Knowledge

Case series

Source đź“ť

121:, time effects, practice effects or the natural history effect. Calculating the difference in effects between two treatment groups assumed to be exposed to a very similar array of such intervening effects allows the effects of these intervening variables to cancel out. Hence only the presence of a comparator group, which is not a feature of case-series studies, will allow a valid estimate of the true treatment effect. 833: 108:
of case series studies is usually very low, due to the lack of a comparator group exposed to the same array of intervening variables. For example, the effects seen may be wholly or partly due to intervening effects such as the
35:
study that tracks subjects with a known exposure, such as patients who have received a similar treatment, or examines their medical records for exposure and outcome. Case series may be
100:; for example, studies that report on a series of patients with a certain illness and/or a suspected linked exposure draw their patients from a particular 85: 286: 314: 43:, depending on whether all cases presenting to the reporting authors over a period were included, or only a selection. When information on 202: 49:
is included, the case series is considered to be a systematic investigation designed to contribute to generalizable knowledge (i.e.,
606: 602: 652: 610: 598: 229:"Nontraditional epidemiologic approaches in the analysis of gene–environment interaction: case-control studies with no controls!" 307: 57:(IRB). Case series usually contain demographic information about the patient(s), for example, age, gender, ethnic origin. etc. 773: 689: 554: 524: 874: 140: 300: 811: 618: 656: 378: 804: 489: 783: 181: 747: 719: 648: 402: 73: 167: 893: 797: 473: 54: 592: 530: 478: 358: 898: 576: 446: 424: 393: 368: 351: 135: 101: 867: 727: 564: 485: 568: 455: 363: 327: 292: 153: 534: 104:(such as a hospital or clinic) which may not appropriately represent the wider population. 89: 8: 441: 373: 694: 644: 459: 388: 346: 245: 228: 77: 69: 860: 848: 768: 732: 699: 624: 546: 323: 250: 105: 542: 463: 417: 412: 240: 118: 114: 32: 737: 560: 515: 174: 188: 160: 844: 763: 684: 636: 429: 341: 97: 65: 887: 742: 709: 704: 584: 468: 189:"Definition of nonconsecutive case series - NCI Dictionary of Cancer Terms" 61: 28: 254: 778: 632: 505: 130: 175:"Definition of consecutive case series - NCI Dictionary of Cancer Terms" 580: 572: 538: 500: 407: 640: 628: 81: 840: 674: 93: 679: 110: 322: 832: 161:"Definition of case series - NCI Dictionary of Cancer Terms" 92:
to investigate the association between an exposure and a
64:; unlike studies that employ an analytic design (e.g. 289:Cornell University College of Veterinary Medicine 885: 270:Introduction to research in the health Sciences 203:"What is the Institutional Review Board (IRB)?" 226: 76:), case series do not, in themselves, involve 53:), and therefore submission is required to an 868: 308: 267: 96:). Case series are especially vulnerable to 875: 861: 315: 301: 220: 244: 607:Preventable fraction among the unexposed 603:Attributable fraction for the population 611:Preventable fraction for the population 599:Attributable fraction among the exposed 227:Khoury MJ, Flanders WD (August 1996). 