168:
234:
ruled that the residency requirements of
Jessica's Law could be applied retroactively. On September 12, 2012, a state appeals court blocked enforcement of the residency requirements of Jessica's Law for all paroled sex offenders in San Diego County, affirming a lower court ruling, stating that it
96:
monitoring of high risk sex offenders. The law also barred convicted sex offenders from living within 2,000 feet of a school or any place where children gather—effectively blocking them from living in the vast majority of the areas of large
California cities, until the provision was found
255:(CDCR) has stated that every registered sex offender paroled after the law's passage in 2006 is wearing a GPS device. However, CDCR is responsible for only 11% of California's sex offenders statewide, and "only a fraction of the state's registered sex offenders wear a GPS unit".
239:
Californian chapter CA RSOL sued over 20 municipalities in federal court over sex offender ordinances causing at least 44 other municipalities to either repeal or quit enforcing their ordinances in order to avoid litigation. In March 2015
235:
was an unconstitutional blanket condition of parole that "limits the housing choices of all sex offenders identically, without regard to the type of victim or the risk of reoffending." During 2014
141:
association) opposed
Proposition 83 and wrote the opposing argument for the voter pamphlet. They argued the restrictions would cause problems with finding a place of residence for freed convicts.
88:. Its provisions increased the penalties for sex offenders, broadened the definition of certain sexual offenses, eliminated good time credits for early release of certain offenders, prohibited
511:
595:
252:
703:
408:
563:
663:
319:
17:
668:
683:
591:
226:
who ruled in a lawsuit filed by an existing offender based on its retroactive nature. However, three months later, U.S. District Judge
648:
137:). It was supported by Governor Schwarzenegger and law enforcement throughout the state. California Attorneys for Criminal Justice (a
698:
275:
349:
620:
92:
for certain crimes, extended parole for some offenses, increased court-imposed fees on sex offenders and provided for lifelong
537:
693:
293:
130:
118:
101:
in March 2015. Under the law, a sex offender with a minimum of one victim and any previous criminal history may be
51:
387:
373:
353:
428:
222:
In
November 2006, enforcement of the new law was initially blocked in four counties by U.S. District Judge
480:
327:
241:
231:
98:
138:
93:
658:
245:
599:
454:
294:"IN THE NEWS: California court upholds indeterminate commitment of Sexually Violent Predators"
81:
8:
63:
357:
688:
413:
392:
102:
85:
68:
276:"Housing Restrictions For Sex Offenders Unconstitutional, California Court Rules"
134:
122:
55:
167:
677:
227:
223:
126:
114:
59:
47:
409:"'Jessica's Law' can be applied retroactively, state Supreme Court decides"
80:
The Act was a lengthy and complex measure that made many changes to the
43:
564:"SPECIAL REPORT: Pair seeks repeal of sex-offender laws in California"
621:"GPS monitoring of sex offenders is useful, but limited, experts say"
89:
244:
deemed blanket residency restrictions unconstitutional citing their
39:
538:"City of Orange Sued Over Sex Offender Halloween Restrictions"
488:
481:"CA RSOL Challenges El Dorado County Sex Offender Ordinance"
236:
32:
Sexual
Predator Punishment and Control Act: Jessica's Law
653:
596:
California
Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation
253:
California
Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation
113:
The law was sponsored by husband and wife legislators
46:
voters on
November 7, 2006, authored by State Senator
62:(R-Antelope Valley). It was proposed by means of the
512:"Attorney files sex offender lawsuit against Lompoc"
72:
proposals that had been considered in other states.
320:"Arguments supporting and opposing Proposition 83"
675:
385:
374:Prop. 83 buffer zone for sex criminals blocked
704:Sex offender registries in the United States
406:
455:"County sued over sex offender ordinance"
669:Campaign Expenditures for Jessica's Law
586:
584:
478:
452:
14:
676:
561:
536:Case, Stephanie (September 19, 2013).
230:dismissed that lawsuit. In 2010, the
108:
509:
386:Jennifer Warren (February 24, 2007).
350:"Proposition 83: Sex Offender Reform"
581:
535:
388:"Prop. 83 rulings leave a gray area"
270:
268:
684:2006 California ballot propositions
24:
664:Arguments and Rebuttals on Prop 83
25:
715:
642:
510:Howes, Rebecca (April 24, 2014).
298:forensicpsychologist.blogspot.com
265:
144:
127:State Assemblywoman Sharon Runner
699:Initiatives in the United States
562:Nelson, Joe (10 November 2014).
479:Belluci, Janice (21 July 2013).
407:Maura Dolan (February 1, 2010).
166:
18:California Proposition 83 (2006)
613:
555:
529:
503:
472:
453:Johnson, Shea (Oct 21, 2014).
446:
421:
400:
379:
367:
342:
312:
286:
217:
13:
1:
354:California Secretary of State
258:
86:Welfare and Institutions Code
75:
356:. 2006-12-14. Archived from
66:process as a version of the
7:
649:Full text of Proposition 83
242:Supreme Court of California
232:Supreme Court of California
115:State Senator George Runner
99:Supreme Court of California
30:of 2006 (also known as the
10:
720:
592:"Sex Offender Information"
139:criminal defense attorneys
105:for an indefinite period.
58:) and State Assemblywoman
694:Sex offender registration
160:
157:
154:
654:Yes on 83 Jessica's Law
485:In Eldorado County News
248:effect and unfairness.
