Knowledge

FIXatdl

Source đź“ť

114:
1.0 specification also afforded insufficient control in terms of user interface layouts. The working group set out to address these limitations in what was to become Version 1.1 on the specification. The first major change was to split the definition of the data content from the presentation, defining what is referred to as a separate "Data Contract" made up of the algorithm parameters, their data types and supporting information such as minimum and maximum values. A separate section of the XML document is then concerned with the layout of the user interface, what controls to use for each parameter and where to place them on the screen. An
69:(OMS) to exchange orders and order execution information without human intervention, using standardised messages and workflows that are defined by the protocol. Initially, sell-side firms only provided access to their 'trading desks' via FIX, which meant that once an order arrived at the sell-side broker, it was handled by a human trader, at least at the start of its lifecycle. Subsequently, sell-side firms started to offer direct access via FIX to the exchanges/markets they were members of; this is known as 174: 81:
ended up requiring a different set of fields (known in FIX as "tags") to be included in the FIX message. This made life very difficult for the buy-side, and more particularly for their suppliers as adding new algorithms to their trading systems and managing all the different combinations of tags became a significant overhead for their development operations.
97:
This solution was not broadly adopted, in part because of the limited penetration of FIX 5.0 and in part due to the fact that firms already had working implementations in the market place that they were unwilling to change without good cause. Perhaps more importantly, it failed to solve what was the
84:
The second issue for the market was that each sell-side firm had a specific way they wanted their algorithms to be displayed on the buy-side OMS, with controls in the user interface arranged logically for easy order entry. Again, this proved a challenge for the buy-side systems vendors, as each new
109:
Despite some initial enthusiasm, overall Version 1.0 had a lacklustre reception by the marketplace. Some vendors saw an opportunity to provide services around the standard, such as ULLINK (now part of Itiviti) with their algorithm publication and management and tool UL AMS but whilst the major OMS
105:
in a 2005 forum posting. Members of the working group developed this idea during 2006 and in January 2007 invited broader industry participation at a workshop to review their ideas. A specification was eventually produced and this began beta testing in July 2007. This specification became FIXatdl
94:
tags were formally introduced with the release of FIX 5.0 in Q4 2006. By allowing sell-side firms to include their proprietary fields in a repeating name-value pair structure, there was no requirement for OMS vendors to define specific FIX message structures for each sell-side trading destination.
278:
and adopting any one platform would risk damaging this proposition. Whilst lacking the degree of sophistication of some of these platforms, the current specification provides an acceptable degree of control in terms of user interface layout without being unduly restrictive. It remains to be seen
113:
Although Version 1.0 was a major step forward, it had some significant limitations. In particular, the definition of the data to be transmitted and its presentation on the user interface were tightly bound together, limiting the flexibility sell-side brokers had in defining their algorithms. The
93:
To tackle these issues, FIX Protocol Limited established the Algorithmic Trading Working Group in Q3 2004. The initial focus of the group was to solve the first of these issues, which it did by defining a new group of fields, the StrategyParametersGrp, made up of FIX tags 957 through 960 – these