886: 296: 827: 774:Correlation does not imply causation 690:Animal testing on non-human primates 88:analyses are sometimes performed in 13: 246:10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a008915 141:Consecutive controlled case series 14: 910: 280: 831: 233:American Journal of Epidemiology 60:Case series have a descriptive 657:Pre- and post-test probability 379:Patient and public involvement 268:Polgar, S; Thomas, SA (2013). 261: 195: 16:Type of medical research study 1: 146: 847:. You can help Knowledge by 784:Sex as a biological variable 74:randomized controlled trials 7: 748:Intention-to-treat analysis 720:Analysis of clinical trials 649:Specificity and sensitivity 403:Randomized controlled trial 124: 10: 915: 826: 55:institutional review board 792: 757:Interpretation of results 756: 718: 667: 617: 591: 553: 523: 514: 490:Nested case–control study 440: 387: 334: 359:Academic clinical trials 272:. Churchill Livingstone. 80:to look for evidence of 46:more than three patients 577:Relative risk reduction 425:Adaptive clinical trial 369:Evidence-based medicine 352:Adaptive clinical trial 136:Consecutive case series 565:Number needed to treat 569:Number needed to harm 456:Cross-sectional study 408:Scientific experiment 364:Clinical study design 287:Study Design Tutorial 535:Cumulative incidence 90:genetic epidemiology 70:case-control studies 442:Observational study 374:Real world evidence 328:experimental design 728:Risk–benefit ratio 695:First-in-man study 645:Case fatality rate 486:Case–control study 460:Longitudinal study 78:hypothesis testing 894:Clinical research 856: 855: 821: 820: 769:Survivorship bias 733:Systematic review 700:Multicenter trial 663: 662: 653:Likelihood-ratios 625:Clinical endpoint 593:Population impact 547:Period prevalence 324:Clinical research 106:Internal validity 23:(also known as a 906: 877: 870: 863: 835: 828: 668:Trial/test types 543:Point prevalence 521: 520: 464:Ecological study 447:EBM II-2 to II-3 418:Open-label trial 413:Blind experiment 389:Controlled study 317: 310: 303: 294: 293: 274: 273: 265: 259: 258: 248: 224: 218: 217: 215: 214: 199: 193: 192: 185: 179: 178: 171: 165: 164: 157: 119:Rosenthal effect 115:Hawthorne effect 82:cause and effect 33:medical research 914: 913: 909: 908: 907: 905: 904: 903: 884: 883: 882: 881: 824: 822: 817: 788: 752: 714: 659: 613: 587: 561:Risk difference 549: 510: 444: 436: 391: 383: 347:Trial protocols 330: 321: 283: 278: 277: 266: 262: 225: 221: 212: 210: 207:Research Office 201: 200: 196: 187: 186: 182: 173: 172: 168: 159: 158: 154: 149: 127: 41:non-consecutive 25:clinical series 17: 12: 11: 5: 912: 902: 901: 899:Medicine stubs 896: 880: 879: 872: 865: 857: 854: 853: 836: 819: 818: 816: 815: 812:List of topics 808: 801: 793: 790: 789: 787: 786: 781: 776: 771: 766: 764:Selection bias 760: 758: 754: 753: 751: 750: 745: 740: 735: 730: 724: 722: 716: 715: 713: 712: 707: 702: 697: 692: 687: 685:Animal testing 682: 677: 671: 669: 665: 664: 661: 660: 637:Mortality rate 623: 621: 615: 614: 597: 595: 589: 588: 559: 557: 551: 550: 529: 527: 518: 512: 511: 509: 508: 503: 498: 493: 483: 482: 481: 476: 466: 452: 450: 438: 437: 435: 434: 433: 432: 430:Platform trial 422: 421: 420: 415: 410: 399: 397: 385: 384: 382: 381: 376: 371: 366: 361: 356: 355: 354: 349: 342:Clinical trial 338: 336: 332: 331: 320: 319: 312: 305: 297: 291: 290: 282: 281:External links 279: 276: 275: 260: 219: 194: 180: 166: 151: 150: 148: 145: 144: 143: 138: 133: 126: 123: 98:selection bias 66:cohort studies 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 