25:
148:
of people or things that are undergoing such selection process, which means that, in the possibility that there is at least one agent who is interested in the success of the people or things that are going through the selection process, the agent(s) will be interested into keeping the subject out of
136:
of concentrating on the people or things that failed to make it past some selection process and overlooking those that did, typically because of their lack of visibility. This can lead to false conclusions in several different ways. It is a form of
145:
844:
819:
849:
97:
69:
116:
76:
54:
246:
921:
839:
649:
942:
50:
768:
83:
654:
308:
46:
303:
209:
947:
426:
65:
762:
288:
219:
957:
892:
616:
416:
394:
916:
829:
711:
476:
456:
352:
35:
39:
902:
586:
566:
347:
325:
681:
596:
571:
516:
634:
486:
362:
239:
198:
90:
8:
789:
706:
606:
541:
481:
471:
466:
330:
214:
686:
671:
431:
421:
404:
799:
736:
721:
644:
626:
561:
357:
273:
866:
726:
666:
591:
576:
436:
389:
298:
293:
278:
834:
824:
601:
581:
496:
399:
374:
369:
342:
320:
232:
149:
the public eye, and thus, to raise the likelihood of the failure bias happening
876:
871:
861:
784:
701:
661:
611:
556:
546:
531:
526:
491:
446:
411:
315:
264:
187:
182:
138:
952:
936:
814:
794:
757:
731:
716:
696:
676:
639:
551:
511:
506:
501:
379:
283:
204:
133:
774:
536:
521:
192:
144:
In several of these cases, one measure of success is precisely the lack of
691:
461:
451:
441:
337:
809:
804:
779:
170:
897:
384:
158:
24:
856:
741:
164:
255:
224:
16:Logical error of focusing on incidents on failure
934:
240:
53:. Unsourced material may be challenged and
903:Heuristics in judgment and decision-making
247:
233:
117:Learn how and when to remove this message
935:
228:
51:adding citations to reliable sources
18:
13:
14:
969:
23:
1:
210:Multiple comparisons problem
7:
769:DĂ©formation professionnelle
176:
152:
10:
974:
763:Basking in reflected glory
254:
220:Texas sharpshooter fallacy
911:
893:Cognitive bias mitigation
885:
750:
625:
262:
477:Illusion of transparency
167:fit into this category
943:Sampling (statistics)
845:Arab–Israeli conflict
572:Social influence bias
517:Out-group homogeneity
487:Mere-exposure effect
417:Extrinsic incentives
363:Selective perception
199:Fooled by Randomness
47:improve this article
712:Social desirability
607:von Restorff effect
482:Mean world syndrome
457:Hostile attribution
215:Selection principle
948:Informal fallacies
627:Statistical biases
405:Curse of knowledge
930:
929:
567:Social comparison
348:Choice-supportive
127:
126:
119:
101:
965:
958:Cognitive biases
727:Systematic error
682:Omitted-variable
597:Trait ascription
437:Frog pond effect
265:Cognitive biases
249:
242:
235:
226:
225:
146:public awareness
122:
115:
111:
108:
102:
100:
59:
27:
19:
973:
972:
968:
967:
966:
964:
963:
962:
933:
932:
931:
926:
907:
881:
746:
621:
602:Turkey illusion
370:Compassion fade
267:
258:
253:
179:
155:
123:
112:
106:
103:
60:
58:
44:
28:
17:
12:
11:
5:
971:
961:
960:
955:
950:
945:
928:
927:
925:
924:
919:
912:
909:
908:
906:
905:
900:
895:
889:
887:
886:Bias reduction
883:
882:
880:
879:
874:
869:
864:
862:Political bias
859:
854:
853:
852:
847:
842:
837:
832:
827:
822:
817:
807:
802:
797:
792:
790:Infrastructure
787:
782:
777:
772:
765:
760:
754:
752:
748:
747:
745:
744:
739:
734:
729:
724:
719:
714:
709:
707:Self-selection
704:
699:
694:
689:
684:
679:
674:
669:
664:
659:
658:
657:
647:
642:
637:
631:
629:
623:
622:
620:
619:
614:
609:
604:
599:
594:
589:
584:
579:
574:
569:
564:
559:
554:
549:
544:
542:Pro-innovation
539:
534:
529:
527:Overton window
524:
519:
514:
509:
504:
499:
494:
489:
484:
479:
474:
469:
464:
459:
454:
449:
444:
439:
434:
429:
424:
419:
414:
409:
408:
407:
397:
395:Dunning–Kruger
392:
387:
382:
377:
372:
367:
366:
365:
355:
350:
345:
340:
335:
334:
333:
323:
318:
313:
312:
311:
309:Correspondence
