2248: 2241: 2240:External links 2238: 2235: 2234: 2220: 2206: 2192: 2172: 2157: 2136: 2109: 2083: 2069: 2038: 2007: 1985: 1954: 1928: 1902: 1876: 1843: 1798: 1764: 1733: 1714: 1702: 1676: 1660: 1625: 1617:28 U.S.C. 1608: 1599: 1583: 1574: 1565: 1557:26 U.S.C. 1547: 1546: 1544: 1541: 1539: 1538: 1533: 1528: 1523: 1518: 1513: 1508: 1503: 1498: 1493: 1488: 1483: 1478: 1473: 1468: 1463: 1456: 1450: 1448: 1445: 1388: 1383: 1371:with prejudice 1339: 1334: 1323: 1320: 1285: 1282: 1273: 1270: 1263:judge, sued a 1250: 1245: 1237: 1236: 1233: 1230: 1223: 1220: 1213: 1206: 1199: 1196:Psychoanalysis 1192: 1185: 1182: 1179: 1172: 1165: 1162: 1155: 1143: 1138: 1136: 1133: 1111: 1108: 1084:26 U.S.C. 1039: 1036: 962: 959: 895: 894: 892: 891: 884: 877: 869: 866: 865: 864: 863: 861:Law portal 848: 847: 846: 845: 832: 827: 822: 817: 809: 808: 800: 799: 798: 797: 792: 787: 782: 777: 775:European Union 772: 767: 762: 757: 749: 748: 744: 743: 742: 741: 736: 731: 726: 710: 705: 704: 703: 690: 689: 685: 684: 683: 682: 677: 672: 667: 662: 657: 656: 655: 650: 645: 632: 631: 627: 626: 625: 624: 619: 614: 609: 602: 595: 588: 583: 581:Eggshell skull 578: 573: 565: 564: 560: 559: 558: 557: 552: 547: 542: 541: 540: 530: 525: 520: 515: 507: 506: 500: 499: 498: 497: 492: 487: 485:(American law) 479: 474: 466: 465: 463:Economic torts 459: 458: 457: 456: 449: 441: 440: 434: 433: 432: 431: 426: 421: 413: 412: 401: 400: 399: 398: 393: 388: 383: 381:Duty to rescue 378: 373: 368: 361: 356: 355: 354: 344: 343: 342: 337: 332: 319: 318: 312: 311: 310: 309: 308: 307: 302: 292: 287: 282: 274: 273: 267: 266: 265: 264: 263: 262: 257: 252: 247: 239: 234: 229: 224: 223: 222: 212: 207: 206: 205: 202: 194: 186: 185: 179: 178: 177: 176: 171: 170: 169: 164: 151: 150: 149:Property torts 146: 145: 144: 143: 136: 131: 126: 118: 117: 111: 110: 100: 99: 93: 92: 78: 77: 38:of the subject 36:worldwide view 31: 29: 22: 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 2288: 2277: 2274: 2272: 2269: 2267: 2264: 2262: 2259: 2258: 2256: 2247: 2244: 2243: 2230: 2224: 2216: 2210: 2202: 2196: 2188: 2187: 2182: 2176: 2168: 2161: 2153: 2152: 2147: 2140: 2124: 2120: 2113: 2098: 2097:The Oregonian 2094: 2087: 2081: 2078: 2073: 2057: 2053: 2052:The Oregonian 2049: 2042: 2026: 2022: 2021:The Oregonian 2018: 2011: 1995: 1989: 1973: 1969: 1965: 1958: 1942: 1938: 1932: 1916: 1915:National Post 1912: 1906: 1890: 1886: 1880: 1864: 1860: 1859: 1854: 1847: 1836:September 10, 1831: 1827: 1823: 1820:p. B01. 1819: 1815: 1814: 1809: 1802: 1795: 1782: 1778: 1774: 1768: 1752: 1748: 1743: 1737: 1730: 1726: 1723: 1718: 1711: 1706: 1690: 1686: 1680: 1673: 1669: 1664: 1648: 1644: 1640: 1636: 1629: 1622: 1618: 1612: 1603: 1596: 1592: 1587: 1578: 1569: 1562: 1558: 1552: 1548: 1537: 1534: 1532: 1529: 1527: 1526:Tax protester 1524: 1522: 1519: 1517: 1514: 1512: 1509: 1507: 1504: 1502: 1501:Stella Awards 1499: 1497: 1494: 1492: 1489: 1487: 1484: 1482: 1479: 1477: 1474: 1472: 1469: 1467: 1464: 1462: 1461: 1457: 1455: 1452: 1451: 1444: 1442: 1438: 1434: 1430: 1426: 1422: 1418: 1414: 1410: 1406: 1402: 1398: 1397:sex addiction 1394: 1387: 1382: 1380: 1376: 1372: 1367: 1363: 1358: 1354: 1349: 1345: 1338: 1333: 1330: 1319: 1317: 1313: 1312:phallocentric 1309: 1305: 1301: 1300: 1295: 1291: 1281: 1279: 1269: 1266: 1262: 1258: 1257: 1249: 1244: 1242: 1234: 1231: 1228: 1224: 1221: 1218: 1214: 1211: 1207: 1204: 1200: 1197: 1193: 1190: 1189:Nunc pro tunc 1186: 1183: 