Knowledge

Follow-on Forces Attack

Source 📝

22: 164:, he would need to resort to the nuclear option. To improve NATO's conventional defence capability, Rogers proposed a novel idea he labelled the "Follow-on Forces Attack" (FOFA) Concept, which theorized to counter a Warsaw Pact invasion by making deep conventional attacks the enemy's second and third echelon forces to prevent them from reaching NATO's defensive positions. 211:
Operationally, the FOFA concept was simply to interdict Soviet follow-on-forces located 24, 48, and 72 hours removed from NATO defensive positions. The problem was: to coordinate deep battle and air interdiction efforts out to 150 kilometers behind the line of contact, or roughly 72 hours away from
66:, is a useful starting point for translations, but translators must revise errors as necessary and confirm that the translation is accurate, rather than simply copy-pasting machine-translated text into the English Knowledge. 212:
it; and to plan for airborne deep strike missions 300 kilometers into the enemy's rear; and developing technology and doctrine to enable commanders quickly to adapt air strikes and fire missions. FOFA was the first "
52: 201: 76: 312: 213: 205: 160:
SACEUR Rogers was troubled by NATO's inadequate conventional military forces when faced with a Warsaw Pact that dominated his on a numeric basis, and
86:
Do not translate text that appears unreliable or low-quality. If possible, verify the text with references provided in the foreign-language article.
144:
doctrine that dates to the early 1980s and brought the Alliance to exploit the microchip revolution. The eight-point programme was proposed by
180:
Inability to dynamically identify and target armored vehicles moving in and out of urban or other areas (reacquiring lost target tracks)
183:
Lack of effective integration of corps, division, and battalion capabilities to support maneuver forces across division control lines
234:"Technologies for NATO's Follow-on Forces Attack Concept: A Special Report of OTA's Assessment on Improving NATO's Defense Response" 152:. It played a key role in NATO's Conceptual Military Framework and in the conventional leg of NATO's triad of deterrent forces. 71: 94: 325:
Chapter, "The Role of New Technologies and Follow-on Forces Attack in NATO Strategy" author Fen Osler Hampson. Book
107:
Content in this edit is translated from the existing German Knowledge article at ]; see its history for attribution.
216:" architecture. As of 2015 nearly 100 FOFA systems were integrated into the mix available to battle commanders. 116: 34: 102: 167:
FOFA was adopted by NATO in November 1984. The defects which were identified for remedy were:
123: 189:
Ever-increasing demands to increase the depth of sensors, targeting, and deep strike systems
250: 8: 313:"THE COLD WAR OFFSET STRATEGY: ASSAULT BREAKER AND THE BEGINNING OF THE RSTA REVOLUTION" 149: 98: 265: 208:, notable for important applications in reconnaissance and target acquisition. 345: 339: 177:
Inability to acquire and target moving vehicles at night and through clouds
266:"NATO's Follow-On Forces Attack (FOFA) Concept: Past, Present and Future" 286: 233: 105:
to the source of your translation. A model attribution edit summary is
253:. United States Congress, Office of Technology Assessment. June 1987. 197: 239:. Congress of the U.S., Office of Technology Assessment. July 1986. 63: 251:"New technology for NATO: implementing Follow-On Forces Attack" 186:
Defeating enemy air defenses, including shoulder-fired missiles
145: 196:
Rogers saw the technological basis for change lying in the
141: 75:
