Knowledge

Product defect

Source 📝

208:, a standard form of contract widely used in the construction industry, allows the contractor to rectify a defect at their own expense in place of the common law position, and obliges the client to allow the contractor appropriate access to undertake the rectification work. At the end of an agreed period, a defects certificate may be issued, which is intended either to certify that there are no patent defects, or to state any defects which remain outstanding. 152:
In the literature, the concept of product quality risk has not been fully investigated. Although Zsidisin stated that quality risk includes the risk of producing unsafe products that can harm the consumer, even when these defects are caused by another firm or inherited from a sub-contractor. However,
131:
Inherent quality problems (i.e. raw materials / ingredients / production / logistics / packaging) in any of the supply members trigger a domino effect that spread through a multi-tier supply network. For this reason, it is hard for a network member to keep track of who did what, and when, to the
132:
final quality of the products. The product that a focal firm sells to the consumer comprises components made by the focal firm and the suppliers. When the product breaks down due to defects in either the firm’s component or the supplier’s component, the firm has to bear the consequences.
180:
was asked to undertake) or, where the contractor has designed the work, the construction not compliant with any applicable law or with a design for the work offered by the contractor and accepted by the
93:
Depending on the given jurisdiction, the failure of a consumer to read the available warnings may negate causation for purposes of a defective or inadequate warning claim in a product liability suit.
127:
focuses on the quality problems in the supply chain context rather in the manufacturing quality context. Tse and Tan (2009) identified the concept of "Product Quality Risk in Supply Chain" (PQR) as:
273:
You will recall the original factory outlet concept was defined by slightly defective but perfectly usable goods sold directly to consumers straight from the factory store. Today this is a rarity.
164:
The product quality risk in global supply chain concept, though similar to "product harm crisis" (defined as defective or dangerous products) and "moral hazard problem" (defined as the outcome of
57:, where the term is applied to "anything that renders the product not reasonably safe". The field of law that addresses injuries caused by defective products is called 104:
discovers that a line of shirts have been made with slightly uneven sleeves, the manufacturer may choose to sell these shirts at a discount, often through an
82:
if it was incorrectly manufactured, for example if the wrong materials are used. A product may also be considered legally defective if it lacks appropriate
432: 176:
In construction, defects include aspects of the constructed works which are not in accordance with the scope of the project (the work which the
78:, so that the design itself yields a product that can not perform its desired function. Even if the design is correct, the product may have a 141:
Product quality risk is an inherent part of the supply chain risks, with a tendency to comprise some or all of the risk elements, such as
168:, imperfect observability in supplier's quality), are not about the risk of product quality in a global supply chain context. 266: 186: 477: 17: 445: 149:'s toys, it tarnished the company's reputation, and disrupted the supply of its products in the market. 487: 96:
A product that is defective in some way that does not render it dangerous might still be sold, with a
395: 205: 97: 112:
cut off to indicate that the quality is not intended to reflect on the brand. For some products,
204:
should be put right by the client, who then sues the contractor for the costs of doing so. The
256: 482: 357:"Impact of Product-Harm Crises on Brand Equity: The Moderating Role of Consumer Expectations" 185:
or on the client's behalf. They may be "patent defects", observable in practice during or on
165: 458: 428: 113: 8: 376: 341: 306: 201: 177: 35: 380: 325: 310: 262: 83: 66:
A wide range of circumstances can render a product defective. The product may have a
59: 411: 368: 337: 298: 142: 302: 75: 372: 286: 217: 54: 43: 356: 109: 471: 190: 154: 145:, disruption risk and reputational risk. For example, when lead was found in 87: 47: 415: 158: 105: 182: 100:
price reflecting the defect. For example, where a clothing manufacturer's
399: 400:"Vendor Certification and Appraisal: Implications for Supplier Quality" 197: 101: 39: 287:"Managing product quality risk in a multi-tier global supply chain" 53:
