185:, discretionary jurisdiction is a power assigned to the State's highest court through a Constitutional Provision. Florida's discretion in exercising power is likely the most limited of the States courts that employ the discretionary power jurisdiction. While the provision does not expressly state "discretionary jurisdiction," the categorical nature of the language restricts the use of the court's discretion. Like other federal and state court systems, Florida has a two-tier appellate system. A litigant can take two pathways to discretionary review: (1) directly petitioning the State's supreme court or (2) permission from the district court of appeal.
196:. This petitioner must file a notice to invoke within 10 days of filing the notice petitioner must submit a jurisdictional brief to the Supreme Court. If subject to the State's Supreme Court's jurisdiction. a panel of five justices, one of whom oversees the preparation of a memorandum analyzing whether there is a basis for the court's exercise of discretionary jurisdiction, will review the case. If four justices agree on a jurisdictional disposition of the case—based on the four instances listed above—the parties are notified of the court's decision, and the case proceeds accordingly.
145:, those rulings become new laws in themselves. In those cases where: (1) the parties disagree vigorously if any existing legal rule even applies to the facts of the case; (2) the appellant may be deliberately trying to attack an established rule hoping the appellate court will overturn a prior decision and establish a new rule; (3) multiple intermediate appellate courts have ruled upon the question and the question is so perplexing that all the lower courts disagree with each other.
25:
138:
the job of the lower court to adjudicate a matter in accordance with applicable legal standards. However, oftentimes a litigant will appeal, asserting that while the parties agree on the applicable law, they believe the trial court incorrectly interpreted the existing law or incorrectly applied the existing law to the facts. Thus, if the lower court makes an error, the intermediate or highest court will reverse or remand (sends back to the lower court) the case.
173:
concertedly looking to establish uniformity in the law. Although uniformity is the court's primary responsibility, judges are more likely motivated by their policy goals. They will vote to accept cases if the believe they can improve their court's policies or make a decision more favorable to their own policy preferences.
189:
interpretation of of federal constitution; (3) when the district court's decision directly conflicts with the another district's or supreme court ruling; (4) and district court decisions directly affecting the duties, powers, validity, formation, termination or regulation of constitutional or state officers.
93:. This power gives a court the authority to decide whether to hear a particular case brought before it. Typically, courts of last resort and intermediate courts in a state or country will have discretionary jurisdiction. In contrast, the lower courts have no such power. For this reason, the lower courts
137:
The "error correction" function allows the appellate court to examine the record to determine whether the lower court applied existing law correctly according to the law and applicable procedure. The function affords a litigant a second set of eyes and promotes the court's interest in fairness. It is
109:
The power is coined as “discretionary” because a court may choose whether to accept or deny the petitioner's appeal. Moreover, discretionary jurisdiction is reactive rather than proactive. In other words, appellate courts do not search for cases review. Rather the court's exercise of discretion is in
105:
over the parties to the case. Customarily a court is granted the power by rule, statute, or constitutional provision. When a constitutional provision establishes the court's power, it will have more limitations on its screening process. The usual intent behind granting power through a constitutional
130:
This structure creates a two-tier appellate system. The system affords a litigant one appeal as a matter of right after trial. The state's or district's intermediate court will review the first appeal, and after the intermediate court renders a decision, the supreme court will conduct any further
148:
An appellate court with discretionary jurisdiction can delegate error correction to lower courts while it focuses its limited resources on properly developing case law. In the latter situation, the appellate court will focus on truly novel questions or revisiting older legal rules that are now
114:
Moreover, the highest court's exercise of discretion is similar to the intermediate court, except that a supreme court will grant review at a much smaller percentage. For example, the United States
Supreme Court merely grants review for five percent of its requests for discretionary review.