82:California Penal Code
97:unconstitutional by
491:on 29 November 2014
280:The Huffington Post
151:
109:Initiative campaign
300:. 16 November 2007
149:
42:enacted by 70% of
414:Los Angeles Times
393:Los Angeles Times
246:counterproductive
215:
214:
103:civilly committed
16:(Redirected from
711:
636:
635:
633:
631:
617:
611:
610:
608:
607:
598:. Archived from
588:
579:
578:
576:
574:
559:
553:
552:
550:
548:
533:
527:
526:
524:
522:
507:
501:
500:
498:
496:
487:. Archived from
476:
470:
469:
467:
465:
450:
444:
443:
441:
439:
425:
419:
418:
404:
398:
397:
383:
377:
376:November 9, 2006
371:
365:
364:
362:
346:
340:
339:
337:
335:
326:. Archived from
316:
310:
309:
307:
305:
290:
284:
283:
272:
170:
152:
148:
21:
719:
718:
714:
713:
712:
710:
709:
708:
674:
673:
645:
640:
639:
629:
627:
619:
618:
614:
605:
603:
590:
589:
582:
572:
570:
560:
556:
546:
544:
534:
530:
520:
518:
508:
504:
494:
492:
477:
473:
463:
461:
451:
447:
437:
435:
427:
426:
422:
405:
401:
384:
380:
372:
368:
360:
348:
347:
343:
333:
331:
318:
317:
313:
303:
301:
292:
291:
287:
274:
273:
266:
261:
220:
150:Proposition 83
147:
135:Antelope Valley
123:Antelope Valley
111:
78:
56:Antelope Valley
23:
22:
15:
12:
11:
5:
717:
707:
706:
701:
696:
691:
686:
672:
671:
666:
661:
656:
651:
644:
643:External links
641:
638:
637:
612:
580:
554:
528:
502:
471:
445:
429:"In re Taylor"
420:
399:
378:
366:
363:on 2011-07-21.
341:
311:
285:
263:
262:
260:
257:
219:
216:
213:
212:
207:
202:
196:
195:
192:
189:
185:
184:
179:
174:
163:
162:
159:
156:
146:
145:Result of vote
143:
110:
107:
77:
74:
28:Proposition 83
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
716:
705:
702:
700:
697:
695:
692:
690:
687:
685:
682:
681:
679:
670:
667:
665:
662:
660:
657:
655:
652:
650:
647:
646:
626:
622:
616:
602:on 2010-05-27
601:
597:
593:
587:
585:
569:
565:
558:
543:
539:
532:
517:
516:Lompoc Record
513:
506:
490:
486:
482:
475:
460:
456:
449:
434:
430:
424:
416:
415:
410:
403:
395:
394:
389:
382:
375:
370:
359:
355:
351:
345:
330:on 2008-12-02
329:
325:
321:
315:
299:
295:
289:
281:
277:
271:
269:
264:
256:
254:
249:
247:
243:
238:
233:
229:
228:Jeffrey White
225:
224:Susan Illston
211:
208:
206:
203:
201:
198:
197:
193:
190:
187:
186:
183:
180:
178:
175:
173:
169:
165:
164:
153:
142:
140:
136:
132:
128:
124:
120:
116:
106:
104:
100:
95:
91:
87:
83:
73:
71:
70:
69:Jessica's Law
65:
61:
60:Sharon Runner
57:
53:
49:
48:George Runner
45:
41:
37:
36:Jessica's Law
33:
29:
19:
659:Anti-Prop 83
628:. Retrieved
624:
615:
604:. Retrieved
600:the original
571:. Retrieved
568:Daily Breeze
567:
557:
545:. Retrieved
541:
531:
519:. Retrieved
515:
505:
493:. Retrieved
489:the original
484:
474:
462:. Retrieved
458:
448:
436:. Retrieved
432:
423:
412:
402:
396:. p. 2.
391:
381:
369:
358:the original
344:
332:. Retrieved
328:the original
323:
314:
302:. Retrieved
297:
288:
279:
250:
221:
209:
204:
199:
181:
176:
171:
112:
79:
67:
35:
31:
27:
26:
625:nctimes.com
573:14 November
547:14 November
521:14 November
495:14 November
464:14 November
459:Daily Press
218:Enforcement
200:Total votes
34:or simply,
678:Categories
606:2010-05-27
433:justia.com
259:References
191:2,483,597
76:Provisions
64:initiative
44:California
205:8,410,397
177:5,926,800
90:probation
689:Sex laws
84:and the
38:) was a
630:9 April
438:9 April
334:9 April
304:9 April
155:Choice
40:statute
542:KTLA 5
324:ca.gov
237:RSOL's
210:100.00
158:Votes
125:) and
361:(PDF)
194:29.5
632:2018
575:2014
549:2014
523:2014
497:2014
466:2014
440:2018
336:2018
306:2018
251:The
182:70.5
188:No
172:Yes
94:GPS
680::
623:.
594:.
583:^
566:.
540:.
514:.
483:.
457:.
431:.
411:.
390:.
352:.
322:.
296:.
278:.
267:^
161:%
634:.
609:.
577:.
551:.
525:.
499:.
468:.
442:.
417:.
338:.
308:.
282:.
133:-
131:R
129:(
121:-
119:R
117:(
54:-
52:R
50:(
20:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