to this template: there are already 1,848 articles in the
287:"1979-1989: "DUAL TRACK" DECADE - NEW WEAPONS, NEW TALKS" 174:
Inability to operate aircraft at night and in bad weather
59: 55:
a machine-translated version of the German article.
275:. No. CARLISLE BARRACKS PA. ARMY WAR COLLEGE. 200:, which created new possibilities for high-speed, 337: 101:accompanying your translation by providing an 46:Click for important translation instructions. 33:expand this article with text translated from 289:. Supreme Headquarters Allied Powers Europe 192:Requirements for unmanned aerial vehicles 171:Lack of suitable ground-launched missiles 113:{{Translated|de|Follow-on-Forces-Attack}} 319: 279: 338: 306: 304: 257: 310: 263: 243: 226: 15: 301: 13: 311:TOMES, ROBERT (20 November 2014). 14: 357: 264:Diver, Michael J. (1 July 1990). 204:, as well as in micro-electronic 20: 111:You may also add the template 1: 219: 7: 329:published 1985 by Routledge 155: 83:will aid in categorization. 10: 362: 58:Machine translation, like 202:real-time data processing 35:the corresponding article 138:Follow-on Forces Attack 122:For more guidance, see 124:Knowledge:Translation 95:copyright attribution 315:. METAMORPHIC MEDIA. 214:systems-of-systems 103:interlanguage link 206:sensor technology 150:Bernard W. Rogers 135: 134: 47: 43: 353: 330: 327:Defending Europe 323: 317: 316: 308: 299: 298: 296: 294: 283: 277: 276: 270: 261: 255: 254: 247: 241: 240: 238: 230: 114: 108: 82: 81:|topic= 79:, and specifying 64:Google Translate 45: 41: 24: 23: 16: 361: 360: 356: 355: 354: 352: 351: 350: 336: 335: 334: 333: 324: 320: 309: 302: 292: 290: 285: 284: 280: 268: 262: 258: 249: 248: 244: 236: 232: 231: 227: 222: 162:ceteris paribus 158: 131: 130: 129: 112: 106: 80: 48: 25: 21: 12: 11: 5: 359: 349: 348: 332: 331: 318: 300: 278: 256: 242: 224: 223: 221: 218: 194: 193: 190: 187: 184: 181: 178: 175: 172: 157: 154: 133: 132: 128: 127: 120: 109: 87: 84: 72:adding a topic 67: 56: 49: 42:(January 2023) 30: 29: 28: 26: 19: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 358: 347: 344: 343: 341: 328: 322: 314: 307: 305: 288: 282: 274: 267: 260: 252: 246: 235: 229: 225: 217: 215: 209: 207: 203: 199: 191: 188: 185: 182: 179: 176: 173: 170: 169: 168: 165: 163: 153: 151: 147: 143: 139: 125: 121: 118: 110: 104: 100: 96: 92: 88: 85: 78: 77:main category 74: 73: 68: 65: 61: 57: 54: 51: 50: 44: 38: 36: 31:You can help 27: 18: 17: 326: 321: 291:. Retrieved 281: 272: 259: 245: 228: 210: 195: 166: 161: 159: 137: 136: 99:edit summary 90: 70: 40: 32: 293:30 January 220:References 273:ADA224090 198:microchip 117:talk page 69:Consider 37:in German 340:Category 156:Synopsis 148:General 93:provide 115:to the 97:in the 39:. 146:SACEUR 269:(PDF) 237:(PDF) 140:is a 60:DeepL 346:NATO 295:2023 142:NATO 91:must 89:You 53:View 62:or 342:: 303:^ 271:. 297:. 126:. 119:.

Index

the corresponding article
View
DeepL
Google Translate
adding a topic
main category
copyright attribution
edit summary
interlanguage link
talk page
Knowledge:Translation
NATO
SACEUR
Bernard W. Rogers
microchip
real-time data processing
sensor technology
systems-of-systems
"Technologies for NATO's Follow-on Forces Attack Concept: A Special Report of OTA's Assessment on Improving NATO's Defense Response"
"New technology for NATO: implementing Follow-On Forces Attack"
"NATO's Follow-On Forces Attack (FOFA) Concept: Past, Present and Future"
"1979-1989: "DUAL TRACK" DECADE - NEW WEAPONS, NEW TALKS"


"THE COLD WAR OFFSET STRATEGY: ASSAULT BREAKER AND THE BEGINNING OF THE RSTA REVOLUTION"
Category
NATO

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.