172:
A judge's personal policy preferences and workload inadvertently drive the court's selection process or screening procedures. Generally, a court will select cases involving broad and significant policy questions that have produced uncertainties amongst lower courts as the higher courts are
160:, meaning that it calls appellants up to the court only if their case is important enough to merit the court's resources. The Supreme Court employs a "rule of four," meaning that four justices have to think the case is important enough to hear before the court will grant it a review. Many
188:
There are four instances where the State's supreme court can exercise discretion when to review: (1) district court decisions that expressly declare a valid state statute—even where the validity of the statute is not the issue before the court; (2) District Court decisions involving the
131:
review. However, unlike the first appeal, a litigant is not entitled to a successive appeal by the supreme court. Alternatively, in a few cases, those of great importance, such as capital cases, may be appealed directly to the highest court as a matter of right.
212:, where the court had made a decision regarding the first challenge, the judge handling the second challenge noted that his role to exercise "what is plainly a discretionary jurisdiction". In the particular circumstances of the case in
192:
When a litigant is petitioning the court for discretionary review, the litigant must file a notice in the district court w/in 30 days of "a notice to invoke discretionary jurisdiction.
256:"Discretionary Review of the Decisions of Intermediate Appellate Courts: A Comparison of Florida's System with Those of the Other States and the Federal System"
463:
220:) observed that it would be "incongruous" to exercise this discretion in the second case in a way which would annul the decision made in the first.
350:
35:
205:
487:
398:
432:
110:
response to a petitioner's appeal of a lower court's decision or in a motion for rehearing made to the intermediate court
414:
69:
278:
47:
153:
98:
141:
The "law declaring" function means that the appellate court rules on novel issues in a case, and under
124:
43:
510:
102:
51:
491:
515:
388:
134:
At either tier, the court has two basic functions: "error correction" and "law declaring."
90:
8:
161:
408:
332:
313:"Policy Goals in Judicial Gatekeeping: A Proximity Model of Discretionary Jurisdiction"
204:
In a 2011 hearing regarding two concurrent legal challenges to the proposed award of a
157:
394:
217:
255:
324:
209:
127:: trial, intermediate (appellate) court, and court of last resort (supreme court).
123:
Generally, there are three tiers of court at the state and federal levels in the
193:
504:
494:, NIQB 59, paragraph 10, delivered 30 June 2011, accessed 13 December 2023
464:"Taking the Pathway of Discretionary Review Toward Florida's Highest Court"
336:
312:
328:
390:
Structural and Other
Alternatives for the Federal Courts of Appeals
182:
86:
34:
deal primarily with the United States and do not represent a
443:(1): 49–85 – via via Digital Repository at Maurer Law.
164:
use a similar process to choose which cases they will hear.
97:
entertain any case properly filed, so long as the court has
492:
First4Skills Ltd v
Department for Employment and Learning
214:
First4Skills Ltd v
Department for Employment and Learning
266:(1): 23–49 – via UF Law Scholarship Repository.
279:"Discretionary Jurisdiction: Definition & Cases"
16:Power of a court to engage in discretionary review
502:
106:provision is to maintain decisional uniformity.
32:The examples and perspective in this article
430:
488:High Court of Justice in Northern Ireland
70:Learn how and when to remove this message
167:
386:
503:
276:
194:Wells v. State, 132 So. 3d 1110 (2014)
149:clearly obsolete or unconstitutional.
317:Midwest Political Science Association
176:
458:
456:
454:
452:
450:
426:
424:
387:McKenna, Judith A. (December 1994).
382:
380:
378:
376:
374:
372:
370:
310:
306:
304:
302:
300:
298:
253:
249:
247:
245:
243:
241:
239:
237:
235:
233:
18:
13:
14:
527:
447:
421:
367:
295:
230:
199:
311:Baum, Lawrence (February 1977).
118:
23:
393:. DIANE Publishing. p. 7.
480:
343:
270:
101:over the questions of law and
1:
413:: CS1 maint: date and year (
254:Cope, Gerald (January 1993).
