251:: no process can interrupt the function mid-execution and hence see a state that only exists during the execution of the function. This code only serves to help explain the behaviour of fetch-and-add; atomicity requires explicit hardware support and hence can not be implemented as a simple high level function.
225:. However, in multiprocessor systems (even with interrupts disabled) two or more processors could be attempting to access the same memory at the same time. The fetch-and-add instruction allows any processor to atomically increment a value in memory, preventing such multiple processor collisions.
535:
project, which also produced a multiprocessor supporting fetch-and-add and containing custom VLSI switches that were able to combine concurrent memory references (including fetch-and-adds) to prevent them from serializing at the memory module containing the destination operand.
393:(it just wasn't called that then), and with the LOCK prefix, is atomic across multiple processors. However, it could not return the original value of the memory location (though it returned some flags) until the
277:
To implement a mutual exclusion lock, we define the operation FetchAndIncrement, which is equivalent to FetchAndAdd with inc=1. With this operation, a mutual exclusion lock can be implemented using the
389:
In the x86 architecture, the instruction ADD with the destination operand specifying a memory location is a fetch-and-add instruction that has been there since the
316:
myturn := FetchAndIncrement(&lock.ticketnumber) // must be atomic, since many threads might ask for a lock at the same time
116:
scheduled onto some single-core systems). The reason is that such an operation is actually implemented as multiple machine instructions:
336:* lock) { FetchAndIncrement(&lock.turn) // this need not be atomic, since only the possessor of the lock will execute this }
163:
and operate on that, then both store their results with the effect that one overwrites the other and the stored value becomes either
239:
operation. The fetch-and-add operation can solve the wait-free consensus problem for no more than two concurrent processes.
247:
The fetch-and-add instruction behaves like the following function. Crucially, the entire function is executed
96:
The motivation for having an atomic fetch-and-add is that operations that appear in programming languages as
718:
713:
374:
232:
550:
555:
36:
689:
606:
401:
367:
405:
378:
85:
32:
668:
601:
113:
565:
643:
70:
586:
8:
210:
101:
77:
46:
That is, fetch-and-add performs the following operation: increment the value at address
619:
105:
675:
408:
compiler, for both 32- and 64-bit x86 Intel platforms, based on extended asm syntax:
214:
349:
Integer datatype used in lock values can 'wrap around' when continuously incremented
623:
611:
545:
248:
236:
222:
81:
20:
339:
These routines provide a mutual-exclusion lock when following conditions are met:
228:
109:
40:
707:
532:
560:
615:
279:
346:
Number of tasks waiting for the lock does not exceed INT_MAX at any time
343:
Locktype data structure is initialized with function LockInit before use
669:"Intel Itanium Processor-specific Application Binary Interface (ABI)"
218:
151:
69:
in such a way that if this operation is executed by one process in a
304:* lock) { lock.ticketnumber := 0 lock.turn := 0 }
371:
363:
16:
CPU instruction to increment a value in memory by a given amount
73:
system, no other process will ever see an intermediate result.
270:
value := *location *location := value + inc
394:
390:
366:
standard. It is available as a proprietary extension to
100:
are not safe in a concurrent system, where multiple
705:
353:
62:is some value, and return the original value at
231:(1991) proved that fetch-and-add has a finite
377:specification, and (with the same syntax) in
605:
694:Using the GNU Compiler Collection (GCC)
584:
217:supported, it is sufficient to disable
76:Fetch-and-add can be used to implement
706:
108:are running concurrently (either in a
384:
531:Fetch-and-add was introduced by the
13:
14:
730:
696:. Free Software Foundation. 2005.
585:Herlihy, Maurice (January 1991).
397:introduced the XADD instruction.
242:
134:store register value back into
682:
661:
636:
594:ACM Trans. Program. Lang. Syst
578:
461:"lock; xaddl %0, %1"
1:
571:
354:Hardware and software support
39:increments the contents of a
7:
587:"Wait-free synchronization"
551:Load-link/store-conditional
539:
326:spin until lock is acquired
320:lock.turn ≠ myturn
235:number, in contrast to the
91:
10:
735:
526:
142:When one process is doing
254:<< atomic >>
150:concurrently, there is a
58:is a memory location and
644:"std::atomic::fetch_add"
410:
362:function appears in the
154:. They might both fetch
404:implementation for the
206:as might be expected.
43:by a specified value.