Product defects arise most prominently in legal contexts regarding
146: 193:", which are not visible or identifiable until a later date. 90:
of dangers accompanying normal use or misuse of the product.
74:, resulting from the product having been poorly designed or 119: 27:
Characteristic of a product which hinders its usability
461:, last updated 30 September 2020, accessed 8 May 2023. 435:, published 10 October 2017, accessed 29 April 2023. 393: 469: 200:, a defect which results from the contractor's 354: 291:International Journal of Production Research 242:Writing and Designing Manuals and Warnings 235: 233: 446:When is a defect not a Defect under NEC3? 355:Dawar, Niraj; Pillutla, Madan M. (2000). 206:NEC Engineering and Construction contract 323: 258:Cheap: The High Cost of Discount Culture 239: 326:"Managerial Perceptions of Supply Risk" 230: 14: 470: 330:The Journal of Supply Chain Management 284: 254: 285:Tse, Ying Kei; Tan, Kim Hua (2011). 125:Product quality risk in supply chain 120:Product quality risk in supply chain 24: 342:10.1111/j.1745-493X.2003.tb00146.x 171: 25: 499: 189:of the construction process, or " 42:for the purpose for which it was 451: 438: 422: 387: 348: 317: 278: 248: 240:Robinson, Patricia A. (2009). 161:have been thoroughly studied. 136: 13: 1: 433:Guide to construction defects 361:Journal of Marketing Research 223: 324:Zsidisin, George A. (2003). 303:10.1080/00207543.2010.508942 255:Shell, Ellen Ruppel (2009). 86:for its use, or appropriate 7: 373:10.1509/jmkr.37.2.215.18729 211: 34:is any characteristic of a 10: 504: 457:Designing Buildings Wiki, 429:Simmons & Simmons LLP 396:Radhakrishnan, Sarvepalli 448:, accessed 8 May 2023. 416:10.1287/mnsc.1060.0557 166:asymmetric information 134: 129: 153:neither PQR nor its 80:manufacturing defect 459:Defects certificate 478:Quality management 404:Management Science 202:breach of contract 38:which hinders its 488:Product liability 410:(10): 1472–1482. 60:product liability 16:(Redirected from 495: 462: 455: 449: 442: 436: 426: 420: 419: 391: 385: 384: 352: 346: 345: 321: 315: 314: 282: 276: 275: 252: 246: 245: 237: 143:operational risk 116:is appropriate. 21: 503: 502: 498: 497: 496: 494: 493: 492: 468: 467: 466: 465: 456: 452: 443: 439: 427: 423: 392: 388: 353: 349: 322: 318: 283: 279: 269: 261:. p. 104. 253: 249: 238: 231: 226: 214: 174: 172:In construction 139: 122: 28: 23: 22: 15: 12: 11: 5: 501: 491: 490: 485: 480: 464: 463: 450: 437: 421: 386: 367:(2): 215–226. 347: 316: 277: 267: 247: 244:. p. 234. 228: 227: 225: 222: 221: 220: 218:Product recall 213: 210: 191:latent defects 173: 170: 138: 135: 121: 118: 55:product safety 32:product defect 26: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 500: 489: 486: 484: 481: 479: 476: 475: 473: 460: 454: 447: 441: 434: 430: 425: 417: 413: 409: 405: 401: 397: 390: 382: 378: 374: 370: 366: 362: 358: 351: 343: 339: 335: 331: 327: 320: 312: 308: 304: 300: 296: 292: 288: 281: 274: 270: 268:9781101135471 264: 260: 259: 251: 243: 236: 234: 229: 219: 216: 215: 209: 207: 203: 199: 194: 192: 188: 184: 179: 169: 167: 162: 160: 156: 155:domino effect 150: 148: 144: 133: 128: 126: 117: 115: 111: 108:and with the 107: 103: 99: 94: 91: 89: 85: 81: 77: 73: 69: 68:design defect 64: 62: 61: 56: 51: 49: 45: 41: 37: 33: 19: 483:Business law 453: 440: 424: 407: 403: 394:Hwang, Iny; 389: 364: 360: 350: 333: 329: 319: 294: 290: 280: 272: 257: 250: 241: 195: 175: 163: 159:supply chain 151: 140: 130: 124: 123: 106:outlet store 95: 92: 84:instructions 79: 71: 67: 65: 58: 52: 48:manufactured 31: 29: 444:Evans, S., 297:: 139–158. 137:In practice 72:design flaw 18:Design flaw 472:Categories 224:References 198:common law 187:completion 178:contractor 102:inspection 98:discounted 381:167532080 336:: 14–26. 311:110472062 40:usability 398:(2006). 212:See also 88:warnings 44:designed 157:in the 36:product 379:  309:  265:  196:Under 183:client 147:Mattel 114:rework 76:tested 377:S2CID 307:S2CID 110:label 263:ISBN 46:and 412:doi 369:doi 338:doi 299:doi 70:or 474:: 431:, 408:52 406:. 402:. 375:. 365:37 363:. 359:. 334:39 332:. 328:. 305:. 295:49 293:. 289:. 271:. 232:^ 63:. 50:. 30:A 418:. 414:: 383:. 371:: 344:. 340:: 313:. 301:: 20:)

Index

Design flaw
product
usability
designed
manufactured
product safety
product liability
tested
instructions
warnings
discounted
inspection
outlet store
label
rework
operational risk
Mattel
domino effect
supply chain
asymmetric information
contractor
client
completion
latent defects
common law
breach of contract
NEC Engineering and Construction contract
Product recall

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.