223:
7:
431:M. Oldfather, Chad (2010).
154:United States Supreme Court
99:subject matter jurisdiction
46:, discuss the issue on the
10:
532:
83:Discretionary jurisdiction
85:is a power that allows a
103:in personam jurisdiction
206:public sector contract
277:Poortvliet, Kenneth.
168:The selection process
218:Mr Justice McCloskey
162:state supreme courts
91:discretionary review
52:create a new article
44:improve this article
437:Indiana Law Journal
355:www.americanbar.org
433:"Error Correction"
339:– via JSTOR.
260:Florida Law Review
177:Florida case study
158:writ of certiorari
400:978-0-7881-1575-2
351:"How Courts Work"
156:hears cases by a
152:For example, the
80:
79:
72:
54:, as appropriate.
523:
495:
484:
478:
477:
475:
474:
460:
445:
444:
428:
419:
418:
412:
404:
384:
365:
364:
362:
361:
347:
341:
340:
308:
293:
292:
290:
289:
274:
268:
267:
251:
210:Northern Ireland
75:
68:
64:
61:
55:
27:
26:
19:
531:
530:
526:
525:
524:
522:
521:
520:
511:Civil procedure
501:
500:
499:
498:
486:McCloskey J in
485:
481:
472:
470:
468:The Florida Bar
462:
461:
448:
429:
422:
406:
405:
401:
385:
368:
359:
357:
349:
348:
344:
329:10.2307/2110445
309:
296:
287:
285:
275:
271:
252:
231:
226:
202:
179:
170:
121:
76:
65:
59:
56:
41:
28:
24:
17:
12:
11:
5:
529:
519:
518:
513:
497:
496:
479:
446:
420:
399:
366:
342:
294:
269:
228:
227:
225:
222:
201:
200:United Kingdom
198:
178:
175:
169:
166:
120:
117:
78:
77:
38:of the subject
36:worldwide view
31:
29:
22:
15:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
528:
517:
514:
512:
509:
508:
506:
493:
489:
483:
469:
465:
459:
457:
455:
453:
451:
442:
438:
434:
427:
425:
416:
410:
402:
396:
392:
391:
383:
381:
379:
377:
375:
373:
371:
356:
352:
346:
338:
334:
330:
326:
322:
318:
314:
307:
305:
303:
301:
299:
284:
280:
273:
265:
261:
257:
250:
248:
246:
244:
242:
240:
238:
236:
234:
229:
221:
219:
216:, the judge (
215:
211:
207:
197:
195:
190:
186:
184:
174:
165:
163:
159:
155:
150:
146:
144:
143:stare decisis
139:
135:
132:
128:
126:
125:United States
119:United States
116:
113:
107:
104:
100:
96:
92:
89:to engage in
88:
84:
74:
71:
63:
60:December 2023
53:
49:
45:
39:
37:
30:
21:
20:
516:Jurisdiction
482:
471:. Retrieved
467:
440:
436:
389:
358:. Retrieved
354:
345:
323:(1): 13–35.
320:
316:
286:. Retrieved
282:
272:
263:
259:
213:
203:
191:
187:
180:
171:
151:
147:
142:
140:
136:
133:
129:
122:
111:
108:
94:
82:
81:
66:
57:
33:
505:Categories
473:2023-04-03
360:2023-04-03
288:2023-02-17
224:References
409:cite book
283:study.com
48:talk page
42:You may
337:2110445
183:Florida
397:
335:
333:JSTOR
87:court
50:, or
415:link
395:ISBN
95:must
325:doi
208:in
181:In
507::
490:,
466:.
449:^
441:85
439:.
435:.
423:^
411:}}
407:{{
369:^
353:.
331:.
321:21
319:.
315:.
297:^
281:.
264:45
262:.
258:.
232:^
476:.
417:)
403:.
363:.
327::
291:.
112:.
73:)
67:(
62:)
58:(
40:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.