Knowledge

California Senate Bill 1386 (2002)

Source 📝

63: 22: 165: 277:
Any agency that owns or licenses computerized data that includes personal information shall disclose any breach of the security of the system following discovery or notification of the breach in the security of the data to any resident of California whose unencrypted personal information was, or is
266:
Enactment of a requirement for notification to any resident of California whose unencrypted personal information was, or is reasonably believed to have been, acquired by an unauthorized person. This requires an agency, person or business that conducts business in California and owns or licenses
318:
The statute does not apply to "encrypted" information. Thus one way to avoid reporting is to encrypt all "personal information." A corporation can also avoid reporting if its data does not contain "personal information" relating to a California resident.
285:
Corporations with no physical locations in California are not subject to California law. That SB 1386 would affect an out-of-state corporation is based on the notion of 'quasi in rem' jurisdiction, a notion that the Supreme Court invalidated in
322:"Personal information" means an individual's first name or first initial and last name in combination with any one or more of the following data elements, when either the name or the data elements are not encrypted: 278:
reasonably believed to have been, acquired by an unauthorized person. An out-of-state corporation that has personal information relating to a California resident would fall under this statute. A question on
332:
Account number, credit or debit card number, in combination with any required security code, access code, or password that would permit access to an individual's financial account.
336:"Personal information" does not include publicly available information that is lawfully made available to the general public from federal, state, or local government records. 80: 35: 268: 127: 274:
The bill mandates various mechanisms and procedures with respect to many aspects of this scenario, subject also to other defined provisions.
99: 106: 282:
would then ensue as to whether an action may be brought in California to enforce the California resident's rights under the statute.
113: 41: 398: 95: 371: 353: 251: 218: 200: 146: 49: 311:
Was the "personal information" acquired, or is reasonably believed to have been acquired, by an unauthorized person?
175: 418: 84: 120: 250:: civil codes 1798.29, 1798.82 and 1798.84. This was an early example of many future U.S. and international 182: 428: 423: 295:
Corporations can determine whether they are subject to this statute by reviewing the following questions:
403: 73: 267:
computerized 'personal information,' to disclose any breach of security (to any resident whose
235: 247: 8: 288: 279: 239: 412: 255: 315:
A corporation that answers yes to all five of these questions must report.
308:
Was there a "breach of the security" of the data as defined by the statute?
299:
Does their data include "personal information" as defined by the statute?
62: 329:
Driver's license number or California Identification Card number.
302:
Does that "personal information" relate to a California resident?
243: 174:
may be in need of reorganization to comply with Knowledge's
258:
on February 12, 2002, and became operative July 1, 2003.
372:"Bill Text - SB-1386 Personal information: privacy" 354:"Bill Text - SB-1386 Personal information: privacy" 87:. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. 410: 254:, it was introduced by California State Senator 185:to make improvements to the overall structure. 305:Was the "personal information" unencrypted? 50:Learn how and when to remove these messages 219:Learn how and when to remove this message 201:Learn how and when to remove this message 147:Learn how and when to remove this message 96:"California Senate Bill 1386" 2002 411: 271:is believed to have been disclosed). 158: 85:adding citations to reliable sources 56: 15: 13: 14: 440: 392: 252:security breach notification laws 31:This article has multiple issues. 163: 61: 20: 72:needs additional citations for 39:or discuss these issues on the 404:The SB 1386 Management Toolkit 364: 346: 1: 339: 7: 261: 10: 445: 376:leginfo.legislature.ca.gov 358:leginfo.legislature.ca.gov 234:was a bill passed by the 326:Social security number. 236:California legislature 419:Computing legislation 248:personal information 232:California S.B. 1386 81:improve this article 429:California statutes 424:Information privacy 183:editing the article 289:Shaffer v. Heitner 238:that amended the 229: 228: 221: 211: 210: 203: 176:layout guidelines 157: 156: 149: 131: 54: 436: 386: 385: 383: 382: 368: 362: 361: 350: 280:minimum contacts 269:unencrypted data 224: 217: 206: 199: 195: 192: 186: 167: 166: 159: 152: 145: 141: 138: 132: 130: 89: 65: 57: 46: 24: 23: 16: 444: 443: 439: 438: 437: 435: 434: 433: 409: 408: 395: 390: 389: 380: 378: 370: 369: 365: 352: 351: 347: 342: 264: 242:regulating the 225: 214: 213: 212: 207: 196: 190: 187: 181:Please help by 180: 168: 164: 153: 142: 136: 133: 90: 88: 78: 66: 25: 21: 12: 11: 5: 442: 432: 431: 426: 421: 407: 406: 401: 399:Text of SB1386 394: 393:External links 391: 388: 387: 363: 344: 343: 341: 338: 334: 333: 330: 327: 313: 312: 309: 306: 303: 300: 263: 260: 240:California law 227: 226: 209: 208: 171: 169: 162: 155: 154: 69: 67: 60: 55: 29: 28: 26: 19: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 441: 430: 427: 425: 422: 420: 417: 416: 414: 405: 402: 400: 397: 396: 377: 373: 367: 359: 355: 349: 345: 337: 331: 328: 325: 324: 323: 320: 316: 310: 307: 304: 301: 298: 297: 296: 293: 291: 290: 283: 281: 275: 272: 270: 259: 257: 253: 249: 245: 241: 237: 233: 223: 220: 205: 202: 194: 191:December 2015 184: 178: 177: 172:This article 170: 161: 160: 151: 148: 140: 129: 126: 122: 119: 115: 112: 108: 105: 101: 98: –  97: 93: 92:Find sources: 86: 82: 76: 75: 70:This article 68: 64: 59: 58: 53: 51: 44: 43: 38: 37: 32: 27: 18: 17: 379:. Retrieved 375: 366: 357: 348: 335: 321: 317: 314: 294: 287: 284: 276: 273: 265: 231: 230: 215: 197: 188: 173: 143: 134: 124: 117: 110: 103: 91: 79:Please help 74:verification 71: 47: 40: 34: 33:Please help 30: 256:Steve Peace 413:Categories 381:2019-09-20 340:References 107:newspapers 36:improve it 42:talk page 262:Sections 137:May 2017 244:privacy 121:scholar 123:  116:  109:  102:  94:  128:JSTOR 114:books 100:news 246:of 83:by 415:: 374:. 356:. 292:. 45:. 384:. 360:. 222:) 216:( 204:) 198:( 193:) 189:( 179:. 150:) 144:( 139:) 135:( 125:· 118:· 111:· 104:· 77:. 52:) 48:(

Index

improve it
talk page
Learn how and when to remove these messages

verification
improve this article
adding citations to reliable sources
"California Senate Bill 1386" 2002
news
newspapers
books
scholar
JSTOR
Learn how and when to remove this message
layout guidelines
editing the article
Learn how and when to remove this message
Learn how and when to remove this message
California legislature
California law
privacy
personal information
security breach notification laws
Steve Peace
unencrypted data
minimum contacts
Shaffer v. Heitner
"Bill Text - SB-1386 Personal information: privacy"
"Bill Text - SB-1386 Personal information: privacy"
Text of SB1386

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.