1180: 1177: 1173: 1170: 1166: 1163: 1160: 1156: 1153: 1152: 1151: 1149: 1142: 1131: 1129: 1128: 1123: 1116: 1106: 1102: 1098: 1096: 1095:724 F. 2d 469 1091: 1089: 1085: 1080: 1075: 1073: 1069: 1065: 1061: 1055: 1053: 1049: 1048:737 F.2d 1417 1045: 1035: 1033: 1029: 1025: 1024: 1019: 1018: 1012: 1009: 1008:U.S. Congress 1004: 1000: 998: 993: 991: 990:tax protestor 986: 982: 977: 973: 968: 958: 956: 952: 948: 944: 943:due diligence 940: 936: 932: 931:United States 927: 925: 921: 917: 913: 909: 904: 901: 890: 885: 883: 878: 876: 871: 870: 868: 867: 862: 857: 852: 851: 850: 849: 844: 840: 836: 833: 831: 828: 826: 823: 821: 818: 816: 813: 812: 811: 810: 806: 802: 801: 796: 795:United States 793: 791: 788: 786: 783: 781: 778: 776: 773: 771: 768: 766: 763: 761: 758: 756: 753: 752: 751: 750: 746: 745: 740: 737: 735: 732: 730: 727: 723: 719: 714: 711: 709: 706: 702: 699: 698: 697: 694: 693: 692: 691: 687: 686: 681: 678: 676: 673: 671: 668: 666: 663: 661: 658: 654: 651: 649: 646: 644: 641: 640: 639: 636: 635: 634: 633: 629: 628: 623: 620: 618: 615: 613: 610: 608: 607: 603: 601: 600: 596: 594: 593: 589: 587: 584: 582: 579: 577: 574: 572: 569: 568: 567: 566: 562: 561: 556: 553: 551: 548: 546: 543: 539: 536: 535: 534: 531: 529: 526: 524: 521: 519: 516: 514: 511: 510: 509: 508: 505: 502: 501: 496: 493: 491: 488: 483: 480: 478: 475: 473: 470: 469: 468: 467: 464: 461: 460: 455: 454: 450: 448: 445: 444: 443: 442: 439: 436: 435: 430: 427: 425: 422: 420: 417: 416: 415: 414: 410: 406: 403: 402: 397: 394: 392: 389: 387: 384: 382: 379: 377: 374: 372: 369: 367: 366: 362: 360: 357: 353: 350: 349: 348: 345: 341: 338: 336: 333: 331: 328: 327: 326: 323: 322: 321: 320: 317: 314: 313: 306: 303: 301: 298: 297: 296: 293: 291: 288: 286: 283: 281: 278: 277: 276: 275: 272: 269: 268: 261: 258: 256: 253: 251: 248: 246: 243: 242: 241:Sexual torts 240: 238: 235: 233: 230: 228: 225: 221: 218: 217: 216: 213: 211: 208: 203: 200: 199: 198: 195: 193: 192:Appropriation 190: 189: 188: 187: 184: 181: 180: 175: 172: 168: 165: 163: 160: 159: 158: 155: 154: 153: 152: 148: 147: 141: 137: 135: 132: 130: 127: 125: 122: 121: 120: 119: 116: 113: 112: 107: 102: 101: 98: 95: 94: 90: 86: 85: 82: 74: 71: 63: 60:December 2015 53: 49: 45: 39: 37: 30: 21: 20: 2223: 2209: 2195: 2184: 2175: 2160: 2149: 2139: 2127:. Retrieved 2123:the original 2112: 2100:. Retrieved 2096: 2086: 2079: 2072: 2060:. Retrieved 2051: 2041: 2029:. Retrieved 2020: 2010: 1998:. Retrieved 1988: 1976:. Retrieved 1972:the original 1967: 1957: 1945:. Retrieved 1940: 1931: 1919:. Retrieved 1914: 1905: 1893:. Retrieved 1889:the original 1879: 1867:. Retrieved 1856: 1846: 1834:. Retrieved 1811: 1801: 1792: 1785:. Retrieved 1776: 1767: 1755:. Retrieved 1751:the original 1741: 1736: 1717: 1705: 1695:November 23, 1693:. Retrieved 1679: 1671: 1667: 1663: 1651:. Retrieved 1647:the original 1642: 1638: 1628: 1611: 1602: 1595:cert. denied 1594: 1590: 1586: 1577: 1568: 1551: 1458: 1390: 1385: 1352: 1341: 1336: 1325: 1297: 1287: 1275: 1265:dry cleaning 1254: 1253:In 2005, in 1252: 1247: 1238: 1225:"Motion for 1203:Judge Alaimo 1194:"Motion for 1187:"Motion for 1174:"Motion for 1167:"Motion for 1157:"Motion for 1147: 1145: 1140: 1126: 1125: 1121: 1118: 1113: 1103: 1099: 1092: 1076: 1068:jurisdiction 1057: 1043: 1041: 1021: 1015: 1013: 1005: 1001: 994: 964: 928: 905: 899: 898: 820:Criminal law 739:Class action 604: 597: 590: 533:Self-defense 451: 429:Deep pockets 363: 