80:
Whilst FIX is an extensible protocol, there were two challenges that arose as a result of sell-side firms offering access to their algorithmic trading strategies via FIX. The first was that each sell-side strategy had its own parameters that had to be included as part of the order, so every firm
121:
FIXatdl Version 1.1 was preliminarily approved by the GTC on February 9, 2010, when it entered a public comment period, and then finally approved on March 3, 2010. The specification was formally introduced to the market at the FPL’s Europe Middle East and Africa conference on March 23, 2010.
219:
Unlike the previous version, Version 1.1 was widely accepted and adopted by the securities industry. Even at the end of 2009, there were already firms using the 1.1 standard, despite its pre-release status. Examples of firms supporting the FIXatdl standard include:
210:
Controls are laid out using a hierarchy of panels (referred to as StrategyPanels), each of which can be horizontal or vertical in orientation. The picture on the right shows how the XML elements refer to the individual panels within a given layout.
110:
vendors were irritated by the overhead of implementing new broker algorithms, they had grown to enjoy the revenue that they could command from both their customers and from brokers keen to get their algorithms onto buy-side desks.
57:
Prior to the mid-nineties, virtually all trading of securities was transacted over the phone, but with the advent of FIX, trading moved steadily over to electronic means. The FIX protocol is used to communicate between
143:
StrategyLayout section which defines the user interface controls to be used for this strategy, how they should be laid out on the screen and how they map to the parameters described in the previous section of the
140:
Parameters section, listing out each of the parameters used by the strategy, their data types, constraints (e.g., minimum and maximum values) and how they should be represented in the resulting FIX message
101:
The idea of using an XML structure to describe the presentation of algorithm user interfaces and their accompanying parameters was firstly suggested within the working group by Daniel Clayden, then of
423: 368: 438: 125:
Some early work was undertaken on a Version 1.2 of the standard, but lack of industry interest in accommodating further changes meant the standard remained at Version 1.1.
242:
Cornerstone Technology, with their FIXatdl Jump-Start packaged consulting service, public FIXatdl training workshops and free FIXatdl validation service, AtdlTools
77:
strategies, and over time they began to see that offering access to these trading strategies to the buy-side was a way to attract business and increase revenue.
33:, is a standard for the exchange of meta-information required to enable algorithmic trading activity within the financial markets. It works in tandem with the 424:
https://www.simcorp.com/en/news-and-announcements/2013/05/nordea-investment-management-goes-live-with-new-broker-strategy-functionality-in-simcorp-dimension
279:
how this design choice will pan out, and it does seem likely that further refinement of this part of the specification will be needed as adoption grows.
537: 151:
FIXatdl documents should validate against the set of XSD schema provided by FPL. These schema are organised into the following four categories:
321: 369:
http://www.automatedtrader.net/news/algorithmic-trading-news/756/fpl-announces-fix-algorithmic-trading-definition-language-enters-beta-phase
465: 454: 133:
A FIXatdl document can contain one or more strategy definitions. Within a strategy definition, there are four main sections as follows:
399: 383: 552: 411: 435: 340: 164:
Flow (allows controls to be enabled/disabled, hidden/shown and updated, depending on the state or content of other controls)
547: 137:
Meta-data section defining which geographical regions, markets (exchanges) and asset classes the strategy is applicable to
542: 147:
