22:
71:
53:
132:
This photo has been edited (by its original uploader no less) to remove skin blemished and wrinkles, and now it looks like an airbrushed glamour photo out of a fashion magazine. Surely that is not necessary for an endyclopedia portrait, and it should be reverted to an earlier version, no? -
138:
134:
161:
142:
166:
95:
156:
99:
83:
91:
78:
58:
33:
39:
87:
8:
150:
90:
on
Knowledge. If you would like to participate, you should visit the
86:), an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to
70:
52:
148:
32:does not require a rating on Knowledge's
162:NA-importance British royalty articles
149:
135:2003:C8:9731:4400:4261:86FF:FE37:E40A
108:Knowledge:WikiProject British Royalty
167:WikiProject British Royalty articles
111:Template:WikiProject British Royalty
15:
38:It is of interest to the following
13:
14:
178:
157:NA-Class British royalty articles
76:This file is within the scope of
21:
19:
69:
51:
20:
84:Royalty and Nobility Work Group
143:07:21, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
1:
7:
79:WikiProject British Royalty
10:
183:
98:and/or contribute to the
64:
46:
114:British royalty articles
82:(a child project of the
34:content assessment
130:
129:
126:
125:
122:
121:
174:
116:
115:
112:
109:
106:
96:join the project
94:, where you can
73:
66:
65:
55:
48:
47:
25:
24:
23:
16:
182:
181:
177:
176:
175:
173:
172:
171:
147:
146:
113:
110:
107:
105:British Royalty
104:
103:
88:British Royalty
59:British Royalty
12:
11:
5:
180:
170:
169:
164:
159:
128:
127:
124:
123:
120:
119:
117:
74:
62:
61:
56:
44:
43:
37:
26:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
179:
168:
165:
163:
160:
158:
155:
154:
152:
145:
144:
140:
136:
118:
101:
97:
93:
89:
85:
81:
80:
75:
72:
68:
67:
63:
60:
57:
54:
50:
49:
45:
41:
35:
31:
27:
18:
17:
131:
92:project page
77:
40:WikiProjects
29:
151:Categories
100:discussion
36:scale.
28:This
139:talk
30:file
153::
141:)
137:(
102:.
42::
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