911: 900: 897: 895: 892: 891: 889: 878: 873: 871: 866: 864: 859: 858: 852: 850: 846: 843:article is a 842: 837: 834: 830: 829: 825: 814: 813: 809: 807: 806: 802: 800: 799: 795: 794: 791: 785: 782: 780: 777: 775: 772: 770: 767: 765: 762: 761: 759: 755: 749: 746: 744: 743:Meta-analysis 741: 739: 736: 734: 731: 729: 726: 725: 723: 721: 717: 711: 710:Vaccine trial 708: 706: 705:Seeding trial 703: 701: 698: 696: 693: 691: 688: 686: 683: 681: 678: 676: 673: 672: 670: 666: 658: 654: 650: 646: 642: 638: 634: 630: 626: 622: 620: 616: 612: 608: 604: 600: 596: 594: 590: 586: 582: 578: 574: 570: 566: 562: 558: 556: 552: 548: 544: 540: 536: 532: 528: 526: 522: 519: 517: 513: 507: 504: 502: 499: 497: 494: 491: 487: 484: 480: 477: 475: 474:Retrospective 472: 471: 470: 467: 465: 461: 457: 454: 453: 451: 448: 443: 439: 431: 428: 427: 426: 423: 419: 416: 414: 411: 409: 406: 405: 404: 401: 400: 398: 395: 394:EBM I to II-1 390: 386: 380: 377: 375: 372: 370: 367: 365: 362: 360: 357: 353: 350: 348: 345: 344: 343: 340: 339: 337: 333: 329: 325: 318: 313: 311: 306: 304: 299: 298: 295: 288: 285: 284: 271: 264: 256: 252: 247: 242: 239:(3): 207–13. 238: 234: 230: 223: 208: 204: 198: 190: 184: 176: 170: 162: 156: 152: 142: 139: 137: 134: 132: 129: 128: 122: 120: 116: 112: 107: 103: 99: 95: 91: 87: 83: 79: 75: 71: 67: 63: 58: 56: 52: 48: 47: 42: 38: 34: 30: 26: 22: 849:expanding it 838: 823: 810: 803: 796: 585:Hazard ratio 495: 469:Cohort study 269: 263: 236: 232: 222: 211:. Retrieved 209:. 2012-05-25 206: 197: 183: 169: 155: 62:study design 59: 50: 45: 44: 40: 36: 24: 20: 18: 779:Null result 738:Replication 633:Infectivity 555:Association 506:Case report 496:Case series 479:Prospective 131:Case report 37:consecutive 21:case series 888:Categories 581:Odds ratio 573:Risk ratio 539:Prevalence 525:Occurrence 501:Case study 213:2019-07-04 147:References 102:population 641:Morbidity 629:Virulence 531:Incidence 86:case-only 805:Glossary 798:Category 675:In vitro 516:Measures 335:Overview 125:See also 113:effect, 94:genotype 84:(though 51:research 841:medical 680:In vivo 255:8686689 111:placebo 27:) is a 253:  839:This 619:Other 845:stub 458:vs. 326:and 251:PMID 29:type 241:doi 237:144 72:or 39:or 31:of 890:: 655:, 651:, 647:, 643:, 639:, 635:, 631:, 627:, 609:, 605:, 601:, 583:, 579:, 575:, 571:, 567:, 563:, 545:, 541:, 537:, 533:, 462:, 249:. 235:. 231:. 205:. 117:, 68:, 19:A 876:e 869:t 862:v 851:. 492:) 488:( 449:) 445:( 396:) 392:( 316:e 309:t 302:v 257:. 243:: 216:. 191:. 177:. 163:.

Index

type
medical research
institutional review board
study design
cohort studies
case-control studies
randomized controlled trials
hypothesis testing
cause and effect
case-only
genetic epidemiology
genotype
selection bias
population
Internal validity
placebo
Hawthorne effect
Rosenthal effect
Case report
Consecutive case series
Consecutive controlled case series
"Definition of case series - NCI Dictionary of Cancer Terms"
"Definition of consecutive case series - NCI Dictionary of Cancer Terms"
"Definition of nonconsecutive case series - NCI Dictionary of Cancer Terms"
"What is the Institutional Review Board (IRB)?"
"Nontraditional epidemiologic approaches in the analysis of gene–environment interaction: case-control studies with no controls!"
doi
10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a008915
PMID
8686689

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