325:Duty of care 87:Part of the 81: 66: 57: 33: 2186:Screen Rant 2102:January 21, 2080:Oregon Live 2062:January 21, 2031:January 21, 1895:October 27, 1621:§ 1912 1561:§ 7482 1531:Tort reform 1511:Spamigation 1409:ejaculating 1215:"Motion to 1210:Citizenship 1088:§ 6673 1072:Article III 696:Tort reform 330:Trespassers 295:Malpractice 290:Entrustment 210:False light 2255:Categories 1978:January 5, 1968:canada.com 1947:January 5, 1921:January 5, 1757:January 5, 1672:per curiam 1369:dismissed 1299:Family Guy 947:good faith 941:perform a 805:common law 708:Quasi-tort 660:Injunction 653:Incidental 472:Conspiracy 197:Defamation 174:Conversion 89:common law 1826:0190-8286 1496:Pseudolaw 1433:Microsoft 1417:Amouranth 1176:Publicity 1079:colorable 1060:Tax Court 1028:prisoners 1011:damages. 972:26 U.S.C. 951:sanctions 815:Contracts 755:Australia 563:Liability 523:Necessity 411:liability 335:Licensees 255:Seduction 48:talk page 2276:Tort law 2201:"Scribd" 2056:Archived 2025:Archived 1869:June 30, 1863:Archived 1830:Archived 1787:June 21, 1781:Archived 1725:Archived 1689:Archived 1653:March 1, 1466:Barratry 1447:See also 1441:Nintendo 1429:Blizzard 1421:Pokimane 1401:COVID-19 1364:against 1362:subpoena 1357:fair use 1241:contempt 1135:Examples 992:claims. 983:and the 939:attorney 916:argument 912:remedies 830:Property 825:Evidence 675:Replevin 643:Punitive 630:Remedies 504:Defences 438:Nuisance 409:absolute 340:Invitees 167:chattels 157:Trespass 97:Tort law 42:You may 2129:June 4, 2000:June 4, 1794:around. 1722:Rule 15 1411:on his 1379:YouTube 1105:States. 965:In the 929:In the 908:motions 843:estates 670:Detinue 665:Tracing 648:Special 638:Damages 518:Consent 305:medical 201:Slander 129:Battery 124:Assault 106:Outline 2151:Kotaku 1824:  1619:  1559:  1439:, and 1393:Twitch 1217:Exhume 1086:  1023:pro se 974:  841:, and 839:trusts 803:Other 790:Taiwan 760:Canada 713:Delict 680:Trover 405:Strict 91:series 1543:Notes 1506:SLAPP 1405:penis 1366:Valve 1306:was " 835:Wills 807:areas 785:Japan 780:India 765:China 718:civil 490:Fraud 300:legal 204:Libel 50:, or 2131:2024 2104:2014 2064:2014 2033:2014 2002:2024 1980:2022 1949:2022 1923:2022 1897:2011 1871:2016 1838:2008 1822:ISSN 1789:2007 1759:2007 1697:2005 1655:2019 1615:See 1437:Sony 1419:and 1375:DMCA 1329:Nike 1316:LGBT 1310:", " 1020:and 1006:The 720:and 407:and 162:land 1744:in 1146:In 920:law 2257:: 2183:. 2148:. 2095:. 2054:. 2050:. 2023:. 2019:. 1966:. 1939:. 1913:. 1861:. 1855:. 1828:. 1816:. 1810:. 1791:. 1775:. 1687:. 1674:). 1643:78 1641:. 1637:. 1435:, 1431:, 1381:. 1090:. 1054:: 1046:, 957:. 926:. 837:, 2231:. 2203:. 2169:. 2154:. 2133:. 2106:. 2066:. 2035:. 2004:. 1982:. 1951:. 1925:. 1899:. 1873:. 1840:. 1761:. 1712:. 1699:. 1657:. 1623:. 1563:. 1229:" 1212:" 1205:" 1198:" 1191:" 1178:" 1171:" 1161:" 888:e 881:t 874:v 724:) 108:) 104:( 73:) 67:( 62:) 58:( 40:.

Index

worldwide view
improve this article
talk page
create a new article
Learn how and when to remove this message
common law
Tort law
Outline
Trespass to the person
Assault
Battery
False imprisonment
Intentional infliction of emotional distress
Trespass
land
chattels
Conversion
Dignitary torts
Appropriation
Defamation
False light
Invasion of privacy
Intrusion on seclusion
Breach of confidence
Abuse of process
Malicious prosecution
Alienation of affections
Criminal conversation
Seduction
Breach of promise

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.