306:
304:Actor–observer
296:
291:
286:
281:
276:
270:
268:
263:
260:
259:
252:
251:
244:
237:
229:
223:
222:
217:
212:
207:
202:
195:
190:
188:Cherry picking
185:
183:Selection bias
178:
175:
174:
173:
168:
161:
154:
151:
139:selection bias
125:
124:
66:"Failure bias"
31:
29:
22:
15:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
970:
959:
956:
954:
951:
949:
946:
944:
941:
940:
938:
923:
920:
918:
914:
913:
910:
904:
901:
899:
896:
894:
891:
890:
888:
884:
878:
875:
873:
870:
868:
865:
863:
860:
858:
855:
851:
848:
846:
843:
841:
840:United States
838:
836:
833:
831:
828:
826:
823:
821:
818:
816:
815:False balance
813:
812:
811:
808:
806:
803:
801:
798:
796:
793:
791:
788:
786:
783:
781:
778:
776:
773:
771:
770:
766:
764:
761:
759:
756:
755:
753:
749:
743:
740:
738:
735:
733:
730:
728:
725:
723:
720:
718:
715:
713:
710:
708:
705:
703:
700:
698:
695:
693:
690:
688:
687:Participation
685:
683:
680:
678:
675:
673:
670:
668:
665:
663:
660:
656:
655:Psychological
653:
652:
651:
648:
646:
643:
641:
638:
636:
633:
632:
630:
628:
624:
618:
615:
613:
610:
608:
605:
603:
600:
598:
595:
593:
590:
588:
585:
583:
580:
578:
575:
573:
570:
568:
565:
563:
560:
558:
555:
553:
550:
548:
545:
543:
540:
538:
535:
533:
530:
528:
525:
523:
520:
518:
515:
513:
510:
508:
505:
503:
500:
498:
495:
493:
490:
488:
485:
483:
480:
478:
475:
473:
470:
468:
465:
463:
460:
458:
455:
453:
450:
448:
445:
443:
440:
438:
435:
433:
430:
428:
425:
423:
422:Fading affect
420:
418:
415:
413:
410:
406:
403:
402:
401:
398:
396:
393:
391:
388:
386:
383:
381:
378:
376:
373:
371:
368:
364:
361:
360:
359:
356:
354:
351:
349:
346:
344:
341:
339:
336:
332:
329:
328:
327:
324:
322:
319:
317:
314:
310:
307:
305:
302:
301:
300:
297:
295:
292:
290:
287:
285:
282:
280:
277:
275:
272:
271:
269:
266:
261:
257:
250:
245:
243:
238:
236:
231:
230:
227:
221:
218:
216:
213:
211:
208:
206:
205:Meta-analysis
203:
201:
200:
196:
194:
191:
189:
186:
184:
181:
180:
172:
169:
166:
162:
160:
157:
156:
150:
147:
142:
140:
135:
134:logical error
131:
121:
118:
110:
99:
96:
92:
89:
85:
82:
78:
75:
71:
68: –
67:
63:
62:Find sources:
56:
52:
48:
42:
41:
37:
32:This article
30:
26:
21:
20:
800:In education
767:
751:Other biases
737:Verification
722:Survivorship
672:Non-response
645:Healthy user
587:Substitution
562:Self-serving
358:Confirmation
326:Availability
274:Acquiescence
197:
193:Econometrics
143:
130:Failure bias
129:
128:
113:
104:
94:
87:
80:
73:
61:
45:Please help
33:
867:Publication
820:Vietnam War
667:Length time
650:Information
592:Time-saving
452:Horn effect
442:Halo effect
390:Distinction
299:Attribution
294:Attentional
937:Categories
830:South Asia
805:Liking gap
617:In animals
582:Status quo
497:Negativity
400:Egocentric
375:Congruence
353:Commitment
343:Blind spot
331:Mean world
321:Automation
171:Censorship
77:newspapers
898:Debiasing
877:White hat
872:Reporting
785:Inductive
702:Selection
662:Lead time
635:Estimator
612:Zero-risk
577:Spotlight
557:Restraint
547:Proximity
532:Precision
492:Narrative
447:Hindsight
432:Frequency
412:Emotional
385:Declinism
316:Authority
289:Anchoring
279:Ambiguity
159:Espionage
34:does not
795:Inherent
758:Academic
732:Systemic
717:Spectrum
697:Sampling
677:Observer
640:Forecast
552:Response
512:Optimism
507:Omission
502:Normalcy
472:In-group
467:Implicit
380:Cultural
284:Affinity
177:See also
153:Examples
107:May 2018
917:General
915:Lists:
850:Ukraine
775:Funding
537:Present
522:Outcome
427:Framing
132:is the
91:scholar
55:removed
40:sources
922:Memory
835:Sweden
825:Norway
692:Recall
462:Impact
338:Belief
256:Biases
165:crimes
93:
86:
79:
72:
64:
810:Media
780:FUTON
163:Most
98:JSTOR
84:books
953:Bias
70:news
38:any
36:cite
857:Net
742:Wet
49:by
939::
141:.
248:e
241:t
234:v
120:)
114:(
109:)
105:(
95:·
88:·
81:·
74:·
57:.
43:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