StrategyEdit section which describes the validation rules to be applied – typically these will be cross field validations
73:(DMA). At this time, many sell-side firms had their own proprietary systems to trade automatically in the market, using 557: 262:
The question has often been asked, why doesn’t FIXatdl use an off-the-shelf user interface standard, such as Mozilla’s
98:
more substantial issue for the market, the complexity for the buy-side vendors resulting from lack of standardisation.
66: 356: 267: 506: 527: 20: 274:? This is a valid question, but it seems that the authors of the specification wanted to maintain complete 522: 367:
FPL Announces FIX Algorithmic Trading Definition Language Enters Beta Phase, Automated Trading, July 2007:
567: 532: 562: 422:
Nordea Investment Management goes live with new broker strategy functionality in SimCorp Dimension
400:
https://www.fixtrading.org/packages/fixatdl-scope-of-work/?wpdmdl=53695&masterkey=5cdeb86ec9a4a
247: 318: 495: 412:
http://www.automatedtrader.net/news/ems-news/26664/realtick-adds-latest-deutsche-bank-algorithms
436:
http://www.portware.com/flash/files/news/pressreleases/download/Portware%20FIXatdl%20FINAL.pdf
275: 206:
Numeric spinners, both single and double for integers and floating point numbers respectively
181:
Version 1.1 supports 14 different user interface controls, which can be grouped as follows:
572: 70: 380: 8: 288: 254:
implementations, atdl4j and Atdl4net respectively, which are both Version 1.1 compliant.
74: 293: 46: 42: 106:
1.0 which was approved by the FPL Global Technical Committee (GTC) on March 28, 2008.
85:
screen for each sell-side broker required dedicated development and testing effort.
337: 115: 19:
This article is about the financial software. For the Adventure Time spin-off, see
442: 387: 344: 325: 479: 357:
http://www.fixprotocol.org/documents/1994/Algo%20workshop%20details_20070108.doc
317:
Algorithmic Trading & FIX: Extending the Reach of FIX, FPL, November 2004:
251: 102: 516: 38: 485: 298: 34: 271: 173: 158:
Layout (defines the controls that can be used and how they are laid out)
464:
Cornerstone Technology Announces First Public FIXatdl Training Courses
336:
Daniel Clayden’s original post on the concept of what became FIXatdl:
59: 118:
is provided to ensure that FIXatdl files are valid and well-formed.
63: 453:
Cornerstone Technology Helps Firms Accelerate FIXatdl Readiness
319:
http://www.jandj.com/presentations/wednesday/AlgoTradingFIX.pdf
501: 224:
RealTick Execution Management System, by Eze Software Group
379:
FIXatdl on the FIX EMEA 2010 Protocol Conference agenda:
155:
Core (defines data content, data types, constraints, etc.)
263: 203:
Sliders, for selecting one of a small number of settings
381:
http://fixprotocol.org/fplevents/emea_2010/program.html
230:
Itiviti, with their Algorithm Management System, UL AMS
191:
Checkboxes and radio buttons, both singly and in lists
507:
FIXatdl - Changing the landscape of strategy trading
239:
Assimilate Technology, with their Visual FIX product
188:
Text entry fields (often referred to as text boxes)
257: 514: 338:http://www.fixprotocol.org/discuss/read/d3b2124e 410:RealTick adds latest Deutsche Bank Algorithms: 197:Dropdown lists, both editable and non-editable 168: 27:FIX Algorithmic Trading Definition Language 355:FPL Call for Participation, January 2007: 194:Listboxes, both single and multi-selection 498:(open to read, free registration to post) 236:RapidAddition, with their FIXatdl editor 233:The Portware Execution Management System 227:SimCorp Dimension's Order Manager Module 172: 492:(open to all but registration required) 538:Financial industry XML-based standards 515: 509:, FIXGlobal, Dec 2009/Jan 2010 issue. 