34:
20:
48:
357:
325:
242:
340:
352:
206:
149:
303:
330:
386:
133:
128:
123:
118:
113:
103:
98:
93:
88:
83:
162:
335:
266:
196:
184:
376:
254:
381:
308:
65:
179:
283:
230:
39:
8:
313:
201:
174:
218:
370:
53:
293:
278:
25:
358:
Test
Claimants in the Franked Investment Income Group Litigation v IRC
326:
Secretary of State for
Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs v Rahmatullah
298:
288:
19:
62:
148:
The following 26 pages are in this category, out of 26 total.
243:
Investment Trust
Companies (in liq) v HM Revenue and Customs
72:
47:
341:
2012 Judgments of the
Supreme Court of the United Kingdom
353:
207:
15:
145:
Pages in category "2012 in United
Kingdom case law"
78:
304:Ravat v Halliburton Manufacturing and Services Ltd
368:
150:This list may not reflect recent changes
163:Assange v Swedish Prosecution Authority
369:
336:Stringfellow Restaurants Ltd v Quashie
331:Société Générale, London Branch v Geys
267:Othman (Abu Qatada) v United Kingdom
13:
154:
142:
14:
398:
197:Chagos Islanders v United Kingdom
46:
32:
18:
387:United Kingdom case law by year
185:British Airways plc v Williams
1:
255:Lomas v JFB Firth Rixson Inc
143:
7:
10:
403:
309:Redfearn v United Kingdom
66:law of the United Kingdom
180:Berezovsky v Abramovich
284:R v Evans and McDonald
231:HM Advocate v Muirhead
60:This category is for
40:United Kingdom portal
377:2012 in British law
314:Relfo Ltd v Varsani
202:Chandler v Cape plc
175:Gemma Barker case
394:
382:2012 in case law
56:
51:
50:
42:
37:
36:
35:
28:
23:
22:
402:
401:
397:
396:
395:
393:
392:
391:
367:
366:
365:
364:
363:
362:
345:
318:
271:
259:
247:
235:
223:
219:Geary v Rankine
211:
189:
167:
141:
140:
139:
138:
52:
45:
38:
33:
31:
24:
17:
12:
11:
5:
400:
390:
389:
384:
379:
361:
360:
355:
349:
346:
344:
343:
338:
333:
328:
322:
319:
317:
316:
311:
306:
301:
296:
291:
286:
281:
275:
272:
270:
269:
263:
260:
258:
257:
251:
248:
246:
245:
239:
236:
234:
233:
227:
224:
222:
221:
215:
212:
210:
209:
204:
199:
193:
190:
188:
187:
182:
177:
171:
168:
166:
165:
159:
156:
155:
146:
137:
136:
131:
126:
121:
116:
111:
106:
101:
96:
91:
86:
80:
79:
58:
57:
43:
29:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
399:
388:
385:
383:
380:
378:
375:
374:
372:
359:
356:
354:
351:
350:
347:
342:
339:
337:
334:
332:
329:
327:
324:
323:
320:
315:
312:
310:
307:
305:
302:
300:
297:
295:
292:
290:
287:
285:
282:
280:
277:
276:
273:
268:
265:
264:
261:
256:
253:
252:
249:
244:
241:
240:
237:
232:
229:
228:
225:
220:
217:
216:
213:
208:
205:
203:
200:
198:
195:
194:
191:
186:
183:
181:
178:
176:
173:
172:
169:
164:
161:
160:
157:
153:
151:
144:
135:
132:
130:
127:
125:
122:
120:
117:
115:
112:
110:
107:
105:
102:
100:
97:
95:
92:
90:
87:
85:
82:
81:
77:
75:
74:
68:
67:
64:
55:
49:
44:
41:
30:
27:
21:
16:
147:
108:
70:
61:
59:
54:2010s portal
294:R v Peacock
279:R v Clinton
371:Categories
26:Law portal
299:R v Terry
289:R v Huhne
69:in the
71:year
134:2017
129:2016
124:2015
119:2014
114:2013
109:2012
104:2011
99:2010
94:2009
89:2008
84:2007
73:2012
63:case
373::
152:.
76:.
348:T
321:S
274:R
262:O
250:L
238:I
226:H
214:G
192:C
170:B
158:A
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
