20:
79:
Some devoted most of the house to blocks, losing habitability. The new constructions appeared in their facades to be a single floor when they were actually two. The highest rooms were hidden from street view, which could be accessed from inside the building. Another strategy was building only one floor or excessively compartmentalizing each floor.
78:
This royalty required that each citizen accommodate an official of the king in half of their dwelling area. Faced with this invasion of privacy and in order to avoid fulfilling that obligation, the locals found all kinds of ingenious construction solutions to avoid putting strangers into their homes.
82:
Locals still had to pay a monetary royalty, the collection of which was very complex. Due to their inability to host the royal officials, homeowners had to contribute royalties to the value of the third part of the rents that their property could produce, according to the legal provisions of Philip
70:
in 1561. Along with the King came an endless list of nobles, officials of various ranks, representatives of religious orders and other characters. As there was not room to house everyone, the King decreed that the second floor of houses be allocated to accommodating the entourage. The
46:) were a form of construction unique to Madrid from the sixteenth to the eighteenth centuries. This construction style involved one of various techniques used by locals to avoid housing officials of the court in their homes, as required under the
142:"De ornato y policĂa en Madrid: casas principales y ordenaciĂłn viana en el Renacimiento (On ornamentation and policy in Madrid: main houses and viana management during the Renaissance)"
87:(General Visitation) of 1749, still visible on the tiles attached to the facades of the houses in the historic center of Madrid. This act also led to a
141:
124:
205:
200:
148:
96:
72:
59:
47:
172:
115:
British and foreign state papers, Volume 6 by Great
Britain - Foreign and Commonwealth Office
125:
Ignacio Jordán de AssĂł y del RĂo, Miguel de Manuel y RodrĂguez and JoaquĂn MarĂa
Palacios.
8:
28:
63:
19:
194:
88:
92:
147:. Madrid, Spain: Universidad Complutense de Madrid. Archived from
67:
139:
75:
became the duty of every citizen, without exemption.
192:
127:Institutes of the Civil Law of Spain Book II
18:
118:
193:
16:Form of construction of Madrid, Spain
40:casas de difĂcil/incĂłmoda particiĂłn
13:
58:Casas a malicia resulted from the
14:
217:
140:González GarcĂa, Juan L. (2009).
83:II which attempted to solve the
165:
133:
109:
1:
102:
7:
10:
222:
53:
173:"La RegalĂa del Aposento"
66:transferred the Court to
62:that was instituted when
206:Architecture of Madrid
32:
22:
91:and a very detailed
97:RegalĂa de aposento
73:regalĂa de aposento
60:RegalĂa de aposento
48:RegalĂa de aposento
29:Barrio de La Latina
36:Casas a la malicia
33:
201:History of Madrid
175:. 14 October 2010
25:Casa a la malicia
213:
185:
184:
182:
180:
169:
163:
162:
160:
159:
153:
146:
137:
131:
130:
122:
116:
113:
45:
23:An example of a
221:
220:
216:
215:
214:
212:
211:
210:
191:
190:
189:
188:
178:
176:
171:
170:
166:
157:
155:
151:
144:
138:
134:
123:
119:
114:
110:
105:
56:
43:
42:(malice houses
17:
12:
11:
5:
219:
209:
208:
203:
187:
186:
164:
132:
129:. p. 150.
117:
107:
106:
104:
101:
85:Visita General
55:
52:
38:, also called
15:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
218:
207:
204:
202:
199:
198:
196:
174:
168:
154:on 2010-03-30
150:
143:
136:
128:
121:
112:
108:
100:
98:
94:
90:
86:
80:
76:
74:
69:
65:
61:
51:
49:
41:
37:
30:
26:
21:
177:. Retrieved
167:
156:. Retrieved
149:the original
135:
126:
120:
111:
84:
81:
77:
57:
44:(in English)
39:
35:
34:
24:
179:24 November
195:Categories
158:2012-11-25
103:References
89:planimetry
64:Philip II
31:, Madrid.
93:cadastre
54:History
68:Madrid
152:(PDF)
145:(PDF)
95:(see
181:2012
99:).
27:in
197::
50:.
183:.
161:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
