31:
233:
case decided in 2001. The case concerned the extent to which a state prisoner must first utilize an administrative review process provided by the state, prior to filing a case in federal district court. The Court held that Booth still had a mechanism of administrative review, and thus his claim was
283:
of the court, which agreed with the Third
Circuit in rejecting Booth's claims. The Court held that even though the prison grievance procedure did not provide for requested monetary relief, Booth was nonetheless required to exhaust administrative remedies before filing suit with respect to prison
242:
The Prison
Litigation Reform Act of 1995 requires a prisoner to exhaust "such administrative remedies as are available" before suing over prison conditions. Timothy Booth, an inmate at the State Correctional Institution at Smithfield, Pennsylvania, filed a suit in District Court, claiming that
251:
and monetary damages. At the time of Booth's suit, Pennsylvania provided an administrative grievance and appeals system, which addressed Booth's complaints but had no provision for recovery of money damages. After the prison authority denied his administrative grievance, Booth did not seek
118:
Prisoners who seek only monetary damages in suits over prison conditions still must exhaust all administrative remedies before going to court, even if monetary damages are not available under the particular administrative
284:
conditions. Justice Souter wrote for the Court, "we think that
Congress has mandated exhaustion clearly enough, regardless of the relief offered through administrative procedures." Therefore, Booth's suit was premature.
512:
256:
rejected Booth's argument that the exhaustion requirement was inapplicable because the administrative process could not award him the monetary relief he sought.
428:
72:
517:
293:
252:
administrative review. Subsequently, the
District Court dismissed the complaint for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. In affirming, the
502:
389:
507:
397:
230:
35:
253:
475:
244:
216:
457:
344:
439:
150:
390:"Stacking the Deck: Futility and the Exhaustion Provision of the Prison Litigation Reform Act"
432:
64:
448:
8:
406:
178:
466:
142:
134:
298:
280:
67:
371:
356:
332:
320:
174:
162:
186:
154:
496:
264:
276:
166:
484:
243:
corrections officers violated his Eighth
Amendment right to be free from
260:
248:
79:
97:
105:
30:
101:
513:
United States
Supreme Court cases of the Rehnquist Court
267:
briefs at the Court, urging affirmance of the decision.
263:
his case. The attorneys general of over 30 states filed
259:
He appealed to the United States
Supreme Court, which
294:Eighth Amendment to the United States Constitution
494:
367:
365:
518:United States criminal procedure case law
326:
387:
362:
316:
314:
270:
495:
54:Timothy Booth, v. C.O. Churner, et al.
398:University of Pennsylvania Law Review
350:
18:2001 United States Supreme Court case
311:
217:Prison Litigation Reform Act of 1995
13:
381:
36:Supreme Court of the United States
14:
529:
503:United States Supreme Court cases
435:731 (2001) is available from:
417:
29:
508:2001 in United States case law
338:
254:Third Circuit Court of Appeals
1:
304:
237:
229:, 532 U.S. 731 (2001), was a
405:(3): 817–838. Archived from
245:cruel and unusual punishment
7:
287:
231:United States Supreme Court
10:
534:
485:Oyez (oral argument audio)
215:
210:
199:
194:
128:
123:
117:
112:
92:
87:
59:
49:
42:
28:
23:
388:Novikov, Eugene (2008).
100:, 1997); affirmed, 206
96:Complaint dismissed (
78:121 S. Ct. 1819; 149
43:Argued March 20, 2001
412:on February 3, 2011.
279:wrote the unanimous
271:Opinion of the Court
247:. Booth sought both
45:Decided May 29, 2001
476:Library of Congress
179:Ruth Bader Ginsburg
151:Sandra Day O'Connor
203:Souter, joined by
139:Associate Justices
249:injunctive relief
222:
221:
135:William Rehnquist
525:
489:
483:
480:
474:
471:
465:
462:
456:
453:
447:
444:
438:
425:Booth v. Churner
413:
411:
394:
375:
369:
360:
354:
348:
342:
336:
330:
324:
318:
281:majority opinion
226:Booth v. Churner
124:Court membership
33:
32:
24:Booth v. Churner
21:
20:
533:
532:
528:
527:
526:
524:
523:
522:
493:
492:
487:
481:
478:
472:
469:
463:
460:
454:
451:
445:
442:
436:
420:
409:
392:
384:
382:Further reading
379:
378:
370:
363:
355:
351:
343:
339:
331:
327:
319:
312:
307:
290:
273:
240:
177:
175:Clarence Thomas
165:
163:Anthony Kennedy
153:
143:John P. Stevens
83:
44:
38:
19:
12:
11:
5:
531:
521:
520:
515:
510:
505:
491:
490:
458:Google Scholar
419:
418:External links
416:
415:
414:
383:
380:
377:
376:
361:
349:
337:
325:
309:
308:
306:
303:
302:
301:
296:
289:
286:
272:
269:
261:agreed to hear
239:
236:
220:
219:
213:
212:
208:
207:
201:
197:
196:
192:
191:
190:
189:
187:Stephen Breyer
155:Antonin Scalia
140:
137:
132:
126:
125:
121:
120:
115:
114:
110:
109:
94:
90:
89:
85:
84:
77:
61:
57:
56:
51:
50:Full case name
47:
46:
40:
39:
34:
26:
25:
17:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
530:
519:
516:
514:
511:
509:
506:
504:
501:
500:
498:
486:
477:
468:
459:
450:
441:
440:CourtListener
434:
430:
426:
422:
421:
408:
404:
400:
399:
391:
386:
385:
373:
368:
366:
358:
353:
346:
341:
334:
329:
322:
317:
315:
310:
300:
297:
295:
292:
291:
285:
282:
278:
268:
266:
265:amicus curiae
262:
257:
255:
250:
246:
235:
232:
228:
227:
218:
214:
209:
206:
202:
198:
193:
188:
184:
180:
176:
172:
168:
164:
160:
156:
152:
148:
144:
141:
138:
136:
133:
131:Chief Justice
130:
129:
127:
122:
116:
111:
107:
103:
99:
95:
91:
86:
81:
75:
74:
69:
66:
62:
58:
55:
52:
48:
41:
37:
27:
22:
16:
424:
407:the original
402:
396:
352:
340:
328:
277:David Souter
274:
258:
241:
225:
224:
223:
211:Laws applied
204:
195:Case opinion
182:
170:
167:David Souter
158:
146:
88:Case history
71:
53:
15:
335:at 734-736.
234:premature.
497:Categories
305:References
238:Background
205:unanimous
80:L. Ed. 2d
60:Citations
423:Text of
372:532 U.S.
357:532 U.S.
345:532 U.S.
333:532 U.S.
321:532 U.S.
288:See also
275:Justice
200:Majority
119:process.
98:M.D. Pa.
449:Findlaw
374:at 740.
359:at 741.
347:at 733.
323:at 735.
113:Holding
106:3d Cir.
488:
482:
479:
473:
470:
467:Justia
464:
461:
455:
452:
446:
443:
437:
299:Appeal
185:
183:·
181:
173:
171:·
169:
161:
159:·
157:
149:
147:·
145:
431:
410:(PDF)
393:(PDF)
108:2000)
104:289 (
93:Prior
433:U.S.
102:F.3d
73:more
65:U.S.
63:532
429:532
403:156
82:958
68:731
499::
427:,
401:.
395:.
364:^
313:^
76:)
70:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.