616:10.1145/114005.102808
566:Test and test-and-set
146:and another is doing
211:uniprocessor systems
719:Concurrency control
714:Computer arithmetic
400:The following is a
221:before accessing a
80:structures such as
78:concurrency control
506:"memory"
385:x86 implementation
690:"Atomic Builtins"
676:Intel Corporation
556:Read–modify–write
494:// input + output
292:ticketnumber
215:kernel preemption
726:
698:
697:
686:
680:
679:
673:
665:
659:
658:
656:
654:
648:cppreference.com
640:
634:
633:
631:
630:
609:
591:
582:
546:Compare-and-swap
522:
519:
516:
513:
510:
507:
504:
501:
500:// No input-only
498:
495:
492:
489:
486:
483:
480:
477:
474:
471:
468:
465:
462:
459:
456:
453:
450:
447:
444:
441:
438:
435:
432:
429:
426:
423:
420:
417:
414:
361:
237:compare-and-swap
223:critical section
205:
188:
175:
162:
149:
145:
137:
130:
124:into a register;
123:
99:
65:
61:
57:
53:
49:
21:computer science
734:
733:
729:
728:
727:
725:
724:
723:
704:
703:
702:
701:
688:
687:
683:
671:
667:
666:
662:
652:
650:
642:
641:
637:
628:
626:
589:
583:
579:
574:
542:
529:
524:
523:
520:
517:
514:
511:
508:
505:
502:
499:
496:
493:
490:
487:
484:
481:
478:
475:
472:
469:
466:
463:
460:
457:
454:
451:
448:
445:
442:
439:
436:
433:
430:
427:
424:
421:
418:
415:
412:
387:
359:
356:
337:
288:locktype {
275:
245:
229:Maurice Herlihy
196:
190:
183:
177:
170:
164:
161:
155:
147:
143:
135:
128:
121:
110:multi-processor
97:
94:
63:
59:
55:
51:
47:
41:memory location
17:
12:
11:
5:
732:
722:
721:
716:
700:
699:
681:
660:
635:
607:10.1.1.56.5659
600:(1): 124–149.
576:
575:
573:
570:
569:
568:
563:
558:
553:
548:
541:
538:
528:
525:
479:"+m"
467:"+r"
411:
386:
383:
355:
352:
351:
350:
347:
344:
312:* lock) {
284:
282:algorithm as:
253:
244:
243:Implementation
241:
194:
181:
168:
159:
140:
139:
132:
125:
93:
90:
15:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
731:
720:
717:
715:
712:
711:
709:
695:
691:
685:
677:
670:
664:
649:
645:
639:
625:
621:
617:
613:
608:
603:
599:
595:
588:
581:
577:
567:
564:
562:
559:
557:
554:
552:
549:
547:
544:
543:
537:
534:
533:Ultracomputer
422:fetch_and_add
409:
407:
403:
398:
396:
392:
382:
380:
376:
373:
369:
365:
348:
345:
342:
341:
340:
335:
331:
327:
323:
319:
315:
311:
307:
303:
299:
295:
291:
287:
283:
281:
273:
269:
265:
261:
257:
252:
250:
240:
238:
234:
230:
226:
224:
220:
216:
212:
207:
204:
200:
193:
187:
180:
174:
167:
158:
153:
133:
126:
119:
118:
117:
115:
111:
107:
103:
89:
87:
83:
79:
74:
72:
67:
44:
42:
38:
34:
30:
26:
25:fetch-and-add
22:
693:
684:
663:
651:. Retrieved
647:
638:
627:. Retrieved
597:
593:
580:
561:Test-and-set
530:
399:
388:
357:
338:
333:
329:
325:
321:
317:
313:
309:
305:
301:
297:
293:
289:
285:
276:
271:
267:
263:
259:
258:FetchAndAdd(
255:
246:
227:
208:
202:
198:
191:
185:
178:
172:
165:
156:
141:
131:to register;
114:preemptively
95:
75:
68:
45:
35:instruction
28:
24:
18:
280:ticket lock
266:inc) {
112:system, or
82:mutex locks
708:Categories
629:2007-05-20
572:References
358:An atomic
262:location,
249:atomically
219:interrupts
86:semaphores
71:concurrent
37:atomically
602:CiteSeerX
360:fetch_add
330:procedure
306:procedure
300:LockInit(
298:procedure
233:consensus
152:data race
148:x = x + b
144:x = x + a
102:processes
98:x = x + a
540:See also
488:variable
455:volatile
434:variable
334:locktype
310:locktype
302:locktype
274:value }
256:function
213:with no
92:Overview
54:, where
678:. 2001.
624:2181446
527:History
452:__asm__
372:Itanium
370:in the
332:UnLock(
296:turn }
260:address
106:threads
653:1 June
622:
604:
512:return
416:inline
413:static
286:record
272:return
189:, not
23:, the
672:(PDF)
620:S2CID
590:(PDF)
515:value
473:value
443:value
364:C++11
318:while
308:Lock(
120:load
655:2015
391:8086
322:skip
127:add
84:and
612:doi
440:int
428:int
419:int
406:GCC
395:486
379:GCC
375:ABI
324://
314:int
294:int
290:int
268:int
264:int
209:In
195:old
182:old
176:or
169:old
160:old
104:or
50:by
33:CPU
29:FAA
19:In
710::
692:.
674:.
646:.
618:.
610:.
598:13
596:.
592:.
509:);
476:),
381:.
328:}
201:+
197:+
184:+
171:+
88:.
66:.
31:)
657:.
632:.
614::
521:}
518:;
503::
497::
491:)
485:*
482:(
470:(
464::
458:(
449:{
446:)
437:,
431:*
425:(
402:C
368:C
203:b
199:a
192:x
186:b
179:x
173:a
166:x
157:x
138:.
136:x
129:a
122:x
64:x
60:a
56:x
52:a
48:x
27:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.