74:
The lower court decided that the FCC was responsible for properly handling and regulating all radio and frequency industries and operations. Therefore, its mission encompassed the larger breadth of all communications regulations. With this regard, the court believed it could not aptly define what a
66:
The point in question for the court was whether or not the FCC had enacted its regulations with reasonable deliberation. The ARRL was not requesting a complete reversal of the regulation, but it was simply desiring that the FCC be required to renegotiate its regulations and exercise more diligence
70:
The court sympathized with this point, believing that in all likelihood, that the FCC's decision was overly harsh on amateur radio operators. However the court believed it had insufficient reason to prove the FCC had unreasonably mandated its regulations for all radio operators.
50:
The number of CB operators had grown drastically since the 1970s. In 1977, when licenses were still required for CB radio, 14 million licensed operators and as many as 6 million illegal operators were using CB radio. CB-related interference to television viewers was on the rise.
58:, was concerned with the effect of these rules on the amateur radio service. The ARRL did not protest regulation as a whole, but argued that the regulations had unintended consequences with regard to amateur radio.
189:
194:
174:
179:
140:
24:
75:
reasonable regulation of CB radios would be better than what the FCC, responsible for such regulations, enforced.
47:. The FCC justified these regulations in accordance with its mission to "prevent interference between stations".
28:
43:
interference with television and radio signals, the FCC enacted regulations on the production and sale of
115:
20:
31:(RFI). The case was argued in the Court of Appeals on December 12, 1979, and decided on Feb. 22, 1980.
184:
116:"617 F.2d 875: The American Radio Relay League, Inc., Petitioner, v. Federal Communications Co"
8:
40:
83:
The lower court ruled in favor of the FCC. The Court of
Appeals upheld the decision.
44:
54:
The
American Radio Relay League (ARRL), a non-profit organization dedicated to
19:
was a notable Court of
Appeals for the DC Circuit case between plaintiff, the
168:
55:
17:
American Radio Relay League, Inc. v. FCC, 617 F.2d 875 (D.C. Cir. 1980)
67:
and deliberation at arriving at its required regulative stances.
166:
190:Federal Communications Commission litigation
141:"FADING CB CRAZE SIGNALS END TO LICENSING"
110:
108:
106:
104:
102:
100:
98:
96:
167:
93:
13:
14:
206:
25:Federal Communications Commission
27:regarding licensing rights and
195:1980 in United States case law
133:
1:
86:
34:
139:
7:
175:American Radio Relay League
78:
29:radiofrequency interference
21:American Radio Relay League
10:
211:
180:Communications authorities
61:
39:In an effort to combat
56:amateur ("ham") radio
41:Citizens band radio
45:linear amplifiers
202:
157:
156:
154:
152:
147:. April 28, 1983
137:
131:
130:
128:
126:
112:
210:
209:
205:
204:
203:
201:
200:
199:
165:
164:
161:
160:
150:
148:
138:
134:
124:
122:
114:
113:
94:
89:
81:
64:
37:
12:
11:
5:
208:
198:
197:
192:
187:
182:
177:
159:
158:
145:New York Times
132:
91:
90:
88:
85:
80:
77:
63:
60:
36:
33:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
207:
196:
193:
191:
188:
186:
185:Amateur radio
183:
181:
178:
176:
173:
172:
170:
163:
146:
142:
136:
121:
117:
111:
109:
107:
105:
103:
101:
99:
97:
92:
84:
76:
72:
68:
59:
57:
52:
48:
46:
42:
32:
30:
26:
22:
18:
162:
149:. Retrieved
144:
135:
123:. Retrieved
119:
82:
73:
69:
65:
53:
49:
38:
16:
15:
169:Categories
87:References
35:Background
79:Decision
23:and the
151:July 1,
125:July 1,
120:Justia
153:2014
127:2014
62:Case
171::
143:.
118:.
95:^
155:.
129:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.