128: 496:Discussion board & support forum 490:which develops and maintains FIXatdl 200:Clock controls, for date/time entry 13: 14: 584: 473: 434:Portware's adoption of FIXatdl: 553:User interface markup languages 458: 447: 398:Scope of Work for FIXatdl V1.2 268:Windows Presentation Foundation 428: 416: 404: 392: 373: 361: 349: 330: 311: 258:Other user interface standards 35:Financial Information eXchange 1: 502:Video introduction of FIXatdl 304: 161:Validation (self-explanatory) 52: 21:Adventure Time: Distant Lands 37:(FIX) protocol which is the 7: 548:Financial routing standards 282: 246:There are also open source 214: 169:User interface capabilities 10: 589: 543:Electronic trading systems 88: 18: 558:Graphical user interfaces 67:Order Management Systems 178: 276:platform independence 176: 528:XML markup languages 480:Formal specification 71:direct market access 523:Algorithmic trading 482:on official website 289:Algorithmic trading 75:algorithmic trading 568:Financial software 533:Financial metadata 441:2011-07-15 at the 386:2010-03-07 at the 343:2010-05-22 at the 324:2011-07-13 at the 294:Electronic trading 179: 129:Document structure 43:electronic trading 29:, better known as 16:Financial software 563:Financial markets 580: 467: 462: 456: 451: 445: 432: 426: 420: 414: 408: 402: 396: 390: 377: 371: 365: 359: 353: 347: 334: 328: 315: 588: 587: 583: 582: 581: 579: 578: 577: 513: 512: 476: 471: 470: 463: 459: 452: 448: 443:Wayback Machine 433: 429: 421: 417: 409: 405: 397: 393: 388:Wayback Machine 378: 374: 366: 362: 354: 350: 345:Wayback Machine 335: 331: 326:Wayback Machine 316: 312: 307: 285: 266:, Microsoft’s 260: 217: 177:Strategy panels 171: 131: 103:JP Morgan Chase 91: 55: 24: 17: 12: 11: 5: 586: 576: 575: 570: 565: 560: 555: 550: 545: 540: 535: 530: 525: 511: 510: 504: 499: 493: 483: 475: 474:External links 472: 469: 468: 457: 446: 427: 415: 403: 391: 372: 360: 348: 329: 309: 308: 306: 303: 302: 301: 296: 291: 284: 281: 259: 256: 244: 243: 240: 237: 234: 231: 228: 225: 216: 213: 208: 207: 204: 201: 198: 195: 192: 189: 186: 170: 167: 166: 165: 162: 159: 156: 149: 148: 145: 141: 138: 130: 127: 90: 87: 54: 51: 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 585: 574: 571: 569: 566: 564: 561: 559: 556: 554: 551: 549: 546: 544: 541: 539: 536: 534: 531: 529: 526: 524: 521: 520: 518: 508: 505: 503: 500: 497: 494: 491: 489: 484: 481: 478: 477: 466: 461: 455: 450: 444: 440: 437: 431: 425: 419: 413: 407: 401: 395: 389: 385: 382: 376: 370: 364: 358: 352: 346: 342: 339: 333: 327: 323: 320: 314: 310: 300: 297: 295: 292: 290: 287: 286: 280: 277: 273: 269: 265: 255: 253: 249: 241: 238: 235: 232: 229: 226: 223: 222: 221: 212: 205: 202: 199: 196: 193: 190: 187: 184: 183: 182: 175: 163: 160: 157: 154: 153: 152: 146: 142: 139: 136: 135: 134: 126: 123: 119: 117: 111: 107: 104: 99: 95: 86: 82: 78: 76: 72: 68: 65: 61: 50: 48: 44: 40: 39:lingua franca 36: 32: 28: 22: 487: 460: 449: 430: 418: 406: 394: 375: 363: 351: 332: 313: 299:Fix protocol 261: 245: 218: 209: 180: 150: 132: 124: 120: 112: 108: 100: 96: 92: 83: 79: 56: 30: 26: 25: 573:Market data 272:Apache Flex 517:Categories 488:Work Group 305:References 116:XSD schema 53:Background 47:securities 60:sell-side 439:Archived 384:Archived 341:Archived 322:Archived 283:See also 215:Adoption 144:document 64:buy-side 62:and the 49:market. 89:History 45:in the 31:FIXatdl 185:Labels 486:The 252:.NET 250:and 248:Java 270:or 264:XUL 41:of 519:: 23:.

Index

Adventure Time: Distant Lands
Financial Information eXchange
lingua franca
electronic trading
securities
sell-side
buy-side
Order Management Systems
direct market access
algorithmic trading
JP Morgan Chase
XSD schema

Java
.NET
XUL
Windows Presentation Foundation
Apache Flex
platform independence
Algorithmic trading
Electronic trading
Fix protocol
http://www.jandj.com/presentations/wednesday/AlgoTradingFIX.pdf
Archived
Wayback Machine
http://www.fixprotocol.org/discuss/read/d3b2124e
Archived
Wayback Machine
http://www.fixprotocol.org/documents/1994/Algo%20workshop%20details_20070108.doc
http://www.automatedtrader.net/news/algorithmic-trading-news/756/fpl-announces-fix-algorithmic-trading-definition-language-enters-beta-phase

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